Q2 Slowest In Eight Years For Broadband Growth Just 634,000 new subscribers on the quarter... The second quarter is traditionally the slowest for broadband growth each year anyway, but the housing market and a saturated broadband customer base is responsible for Q2 having the slowest broadband growth for the Unites States in eight years. According to new research by the Leichtman Group, the nineteen largest cable and telephone providers in the country, who collectively control 93% of the market, added just 634,000 in the second quarter. According to Leichtman, cable operators now lay claim to about 38 million broadband subscribers,while telephone companies have about 31.9 million subscribers. AT&T (15,548,000 broadband customers) continues to barely beat Comcast (15,322,000) for the title of country's largest broadband provider. While cable operators still control 54% of the market, telcos saw stronger growth than cable last quarter. "In a reverse of last years second quarter, when cable operators got three-quarters of the net broadband adds, Telcos earned over 60% of the broadband net adds in 2Q 2009," says Bruce Leichtman. One strong reason for that? The investment in next-generation infrastructure (which some investors frowned upon) drove people toward products like Verizon FiOS. Both Verizon and AT&T saw the biggest jump in quarterly subscribers, adding 186,000 and 112,00 subscribers respectively. Comcast only added 64,000 new broadband customers, something they blamed on the need to advertise for the digital transition.
|
 jmn1207Premium join:2000-07-19 Reston, VA | Upgrades First It seems like everyone is trying to upgrade their services right now. Once those upgrades are complete, perhaps a more concentrated effort on building out will start to happen. Most of the action taking place now is with customers switching from one type of existing service to another, with no real net gains in broadband growth. | |
|  pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD | Market is Saturated Only lower prices will increase subscriber growth now that the market for people buying broadband at current prices is saturated. -- Blagojevich / Madoff 2012! | |
|  |  cacoPremium join:2005-03-10 Whittier, AK | Re: Market is Saturated Those that can afford it and can get it in their area have jumped on broadband. You still have large areas of this country that their only BB option is Satellite or dial up Add to that the prolonged new housing construction slump and you get the slowdown we are seeing.
IMO first big company that decides to bite the bullet and serve more rural areas will see a good increase in subscriber numbers. How economically feasible will it be to service BFE is another story. -- »www.seabee.navy.mil | |
|  |  |  screavic4Premium join:2006-08-11 Paron, AR kudos:1 1 edit | Re: Market is Saturated Agree, you can only milk these areas for so long before everyone is either sick of their business practice, already have broadband, or doesn't want it. So, the feasible option would be to "broaden" their market by expansion. That's too difficult for them to understand.
Just like all those stupid AT&T Commercials about their horrible broadband service here. The majority of their commercials hit where people don't have broadband so they are pointless. I don't have it can't get it cause I'm just out of range. My friend has it and only gets 768 down and like 20k up cause of the horrible line quality.
They are trying to upgrade alot of those areas to UVerse but I just don't see it coming here still. -- Keyboard not found press F1 to continue. My software never has bugs, they just develop random "features". | |
|  |  |  jmn1207Premium join:2000-07-19 Reston, VA | It might not be financially viable to serve more rural areas with the current technology. If you have 20,000 potential customers all living within a 5 mile radius, it's much easier to support and setup than it would be to service an area 5 times as large with only 10% of the potential customers. In many cases, it's simply not profitable enough (or at all) to justify, when there are more lucrative avenues to travel down that have not been completed exhausted yet. | |
|  |  |  |  me1212 join:2008-11-20 Pleasant Hill, MO | Re: Market is Saturated Current tech, maybe not. Wimax/lte may change that. | |
|
 |  | | Ya, put down prices instead of increasing amount of unnecessary services -- Consumer VoIP Reviews | |
|  |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| said by pnh102:Only lower prices will increase subscriber growth now that the market for people buying broadband at current prices is saturated. There are still a lot of places where build-out needs to occur. -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
| |
|
 kd6caeP2p Shouldn't Be A Crime join:2001-08-27 Palmdale, CA Reviews:
·Vitelity VOIP
·AT&T U-Verse
| Do more with the services we already have I wonder why more cable companies aren't trying to get customers to upgrade to faster tiers by increasing speeds, especially in the upstream direction? Instead all the ads I catch always talk about how awesome powerboost is, which by the way it isn't, and mentioning all the useless TV packages you should get. At least in the case of time warner out here, we're not even seeing the full potential of docsis 1/1.1, so why not give us a permanent 20 meg down 3 or 4 meg up internet tier, which I'm sure even the existing system can do, and not have 3 duplicates of the same network, as we do in much of our digital channel lineup. It's crazy. You won't see much growth if you do nothing to get customers to your services. | |
|  SlyLoK join:2007-10-19 Sugar Grove, VA | Maxxed out? Makes me wonder if they are hitting the " wall "... Even if they were I still doubt if they would expand their service areas. It seems if these guys cant make uber proft the first month they dont want to serve an area.
Its true that some areas probably wouldnt bring profit for months if not longer but if you serve a lot of those areas then it begins to add up.
Sometimes you gotta take a loss to make money in the long run. | |
|  Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
| side effects of duopoly/monopoly disease comcast and at&t deserve most of the blame within this problem.. and companies of all shapes, industries and sizes will use the economy as THE POSTER CHILD excuse for not innovating, investing, and doing right by the consumer. they're not the only ones to suffer.. all those fancy electronics media products that chew down bytes won't get bought if there isn't an infrastructure to support it in the last mile.
far be it for me to call consPIRACY theory, but maybe the RIAA/MPAA are paying these companies to screw the consumer long enough to finally nail that killer piece of legislation that has toothy jailtime & fines for violators of copyright law. having broadband deployment/service that sucks is the content industry's best friend. | |
|
 | |
|
|