republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category Qualcomm Cuddles Up To LTE
Releasing LTE support, conducting HSPA+ trials
(old news - 03:49PM Friday Feb 08 2008)
tags: competition · business · wireless · hardware · bandwidth · world
If there was any question that LTE is dominating the charge toward 4G, Qualcomm, the primary supporter of competing UWB technology, is now deploying a number of chipsets with LTE support. Verizon is one of Qualcomm's largest customers, and their decision to go LTE has apparently broadened Qualcomm's horizons. The company also says they'll be conducting HSPA+ tests throughout 2008.
The HSPA+ trials are expected to take place this year, enabling commercialization of the technology as early as 2009. The trials will use Qualcomm's Mobile Data Modem™ (MDM™) MDM8200™ chipset. Key features being trialed include 64-QAM HSDPA for 21 Mbps downlink data rates and 2x2 downlink MIMO for 28 Mbps downlink data rates.
At the moment, there's three front-runners for the fourth-generation wireless broadband crown: 3GPP LTE (Long Term Evolution), mobile WiMax and 3GPP2 UMB (Ultra Mobile Broadband). All three standards will offer low latency and theoretical max speeds that easily best existing 3G offerings. However, LTE is officially leading the 4G push.

AT&T has said they're planning on migrating toward LTE. Verizon Wireless recently confirmed they would be embracing LTE as well, in order to have a unified standard across both their network and the network of European partner Vodafone. Sprint, of course, is hitching their wagon to Mobile WiMax under the Xohm name.

Related:
  1. Nokia LTE Wireless Tests Surpass 100Mbps
  2. C-Block Spectrum Auction Hits Reserve Price
  3. Cablevision Network DVR: 160GB, $10/Month
  4. TekSavvy Offers Connection Tweaking Contest
  5. iPhone Heading To Verizon
  6. Wednesday Evening Links
  7. Thursday Morning Links
  8. Thursday Evening Links
Forums » Qualcomm Cuddles Up To LTE
view: topics flat text 
Post a:
amungus
Premium
join:2004-11-26
America
clubs:

awesome

Sounds like some good speeds!
Standardization also sounds like a good idea IMO.

...Now, how much cancer will be caused by all this extra pulsed radio action

jjsk8r85

join:2005-02-17
Belleville, MI

why?

what gets me is that everyone is pushing 4G already, when a good portion of the country doesn't even have real 3g yet. why upgrade something that doesn't exist?

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Re: why?

The world is larger than the U.S., and just because 3G isn't fully deployed, it doesn't mean that it won't be in the not too distant future.
--
Canada = Hollywood North
rahvin112

join:2002-05-24
Sandy, UT

Re: why?

Some of the companies that are 2 or 2.5G right now will likely skip 3g right on to 4G, just as some of them went right from analog to 3G. 4G is a much bigger deal than 3G. 4G allows for enough bandwidth to make mobile high usage Internet available without minuscule limits. Some predict 4G will make mobile broadband so cheap and easy that it will begin to make serious competition with land line Internet. 4G offers not only latency equivalent to land line but bandwidth and a shared pool of 10x more bandwidth available per tower. Tack in the 700mhz spectrum and you have a major third tier broadband provider that could bring real competition to the land line market and might make non-satellite rural broadband a reality.
cmaenginsb
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-19
Palmdale, CA

Re: why?

said by rahvin112 See Profile :

Some of the companies that are 2 or 2.5G right now will likely skip 3g right on to 4G, just as some of them went right from analog to 3G. 4G is a much bigger deal than 3G. 4G allows for enough bandwidth to make mobile high usage Internet available without minuscule limits. Some predict 4G will make mobile broadband so cheap and easy that it will begin to make serious competition with land line Internet. 4G offers not only latency equivalent to land line but bandwidth and a shared pool of 10x more bandwidth available per tower. Tack in the 700mhz spectrum and you have a major third tier broadband provider that could bring real competition to the land line market and might make non-satellite rural broadband a reality.
There's one big issue to this, what good is it to have 20 Mbps to the phone when the cellsite backhaul is a single T-1. This is a problem providers are finding with 3G now, they have to increase capacity on the site.
Add to that 64QAM will require a higher RSSI and that means you can see new sites in the future as well.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Re: why?

Yup, as well, 4G requires larger chunks of spectrum to obtain its datarates. 20MHz of unused spectrum isn't exactly just sitting idle these days, and FCC auctions make that spectrum pretty expensive.
--
Canada = Hollywood North
Forums » Qualcomm Cuddles Up To LTE


Tuesday, 14-Oct 04:47:26 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole