Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
Movielink Starts Rolling
200 films available at Movie project's launch
(old news - 09:10AM Monday Nov 11 2002)
tags: Video · business
The first studio backed, large scale effort to offer film rentals via broadband connections is set to launch today. Movielink debuts with about 200 titles at roughly $2.99 to $4.99 a piece, to be played with either Microsoft's Windows Player or RealNetwork's RealPlayer. Critics charge that despite the 25 million broadband enabled households the service intends to target (many of which aren't really broadband), the market simply isn't ready for such an endeavor.

Related:
  1. Netflix Streaming Coming To PS3 In November
  2. Apple Cooking Up New $30 A Month TV Service?
  3. Blockbuster Still Not Getting This Whole Broadband Thing
  4. Comcast TV Everywhere WILL Work Outside The Home
  5. Netflix CEO: Netflix Is Broadband Killer App
  6. Joost's Remaining Pieces Sold
  7. TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
  8. Verizon CEO: Hulu Will Be Dead Soon
Forums » Movielink Starts Rolling
view: topics flat text 
Post a:
page: 1 · 2

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ

It's a great idea, but...

I won't be interested. I'd much rather pay $3.99 to get the same movie from DirecTV pay per view with Dolby Digital 5.1 surround.

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02

Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech

Re: It's a great idea, but...

Well, and on a nice couch as well.....

These service won't take off until broadband enabled homes and living rooms take off.

I have a nice desk and chair in my office, but I still don't want to watch a 2 hour movie there when I've got a 5.1 DVD system in the living room....

RenderXP
Disturbed

join:2001-02-15
Georgetown, KY
·AT&T Southeast

I wonder

Ok if you read the F.A.Q. the movie automatically deletes itself after 24 hours. I guess it will take roughly half that time before someone figures out a way to "crack" this system so one can watch the film over and over again.
--
-Occasionally glancing up thru the rain , an watching for pigs on the wing-
russotto

join:2000-10-05
Collegeville, PA

Re: I wonder

<shocked>But that would be ILLEGAL</shocked>

phantasm99

@adelphia.net

Since this movie will just delete itself within 24 hours of when you press play... Could you then just burn it to a cd without clicking play and then either just watch it from the cd or drag and drop it back onto your system so its not running it from the cd. So then the copy on your system would delete itself after the 24 hour period but then you still have the nice clean copy on cd.... Sure it may be a hassle but it seems a viable way to keep the movie for good.

Aramis604
I Represent Nobody But Myself.
Premium
join:2000-12-15
Poway, CA
clubs:

Re: I wonder

Good idea, but I bet that the file will input a line in the the windows registry to prevent that from being possible. If you're willing you can try and remove that line from your registry, but that could be tricky.

RenderXP
Disturbed

join:2001-02-15
Georgetown, KY
·AT&T Southeast

Well, If there is anything that is 100% positive in the land of software. If someone makes a protection. Someone will come along and break it.
And this is just another form of software if you think about it.

--
-Occasionally glancing up thru the rain , an watching for pigs on the wing-

MrTangent

join:2001-12-28
Earth

Uggh

Windows Media or Real Media?

No thanks.

Count Hogula$
Notorious Dog
Premium
join:2002-06-19
Corona, CA

Who would pay $5?

When you can get half those DVD's from super discount retailers like deepdiscountdvd for $12-$15.

This is going to go over like a fart in a spacesuit.
--
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. -Thomas Jefferson

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ

Re: Who would pay $5?

quote:
When you can get half those DVD's from super discount retailers like deepdiscountdvd for $12-$15.
People already pay that price or slightly less for pay per view movies and blockbuster rentals.

Count Hogula$
Notorious Dog
Premium
join:2002-06-19
Corona, CA

Re: Who would pay $5?

said by Eat Me See Profile:
quote:
When you can get half those DVD's from super discount retailers like deepdiscountdvd for $12-$15.
People already pay that price or slightly less for pay per view movies and blockbuster rentals.
Yeah...they pay less for the movie and get to watch it on a screen 50X larger with better sound and playback control. Until people start using PC devices with their HDTV monitors...their plan will go NOWHERE.
--
The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not. -Thomas Jefferson

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
·PenTeleData
·Future Nine Corpor..
·VOIPo
·Vonage

Re: Who would pay $5?

quote:
Until people start using PC devices with their HDTV monitors...their plan will go NOWHERE.
I'm not so sure of that. While there are people like me who want to watch a movie on their HDTV sets there are others who would be perfectly happy watching VHS on a 13 inch screen. It's hard to say if this service will take off or not.

