 brianiscool
join:2000-08-16
Miami, FL | Sprint What happened to you? You're going down hill | |
|
 | 
Sr Tech
Premium
join:2003-01-19
New Fairfield, CT | Re: Sprint All part of the plane to Kill Of Nextel or what ever is left of it in my opinion. All these agencies used Nextel and slowly they have been migrating off due to poor service. | |
|
| | jester121
Premium
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL | Re: Sprint None of the local governments I work for around here are migrating from Nextel, rather some are moving back to them. Municipalities have been known to strike deals to build towers on public land to ensure they have good coverage for employees. | |
|
| | |
Sr Tech
Premium
join:2003-01-19
New Fairfield, CT | Re: Sprint I know quit a few in my area hat are doing so, I cannot tell you who they are but it is happening. | |
|
| | | |
| fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20 | The government, being in bed with phone, learned a little something.. they learned to cherry pick their partners. | |
|
| axus
join:2001-06-18
Washington, DC | Didn't build enough locked rooms for the NSA to get the contract | |
|
| | 
batterup
I Can Not Tell A Lie.
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Netcong, NJ
clubs:
 ·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: Sprint said by axus  :Didn't build enough locked rooms for the NSA to get the contract Quest told the NSA no so you are wrong. | |
|
Cheese
Premium
join:2003-10-26
Naples, FL
clubs: | Sprint..... Well, it is the government after all, it's their choice  | |
|
tpac_man
join:2007-02-27
Riverbank, CA | Sprint, WTF are u doing! Man I gotta say Sprint is really screwin up lately...
They definitely need to get this shit straight. | |
|
| 
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Re: Sprint, WTF are u doing! yup...
Sprint's takeover of Nextel = loss of many customers
Sprint losing out of Gov't contract $$$
Lets see if that WiMAX lifeboat has any leaks.
Still waiting to see about Alltel sale as well. | |
|
| 
Siryak
join:2005-11-26 | How is this Sprint's fault? Also Sprint has 10x better coverage than Verizon or AT&T.
--
Wildblue Pro Pack / Beam 40 / Laredo NOC / Windows MCE SP2 | |
|
| | |
| | | |
| | | | 
SterlingJ85
Obama 2008
join:2000-11-19
Millville, NJ | Re: Sprint, WTF are u doing! Haha, that is not all Sprint's network.
That is Sprint's network + all their roaming providers!
The first map looks just like Sprint's own CDMA network coverage. | |
|
| | | | | 
cob_
1310nm Of Goodness
Premium
join:2003-07-08
Tulsa, OK | Re: Sprint, WTF are u doing! You might also consider that most other providers are in the same boat. Here, Verizon Wireless has fantastic coverage - but none of it is on their own towers.
MCI's failure of a venture into wireless was entirely Sprint's network. | |
|
| | | |
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | That link was from the same page 
Covering roaming partners in a dotted green as 'unknown signal' only when zoomed down to the street level is a little deceptive. | |
|
| | | | | 
Camelot One
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-21
Sarasota, FL
clubs:
| Re: Sprint, WTF are u doing! said by en102 :Covering roaming partners in a dotted green as 'unknown signal' only when zoomed down to the street level is a little deceptive. And my personal experience with Sprint coverage maps is that they took a page from the "FCC Broadband availability" book. If you can get a signal, even a weak one, anywhere in a given zip code, then they call that area covered.
--
AMD X2 4800+ @2700Mhz/ MSI K8N Neo 4 Platinum SLI/ 4x 1024Mb Corsair XMS PC4000/ WD 74Gb Raptor/ PNY 7800GTs SLI/ Antec 550 True Control/Custom water cooler | |
|
| | | fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
| Even if that map was the right one.. so? One can also say that this map is a population map. They have all the major population centers of the country. One could say they stay true and lean and provide service where it matters and not to the 1 horse towns.
When you look at the other's maps, you think the blobs of color equal a company owned tower? or one they have roaming agreements with as well where they include your available calling area?
