Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category Qwest Tells Us Their FTTN Plan Is Ahead Of Schedule
New ADSL2+ will be available to 1.8 million by year's end....
(old news - 02:19PM Wednesday Dec 17 2008)
tags: dsl · prices · business · Qwest.net
Qwest's currently in the process of spending roughly $300 million to upgrade 1.8 million of their customers to ADSL2+ technology, offering users 12Mbps/896kbps tiers for slightly less than $50, and 20Mbps/896kbps tiers for around $100. Those are introductory rates, change depending on whether you bundle local phone, and those prices increase after a year -- though can be locked down with a long term contract. Qwest hopes to see a FTTN penetration rate of 40% by 2010, with upgrades costing the company around $175 per home. It's a far less aggressive plan that AT&T or Verizon, but so it goes when you lack a cash cow wireless division.

Back in August, Qwest issued a press release stating that their deployment was on schedule, with the FTTN/ADSL2+ service available to more than a million customers. Qwest's goal for the year was to bring potential service to more than 1.8 million customers across twenty markets. Earlier in the week we referenced a report citing a Qwest hardware vendor, who suggested that Qwest had put their upgrade plans into hibernation mode until the Spring thaw. The telco reached out to note that the carrier is actually ahead of schedule with their plans.

"As you mention, we have indicated that our FTTN deployment has run ahead of schedule, and we do plan to achieve our year-end goal of 1.8 million homes passed in 20 markets," says Qwest spokesperson Monica Martinez. According to Martinez, Qwest hit the 1 million mark in August more quickly than they anticipated. The telco says they should have a little more detail on their FTTN project numbers when they announce third quarter earnings on October 29. I asked Martinez about plans beyond 20Mbps, and was told "we are still testing the bonded DSL line platform."

Bonded DSL could allow the telco to theoretically offer speeds closer to 35Mbps -- all used for data, given that Qwest currently has no plans for IPTV.

Related:
  1. New Qwest 20Mbps Service Now On Website
  2. Qwest Sued Over DSL Early Termination Fees
  3. Qwest Cuts Off SkyWi Customers
  4. Qwest Offers New $79.99 Bundle Offer
  5. Qwest Latest To Offer Netbooks
  6. AT&T Offers 'Buy Two, Get One Free' U-Verse Bundle
  7. Sonic.net Drops Prices On ADSL2+ Service
  8. FCC To Investigate Special Access Pricing
Forums » Qwest Tells Us Their FTTN Plan Is Ahead Of Schedule
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Fiberbegoodforu

@charter.com

Anyone seen a deployment schedule?

Qwest used to have a spreadsheet of DSL deployments. Is there anything like that for the FTTN rollout?

tubbynet
reminds me of the danse russe
Premium
join:2008-01-16
Chandler, AZ
·Cox HSI
·Callcentric
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·FrontierNet Intern..


1 edit

really qwest...really?

before the halt to the fttn deployment, i would see qwest vehicles parked along one of the surface streets that i would take to school.
while i am a cox sub, i am glad that qwest is pushing *a little* as it is keeping cox *a little* more honest (in terms of speed, but not price). however, if qwest really wants to compete in markets with an mso, they really have to give something special on price, because their speeds aren't anything to really write home about (especially with their limited availability).
i was looking to see if i could cut down the cost of my internet service by going with qwests 1.5meg tier and was *shocked* at the price they wanted. details as follows

*qwest high speed internet with office basic
*1.5m/896k tier
*purchase a simple dsl modem
*no bundle with qwest pots (dry-loop dsl) or long-term contract

price per month: $55.50
one time cost: $69.98

granted, i know the price is inflated with the lack of pots or a contract, but seriously!
when looking at qwest, we always see that they are only spending $300 million to upgrade *a portion* of their subs, but to really see how big of a deal, that needs to be compared to the revenue stream that qwest is taking in. if we have a proportion like that and can compare that against numbers from att and verizon, we can really see who is taking more of a financial hurt.

q.

--
"The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers."

~ Carroll Quigley - Tragedy and Hope
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

Re: really qwest...really?

AT&T pricing isnt much better for dry-loop. Actually roughly right around the same price then just find out that "can't" install it due to being too far away. Order POTS service along with it and BOOM! instant DSL.

tubbynet
reminds me of the danse russe
Premium
join:2008-01-16
Chandler, AZ

Re: really qwest...really?

order pots with my dsl and *boom!* my price exceeds that of dry-loop for a service i don't use (two mobiles plus skype-out).

q.
hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH
·Time Warner Cable
·buckeye cable

Re: really qwest...really?

