site Search:


 
   
story category
Qualcomm Fined For Violating Chips Injunction
Broadcom chips used in Sprint's Q-chat violate court order
by KathrynV Saturday 30-Aug-2008 tags: competition · business · wireless · hardware · trouble
After a long series of lawsuits between Qualcomm and Broadcom last year, it was determined that Qualcomm was in violation of patents when using certain chipsets and an injunction was issued. A court has found that Qualcomm has been violating that injunction and has ordered Qualcomm to make a payment to Broadcom for profits lost. The violation is for the use of the chipsets in the company’s Q-chat walkie-talkie feature used by Sprint Nextel. In a slap from the court, it was also ordered that all Qualcomm employees currently using older phones with the questionable chips in place must stop using them immediately. Qualcomm says that it will pay the fine but file an appeal as the company believes that they are not in violation of the injunction.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ

are they stealing the chips?

what im trying to figure out in these kinds of cases, if they are using Broadcom chips that means they are paying Broadcom because well they have to purchase the chips. unless they are making their own copies of the chips or stealing them from warehouses.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports

not me 2

@comcast.net

Re: are they stealing the chips?

Reading this article it seems like they are using Broadcom chips but the Qtalk feature isn't included in the cost of the chip. Perhaps it's a patented feature by Broadcom and Qualcom didn't license the use of the feature so that's why they are being penalized by the court.
EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

Re: are they stealing the chips?

I believe it has to do with patent violations.

uid1307457
Premium
join:2005-12-30
Tempe, AZ

Re: are they stealing the chips?

said by EPS:

I believe it has to do with patent violations.
second
RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
kudos:1

As we found out once

Just because you BUY something does not give you the right to SELL/USE it. That is covered under another payment scheme. The system is kinda screwy in that way. And I gather that in some cases you have a tiered payment depending on which features of the item you have bought that you use.

So do not use the antenna of your cell phone to pick your nose, you might get sued for some patent violation since that feature was not paid for.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time.
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ

Re: As we found out once

well the way patent and IP rights go, GM could be sued for putting a headlight bulb in a foglight because while it might use the same S3 bulb its a different license to put it in a foglamp.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports

Sunday, 03-Jun 20:41:29 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.