site Search:


 
   
story category
Siemens Speeds Up EDGE Networks
Now only somewhat annoyingly slow...
by Karl Bode Thursday 27-Mar-2008 tags: business · wireless · bandwidth · networking
Nokia Siemens has unveiled their downlink Dual Carrier EDGE software solution, which should more than double the downstream capacity of EDGE wireless broadband networks to 592kbps during the second half of this year. Thought EDGE was dead because AT&T is moving on to HSDPA and ultimately LTE wireless broadband? Nokia Siemens apparently begs to differ, and claims the old gal has some life in her yet:

As a strong innovator of EDGE Evolution, Nokia Siemens Networks already has additional plans to introduce in its networks the next substantial step, the so called EGPRS 2, to further boost end user experience in up- and downlink performance. This will result in downlink speeds of up to 1.2 Mbps and will double uplink speed to up to 473 kbps, thus quadrupling the capabilities of EDGE today. EDGE Evolution is based on the 3GPP release 7 standard.

So, should AT&T decide to upgrade the existing EDGE network, those first generation iPhone users will see slightly peppier connectivity. However, it initially still won't technically constitute broadband according to the FCC's new definitions, and it obviously won't match second generation iPhone (expected mid-year) HSDPA connectivity. But, EDGE won't suck quite so badly, which we suppose is something.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1

Screw EDGE

Siemens shouldn't waste time and money trying to lift EDGE up into mediocrity. Let's get more out of HSDPA if anything...
wb6uqu

join:2001-01-27
Milpitas, CA

Why not upgrade?

For remote areas that will not see 3G for some time to come why not upgrade?

gattaca
Premium
join:2003-05-28
USA

Re: Why not upgrade?

said by wb6uqu:

For remote areas that will not see 3G for some time to come why not upgrade?
Agreed. Especially if the cost to implement these improvements to EDGE is much less than expanding 3G coverage. Not everyone wants to run out a buy a new phone when their carrier could make further improvements on their end.

Sircolby45

join:2005-11-26

Latency?

I wonder what kind of effects this will have on the latency? Is it still going to suck worse than dial-up or is it going to be half way decent?
--
Wildblue Pro Pack / Beam 40 / Laredo NOC / Windows Vista Home Premium

MrMaster
jetsetter
Premium
join:2000-12-16
St Thomas, VI
Reviews:
·Sprint Mobile Br..
·Virgin Mobile Br..

Will upgrading require new hardware

The article here assumes that the hardware only needs to be updated on the back end(or is it front end?)

Wouldn't we need new phones to also understand the new software?
--
One never notices what has been done; one can only see what remains to be done. -Marie Curie
jc100

join:2002-04-10

Re: Will upgrading require new hardware

Firmware update might solve that issue....

BigPete

@qwest.net
said by MrMaster:

The article here assumes that the hardware only needs to be updated on the back end(or is it front end?)

Wouldn't we need new phones to also understand the new software?
It appears to be only a software upgrade, not a hardware upgrade. In theory, carriers would be able to send out a software update to the phones that is able to support the higher data rates.

Fox McCloud
Crazy like a fox.

join:2006-07-23

hmm

This is interesting to hear...and if it is truly only a software upgrade, it could give AT&T a huge plus for "mobile broadband".

Now, if only someone would do something similar with 1xRTT.

wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY

As fast as EVDO..;..

I dont know what you are all complaining about. Assuming these speeds are actual instead of theoretical, EDGE will now be as fast as regular EVDO, which is what 99% of people (using CDMA based 3G) have right now anyway.
--
с новым годом

Monday, 04-Jun 22:40:02 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.