 | | I watch free tv I go right to the content owners site these days, its free there and everyone can watch at once. Why would I ever pay for crappy tv these days? | |
|
 |  tschmidtPremium,MVM join:2000-11-12 Milford, NH kudos:5 | Re: I watch free tv If you are using over the air (OTA) then I agree. If you are using the Internet then you run afoul of bandwidth caps if you do much in the way of viewing.
/tom | |
|
 |  |  nixenRockin' the BoxenPremium join:2002-10-04 Alexandria, VA | Re: I watch free tv said by tschmidt:If you are using over the air (OTA) then I agree. If you are using the Internet then you run afoul of bandwidth caps if you do much in the way of viewing. /tom Yeah, but in the case of Rogers, you run into those caps whether using Rogers's service or an external service. So, why would you use Rogers's service when there's so many better ones out there, free or otherwise. -- The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. -- Bertrand Russell | |
|
 | | Not worth it...at the moment. All the content and more is available from other sources and at higher quality, i personally don't see and use in the service. I'm sure some will see some value in it. If i can't catch something on tv i will download it from other sources. Which will also count towards my cap, but i can archive the copy and get it in pretty much any format i want, not one dictated by my cable company.
This service may catch on with the "general public" but i think most users will continue to seek out content from alternate sources. But i guess time will tell. | |
|
 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
·Bell Sympatico
·Rogers Hi-Speed
| Absolutely not interested! Why would I want this service? It has absolutely no advantages to me, considering the other options available to me.
It's not even HD - WTF? Who gives a Standard Definition crap? I want my crap in HD - get with the 21st century Rogers!
There is so little value in Roger's TV service that I'm about 2 cm away from canceling cable TV service. Put that in your pipe and smoke it Rogers! | |
|
 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD | Geez The old outdoor antenna is looking like a better and better option every day. -- Blagojevich / Madoff 2012! | |
|
 |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| Re: Geez said by pnh102:The old outdoor antenna is looking like a better and better option every day. With today's OTA HD, it's actually not bad at all.
I get more stations now, too. All free. -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
| |
|
 | | Just Wrong... $5 per GB is just fucking disgusting. $2 per GB is even beyond wrong.
They pay no where near that much for it. Thats probably a 10,000 % markup per GB.
I pay $0.014 per GB with a 10,000 GB allotment plus I get a bad ass server with a 100 Mbps connection, on a network with 9 different carriers.
Even if I go over my allotment its still only 10 cents per GB over.
There is no reason at all for ISP's to be doing this. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Just Wrong... said by dlewis23:$5 per GB is just fucking disgusting. $2 per GB is even beyond wrong. They pay no where near that much for it. Thats probably a 10,000 % markup per GB. I pay $0.014 per GB with a 10,000 GB allotment plus I get a bad ass server with a 100 Mbps connection, on a network with 9 different carriers. Even if I go over my allotment its still only 10 cents per GB over. There is no reason at all for ISP's to be doing this. I wish your post was auto-posted every time a mouthpiece came on the forum to defend the carriers` practices. | |
|
 |  |  chimera join:2009-06-09 Washington, DC | Re: Just Wrong... From those numbers that server is most likely located in a data center or actually a logical distribution spread out across the world over a number of centers with a cumulative cap. It's true that $5 per GB is highway robbery for a wired connection, but it costs more for residential connections because there is a strong economy of scale behind all of this which is much harder to take advantage with for residential connections as opposed to data centers.
Again, I am in no way saying that $5 per GB is anywhere near fair. $0.50 per GB is a high as I would ever consider fair in this day and age, but I'm fairly certain that it costs most carriers more than a penny per GB per month on a full residential circut.
