 WiFiguruTo infinity... and beyondPremium join:2005-06-21 Los Gatos, CA | Zerigo Zerigo.com DNS works wonders.
Check em out | |
|
 |  MVSPremium join:2005-04-18 | Re: Zerigo Another good provider is DNSMadeEasy.com. Great prices, and very reliable. | |
|
 |  |  jimkPremium join:2006-04-15 Raleigh, NC Reviews:
·voip.ms
·RoadRunner Cable
| Re: Zerigo said by MVS:Another good provider is DNSMadeEasy.com. Great prices, and very reliable. Apparently the issue is a massive DDoS attack on EasyDNS (or, to be more accurate, one of their customers domains according to their Twitter account).
DNS Made Easy is a very good provider (in fact, I strongly recommend them), but they have also been subject to a DDoS attack in the past.
Unfortunately this is something that can happen with any provider. The only answer is to use multiple providers. DNS Made Easy, Dyn, and ZoneEdit (among others) all offer this service. | |
|
 |  |  |  MattAll noise, no signal.Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12 | Re: Zerigo said by jimk:said by MVS:Another good provider is DNSMadeEasy.com. Great prices, and very reliable. Apparently the issue is a massive DDoS attack on EasyDNS (or, to be more accurate, one of their customers domains according to their Twitter account). Or just do what we did when Dyn's corporate DNS service was DDoS'd, run your own primary and use someone like Dyn as a secondary. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  davoice join:2000-08-12 Saxapahaw, NC Reviews:
·Comporium
| Re: Zerigo Yep. This is what every SMART site does - use more than 1 DNS provider. Preferably 3 of them. Our important corporate sites use 1) in-house, 2) provider A and 3) provider B. Thus to effectively take down DNS for any of those resources someone would have to successfully DDoS 3 completely different networks. Not impossible but a much higher bar.
Aside... I wish OpenDNS would start running a managed DNS hosting service on their infrastructure!
}Davoice | |
|
 |  |  |  |  | | The optimal speed can be achieved by the compression of traffic and by minimizing server loads. Web acceleration will enable you bring about a drastic improvement in the web page response time. This kind of acceleration usually come in lesser costs and offers the best web application performance. | |
|
 |  OmegaDisplaced OhioanPremium join:2002-07-30 Cheyenne, WY | said by WiFiguru:Zerigo.com DNS works wonders.
Check em out They have some magical defense against DDOS attacks? -- What smells like blue? | |
|
 |  imtim83Premium join:2001-06-03 Kenner, LA | See I told you all they are trying to. | |
|
 DrStrangeTechnically feasiblePremium join:2001-07-23 West Hartford, CT kudos:1 | no kidding Just ran into that issue.
Using the IP now.
Hope they sort it out. | |
|
 FBGuyyippee ki yayPremium join:2005-03-19 | dyndns i suggest dyndns. | |
|
 |  rchandraStargate Universe fanPremium join:2000-11-09 14225-2105 | Re: dyndns +1 | |
|
 |  |
 |  |  FBGuyyippee ki yayPremium join:2005-03-19 | Re: dyndns Only their standard dns service was affected. | |
|
 Smith6612Premium,MVM join:2008-02-01 North Tonawanda, NY kudos:21 | Haven't noticed anything... I've been browsing around on and off all day today. DNS has been resolving without an issue for me. That might be because of my DNS servers caching results for some time when they don't receive a record, though. | |
|
 JuggernautIrreverent or irrelevant?Premium join:2006-09-05 Everywhere kudos:1 | DSLR down Had a problem for an hour or so. It's back up again, obviously!  | |
|
 |
 CheesePremium join:2003-10-26 Naples, FL kudos:1 | haven't had a problem with dslreports but the page for the announcement failed | |
|
 |  aSicapplication specificPremium join:2001-05-17 Wakulla, FL | Re: haven't had a problem with dslreports Google cache. Apparently the spiders crawled sometime recently, showing the announcement on the top of the page.  -- Teamwork is a lot of people doing what I say. | |
|
 | | Im on it the easydns HQ is a few blocks away. I'll go kick the hamster to restart it. -- a birth certificate is also proof of death, eventually | |
|
 |  | | Re: Im on it EasyDNS suffers DoS attack... | |
|
 |  |  cabanaDepartment of AdjustmentsAssistant join:2000-07-07 New York, NY | Re: Im on it @easydns on Twitter has been pretty transparent and reporting that they are in final mop up stage. Hopefully easing.
