dslreports logo
 story category
Philadelphia Makes Back-Up Plan In Case Earthlink Bails
The city is prepared to take over if need be
Terry Phillis, Chief Information Officer for Philadelphia’s Mayor’s Office, has stated that the city expects EarthLink to bail on its construction of a citywide wireless system. He says that more will be known within the next sixty days but the city is making back-up plans for municipal Wi-Fi based on the belief that EarthLink will sell (or entirely abandon) the system. They would prefer if EarthLink sold the system to another provider but are prepared to take it over themselves if need be. Phillis was vague about the city's plans but stated that the city sees the network as a valuable asset for residents as well as for their tourist economy. It is believed that about 10,000 people are currently using the system although EarthLink has released no definite statistics.
view:
topics flat nest 

RadioDoc

join:2000-05-11
La Grange, IL

RadioDoc

Earthlink?

Are they still in business? Where are all of their WiFi projects?

wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace
join:2004-08-07
New York, NY

1 recommendation

wifi4milez

Member

4 years late, and nothing to show for it!

For a network that was supposed to be up and running in 2004, this cant be a shock to anyone. What a joke this was, and what a waste of money.

nipseyrussel
Nipsey Russell, yo
join:2002-02-22
Philadelphia, PA

nipseyrussel

Member

Re: 4 years late, and nothing to show for it!

well, at least "The city and the taxpayers are not paying anything for the network buildout or operation"
howrman
join:2000-07-08
Philadelphia, PA

1 recommendation

howrman to wifi4milez

Member

to wifi4milez
said by wifi4milez:

For a network that was supposed to be up and running in 2004, this cant be a shock to anyone. What a joke this was, and what a waste of money.
Actually, there's a lot to show for it. The network is up and running and it's about 70% complete. Plus, it hasn't cost the City a penny. All in all, even if Earthlink bails, it was a very good deal.
ashworth7
join:2001-10-06
Pittsburgh, PA

1 recommendation

ashworth7

Member

Re: 4 years late, and nothing to show for it!

Why not get an IT guy that knows what he's doing, then buy bandwidth from a Tier I provider, maybe a have a rudundant backup by another Tier I provider....then you've cut out the middleman(Earthlink)...then maybe you'll have a workable WiFi system on a municipal basis. As the previous post said "The network is up and running and it's about 70% complete". So why do you need Earthlink ??
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

1 recommendation

patcat88

Member

Re: 4 years late, and nothing to show for it!

Oversubscribtion cough cough. Tier 1 bandwidth is 20-60 a mbit per month. Wanna pay? Bandwidth is a rip off these days, Tier 1s charge as much as they can because they know they are valuable.
Nightstick
join:2000-09-21
Philadelphia, PA

1 edit

Nightstick to howrman

Member

to howrman
said by howrman:

said by wifi4milez:

Actually, there's a lot to show for it. The network is up and running and it's about 70% complete. Plus, it hasn't cost the City a penny. All in all, even if Earthlink bails, it was a very good deal.
That is complete fiction.

The network was slated to cover the entire city.

Right now it barely reaches out of Center City, if you can even find it working there.

Like most other technology projects that the city runs, Philadelphia Municipal Wifi is a complete disaster.

I saw this coming YEARS ago, as did anyone else who knows how Philadelphia's city government operates.

That said, I don't think ANYONE ANYWHERE has come up with a viable business model for municipal wifi. The fact that a city CAN do wifi, doesn't mean it SHOULD. While cities spin their wheels trying to work out kinks SLOWLY, like everything else in government, their private sector competition advances in leaps and bounds, giving few but the ultra-poor ANY reason to consider the second-rate service offered by municipalities.

If Philadelphia's city government REALLY wants to put more-affordable broadband into more of its citizen's hands, it should stop running interference for Comcast and allow Verizon FIOS within city limits.

But I won't be holding my breath waiting for this, anymore than I was holding my breath waiting for city wifi ANYWHERE NEAR my neighborhood in NE Philly.

patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

1 recommendation

patcat88

Member

Re: 4 years late, and nothing to show for it!

said by Nightstick:

The network was slated to cover the entire city.

Right now it barely reaches out of Center City, if you can even find it working there.
So this map is a complete lie? ahhahaah »www.wirelessphiladelphia ··· area.cfm
Nightstick
join:2000-09-21
Philadelphia, PA

Nightstick

Member

Re: 4 years late, and nothing to show for it!

said by patcat88:

said by Nightstick:

The network was slated to cover the entire city.

Right now it barely reaches out of Center City, if you can even find it working there.
So this map is a complete lie? ahhahaah »www.wirelessphiladelphia ··· area.cfm
Absolutely!

A WiFi router stapled to a telephone pole is not "coverage."

Sustainable connectivity=coverage. Good luck finding THAT anywhere outside the initial pilot areas.
patcat88
join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

1 recommendation

patcat88

Member

Re: 4 years late, and nothing to show for it!