MrTangent

join:2001-12-28
Earth

Windows only. You other untermensch need not apply

In addition, the computer must be running Windows 98, 2000, ME or XP operating systems, with 2GB of free hard disk space available.
Nothing like excluding everyone else that uses any other OS.

This thing will fail fantastically. Mark my words. Like another poster mentioned, who wants to watch a small, pixelized, compressed video on their computer that probably will only be in stereo? I'd rather just *shock*LEAVE*/shock* my house for ten minutes and go rent a movie and watch it with better resolution, convenience in the living room where I'd be infinitely more comfortable.

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
·PenTeleData
·Future Nine Corpor..
·VOIPo
·Vonage

Re: Windows only. You other untermensch need not apply

quote:
This thing will fail fantastically. Mark my words. Like another poster mentioned, who wants to watch a small, pixelized, compressed video on their computer that probably will only be in stereo?
Uhhh.... 2GB of space certainly won't yield a "small pixelized" video, and most consumer digital video (DVD, DBS, Dig cable) is compressed anyway. If they can provide decent quality video with Dolby/DTS 5.1 sound, I might be tempted to use this in my home theater as an alternative to movie rentals or pay per view.

I personally think this service is way too far ahead of its time. When the PC becomes a standard piece of home theater equipment, maybe then.

hhawkman
Premium
join:2001-02-08
Port Hueneme, CA
Actually you COULD use Real Player on Linux, But I'm not sure about other systems.

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ

Re: Windows only. You other untermensch need not apply

Real Player is now going to be open source.
scarletsmith

join:2001-08-01
Laurel, MD

quote:
In addition, the computer must be running Windows 98, 2000, ME or XP operating systems, with 2GB of free hard disk space available.

Nothing like excluding everyone else that uses any other OS.
Or any other browser, as I discovered when it rejected my Opera query of its page.

KoolMoe
Aw Man
Premium
join:2001-02-14
Annapolis, MD
clubs:
·Verizon FIOS
·Speakeasy

could work!

All you negative-nancies...
I think this is a fine idea. $2-$4 for a movie is just fine. No late fees. Blockbuster is killing this lazy-ass on late fees.
We don't do NetFlix yet cause we don't have a DVD player.
I have video-out on several of my video cards. I have X10 send/receivers to get that and the audio signals to the living room. We already watch clips from AtomFilmz and such that way. Biggest hassle is having to get up to pause for pee/snack breaks (though a laptop with pcAnywhere or Terminal Services would solve that).
Best thing about this - NO MONTHLY FEES. I'll be checking this out this weekend, of not sooner. I don't need stinkin' dolby sound, don't need super-crisp visuals. As long as I can see and hear the story and be entertained, the convenience and cost is just fine. This kills PPV, IMO, cause it's at MY convenience.
I like it. I will use it.
KM

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ

Re: could work!

quote:
This kills PPV, IMO, cause it's at MY convenience.
Does your cable co. offer VoD? VoD is what will kill PPV, not this.

KoolMoe
Aw Man
Premium
join:2001-02-14
Annapolis, MD
clubs:
·Verizon FIOS
·Speakeasy

Re: could work!

I don't think so...Comcast...but I haven't looked cause I have no desire to pay even more for 'digital cable' (= 10x the channels and still nothing on).
I completely agree cable VoD will be more of a PPV killer, no doubt, but I just meant this kills any attraction I had to PPV due to the convenience. If it all works well, I'll use it every weekend instead of stupid blockbuster....
KM

GlobalMind
Domino Dude, POWER Systems Guy
Premium
join:2001-10-29
Hollywood, FL

Close but no cigar....

While I think this is good in theory, in practice this first cut is unlikely to make a good impression.

As much as some folks may like viewing films on their PCs...like in college dorms...most prefer viewing film on large screens with 5.1 surround.

I would bet that this good intentioned but somewhat flawed model will end up failing at the outset and yet again be another reason why no online rental or purchasing system will work since OBVIOUSLY consumers would rather download their film from P2P instead of legit services. The MPAA will say -- "See, told you so"

K.
--
"We can go from boom to bust, from dreams to a bowl of dust. We can fall from rockets red glare, down to 'Brother can you spare' -- another war -- another waste land -- and another lost generation. . ."