A quick run through the numbers from »www.infobahn.com/research-information.htm prices an OC3 connection at a minimum of $20,000 per month. This provides a speed of 155Mbps which translates to a cost of $0.40 per GB per month. I'm guessing that ISPs can do this for cheaper internally, but even if it costs them a quarter of this amount per month that still means $0.10 per GB per month so expecting to pay a penny per GB for a residential connection doesn't add up... for now at least. In ten years it might, which is why it's important that if caps show up we make sure that they increase with network capacity. | |
|
 |  ReformCRTCSupport Your Independent ISP join:2004-03-07 Canada | In Rogers' case, though, there is a $25.00 overage fee limit. So, theoretically, you shell out the 25 bucks extra over your monthly rate and you get unlimited.
The resulting total for that is expensive and sucks compared to leading broadband countries, I'll give you that. | |
|
 El Quintron... a faint odor of kerosenePremium join:2008-04-28 Etobicoke, ON kudos:2 | Why would they even bother launching this No selection, high cost, accessible for free elsewhere...
I wonder how this one snuck the board...
The amount of self delusion that goes on in Canadian Telecom borders on the absurd. | |
|
 | | Capping an advertised service? You can access the service, but it counts against your cap? How does this benefit the consumer?  | |
|
 |  |
 |  |  ReformCRTCSupport Your Independent ISP join:2004-03-07 Canada | Re: Capping an advertised service? That would be called "Grocery Shrink-Ray." | |
|

approval from: Romney2012 
| Get the facts please You can get this service with 'ANY' Rogers service, including just wireless, and you also DON'T have to have Rogers Internet, you be using any other Canadian internet service and their own caps. So your little story here is completely ignorant and misleading by the way... | |
|
 |  J E F FWhatta Ya Think About Dat?Premium join:2004-04-01 Kitchener, ON Reviews:
·Rogers Hi-Speed
·Rogers Portable ..
·magicjack.com
| Re: Get the facts please said by user6578 :
You can get this service with 'ANY' Rogers service, including just wireless, and you also DON'T have to have Rogers Internet, you be using any other Canadian internet service and their own caps. So your little story here is completely ignorant and misleading by the way... True - the story in that regard is misleading. I just signed up because I have rogers wireless.
Selection isn't huge - but free is good. I have DSL with no caps, so no worries. -- This message was composed using 100% post-consumer recycled electrons, please recycle responsibly. Composed and sent with Mac OS X... because windows sucks. Public PGP Key available. Opinions expressed are entirely my own.
| |
|
 |  |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK | Re: Get the facts please Bell has caps. | |
|
 |  |  |  J E F FWhatta Ya Think About Dat?Premium join:2004-04-01 Kitchener, ON Reviews:
·Rogers Hi-Speed
·Rogers Portable ..
·magicjack.com
| Re: Get the facts please said by KrK:Bell has caps. Bell does have caps but I am not with them. Bell is trying to enforce caps for all resellers but so far I am good. | |
|
 |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| said by RogersShill6578 :
You can get this service with 'ANY' Rogers service, including just wireless, and you also DON'T have to have Rogers Internet, you be using any other Canadian internet service and their own caps. So your little story here is completely ignorant and misleading by the way... The only thing Ignorant and misleading here is Rogers themselves. -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
| |
|
 |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | said by user6578 :
You can get this service with 'ANY' Rogers service, including just wireless, and you also DON'T have to have Rogers Internet, you be using any other Canadian internet service and their own caps. So your little story here is completely ignorant and misleading by the way... The point is you can have access to this unless you have Rodgers service. In otherwords you can't get it as a stand alone offer. This is like the stuff Comcrap and other US cable companies are trying to do. | |
|
 gballMaster YodaPremium join:2000-11-28 South Bend, IN 1 edit | ok so let me make sure I understand this.
I have to sign up and pay for cable tv and then I have the option to sign up and pay even more for this video portal service that will basically let me watch the same shows I'm already paying for but on my computer?
Am I following this right? | |
|
 |  Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 1 edit | Re: ok said by gball:so let me make sure I understand this. I have to sign up and pay for cable tv and then I have the option to sign up and pay even more for this video portal service that will basically let me watch the same shows I'm already paying for but on my computer? Am I following this right? Did you miss the part where the service is FREE if you are a TV subscriber already.