"The attack is multi-faceted, multi-gb/sec SYN flood, ICMP and DNS flood. Working with Prolexic to get DNS2 back online ASAP" | |
|
 koitsuPremium,MVM join:2002-07-16 Mountain View, CA kudos:14 | DSLR/BBR, stop using EasyDNS This outage has been discussed on the official outages mailing list. I pointed out in my post that DSLR/BBR's official NS records refer to 5 EasyDNS nameservers -- except of those 5, there are only two unique IPs, so really you aren't getting anything more than primary and secondary DNS.
Karl0 et al, I would strongly advise you reconsider what DNS provider you're choosing to use for your domains here. Any DNS provider which solicits use of 5 FQDNs yet hands out only 2 unique IPs is a provider who probably doesn't understand the term "redundancy". E.g. it gets you nothing more than standard primary/secondary DNS (no tertiary). Heed my words! -- Making life hard for others since 1977. I speak for myself and not my employer/affiliates of my employer. | |
|
 |  rradina join:2000-08-08 Chesterfield, MO | Re: DSLR/BBR, stop using EasyDNS FYI -- As the news guy, Karl might be considered the "face" of DSLR but Justin owns and operates it. | |
|
 |  |  koitsuPremium,MVM join:2002-07-16 Mountain View, CA kudos:14 | Re: DSLR/BBR, stop using EasyDNS Yeah you're right, sorry -- total brain fart. I'm never sure who to nag, Karl, Justin, or nil.  | |
|
 |  |  NWOhio join:2011-10-25 Toledo, OH | Thank that if you want but others have something else to say about that. | |
|
 |  dib22 join:2002-01-27 Kansas City, MO kudos:2 | Perhaps you don't know about Anycast?
edit: and since everyone is popping up their recommended dns provider, let me toss in: »dns.he.net/ | |
|
 |  |  NWOhio join:2011-10-25 Toledo, OH | Re: DSLR/BBR, stop using EasyDNS must not work that well. | |
|
 |  |  koitsuPremium,MVM join:2002-07-16 Mountain View, CA kudos:14 | I'm familiar with it, but I was not lead to believe EasyDNS implemented it. Googling a bit, I see they implemented anycast in late 2011 -- not slamming them for that, just saying prior to now I was under the impression they weren't using it.
edit: and since everyone is popping up their recommended dns provider, let me toss in: »dns.he.net/ As someone who used to have co-location with them, I wouldn't recommend Hurricane Electric for anything mission-critical. Their FMT1 and FMT2 datacenters are plagued with chronic router failures (with redundancy never kicking in). You can read about our experiences with them, and others' reports as well. HE being down comes up on the outages list every few months, and even more so now that they're an IPv6 tunnel broker. Stay away from HE if you care even remotely about reliability. -- Making life hard for others since 1977. I speak for myself and not my employer/affiliates of my employer. | |
|
 |  |  |  dib22 join:2002-01-27 Kansas City, MO kudos:2 | Re: DSLR/BBR, stop using EasyDNS said by koitsu:As someone who used to have co-location with them, I wouldn't recommend Hurricane Electric for anything mission-critical. Have been using their DNS for years... never had one issue. Sorry about your luck with them! | |
|
 |  MattAll noise, no signal.Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC kudos:12 | said by koitsu:This outage has been discussed on the official outages mailing list. I pointed out in my post that DSLR/BBR's official NS records refer to 5 EasyDNS nameservers -- except of those 5, there are only two unique IPs, so really you aren't getting anything more than primary and secondary DNS. »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anycast
Those two IPs could be pointed to 1,000 servers, of which you are directed to the nearest single server based upon your routing.