KoolMoe
Aw Man
Premium
join:2001-02-14
Annapolis, MD
clubs:
·Verizon FIOS
·Speakeasy

Re: Close but no cigar....

Do most people like to watch on large screens and 5.1 surround?
Of my small range of friends, only one has all the 'stuff' - wide screen, dolby, true surround...
We have a 32" TV. Big enough for us. Only thing I'd like better is flat screen, but don't need anything bigger.
I run my audio through the stereo and have 4 speaker out. Not surround, but sounds fine enough.
But perhaps I'm in the minority.
KM

alex4life
Alex4life
Premium
join:2001-06-22
Delta, BC

Re: Close but no cigar....

said by KoolMoe See Profile:
Do most people like to watch on large screens and 5.1 surround?
Of my small range of friends, only one has all the 'stuff' - wide screen, dolby, true surround...
We have a 32" TV. Big enough for us. Only thing I'd like better is flat screen, but don't need anything bigger.
I run my audio through the stereo and have 4 speaker out. Not surround, but sounds fine enough.
But perhaps I'm in the minority.
KM
You're in the minority of people who like their movies, but in the majority as a whole. Most people usually don't give a damn what the picture or sound is like. 32" is a decent size TV. No real need to go bigger unless you're really in to movies. 5.1 Surround is really great though.
--
"It's as if companies are coming back to life as zombies....we need the zombies to die." -Susan Kalla. Drop by the Canadian Forum!

GlobalMind
Domino Dude, POWER Systems Guy
Premium
join:2001-10-29
Hollywood, FL

Well with all that said I have a 36" set...but I would prefer to have a nice flat panel etc etc...

I guess my point is that IMHO most folks would prefer to watch a movie on their 36" TV then on a 19" monitor.

Course my PC presently has better sound than my (starting to fail) stereo receiver....

K.
--
"We can go from boom to bust, from dreams to a bowl of dust. We can fall from rockets red glare, down to 'Brother can you spare' -- another war -- another waste land -- and another lost generation. . ."

ergibbs
To Be Free
Premium,ExMod 2001-05
join:2001-03-07
on the ocean

It might work

There's a reason people are buying DVD players for their computers - they want to be able to watch movies on their PCs. WMP has a full screen mode which works quite well.

Obviously the theory that "you can buy the DVD for $12-$14" doesn't hold water since movie renting from Blockbuster, etc. is big business.

This is just the next step in creating the virtually-connected home. Download the movie via the 'Net, watch it on your TV. Just as with any technology, you have to start with small steps first. I'd be surprised if this wasn't a huge success.
--
Having children is like being pecked to death by a duck.

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02

Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech

Re: It might work

The problem is, even many of the technologically swift people I know don't have TV out video cards, or the capability of delivering the film to a TV, and again, other that teens who are downloading 700meg Divx rips for free, there's not a huge market of legitimate customers who want to sit at their desk for 2 hours watching a movie, when they get a better experience in the theatre or the living room....

Besides there's too much competition. Not only can customers already rent a film in a store or on-line, but they can order one via pay perview without moving their but from the couch, or watch one of the 40 film channels most digital line-ups already offer.

Until there's a broader adoption of things like living room servers that serve MP3's and film via broadband, this is going to be a fringe operation. And I fail to see how they can compete with cable providers.

While they may just be staking their claim for the future, it would appear to me like an effort to bypass the middle men (cable, satellite, theatres) well before its time.

I imagine they expect heavy losses, and it will probably break even if they don't spend too much on advertising....but "a huge success" isn't terribly likely.

ergibbs
To Be Free
Premium,ExMod 2001-05
join:2001-03-07
on the ocean

Re: It might work

Good points; however, teens can afford movies like this, too. If you capture an audience while it's young, you have a better chance of retaining it as it grows older. Things like the networked home and single routers that control an entire house are not too far off. Some devices are already in production. Here's one article (pdf format) on the possibilities. I believe that RCA has a device out now, too, that allows you to network PCs with TVs (I was trying to find it, but can't think of the name right now).

The problem with renting on-line through netflix is that you have to wait a couple of days to get the movie. To go to Blockbuster, you have to move your butt from your house and concern yourself with making sure the movie is back so you don't get charged late fees. PPV is extremely limited in what it shows and the movie channels are not too much better.