Here Dry loop is more than the POS POTS only because DSL starts at $10 per month and you can have a phone line for about $6.75 before "taxes and fees" but are still paying $50+ for a shitting 2Wire or Mot DSL modem when you can have a better one had at BestBuy for the same price and never have to worry about the telco having remote access to it.

WiseOldNerd
De gustibus non est disputandum
Premium
join:2001-11-25
Phoenix, AZ
·Cox HSI
·Qwest.net
·Charter Pipeline

NOT in Central Phoenix

Qwest continues to cherry pick where they are installing fiber. They continue to ignore the north central area of Phoenix where many very expensive homes are unable to get higher than 1.5 down because of the very old copper. They should wise up to the reality that long established home owners are more likely to stay customers than the outskirts that were financed with the flaky mortgages. But then we know that living at high altitudes with lessened oxygen causes brains to slow down.
--
My perception is REALITY
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
·Comcast
·Qwest.net
·magicjack.com
·BeeCreek Communica..
·Sprint Mobile Broa..

Still waiting here...

$40 for 1.5/896? How about no...
$47 for 5/896? Not for me either...

I'm in a college town where people would value a decently high speed connection for a reasonable price. The only provider who offers such a connection here is Comcast IMO...aside from upload speed issues, Qwest here is not FTTN and I haven't definitively heard that they'll upgrade this area any time soon. I'd be willing to switch to the $57-a-month 12/896 Titanium plan or at least the 7/896 ADSL2+ mid-tier offering if Qwest offered it here, but they don't, so I use Comcast.

What's funny is that the $175 per customer upgrade cost could be recouped in about 18 months by that customer choosing the 12 Mbps tier over a lower one, or the 7 Mbps ADSL2+ tier over 1.5 over the course of 24 months or so. Or look at it this way: that $175 upgrade could actually bring more Qwest customers on board with a more expensive ADSL2+ plan, so at $57 per month you're looking at a dang quick ROI.

Why they're only aiming for 40% FTTN penetration I just don't know...in non-FTTN areas the price for DSL is high enough compared to cable that using the MSO instead of the telco gives extra speed at a minimal price increase. Not good for customer retention...

MSauk
MSauk
Premium
join:2002-01-17
Sandy, UT

qwest sucks

can my area please just get a fricken upgrade? 1.5down 500 something up!

Give me a break
--
MatthewSauk.com

Kfedka
Premium
join:2005-05-06
Spokane, WA

Re: qwest sucks

Gotta love comcast then!:D

MSauk
MSauk
Premium
join:2002-01-17
Sandy, UT

Re: qwest sucks

oh gosh trust me there is a reason I am hoping qwest will one day upgrade my area. Comcast is not even close to being comcastic
Panthergm

join:2004-03-22
Salt Lake City, UT

Qwest Upgrade

Msauk,

I dont know if this means anything but up north here Around the Davis SL County Line there has been alot of Qwest, SCI Trucks around. I have seen them as far southeast as 2100 south and 2300-2400 East Foothill Area. I talked to someone who lives in bountiful and they told me they were looking at some huge cabinet that looked kind of like a refridgerator in a neghiborhood. I dont know whats going on but its something. I dont know if this means anything or what any ideas? or anyone on the boards have any idea really?

MSauk
MSauk
Premium
join:2002-01-17
Sandy, UT
·Qwest.net
·Vonage
·Verizon BroadbandA..
·surpasshosting
·Comcast

Re: Qwest Upgrade

yeah I see them putting something like that in on 700 East and around 7800 South (actually around 7700th south).

Right by Hollywood Video in the Harmons shopping center. Though being that is far from where I live I doubt that means much to my neighborhood.
--
MatthewSauk.com
Panthergm

join:2004-03-22
Salt Lake City, UT

Re: Qwest Upgrade

I drive for work all over the SLC Metropoloitan area (Davis County Line To 2700 SOuth And Foothill Drive) and as far west as the airport. I dont know what it is I am really curious is to what the heck is going on does anyone have any idea what it is? should I take some pics for people?
Quento21

join:2007-09-28
Laurel, MT

still use interleave?

With those 12mbps and 20mbps do they still use interleave? i know that Billings Area will probably be one of the last places they will put down fiber but im still wondering. Right now i have Cable Montana 5/384 and qwest only offers 1.5/3 meg services here now.
Forums » Qwest Tells Us Their FTTN Plan Is Ahead Of Schedule


Sunday, 08-Nov 15:46:01 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.