  AnonProxy Proxy of Anon Premium join:2001-05-12 ß 1 edit | Ohhh they still are They are still the old papers just delivering the same content electronically...nothing more nothing less. | |
|
 |   King P Don't blame me. I voted for Ron Paul Premium join:2004-11-17 Inman, SC
·Windstream
·Charter Pipeline
| natural evolution This is the natural evolution of media in general. Eventually all media will be available in physical (print, disc, etc.) and in electronic form on the internet. -- Forget 'em, Support the Indies. »www.ind-music.com | |
|
 |  |   AnonProxy Proxy of Anon Premium join:2001-05-12 ß | Re: natural evolution I dobut CNN will be in print...I think the way of media is to go electronic for most services (internet or video)...and ppaers are going to move to mostly online or portable via podcast and "read" to a person...audio newspapers. | |
|
 |  |  |  Eek2121 Lovin Verizon FIOS
join:2002-10-12 Flanders, NJ
| Re: natural evolution not really, there are many people out there who still prefer to just read a newspaper. Like me. I'm the biggest geek you'll ever know, i get nearly all of my content online, i'm hardcore, can code in 20 languages, build a system with a blindfold and one hand tied behind my back, yet i will STILL pick up a newspaper every once in a while.  | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  fiberguy My views are my own. Premium join:2005-05-20
| Re: natural evolution I guess that's me.. I have an ethernet jack in EVERY room of the house in addition to telephone and tv.. and I do mean EVERY room.
Nothing like sitting in the whirlpool tub and watching a good tv show.. or being able to listen to music, or what ever. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |   AnonProxy Proxy of Anon Premium join:2001-05-12 ß | Re: natural evolution wireless | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  fiberguy My views are my own. Premium join:2005-05-20 1 edit | Re: natural evolution Wired..
more reliable.  | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   AnonProxy Proxy of Anon Premium join:2001-05-12 ß | Re: natural evolution If your wireless is so unreliable that you can't get internet service in your bathroom....you got problems. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |   novaflare The Dragon Was Here Premium join:2002-01-24 Barberton, OH
| Re: natural evolution Well what hapens if you run out of toilet paper mid chore? -- DSLR security chat at us.ausirc.net chanel #dslr_sec lets pack this channel open source dns server for *nix and windows »powerdns.com | |
|
 |  |  |  |   DaSneaky1D one wall to block them all Premium,MVM join:2001-03-29 The Lou | And people will always have pets  | |
|
 |  |  |  |   AnonProxy Proxy of Anon Premium join:2001-05-12 ß
| every once in a while does not pay the bills for these paper, less subcribers mean less ad revenue. How about this...consider how much time you spend with the various news media in a given day...Internet, TV, radio and print give me a percentage....I bet print is really low. | |
|
 |  |  |   novaflare The Dragon Was Here Premium join:2002-01-24 Barberton, OH
| personaly i prefer a printed book or news paper over the likes of a ebook or newspaper. They all have one thing in common more difficult to read. Ive yet to see any pdf viewer that isnt slow at least part of the time to render and have a blurry effect to it. I would have to take a guess and say i can read a paperback novel in say 8 to 12 hours full novel as in 400 to 800 pages. If i had to read the same book in pdf format double that time easly. -- DSLR security chat at us.ausirc.net chanel #dslr_sec lets pack this channel open source dns server for *nix and windows »powerdns.com | |
|
  odreian615
join:2006-01-18 Chicago, IL | What I dont like about them you have to sign up on most of them just to view the stories | |
|
 |   AnonProxy Proxy of Anon Premium join:2001-05-12 ß | Re: What I dont like about them that will be a thing of the past. | |
|
 |  |  |
 |
 ricep5 Premium join:2000-08-07 Jacksonville, FL
·AT&T Southeast
·AT&T CallVantage
·VoicePulse
·Comcast Formerly ..
| Long Migration While the trends are away from print, it is not very rapid. There is still room for traditional print in news delivery.
As long as advertisers want to use print, it will always survive in some form.
The news delivery "revolution" that was predicted during the bubble never occurred because everyone found out that there were only 2 news sources available from non-captives, Associated Press and Reuters. No matter what portal or news feed they used, it was all the same thing.
The value add the print press provides is in alternative and local reporting. NY Times, Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, SF Examiner all have full time reporters on the beat providing alternative reports to the newswires. Don't want a newswire report from the White House? ok, go check out the beat reporter.
I am going to get better and more detailed coverage for example, of the Chicago train derailment in the Chicago Tribune than in the NY Times. But newswires may be adequate for the Mumbai train attack.
Fantasy Football nuts can research local team issues in the local rag much more than what a newswire can provide.
CNN was unique in its time because they went out and built a reporting corp from scratch. The peak of which was the Baghdad coverage during Desert Storm. They have been cost cutting ever since.
That captive reporting corp costs money to support and maintain. The web expects it now and for almost free. Something will have to give. | |
|
 JazzJRabbit
join:2003-09-27 Wheaton, IL
·WOW Internet and C..
| What I don't like about traditional newspapers... is that too many times I see on my morning train commute people coming in with their morning newspaper, read one, maybe two articles and then just throw it all into the trash bin. Sometimes they just go straight for the sports section and throw everything else. What a waste of resources, all for just one article. | |
|
 |
 bchris02
join:2006-05-25
| Newspapers are still good.... A lot of people don't have computers and they still read the newspaper. Or they have dial-up and picking up a paper and drinking coffee in the morning is a lot more convenient than dialing into AOL for something as simple as the morning news. I don't see newspapers going anywhere at least during the first half of this century.
Not everybody has a laptop/PDA to take with them into the bathroom. A big problem with geeks is they think everybody is as sophisticated and as high tech as them. I used to be this way until I started working retail. Then I rapidly learned I was in the minority. Its sad, but true. | |
|
  FiL Premium join:2005-08-16 Silver Spring, MD
| yea anyone saying newspapers are going nowhere quick either dont take mass transit systems to work, or never leave their homes. I see people everyday holding their paper in one hand and a coffee in the other. Round here, it wouldnt be to smart opening ya laptop on the Metro. Less you WANNA be followed off the train. haha. My favorite paper is a spinoff/summation of the Washington Post called "Express". Shits tight and makes the morning commute that much quicker. | |
|
 |  Diddy1
join:2003-07-19 Sidney, NE | Re: yea Perhaps that's the answer to one part of the problem. There is a little more time to press, than the hurried "I want it now" on the Internet. Maybe this makes for more creative journalism?
Aaron | |
|
 |
|
 |