SPDY Gonzales: Google’s Attempt to Speed up the Web Google has set out on yet another venture, and this time its to make our web experience faster, by 23% in fact. SPYD (pronounced Speedy) aims to augment the HTTP protocol in order to help speed up the loading of webpages. Googles ultimate goal is to speed up the browsing experience by as much as 50%. As stated, SPDY isnt a replacement for HTTP; instead, it simply enhances it by overriding connection management and data transfer formats, among other things, while still utilizing HTTP methods and headers. Reducing web page load times by 50% isnt exactly the easiest thing to do when working with established standards. However, Google has laid out several technical goals that modify or enhance current protocols to aid in this ultimate end goal of reducing latency. One of them is to allow many concurrent HTTP requests to run across a single TCP session. Reducing the amount of TCP sessions required means there will be less load on web servers, which will mean a better and faster web experience for all. Another is that the SPDY protocol compresses headers and eliminates unnecessary ones. This header compression resulted in an 88% reduction in the size of header requests and an 85% reduction in the size of response headers. Some of the most dramatic results from header compression were seen in those with upload connection speeds of 375Kbps, which is a very common upload speed for DSL and many cable connections. 
|
As the results to the right, published by Google, show, there is significant speed up for not only a standard DSL connection, but there is an even more significant speedup for the speedier cable connection with nearly three times the upload bandwidth. A lot of this has to do with the SPDY protocol allowing many HTTP requests on a single TCP session, which allows for full parallelization on all downloads. It is similar to those old download managers that would open multiple sessions when downloading a large file in order to get greater speed, except that it is doing it for webpages instead. Even with all of that, Googles not done yet. They plan to optimize for 3G/4G networks, which are quickly becoming a place where a lot of people do a good amount of web browsing, and they are also wanting to make SSL part of the underlying transport protocol in order to make it more ubiquitous. So what do you need to do to take advantage of this new SPDY protocol? The good news is that if youre using Firefox 11+ or Google Chrome, you dont need to do anything extra as it is already built in and fully supported on those browsers. The bad news is that there are currently not many web servers utilizing the SPDY protocol. Some Google services use it as well as their ads, and just recently, Twitter enabled SPDY on its servers. In addition, Google recently started providing SPDY packages for Apache, which will allow many small websites to start using SPDY. Hopefully this will lead to a faster and better web experience for all.
|
 LinklistPremium join:2002-03-03 Longport, NJ kudos:5 | SPDY isn't nearly as speedy as Google claims
»www.guypo.com/technical/not-as-s···thought/
Previous benchmarks tout great benefits, ranging from making pages load 2x faster to making mobile sites 23% faster using SPDY and HTTPS than over clear HTTP. However, when testing real world sites I did not see any such gains. In fact, my tests showed SPDY is only marginally faster than HTTPS and is slower than HTTP.
The results show SPDY, on average, is only about 4.5% faster than plain HTTPS, and is in fact about 3.4% slower than unencrypted HTTP. This means SPDY doesnt make a material difference for page load times, and more specifically does not offset the price of switching to SSL.

Why? Simply put, SPDY makes HTTP better, but for most websites, HTTP is not the bottleneck............. Unfortunately SPDY can't shine when most web pages now draw content(mostly crap advertising and trackers) from an average of 18 separate domains, most of which don't support SPDY.
