Sources: Comcast To Sever Involvement With PivotMemo obtained by BBR shows mutual decision to part ways... 09:15AM Wednesday Apr 23 2008 by Karl Bodetags: business · exclusive · wireless · cable · Comcast · Sprint Broadband DirectSources within Comcast tell us that the company has decided to stop offering Sprint Pivot wireless service to new and existing customers starting this week, though an official announcement has yet to be made. According to an internal Comcast announcement, Pivot customers should begin receiving an e-mail by the end of April or May offering them the option to transition to traditional Sprint phone service without an early termination fee. The Pivot brand is a coalition between Sprint, Cox, Time Warner Cable, Advance/Newhouse and Comcast that allowed cable customers to purchase rebranded wireless service. For $15-$25 (on top of a traditional Sprint mobile plan) the service provided cable customers mobile video content, email access and web browsing. But selling the system to consumers has been a real problem, and both Sprint and Comcast execs had been publicly airing complaints. Comcast's CEO admitted there was limited consumer interest, while Sprint complained that the cable operators weren't pushing the service very hard. Last November, any new expansion of the program was put on hold, and now it appears the idea could be facing a death blow. Comcast offered Pivot in select markets across Connecticut, Southern New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Portland, Oregon and Southwestern Washington State. According to insiders, Comcast hopes to have the migration finished by the end of the summer. What few Pivot customers there are will receive a "one month free promotion for monthly recurring voice and data plans," insiders tell us. Update: The Associated Press this afternoon reports that Cox and Time Warner Cable are also pulling out of the Pivot program. Related:- Comcast Xohm Deal Not Happening?
- Comcast WiMax Deal Could Come Next Week
- Comcast Considering 250GB Cap, Overage Fees
- Sprint Xohm, Clearwire To Merge, Create Ultra-WiMax Robot
- Comcast Begins Testing 'Protocol Agnostic' Network Management
- Comcast To Deploy Femtocells
- Comcast Promises WiMax Bundles
- Comcast WiMax Femtocells
|
  MattE Obama '08 Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC | Lower Price?
Do they get the lower price of the traditional Sprint plan, or will they be stuck paying the higher Pivot price? | |
|  |   Karl Bode News Guy join:2000-03-02 | Re: Lower Price? Lower Sprint price. They're essentially just becoming normal Sprint customers. | |
|  |  |   MattE Obama '08 Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
·Corporate Colocation
| Re: Lower Price? said by Karl Bode :Lower Sprint price. They're essentially just becoming normal Sprint customers. That's not a bad deal then. I'm surprised they are not trying to lock them into the higher Pivot price .... at least for the remainder of their contracts. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |   MattE Obama '08 Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
·Corporate Colocation
| Re: Lower Price? said by tc1uscg :said by MattE :said by Karl Bode :Lower Sprint price. They're essentially just becoming normal Sprint customers. That's not a bad deal then. I'm surprised they are not trying to lock them into the higher Pivot price .... at least for the remainder of their contracts. Why is that surprising? They are talking about Sprint, not VerizonW. The same Sprint that charged me an ETF to switch from Nextel to Sprint after the merger, but then sent me a refund check weeks later?
The same Sprint who refused to allow me to add another family line, even though my credit is perfect, and I was never late with Nextel nor Sprint?
I was very happy with my Sprint service and I still think my Samsung A900 was the best phone I ever owned, but their customer service policies are rancid. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |   HardwareGeek
join:2003-11-15 Brooklyn, NY | Re: Lower Price? My gf switched to sprint from Nextel 3 weeks after the merger and they didn't charge her an ETF and her contract was just 6 months old. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |   MattE Obama '08 Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
·Corporate Colocation
| Re: Lower Price? said by HardwareGeek :My gf switched to sprint from Nextel 3 weeks after the merger and they didn't charge her an ETF and her contract was just 6 months old. They do charge the ETF, but then refund it. You don't ever have to actually pay the ETF (as I later found out), but I went ahead and paid it as I didn't trust them to apply the credits properly.
They expect you to carry the ETF as a final bill with Nextel, until Sprint sends the check to Nextel. I told them to just send the check to me. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  hottboiinnc Kyle
join:2003-10-15 Toledo, OH | Re: Lower Price? after their merger i was allowed to change to Sprint from Nextel with no ETF. The only thing I had to do was wait 9 months on the Nextel side. If i didnt wait the 9months i would have been charged an ETF. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  hottboiinnc Kyle
join:2003-10-15 Toledo, OH
·buckeye cable
| Re: Lower Price? no i only had to be a Nextel customer for 9 months. 9months in after the contract i could transfer to Sprint without any problems. And did so. The only problem i had was with the outsourced service reps on the Sprint side. Which is why i left the company as a whole. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |   tc1uscg
join:2005-03-09 Saint Clair Shores, MI
·Comcast
·WOW Internet and C..