As noted at their page here, EasyDNS, uses Anycast, so at a minimum, DSLR is hosted by 14 nameservers, at maximum, 25. | |
|
 |  |
 MEDIAN2k3LocalhostPremium join:2002-12-04 Bronx, NY kudos:1 | FiOS DNS didnt work but googles did wtf? I used googles dns servers and got back to you, however my FiOS DNS servers couldnt resolve dslreports.com -- What a great place to be 127.0.0.1 | |
|
 |
 DustynPremium join:2003-02-26 Ontario, CAN kudos:7 | DNS Few problems tonight and early this morning... not too bad up here in Canada. | |
|
 | | weird.. right around the time I decide to switch my proxy settings to watch overseas TV, this DNS downtime happens, ugh. | |
|
 whfsdudePremium join:2003-04-05 Washington, DC | IPv6 Justin, mind posting BBR'S IPv6 address?  | |
|
 |  See 6 replies to this post |
|
 |
 |
 Simba7I Void Warranties join:2003-03-24 Billings, MT 1 edit | More than EasyDNS getting hit Looks like this rogue domain is bouncing around several DNS providers and crashing them.
No one could've predicted this. I'll be checking ZoneEdit and see if they've gotten nailed.
All I can say to the guys at EasyDNS.. Hold on tight, because I don't think the idiots responsible are done. It's going to be a long week. | |
|
 |  Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 1 edit | Re: More than EasyDNS getting hit said by Simba7:Looks like this rogue domain is bouncing around several DNS providers and crashing them.
No one could've predicted this. I'll be checking ZoneEdit and see if they've gotten nailed.
All I can say to the guys at EasyDNS.. Hold on tight, because I don't think the idiots responsible are done. It's going to be a long week. What rogue domain? A link to this info if you have one?
Edit: EasyDNS claims it was a porn domain and that easydns will no longer accept porn or gambling domains as clients from now on. -- The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, I'm from the government and I'm here to help. »www.politico.com/2012-election/
| |
|
 | | DNSResolvers.com cache1.dnsresolvers.com -> 205.210.42.205
»dnsresolvers.com/
easyDNS launches DNSResolvers.com: no frills, pure DNS lookups fully patched Some of our members have expressed reservations around using any DNS resolver that "alters" the traffic in any way, including typos and non-existent domains. Which is good news for us, because we've done this so fast we haven't had time to build anything like that even if we wanted to. What we did want to do is provide a couple of DNS resolvers for use by our members (or anybody else) who just want to know they're using a system run by people who are actively following this situation and are proactively keeping their own resolvers and caching nameservers as secure as the protocol allows.
With this in mind we've turned up DNSresolvers.com today. No website, no user interface, at the moment it's just a couple of resolvers with the latest security patches in place and that will continue to do so, open to use by anybody who wants. We have no idea where this will go, and it's not really an official easyDNS "service" per se. But we wanted to do something to give our members options.
If you want to use DNSresolvers.com, the details are as follows:
cache1.dnsresolvers.com -> 205.210.42.205 cache2.dnsresolvers.com -> 64.68.200.200 | |
|
 Fishie join:2003-01-14 Riverside, CA | DNS Benchmark DNS performance not only includes the performance of the server itself, but the location of the server in relation to the user as well. In essence, one DNS server does not fit all. For example, people continuously tell me to use Google's DNS servers. However, I routinely receive subpar performance when using their DNS servers. DNS server performance is better checked by each individual user. Thus, running Steve Gibson's DNS benchmark utility is the best way to tell which DNS server will meet the needs of an individual user. | |
|
 |
|