At least Sprint doesn't cut you off for roaming too much like the others have. Cingular/american thieves & thugs, say one thing, mean another. Spring - upfront. So, if sprint is doing it wrong and loosing customers, then I'd rather be with the loosing ship. Just shows that most Americans don't care about the truth, rather, they want to be fed what they want to hear even if it's not true. For that reason alone, my attitude will never change.
--
"Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-reitchous and lazy ... those who also never take the time to point out a good fortune when the opportunity presents itself. It says a lot about one's moral character." - Unknown | |
|
| | | 
Albatross6
join:2000-12-22
Dallas, TX | Their coverage in Western Kansas is amazing. | |
|
| | | | bluedragon
join:2000-05-09
Hutchinson, KS
1 edit | Re: Sprint, WTF are u doing! The western Kansas coverage is not technically theirs. It is through the Sprint roaming alliance. 2 local carriers cover that area for Sprint. | |
|
| | | | |
Albatross6
join:2000-12-22
Dallas, TX | Re: Sprint, WTF are u doing! Does it matter? Does wheat need wireless? | |
|
| | | | | | bluedragon
join:2000-05-09
Hutchinson, KS | Re: Sprint, WTF are u doing! Probably not, but the cattle might.
Seriously though, you might be surprised how many farmers are using cell phones. There are areas it is miles between houses, and a cell phone is the only communication. | |
|
| | | | evoxfan
Waiting On Dsl Or Cable
join:2004-02-12
Daleville, AL
| said by Albatross6 :Their coverage in Western Kansas is amazing. Their home office is located in Kansas City!
--
WinXP_Home SP2, 1.8GHz P4, 512DDR, DW7000, SatMex5, 1090MHz, RSL~87, WRT54G v5.0, WGPS606 Printer Server. | |
|
| | 
bassthumpa
Premium
join:2000-12-26
Austin, TX
| said by Siryak :How is this Sprint's fault? Also Sprint has 10x better coverage than Verizon or AT&T. Somebody's been watching too many commercials.
--
Myspace | Yahoo! 360° | Blogspot | |
|
| | |
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Re: Sprint, WTF are u doing! Or somebody works for Sprint | |
|
| | 
NOCMan
Verizon Fios User
Premium
join:2004-09-30
Flower Mound, TX
| said by Siryak :How is this Sprint's fault? Also Sprint has 10x better coverage than Verizon or AT&T. Man I can't breath this is so funny.
--
Mac Chatter
»www.macchatter.net | |
|
| | 
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
| said by Siryak :How is this Sprint's fault? Also Sprint has 10x better coverage than Verizon or AT&T. Maybe because Sprint continues to lose money and execs faster than anybody else in a booming industry. Their proposal may not have met minimum standards for an ongoing company.
Turnover in the executive offices has also been high. Three key leaders jumped ship last year: onetime chairman and former Nextel chief Tom Donahue, strategy man Tom Kelly and operations head Len Lauer. Meanwhile, with its eroding customer base, falling long-distance and wholesale prices and weakening business services unit, Sprint managed to turn in four consecutive quarters of disappointing financial results last year. quote:
Maybe they are losing too much money on those "UNLIMITED" data plans everyone loves so much.
In January, after losing 306,000 postpaid mobile phone subscribers in the fourth quarter, the company lowered guidance and said it would fire 5,000 workers.
--
--
My BLOG
My Web Page | |
|
| | | |
| | | 
Jim Gurd
Premium
join:2000-07-08
Plymouth, MI | They need to bring back William Esrey. The company performed much better under his leadership. | |
|
| | |
| | |
See 7 replies to this post |
|
| | 
SteveCon
IBEW 2222 Boston, MA
Premium
join:2004-09-02
Burlington, MA
 ·Verizon FIOS
| said by Siryak :How is this Sprint's fault? Also Sprint has 10x better coverage than Verizon or AT&T. Really?? On what PLANET??