·VoiceEclipse
edit: April 24th, @01:13AM
| said by MattE :The same Sprint that charged me an ETF to switch from Nextel to Sprint after the merger, but then sent me a refund check weeks later? The same Sprint who refused to allow me to add another family line, even though my credit is perfect, and I was never late with Nextel nor Sprint? I was very happy with my Sprint service and I still think my Samsung A900 was the best phone I ever owned, but their customer service policies are rancid. yep.. wanna hear about my Comcast or AT&T billing problems that took a few months to resolve? How about my VoIP provider who "gave away" my phone number to someone else causing me to pull in the FCC and PUC to get it back, 2 months later? We all have tears to shed at the boo hoo party of bad customer service so you or Sprint don't hold the patent on such issues. I just got a email from Sprint saying my kids phone upgrade didn't qualify for a rebate because it was a "business provided discounted" phone (say what?). One call to customer service, they just credited my bill the 50 bucks. Before that, I emailed the rebate department asking WTF? But was going to take 72 hrs for a reply and I wanted answers NOW. So, after the 72hrs, a email stated they are processing my rebate. So, I end up with a free phone. When I told the rebate side of Sprint what happened (doing the right thing), they said that's ok, and they were sorry for my troubles. Enjoy my rebate. Sprint is just fine when I compare them to the other services I have. Credit card companies who keep calling trying to upsale you services to Chrysler calling you 6 months before your car's lease expires trying to get you to buy it, re-lease it, take it to your dealer early to get things fixed before the end of the lease.. blah blah blah. Sorry but have had the issues I've hand with other providers, some people are never happy, they go into the issue feet first without thinking and from I read, are ready to explode on impact before trying to fix it. Go check out some Verizon forums, they are as bad if not worse. Only difference is, VZW charges you more for your pain.. Been there too.  | |
|  |  DarkSly
join:2004-12-10 Danvers, MA | Customers can either migrate to a Sprint Account or Cancel service all together without having to pay an ETF.
Pivot hasn't really been sold since late November...this is old news. | |
|   PGHammer
join:2003-06-09 Accokeek, MD clubs:
·Comcast
| Why Pivot Flopped Pivot's biggest issue was the underlying Sprint PCS service could not compete heads-up with the existing cellular services (especially that from VZW or AT&T Mobility). AT&T Mobility has the iPhone (and wins on *cool factor* because of it), while VZW wins on network coverage. Even worse (for Pivot), both AT&T Mobility and VZW have a greater selection of lower-cost handsets (in addition to cheaper rates on services). So *why* would anyone choose Pivot over AT&T Mobility or VZW? | |
|  |  GujuGuy67
join:2003-07-28 Garland, TX
| Re: Why Pivot Flopped I suppose now the more appropriate question is, why would anyone choose Sprint over AT&T, Verizon, or T-Mobile...
AT&T has the iPhone "cool" factor. Verizon has the network. T-Mobile has amazing customer service.
The only thing that is really keeping Sprint afloat or rather keeping customers from defecting is the fact that they have ways of making you want to stay - discounts, free addons, etc... in combination with a plan that you may be on, it usually ends up being the best deal of the four. Take particular notice of SERO and their unlimited plan, which is inclusive of every service they have to offer - Blackberry, GPS, etc., etc... | |
|  |  disc
join:2005-12-31 Raleigh, NC
| said by PGHammer :Pivot's biggest issue was the underlying Sprint PCS service could not compete heads-up with the existing cellular services (especially that from VZW or AT&T Mobility). Are you suggesting that Pivot would have been successful if only VzW or AT&T Mobility were used instead? Dream on. Pivot was all about converged features, and simply put the converged services offered weren't compelling enough. Changing the carrier underneath it wouldn't have changed a thing.
They just needed to think a little bit more outside the box on the converged services offer. Maybe Unified Communications (premised on the wireless service) to the broadband home and/or to the TV would have been the ticket. | |
|  |  |   wifi4milez In Need Of Garbage Pail Kids 1st Series
join:2004-08-07 New York, NY
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| Re: Why Pivot Flopped said by disc :They just needed to think a little bit more outside the box on the converged services offer. Maybe Unified Communications (premised on the wireless service) to the broadband home and/or to the TV would have been the ticket. I think the real reason this failed is because they charged a premium ($15 to $20) for bundling in wireless service with your existing cable service. This was a complete disaster for a number of reasons. First, the so called "quad play", offering customers a discounted price on TV, phone, internet, and cell service is a pipe dream, and nobody wants it. Secondly (and the exact opposite), is that charging people MORE money to bundle in their cell service is the stupidest concept ever created.