Again, it's the process of taking small steps to lead the consumer where you want the consumer to go.
--
Having children is like being pecked to death by a duck.
randysavage0

join:2002-04-16
Fayetteville, AR

Re: It might work

I agree that it is a small step.... a baby step... pretty much a laughable matter.

If this business plan works, I am starting a new country on a deserted island.

ergibbs
To Be Free
Premium,ExMod 2001-05
join:2001-03-07
on the ocean

Re: It might work

I don't know if it's deserted, but here's one for you to consider.
--
Having children is like being pecked to death by a duck.

Overdrive
Are You Where You Want To Be?
Premium
join:2001-05-31
Waterbury, CT

Re: It might work

said by ergibbs See Profile:
I don't know if it's deserted, but here's one for you to consider.

that is too much! How did you find that and How much to buy it?
--
Need a Web Developer?

elias
Premium,VIP
join:2000-07-24
Miami, FL
clubs:

Well, At Least They're Doing Something...

RIAA take note.

At least the movie industry is trying to jump on it.

I'm not sure how this 24 hour delete itself crap is going to work... I mean, I'm sure you can just burn it to a CD and be over with it.

But hey, it's something.

-- Elias
--
Crunching the Midnight Oil. Visit my PhotoJournal.

raymondh

@65.100.x.x

2-gigs and no DD?

A 2-gig Divx encoded movie can easily contain 5.1 DD almost DVD quality. Not to mention it can be played on other OS's.

Me thinks they picked the wrong format....

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
·PenTeleData
·Future Nine Corpor..
·VOIPo
·Vonage

Re: 2-gigs and no DD?

quote:
A 2-gig Divx encoded movie can easily contain 5.1 DD almost DVD quality.
Really? I've never seen a DivX movie with 5.1DD. The audio is compressed MPEG audio so I don't see how they can fit DD in there.
madforry

join:2001-01-22
Tempe, AZ

Re: 2-gigs and no DD?

DivX supports ogg, mp3, ac3, wav, pretty much anything. Your media player may have to be set up differently, though.

BellBoy
Obama racist? Then Bush is Hitler.
Premium
join:2001-02-20
Los Angeles, CA
clubs:
·Pacific Bell - SBC

It DOESN'T Work...

First off...it really burned me that I had to use IE. With all of the bugs in that thing, you expect me to give you a CC# using IE? Guess again.

I have to use Windows Media or Real Player? Keep guessing...

I was curious about the picture quality though so... I went to look at the Ocean's Eleven Trailer and spent the next ten minutes looking at about twelve single frames of the trailer--frozen while the audio played, when it wasn't stopped completely. You expect me to pay $5 for a full length film in that environment? You guys just don't have a clue...

Even when I had the picture full screen it didn't even come close to the DVD-quality picture and sound that I can get from--DUH--a $2.50 DVD rental!

A word of advise to the studios...keep doing what you do best: putting out shlocky, crappy films most of the year while you save your money and talent for the few good ones you squeak out...

My rating on this mess? Thumbs WAY WAY WAY down!
--
I'm not an ASI tech, but I play one on TV...

MrMaster
What If
Premium
join:2000-12-16
Austin, TX
clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable

Re: It DOESN'T Work...

$2.50 DVD Rental? Where do you shop? On some street corner?

Secondly, what do you think 90% of all people use? Opera? No. They use IE.

Lastly, if you aren't using WMP or Real Player, what are you using?

Due to the DRM in WMP you probably could burn it to a CD but the 24 hour limit would still apply.

BellBoy
Obama racist? Then Bush is Hitler.
Premium
join:2001-02-20
Los Angeles, CA
clubs:
·Pacific Bell - SBC

Re: It DOESN'T Work...

said by MrMaster See Profile:
$2.50 DVD Rental? Where do you shop? On some street corner?

Secondly, what do you think 90% of all people use? Opera? No. They use IE.

Lastly, if you aren't using WMP or Real Player, what are you using?

Due to the DRM in WMP you probably could burn it to a CD but the 24 hour limit would still apply.
I don't shop at Blockbuster or the other big chains. I rent from a local chain that beats the crap out of the national chains. It's no street corner...