On the other hand it's free to existing customers, -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
| |
|
 |  |  | | Re: ok the article was poorly written and misses a critical point - THE SERVICE IS FREE FOR *ALL* ROGERS CUSTOMERS. YOU Can even be FIDO customer who pays like $10 a month for prepaid and get the service for free, and use any ISP, Bell, Shaw, Telus, whatever you want for dsl/cable connection, or go to a cafe and use wi-fi, it will work.
so for $15 that you already pay for FIDO, you can access it for free.
on top of it all, if you happen to be arogers tv customer and you order speciality tv shows/channels , then you can access these online. | |
|
 |  |  |  milnoc join:2001-03-05 H3B kudos:1 | Re: ok Does that include Fido Prepaid?  | |
|
 |  |  |  |  bt join:2009-02-26 canada kudos:1 Reviews:
·Start Communicat..
| Re: ok said by milnoc:Does that include Fido Prepaid? As long as you've got an account number, then supposedly yes. Might need to have a positive balance on the account for it to work with pre-paid though. Though I don't know anyone with Fido prepaid who has actually tried to access it. | |
|
 |  |  |  pfakBow before me for I am rootPremium join:2002-12-29 Vancouver, BC | Doesn't work for Fido. I tried. | |
|
 |  |  dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ kudos:4 | said by Romney2012:said by gball:so let me make sure I understand this. I have to sign up and pay for cable tv and then I have the option to sign up and pay even more for this video portal service that will basically let me watch the same shows I'm already paying for but on my computer? Am I following this right? Did you miss the part where the service is FREE if you are a TV subscriber already. On the other hand it's free to existing customers, its not 'free' if you're eating away at your cap using it! -- When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee | |
|
 VanPremium join:2009-07-08 New Orleans, LA | I will stick with my DVR if my company does this to me
Absurd that they are begging people to use the internet MORE yet find ways to keep them using LESS in the same breath | |
|
 maartenaElmoPremium join:2002-05-10 Orange, CA kudos:1 | This must be the saddest offer.... This must be the saddest offer I have seen in a long time from any company. It actually made me cry. And not in the happy tears kind of way. -- "I reject your reality and substitute my own!" | |
|
 n2jtx join:2001-01-13 Glen Head, NY Reviews:
·Optimum Online
| Another Name There is a reason why many Canadian's call them "Robbers" instead of "Rogers". I have family in Mississauga and they are constantly in fear of bumping in to their monthly cap and getting hit with overages. Glad I am in Optimum Online country. -- I support the right to keep and arm bears. | |
|
 | | seems good to me - it's free! I am a student that has only Rogers wireless, but this service allows me to use this over any free wi fi connection at a campus cafe/pub or any external wi-fi hotspot for that matter.. and i can use it on my parents Bell DSL line too it seems. i don't see the big issue - Rogers isn't forcing me to pay a dime and I can watch shows instead of downloading them and getting a virus on my computer. | |
|
 |  1 edit | Re: seems good to me - it's free! Rogers (or any monopoly Telco) won't do anything which COSTS them more money than they make. They're counting on you going over your overages if your with Rogers Internet. You can't even join if you don't have any services with them, even though all of their shows are with Bell/Starchoice anyway. They're not offering this service out of the goodness of their hearts..."goodness" in business went out a long time ago. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: seems good to me - it's free! no. it IS free even if i am NOT with Rogers Cable. Go read the actual press release. I have already been using it last night (watched Saw), and I don't have Rogers Cable.
i see this as a tactic for them to retain me as a wireless customer as well. if i was a bell-only wireless customer, i would not be able to use this service.
Please re-read the press release and get the proper information before bashing me. I am a Rogers Wireless customer and I have used the service fine so far. No problems on my end. | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: seems good to me - it's free! said by jjman :
no. it IS free even if i am NOT with Rogers Cable. Go read the actual press release. I have already been using it last night (watched Saw), and I don't have Rogers Cable.
i see this as a tactic for them to retain me as a wireless customer as well. if i was a bell-only wireless customer, i would not be able to use this service.