P.S.>> I run FF 13 and have SPDY turned on and can see what web sites use SPDY using a FF addon. And my results match those mentioned in link above. Not much difference. Since I use HTTPS extensively, I do see a small improvement on the FEW sites that use it - mostly just Google sites,. | |
|  |  | | Re: SPDY isn't nearly as speedy as Google claims I think that running Adblock Plus does more to speed up browsing than anything else. It's not so much that I mind the ads themselves, but what drives me crazy is when an ad server is slow to respond, and your page just sits there, half-drawn, waiting...and waiting...and waiting. Not to mention that a good deal of malware gets delivered via infected banner ads. | |
|  |  |  newviewEx .. Ex .. ExactlyPremium join:2001-10-01 Parsonsburg, MD kudos:1 | Re: SPDY isn't nearly as speedy as Google claims said by ISurfTooMuch:I think that running Adblock Plus does more to speed up browsing than anything else. I'll 2nd that ... getting rid of the ads GREATLY speeds up the browsing experience. Blocking all the privacy intrusive tracking scripts also helps. | |
|  |  |  |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Re: SPDY isn't nearly as speedy as Google claims said by newview:said by ISurfTooMuch:I think that running Adblock Plus does more to speed up browsing than anything else. I'll 2nd that ... getting rid of the ads GREATLY speeds up the browsing experience. Blocking all the privacy intrusive tracking scripts also helps. As soon as people are willing to PAY for access to websites I'm sure they'll get rid of the ads. You access a site and it content for free they have every right to try to at least to make some money to pay for the cost of running that website. You think websites run for free? | |
|  |  |  |  |  newviewEx .. Ex .. ExactlyPremium join:2001-10-01 Parsonsburg, MD kudos:1 | Re: SPDY isn't nearly as speedy as Google claims Paying for access to cableTV hasn't eliminated the ads. I'm certain they would continue with the ads even if 100% of costs were covered by paid subscriptions. That's the way greed works. | |
|  |  |  |  |  | | It isn't that I mind the ads; I just mind all the crap that they cause, as I mentioned earlier. In my view, if you're running an ad server, you need to make sure that you have enough resources to ensure that it can serve up the ads in a timely way, so as not to bog down page loading, and you'd better be sure that your server is clean and secure from known exploits. I don't mind seeing your ad, but I sure as hell don't want a piece of malware trying to hitch a ride. | |
|
 |  tshirtPremium,MVM join:2004-07-11 Snohomish, WA kudos:3 Reviews:
·Comcast
| said by Linklist:Unfortunately SPDY can't shine when most web pages now draw content(mostly crap advertising and trackers) from an average of 18 separate domains, most of which don't support SPDY.
Exactly! google breaks web standards to...solve a problem they contribute a great deal too. Less, Simpler ads or faster, better integrated ad servers would help everybody on all sites. | |
|  |  |  |  GuspazGuspazPremium,MVM join:2001-11-05 Montreal, QC kudos:20 | Those benchmark results are extremely questionable, because:
1) In his testing methodology, he states that he only enabled SPDY for first-party domains, and not third-party domains, because web developers can't control third-party domains. This is flawed, since there's no reason to assume that no third-party domain will ever support SPDY. Indeed, if mainstream web server software were to integrate SPDY support, virtually all third party domains would support it.
2) In his testing methodology, he says he used a SPDY-supporting reverse proxy to run his tests. This renders his results completely meaningless, because that proxy still communicated with the web servers via plain HTTP. All he tested was the benefit of putting a SPDY-supporting proxy between the client and server.
The first point is a flaw, but the second point makes his results completely meaningless, because in the end he's not using SPDY to communicate with the web servers, but plain HTTP and HTTPS. -- Developer: Tomato/MLPPP, Linux/MLPPP, etc »fixppp.org | |
|
 | | Evil NWOhio is not allowed to use SPDY since it's a Google product. | |
|  BabyBearKeep wise ...with Nite-Owl join:2007-01-11 2 edits | Firefox 13 SPDY isn't enabled in Firefox 11/12. Not until FF 13 is it enabled by default.
You need to enable it in the about:config - network.http.spdy.enabled
SPDY Wiki | |
|  |  IllIlIlllIllEliteDataPremium join:2003-07-06 Hampton Bays, NY kudos:7 | Re: Firefox 13 redacted | |
|
 |  | | This sounds like..... This sounds like Propel. The dial-up "accelerator" that's been around for EVER!
»propel.com/ | |
|  |  |  tp0dyabbazooiePremium join:2001-02-13 Carnegie, PA kudos:4 | Re: Again? Using PaleMoon x64 12.2 (firefox base) , SPDY is not enabled by default... i just enabled it tho..
and, using adblock plus, since 2009! much faster.
-j -- if it aint broke, tweak it!! currently on FiOS (kick aZZ!) | |
|  |  |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Re: Again? said by tp0d:Using PaleMoon x64 12.2 (firefox base) , SPDY is not enabled by default... i just enabled it tho..
and, using adblock plus, since 2009! much faster.
-j yes get FREE access to a site and it's content AND steal ad revenue away from them. How nice of you. People like you is what is going to ruin the internet when everything is subscription based. Do YOU work for free? Why do you expect others to? | |
|  |  |  |  1 edit | Re: Again? said by BF69:said by tp0d:Using PaleMoon x64 12.2 (firefox base) , SPDY is not enabled by default... i just enabled it tho..
and, using adblock plus, since 2009! much faster.
-j yes get FREE access to a site and it's content AND steal ad revenue away from them. How nice of you. People like you is what is going to ruin the internet when everything is subscription based. Do YOU work for free? Why do you expect others to? Count me in as someone who is going to ruin the internet then as I block EVERYTHING under the sun and especially Google crap.