Are you expecting full building penetration or something? Using a directional antenna at a window and a inside dwelling repeater I would say should be standard procedure. Full building penetration would mean every lightpole or every other lightpole must have an AP. I am going to assume thats what your talking about. Or is there extreme wifi interference (# of APs) that makes its impossible to use even with LOS to the AP? If you can't get a connection with LOS to the AP on the pole, your story is too fishy.

IEEE needs to be put in the stocks for not having transmit power control in WiFi (using minimum amount of power needed to reach client), because they have polluted 2.4ghz so badly in urban/suburban areas.

Lone Wolf
Retired
Premium Member
join:2001-12-30
USA

Lone Wolf to wifi4milez

Premium Member

to wifi4milez
Here's an older article on Philly WiFi....

»www.philly.com/inquirer/ ··· 632.html

"Tripped by wireless
Phila. and other cities promising WiFi ignored obstacles."

feek
join:2002-01-23
Philadelphia, PA

1 recommendation

feek

Member

earthlink wifi

im using it right now. it's way overpriced for what it is (often slow, usually unstable connection), but good if you're desperate

Voyager2K2
join:2001-10-04
Wayne, PA

1 recommendation

Voyager2K2

Member

Let Philadelphians Know About It!!

I manage a high volume shop at 31st and Grays Ferry Ave.
Almost no one and I mean no more than a couple of customers know anything about Earthlink's wireless network.
I guess my next email is to Mayor Nutter to explain the problem since no one else has.
Here in Philly it's a pretty cool situation. No good for P2P, but plenty of bandwidth for regular net activities. $20/mo is a little steep compared to Verizon DSL, but the portability at over 80% and climbing of the city is way cool.

BTW insiders tell me Philly should have the fiber laid (FIOS) for the entire city by year's end. No word on lighting it up yet.

carlini
@sbcglobal.net

carlini

Anon

I told you so - WiFi is not the solution

In many columns I have said WiFi was not the Universal Solution. I rest my case.

ALSO - The municipality needs to have a stake in the game - nothing is FREE.
carlini

1 recommendation

carlini

Anon

WiFi was not right

»wistechnology.com/articl ··· ?id=4096

All the "experts" were really not too expert.

Maybe WiMAX and fiber combined. WiFi is good for coffee shops and not major metropolitan areas. As I said in articles - just because you built a Lionel track in your basement doesn't qualify you to be the Chief Infrastructure Engineer for the Burlington Northern. Same goes for communication networks.

marigolds
Gainfully employed, finally
MVM
join:2002-05-13
Saint Louis, MO

1 recommendation

marigolds

MVM

Re: WiFi was not right

Your article misses the mark on one point.
You approach with the assumption that muni wi-fi is to provide wi-fi to the residents. This is not the primary purpose of muni wi-fi. The primary purpose is to provide wi-fi to government services, especially mobile vehicles and in emergency scenarios. Cities do not turn to the likes of earthlink for these networks. They turn to established providers of vhf, microwave, and cellular technologies.
Nightstick
join:2000-09-21
Philadelphia, PA

Nightstick

Member

Re: WiFi was not right

said by marigolds:

Your article misses the mark on one point.
You approach with the assumption that muni wi-fi is to provide wi-fi to the residents. This is not the primary purpose of muni wi-fi. The primary purpose is to provide wi-fi to government services, especially mobile vehicles and in emergency scenarios. Cities do not turn to the likes of earthlink for these networks. They turn to established providers of vhf, microwave, and cellular technologies.
Really?

Well maybe somebody should clue the Philadelphia Police and Fire departments into this plan...because there is not ONE patrol car or piece of mobile fire equipment currently using anything on the mirage called Philly Wifi.

The "primary purpose" (using your words) of municipal wifi in Philly was the city controlling/administering the distribution of broadband as a new government-funded welfare entitlement. This is what the city already managed to do with the municipal gas and water utilities it has run into the ground. Somehow the natural gas and water utilities in Philly have been transformed into social services for the poor, funded by an ever-decreasing pool of people who actually pay their utility bills.

But what the dopey city broadband proponents didn't realize is that consumers have viable, market-driven alternatives to municipal wifi. So they aren't STUCK with an overpriced municipal wifi utility, like they are with natural gas and water in Philly.

Without a viable business model, municipal wifi projects nationwide will quickly evaporate.

marigolds
Gainfully employed, finally
MVM
join:2002-05-13
Saint Louis, MO

1 recommendation

marigolds

MVM

Re: WiFi was not right

Philly Wifi was not a municipal wifi project though. It was some hybrid with a completely different purpose, as you pointed out.
Read Tom Carlini's article. He is talking about muni wifi in general as a network structure; and starting from the assumption that the primary purpose should be profitability. And then arguing that a profitable business model does not exist (which I think is true).
The problem is that the business model for successful muni fi is not about profitability but about cost savings. There are extremely successful municipal wifi, electric utilities, water utilities, etc. that operate on a service provision and cost savings model. In the case of wifi, they make the important distinction that they are not providing broadband services to the whole populace, but rather only to city services. This replaces the fortune that has to currently be spent on mobile broadband services, resulting in a huge cost savings.
Profitable? Not at all when the city is the only customer. Saves taxpayer money? Absolutely.