Please re-read the press release and get the proper information before bashing me. I am a Rogers Wireless customer and I have used the service fine so far. No problems on my end.
Wasn't bashing you in anyway. Merely pointing out the shortcomings of this idea. This the big problem with Canadian distributors, they have absolute control over everything coming into and out of your house. We can find some small ways around it, but in the end, we still get screwed by high pricing and ridiculous caps designed to keep you from downloading content. | |
|

approval from: matt0509 
| Wouldn't work for me
Assuming I had this service, my bill for November would have been $187.71. Instead I pay $70 for unlimited FiOS (20Mb/20Mb), I really hope Verizon keeps it this way. Between Xbox Live (downloading demos, game content and the 1080p Zune store), my Netflix subscription and my roommate uses OnLive. We're both also members of MSDNAA, have Linux boxes which pull a few gigs a month worth of updates, we stream music from Pandora, back-up both of our computers to Mozy, and sometimes have friends over to play Left4Dead (which is downloaded from Steam). Last month we transferred over 130GB and previously 170GB (this would have cost $266.99). Prices like that are unreasonable, especially when I can generate this amount of data using legitimate services. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Wouldn't work for me Overages are capped at $25 so, while it still sucks if you only go slightly over the cap, if you go all out the cost per GB over the cap starts to decrease.
(I'm not defending Rogers, I still think they're awful, just pointing out that little tidbit) | |
|
 |  ReneM join:2003-07-18 Cockeysville, MD 1 edit | Lucky you . I do 1.5TB/month on my 20/20 FIOS. I have a decent salary but a $3000 bill would definitely kill by budget. | |
|
 | | EPIC FAIL! when will they ever learn. | |
|
 DrZEUS join:2004-01-13 Mississauga, ON | caps so if you dont have rogers internet, but you do pay for tv and wireless, the monthly caps are irrelevant and condusive to your ISP's caps? | |
|
 |  | | Re: caps Subject to your ISP's caps, yes. It appears, as long as you have 1 Rogers' service you may use the service. | |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| Corporate Wet Dream Maybe they should just turn their wallets over to Rogers and then submit written requests whenever they'd like to pretty please get some money back.
FFS.
Talk about being bent over. -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
| |
|
 JasonX join:2008-04-08 Houston, TX | overage fees are probably ok I'm surprised so many people are angry that Rogers is imposing overage fees for use of this service. The alternative would be for Rogers to exempt this service from its bandwidth caps, in which case other broadband video competitors would be placed at a competitive disadvantage, and Rogers would be accused of misusing its status as an ISP. At least this way, all broadband video is on a level playing field. | |
|
 |  ReneM join:2003-07-18 Cockeysville, MD | Re: overage fees are probably ok Not really. This is pretty much a literal quote from Verizon (FIOS). The internet 'channel' is the most profitable channel we offer. I have 20/20 with no caps and fees for $70. Go figure. | |
|
 |  bt join:2009-02-26 canada kudos:1 | Exactly! If they had made it exempt from their usage caps, people would be screaming about anti-competitive behaviour right now. | |
|
 |  |  ReneM join:2003-07-18 Cockeysville, MD | Re: overage fees are probably ok You misunderstood. 'Channel' is used as in any other digital channel, be it TV or whatever else comes down your pipe. i think my internet access uses channel 113/4. My router (provided by Verizon) has a maximum bandwidth of 384Mb/s. The 20/20 i get doesn't even scratch my fiber. It's just a bit more noise on the line given that i also have 4TV's and 1 DVR i get full HD (aka 1080p uncompressed) at the same time. | |
|
 | | Walled gardens... ...have walls.
That is all. | |
|
 | | Paying to stream tv? Who's gonna pay for substandard streaming service when cable channels allow you to see it for free? And what unique TV shows does Rogers have that are must see? Talk about not doing your research. | |
|
 |  bt join:2009-02-26 canada kudos:1 | Re: Paying to stream tv? If you've got cable channels from Rogers, you aren't paying to watch it online (or the view from the negative angle, you're paying regardless of if you watch it online or not). | |
|
 |
|