site Search:


 
   
story category
New Wireless Privacy Bill Addresses CarrierIQ Fallout
'Consumers Have the Right to Know and Say No...'
by Karl Bode Monday 30-Jan-2012 tags: wireless · privacy · consumers · wireless
Responding to the CarrierIQ scandal, Edward Markey (D-Mass.) has released a draft (pdf) of a new cellphone privacy bill. The Mobile Device Privacy Act would give the FTC the authority to regulate monitoring software, give consumers the clear information about the use of such software, and require that third party vendors have clear standards when it comes to the storage of the information collected. According to a statement posted to Markey's website, Markey's primary focus of the bill is on disclosure and consent.

Click for full size
"Consumers have the right to know and to say 'no' to the presence of software on their mobile devices that can collect and transmit their personal and sensitive information," Markey said.

The problem, as we've noted more than a few times, is that with the collective lobbying power and wealth of the telecom, content, and advertising industries against privacy regulations, the chance of getting any bill with teeth actually passed (particularly if it requires opt in) is virtually non-existent.

Carriers traditionally argue they can self-regulate on this front, arguing that public shame will keep them honest. However, the effectiveness of this approach is made somewhat clear by the fact nobody knew CarrierIQ even existed on devices early last year, much less that any user data was being collected.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:

mod_wastrel
Gone fishin'

join:2008-03-28

?

Has the NSA approved this?
CXM_Splicer

join:2011-08-11
kudos:1

Re: ?

They aren't worried... they will just ignore it like the other privacy laws.
slckusr
Premium
join:2003-03-17
Maumee, OH
kudos:1

Re: ?

or just have google/apple build it into the core of its operating sys..... oh wait.
pkorx8

join:2003-06-19
San Francisco, CA
Reviews:
·Comcast
·SONIC.NET

Re: ?

Makes us all ponder on the possibility of the "SkyNet scenario".....
The hardware suite of sensors (camera, mic, location, dynamics, NFC, etc...) already exists in all smartphones now, and its the software that triggers its use, for nefarious purposes or not.

Legislating new rules and laws will only control legitimately released software, what about all the illegitimate software on phones (like side-loaded or viruses)?

mod_wastrel
Gone fishin'

join:2008-03-28

Re: ?

Get Siri-US.

firephoto
KDE
Premium
join:2003-03-18
Brewster, WA
Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..

Why was it just CarrierIQ?

Ask yourself why it was ciq that was on nearly every makers phones and every US carrier. Ask yourself why it was just a single small company with nothing that special as far as technology goes that was the provider of this monitoring software.

Personally I see it as more than just the manufacturers and carriers offloading the liability (which is some of the reason obviously) because they could of done the same thing with any of their own sub contracted divisions that come and go to create just as good of a tool. Seems it was a bit of standardized snooping for 3rd party convenience since the amount of raw data is probably overwhelming the normal network collection points.
--
Say no to JAMS!
Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO

Removed

I just had CarrierIQ removed from my EVO a few days ago with an update.

Glad to see it!

Sunday, 03-Jun 12:26:27 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.