Pivot could have made an impact if they offered a discount to customers who purchased the service. For instance, they could have offered customers the SERO rate given that they already had the cable services on their account. Unfortunately, they chose to not do this and thats why it failed. People will NEVER pay more money for less service, and this just proved that. -- Весна прибыла | |
|  |  |  |  |  hottboiinnc Kyle
join:2003-10-15 Toledo, OH | Sprint, VZW, and Alltel almost have the same size network. They're all partnered together for roaming. One's network is not the issue. It was the pricing for the most part. | |
|  |  |   wifi4milez In Need Of Garbage Pail Kids 1st Series
join:2004-08-07 New York, NY
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| Re: Why Pivot Flopped said by hottboiinnc :Sprint, VZW, and Alltel almost have the same size network. They're all partnered together for roaming. One's network is not the issue. It was the pricing for the most part. This had nothing to do with the network, and everything to do with the pricing model. -- Весна прибыла | |
|  |  |   PGHammer
join:2003-06-09 Accokeek, MD clubs: | VZW *has* no roaming charges (and with their network coverage, their customers have little reason to roam). You must mean Sprint and AllTel. | |
|  |  |  |   tc1uscg
join:2005-03-09 Saint Clair Shores, MI
·Comcast
·WOW Internet and C..
·VoiceEclipse
| Re: Why Pivot Flopped  said by PGHammer :VZW *has* no roaming charges (and with their network coverage, their customers have little reason to roam). You must mean Sprint and AllTel. Yeah, that must be what they mean . It also could be the reason why every summer at our boy scout summer camp session, mom's and dad's ask what service works in the areas we go to (between the 2 camps). It's always the same answer. Altel, Sprint and Nextel. If you have TM, AT&T, forget it though TRAC phones work ok. VZW, it's funny to see the boys walking in circles trying to get a signal during our allowed "communications period". At best, some get "roaming on enhanced network". Meanwhile I'm getting EVDO speed weax updates on my phone (Sanyo MM7500). That's why I've stayed with Sprint. Been to some backwoods areas so I'm not convinced that anyone can offer anything better, even at the same price . But if I was REALLY worried and wanted 100% coverage with no price restrictions, I'll just get a satellite phone.  | |
|  |  |  |  |  hottboiinnc Kyle
join:2003-10-15 Toledo, OH
·buckeye cable
| Re: Why Pivot Flopped Just because a cell provider doesnt charge roaming doesnt mean it won't. They can eat those. But VZW does roam with Sprint in Alltel. I don't know how you figure they never roam. I can tell you 1 city in MI (adrian) that VZW has on "extended network" better known as roaming. All companies eat roaming. Just some do not eat it in certain areas where they do not have roaming agreements for. | |
|   Jim Gurd Premium join:2000-07-08 Plymouth, MI | Pivot?
I'm a Comcast customer and never even heard of it. It seems like they did a very poor job of advertising this service. -- Calling an illegal alien an undocumented worker is like calling a crack dealer an unlicensed pharmacist. | |
|  |  |  |  |   klipko
join:2006-06-28 Portland, OR
·Verizon FIOS
·Comcast Digital Vo..
·Comcast
| Re: Pivot? said by bobjohnson :said by Jim Gurd :I'm a Comcast customer and never even heard of it. It seems like they did a very poor job of advertising this service. You're right.. Comcast didn't advertise pivot at all.. TW and bright house are really the only ones that advertise it.. Comcast getting rid of it is probably not much of a loss.. True. There was NO advertising on Pivot here in Portland from Comcast. I was only reminded about it one time when I walked into a Sprint Store. A small display with Pivot brochures. Nothing at Comcast's stores, kiosks, fliers within my bills (when I was a Comcast customer).
And that "overhead" price for the service...wtf? | |
|  |  |  |  Fibertekh
join:2008-03-18 Wakefield, RI
| Re: Pivot? Cox advertises it pretty heavily here in RI... but yes.. the model is horrific, and the as far as the wireless thing goes providers (at least the CDMA providers) DO have seperate networks, however also DO work together for roaming issues and should network problems occur, the other provider actually will allow others to use their wireless lines for service while the issue gets resolved. Think of it as helpful competition as oppose to healthy competition  | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  Fibertekh
join:2008-03-18 Wakefield, RI | Re: Pivot? even better... the svc was kind of a joke anyways.. just a way to >>TRY and break into the wireless market that already has enough provider selections to choose from... | |
|  | |  |
|
|