Between using a modified host file from »winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm and Ghostery adblocker, I see very few ads. Cant say as blocking ads has really sped up anything noticeably, but sure do see a lot less content that I didn't want to see, to begin with.
I use Seamonkey, Palemoon and Waterfox. Will have to give this a try.
I just checked in Seamonkey 2.10.1 and spdy is enabled by default. Have to agree with OP. Spdy DOES NOT make that much of a difference, if any at all. -- The Firefox alternative. »www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/ | |
|  |  |  |  ZaberWhen all are gone, there shall be none join:2000-06-08 Cleveland, OH | said by BF69:yes get FREE access to a site and it's content AND steal ad revenue away from them. How nice of you. People like you is what is going to ruin the internet when everything is subscription based. Do YOU work for free? Why do you expect others to? Count me in this group as well. When the ads increase the page load time over 100 fold (which they do), when the ads prevent me from seeing the content I am looking for (which they do), when the ads are streaming videos which use up far more bandwidth (which I pay for) then the actual content I (which they do), I will block them and continue to block them has they are destroying the "Internet browsing experience." When these ads once again become unintrusive and use only a portion of the resources the currently do I will stop blocking them. I have no problems with ads but the way things have gone they actually devalue the content. -- Give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he will feed himself for a lifetime | |
|  |  |  |  |  Noah VailSon made my AvatarPremium join:2004-12-10 Lorton, VA kudos:2 Reviews:
·Bright House
| Re: Again? said by Zaber:When the ads increase the page load time over 100 fold (which they do), when the ads prevent me from seeing the content I am looking for (which they do), when the ads are streaming videos which use up far more bandwidth (which I pay for) then the actual content I (which they do), I will block them and continue to block them Also in play is that I've made thousands of dollars cleaning up viruses that come embedded in internet ads.
Ad blocking has become a layer of virus protection. -- The Dark Tower's Skynet evolves from 4chan. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  tp0dyabbazooiePremium join:2001-02-13 Carnegie, PA kudos:4 | said by BF69:said by tp0d:Using PaleMoon x64 12.2 (firefox base) , SPDY is not enabled by default... i just enabled it tho..
and, using adblock plus, since 2009! much faster.
-j yes get FREE access to a site and it's content AND steal ad revenue away from them. How nice of you. People like you is what is going to ruin the internet when everything is subscription based. Do YOU work for free? Why do you expect others to? lots of other brainless zombies out there to provide revenue dood.. go fark off..
-j -- if it aint broke, tweak it!! currently on FiOS (kick aZZ!) | |
|
 |  |  Noah VailSon made my AvatarPremium join:2004-12-10 Lorton, VA kudos:2 Reviews:
·Bright House
| said by BF69:yes get FREE access to a site and it's content AND steal ad revenue away from them. How nice of you. People like you is what is going to ruin the internet when everything is subscription based. Do YOU work for free? Why do you expect others to? It's all so TRUE!
10+ years of blocking (virus laden) ads has ruined The Internet. There's been no growth AT ALL. The Internet is crumbling in disrepair. Did you even know that there are only 9 internet sites left, including DSLR and »zombo.com?
Everyone knows that Wholesome, Honest Advertising (which composes 100% of internet ads) is THE FUEL that powers the web. And YOU tp0d are painfully starving The Internet and causing it's premature demise which will occur around 4:45pm EDT next Juneteenth.
The Internet doesn't exist to facilitate research, give repressed people a voice or inform us of massive government corruption. No SIR. The Internet was created as a vehicle for Advertising.
You remember Advertising don't you? Source of all joy and beauty? Mankind's only worthwhile creation? Ring a bell now?
Well YOU tp0d , have thwarted The Internet's purpose. Yes, YOU tp0d , have denied The Internet it's only reason for existing. And YOUR FILTHY AD BLOCKING HABITS have sucked the joy, light and purity right out of The Internet. That was OUR Internet Mr. tp0d .... it was ours.
Mr. tp0d , I've never known a creature so black as you. The next time you find yourself alone in your cave, weeping because the world has no beauty left in it; I want you to think back on this post. I want you to remember just what you admitted here today. And I want you to suffer all the more for it.
Now get out of my thread Mr. tp0d , before I say something I'll regret. -- The Dark Tower's Skynet evolves from 4chan. | |
|  |  |  |  | | Re: Again? lol thanks for the laugh  | |
|
 | |
|
|