republican-creole
site Search:


 
   
story category
North Carolina's Anti Community Fiber Bill Postponed
As opposition in the state mounts...
by Karl Bode Thursday 27-May-2010 tags: Fiber · business · municipal
Time Warner Cable, AT&T and CenturyLink/Embarq's latest attempt (they've been trying since 2005) to pass a bill in North Carolina that would hinder communities interested in wiring themselves with fiber -- seems to be seeing some opposition in the state. The Senate Finance Committee on Wednesday postponed considering the new law, which opponents say is little more than protectionism -- intentionally layering projects like Wilson's Greenlight fiber service (funded with private money) with bureaucratic obstacles. In an editorial last week, the Winston-Salem Journal put it this way:

These communities can't wait until it will be profitable for a private company to serve them adequately. So, using the democratic process, they are asking their local governments to establish service for them. This is reminiscent of the early 20th century when small towns in this state developed their own electrical grids rather than wait for the big utilities to do so. If the telecoms don't want local governments to establish these Internet services, they should rush into these areas and establish service now.

Of course dozens of these kinds of bills were passed over the last decade before many people realized what carriers were doing -- namely refusing to serve areas (either with next-generation broadband or broadband of any kind) -- then pushing for laws that would ban them from serving themselves.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:

bear73
Metnav... Fly The Unfriendly Skies
Premium
join:2001-06-09
Grand Forks Afb, ND

doesn't anyone care about NC?

I'm glad to see hte politics in NC are Against the Big Telcos from preventing muni-broadband. I just cant believe noone is talking about it... hope to see this and others like it defeated/repealed and muni-broadband brought into these rural areas. More and more people and governments are recognizing that internet needs to be a utility like telephone, power, water are.
--
If ya gotta go, Go with a SMILE!
»www.thereligionofpeace.com/
tmc8080

join:2004-04-24
Brooklyn, NY

join the bandwagon

vote your incumbents out.. that's a sure-fire way to send a message.

n2jtx

join:2001-01-13
Glen Head, NY
Reviews:
·Optimum Online

1 edit

Re: join the bandwagon

said by tmc8080:

vote your incumbents out.. that's a sure-fire way to send a message.
The only problem is, from past reports on this story, the idiot pushing this bull$hit is not running so he can work on scorched Earth bills without fear of reprisal. In fact, I bet he has a job lined up with a TELCO as soon as he "retires" from office.
--
I support the right to keep and arm bears.
megatron266
Premium
join:2007-08-11
Miami, FL
Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·Verizon FiOS
·Clearwire Wireless
·AT&T U-Verse

I just don't understand...

What is it that the big dawgs say to have the ban put in place? A ban is usually put in place to protect someone or something from someone or something else. For example anybody under the age of 21 is banned from drinking alcohol. Why are these bans being put in place? To protect who from what? Now I understand the big companies are protecting themselves from competition. I get that but of course they don't say this as the reason for wnting the ban.

alchav

join:2002-05-17
Palm Desert, CA

Re: I just don't understand...

said by megatron266:

What is it that the big dawgs say to have the ban put in place? A ban is usually put in place to protect someone or something from someone or something else. For example anybody under the age of 21 is banned from drinking alcohol. Why are these bans being put in place? To protect who from what? Now I understand the big companies are protecting themselves from competition. I get that but of course they don't say this as the reason for wnting the ban.
I don't get it either, if a Community wants to run Fiber on their own, what's the big deal! They still need Providers to hook them up. Unless they plan on tapping into the City, but then the City has to buy more capacity from their Providers. When Communities run their own Fiber they tie into a Head-in central location, and from here they buy and bring in High Capacity Trunking from the Providers they want. So what is the big problem, you do have more flexibility to buy from someone like Google....So What!
RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
kudos:1

Guess they are getting more powerful

The rich cats essentially killed our public system (UTOPIA) here in Utah because it was unfair to them (not that they have done much here themselves). Now they are going after apparently private companies who have a chance to prove that the whining was just that?

Wonder how the incumbents and their apologists who post here against The People serving themselves will justify this?
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time.
Rockchuck
Qwest Silver 1.5
Premium
join:2010-05-26
Boulder, CO

Re: Guess they are getting more powerful

Colorado enacted a law in 2005 which prevents municipalities from retailing broadband services to the public without local referendums. Such a vote, held last November to let a municipality's citizens decide for themselves, was soundly defeated by the infusion of almost $200,000 by cable TV and telephone interests:

»www.muninetworks.org/tags-216

It was amazing to see the populace of this rather conservative town worked up to a ridiculous level of furor, ultimately voting -- against their own interests -- to stifle competition. The notion of "the free market" doesn't quite so easily transform into practice, it appears!

Monday, 04-Jun 22:14:35 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.