I like as much security as I can get and I use Mozilla, thank you very much. IE has always been flypaper--probably always will. No browser is bug free, but I'll take the lesser of two evils. Mozilla is fast, more secure, and free of the Microsoft bull$h!t.

Since I have a Mac as well, I prefer either QuickTime or DivX. Real Player is almost as bad as M$ and the new Media Player beta can't even be uninstalled without ripping your system apart. If I'm forced to upgrade to it, I'll do without.

Regarding DRM in WMP...give it time, someone will hack the crap out of it and then the studios get to start all over again...
--
I'm not an ASI tech, but I play one on TV...

KoolMoe
Aw Man
Premium
join:2001-02-14
Annapolis, MD
clubs:
·Verizon FIOS
·Speakeasy

I don't wanna keep harping like a die-hard; I have yet to try the service...
But a quick look indicates most movies are $3, not $5.
And the movies are not streamed but dloaded fully to your HD (though I'm sure some kinda wrapper). So playback is totally dependant on your machine specs.
Audio could be bad, pict quality could be bad. But if it goes 640x480 fullscreen and audio is not pure crap (no audiophile here!), cool by me.
But reserve final judgement til I try it

I do agree that this is a good thing to at least try as opposed to the RIAA which just tries limited, half-hearted attempts while it prefers to squash.
I hope the MPAA keeps an open mind and if this fails, hope they really try to find out why.
KM
KM

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ

Ok, so i viewed the sample clips

The video quality was good, but the audio wasn't. I'm an audiophile so I think I'll pass on this one.

Pz_

join:2001-03-31
Brownsburg, IN
clubs:

I'll pass too

I have a PC in my living room with 5.1 and tv out just for this sort of thing. All I use it for is watching DVDs & the like.

So I could sit on a couch and I could get nice sound and video, still not interested. Too many restrictions and concerns about speed of delivery and quality.
Lord Requiem
Big Silver Hotdog

join:2002-10-08
Hillsboro, TX

Re: I'll pass too

I will also pass. I am completely unwilling to pay 3-5 dollars for a non dvd-movie only watchable on a computer screen. (Assuming you don't have a super hooked up home theatre, which sort of blows the point of this anyway)

IF:

A) The movies were 700mb-1.4gb divx style format with at least "excellent" sound quality (even if it was only Stereo)

B) The 3-5 dollar price was a PURCHASE and not a rental, of this format of media. (if you own a VHS of Pulp fuction, you still have to buy the DVD if you want that quality/format, it should be no different here) The online distribution cuts out almost all the costs associated with traditional distribution and retailing. This pricetag would still net them a lot of money.

THEN I would buy. ONLY then. Until then, welcome to my continuing filesharing on p2p until you get your act together and give me products I will pay money for.

I am the consumer, and if you don't give me products I want you aren't getting my money.

Brendan
Warr Guitar is here

join:2000-07-14
Littleton, CO


What they need to do is...

... instead of .wmp or Real formats, encode the movies in MPEG-4, and use QuickTime (or another decoder, if one is even available). Far superior to .wmp and a fraction of the bandwidth required.

Edit: On a side note, I think I'll stick to renting DVD's from my friendly local Hollywood Video. Besides, a cute girl works there.
[text was edited by author 2002-11-11 14:03:49]

alex4life
Alex4life
Premium
join:2001-06-22
Delta, BC

Also

This will have no market in Canada, as most companies have, or will be implementing download/upload limits.

See 11 replies to this post
TechLarry

join:2002-02-02
Fairfax, VA

Sounds like Divx to me...

This is exactly the same as the old Divx fiasco which was laughed out of existance and gave Circuit City a black eye.

People don't want 'vaporizing' media. Once I pay for something, I expect it to be there the next time I want it.

When will they ever learn ?

TL

Pz_

join:2001-03-31
Brownsburg, IN
clubs:

Re: Sounds like Divx to me...

said by TechLarry See Profile:


When will they ever learn ?

TL
The answer to that probably reads like a warranty on your car. 3 years/36k miles, which ever comes first.

They will learn right after the RIAA does/never, which ever comes first.

ergibbs
To Be Free
Premium,ExMod 2001-05
join:2001-03-07
on the ocean

said by TechLarry See Profile:
Once I pay for something, I expect it to be there the next time I want it.
So, when you buy a cheeseburger, you expect it to be there the next time you want one, too? Or, when you pay to go to the movie theater, you should be able to come back and watch it again whenever you want at no charge? This is no different than PPV movies on cable or satellite or renting a movie from the local video store.

Alexthepsycho brings up a good point, though. If more providers move toward implementing download caps, services like this could take a real beating.
--
Having children is like being pecked to death by a duck.

8_Ball

@classicnet.net

Re: Sounds like Divx to me...

First, off... what about network congestivity!? What if I order a streaming video, and it stops downloading!? Would a rebate that's EASY to obtain be instore for me? I doubt it... this will fail for more reasons than I can see birds on a wire. Good idea... but, bad timing. Perhaps in another 10 to 15 years or so, then HOPEFULLY they can go back to the drawing boards (that is if the MPAA and RIAA haven't totally phucked things up by then).

skatetech
Aka Dillhole
Premium
join:2002-07-31
Louisville, KY

Too soon...

I personally think this service could possibly be a nice competitor to rental chains and VOD. Just maybe not right now. Broadband is still spreading, and just isn't currently ubiquitous enough to make major profits. But that is subject to change.

The price is right though and the quality sounds nice. I would like to try the service and report my findings, but the reason I cannot is the same reason that makes me stop and question their systems. When I head to the site all I see is a blue screen with the Movielink logo and this message:
"Thank you for your interest in Movielink. We want you to take part in the powerful Internet movie rental experience that Movielink delivers, but it is presently unavailable to users outside of the United States."

Last I checked Louisville was in the United States. I wish our government would inform me before excommunicating my city. Seriously though, this was attempted with two different IP's as well.

I also do not like the corralling of users in to the Real Player/WMP/Windows realm. That bothers me, but I understand that these are the most commonly used and see the business sense in not investing money in to other OS or players that may not offer significant financial gains.

Although I like the general idea, it just seems to need more refining before the profits come rolling in.

--
"Ignorance is bliss." Oh! That's why I am so damn angry.

dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ

Re: Too soon...

At least they're letting windows media in on this one and not forcing you to load that spyware ridden REAL crap on your system to view it.

Eat Me

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ

Re: Too soon...

REAL can just act like a transport. Other codecs are usually used.

some guy$
Mommy What's Irony?

join:2002-11-08
Manitowoc, WI

This is an attempt which I think they are hoping will fail. They put this site/service out when there's no market for it, and when it fails, they'll blame p2p and whine to Congress and get DRM forced down our throats. In addition to passing anti-p2p legislation to prevent damage to our "valued media companies"

dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ

why

Why not in MPEG2 or AVI format? because there are too many tools out there that can capture this sort of format. will virtual dub ever have .wma support? i dont think so. they removed .asf support due to microsofts strongarm tactics.
LAPD_IRON

join:2001-11-18
Muncie, IN

I'll keep my DivX

With the advent of DivX, there is no need for a DVD when you can get DVD quality in a full length file that will fit on a cd-r. I have 113 full length, high-resolution movies with Dolby Digital encoding in the audio and I paid nadda for any of them. I have a 21" Nokia monitor, Soundblaster Live Platinum sound card which is connected to 4 Harmon Kardon powered towers, a 10 and a 12 inch powered Infinity subs, and a cheesy Sony powered center channel. I put a people lounger sectional in my computer room and the only problem is my friends wanna watch movies when I wanna play Americas Army. There is no need to pay for something you cant keep when you can get the same thing for free and you can watch it over and over again.

See 6 replies to this post

some guy$
Mommy What's Irony?

join:2002-11-08
Manitowoc, WI

It's impractical!

from the cnet article

"The download speed depends on the consumer's connection, but with a cable modem at a maximum of 3 megabits per second, downloads take about 17 minutes. With a digital subscriber line connection at 280kbps it would take about an hour and a half."

80% of the people don't have broadband, and of the ones that do, less than 10% have >1.5mbps connection (in the US, since it isn't available to anyone else) that would be consistent enough to get movies at a speed that would make it more convenient than driving to your local rental store.

also--why 2 GB? that is insanely large. Since almost all monitors are less than 21" (which makes me wonder why anyone would want "1 day computer only" movies)you could compress the movie some more, and what difference would it make?

these guys must have gone to the business school that Sally Struthers used to advertise (Get your degree at home with International Correspondence School!)
Forums » Movielink Starts Rollingpage: 1 · 2


Saturday, 28-Nov 16:50:21 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.