--
United we bargain, divided we beg. | |
|
| | |
Siryak
join:2005-11-26
 ·WildBlue
1 edit | Re: Sprint, WTF are u doing! said by SteveCon :said by Siryak :How is this Sprint's fault? Also Sprint has 10x better coverage than Verizon or AT&T. Really?? On what PLANET?? Ok first of all that map posted above is not a Sprint coverage map. Second of all Cingular or Verizon doesn't get within 70 miles of where I am at and Sprint covers it all over. 3rd most of Cingular and Verizon's coverage are roaming. 4th Sprint's EVDO coverage is FAR superior. Also to the guy saying they don't serve the boonies. You couldn't be more wrong. I am in such a small town I haft to drive 25 miles to get to a grocery store and I haft to use satellite internet because nothing else is available. I have coverage from Sprint. Guess who doesn't come within 70 miles of me? Cingular and Verizon. Actually Verizon doesn't even come that close.
--
Wildblue Pro Pack / Beam 40 / Laredo NOC / Windows MCE SP2 | |
|
| | | |
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
1 edit | Re: Sprint, WTF are u doing! Who said anything about EVDO ?
I don't have any concern over 3G data that I don't use. | |
|
| | | | |
Siryak
join:2005-11-26
·WildBlue
| Re: Sprint, WTF are u doing! said by en102 :Who said anything about EVDO ? I did.... 
--
Wildblue Pro Pack / Beam 40 / Laredo NOC / Windows MCE SP2 | |
|
| | | | | |
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Re: Sprint, WTF are u doing! Well, I can say that Sprint's iDEN blows chunks...
best I get is ~ -90dBm, coverage a few miles from me is non-existant (on the way to Costco no less), and the only place I get good service is at HomeDepot. | |
|
| | |
| | |
Siryak
join:2005-11-26
·WildBlue
| Re: Sprint, WTF are u doing! said by batterup :said by Siryak :How is this Sprint's fault? Also Sprint has 10x better coverage than Verizon or AT&T. No they don't. That is so obviously false where did you pull that from? Then prove me wrong...If you lay the evidence out in front of me I am not afraid to admit I was wrong. I have personally looked at the maps and from what I see Sprint appears to have the better coverage. In Texas Verizon's coverage is literally laughable. Then Sprint still beats Cingular here too. Also Sprint seems to have a denser coverage throughout the rest of the US.
--
Wildblue Pro Pack / Beam 40 / Laredo NOC / Windows MCE SP2 | |
|
| 
biggbrother
Premium
join:2001-11-07
Providence, RI
| I left Nextel after 2 years because of the Sprint takeover. I have a few friends who used to work for Nextel and still have collegues there. They are hearing that Sprint is not putting any money into the iDEN infratructure. They are simply letting it die.
As a result of the poor coverage, Nextel users are literally ruunning away. T-Mobile has been a huge beneficiary. That's where I went and couldn't be happier with my MDA Windows Mobile 5 phone.
--
"Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them." -- George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four.
| |
|
jslik
That just happened
Premium
join:2006-03-17
clubs:
| Well, the GSA needs help.... Glitch leaves reporters in lurch
»www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/t···,00.html
"Talk about getting your lines crossed.
Journalists hoping to learn from a Thursday teleconference the winners of the largest government telecommunications contract in history were accidentally left out of the loop for about 20 minutes due to a phone glitch." | |
|
justbits
More fiber than ATT can handle
Premium
join:2003-01-08
Chicago, IL | Merger coming In other news, Verizon, AT&T and Qwest announced that they are going to merge together for this opportunity so they can provide better service to the government. The new government contracted entity will be called "AT+T". | |
|
| 
nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy
| Re: Merger coming said by justbits :In other news, Verizon, AT&T and Qwest announced that they are going to merge together for this opportunity so they can provide better service to the government. The new government contracted entity will be called "AT+T". Which would cause Sprint to be automatically be put back in the picture, since the government contract requirements generally require that no one/single provider can control more than a certain percentage the overall gov't telecom picture.
--
Everyday, thousands of new cars are delivered to their new owners with poorly-selected radio station presets. | |
|
| |
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Re: Merger coming I suspect heavy lobbying from 'old Telco' didn't hurt the process. Since Sprint isn't a real telco anymore (Embarq is spun off), it has more in place with Cable than telco now. | |
|
| | |
nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA
·Cox HSI
·Speakeasy
| Re: Merger coming said by en102 :I suspect heavy lobbying from 'old Telco' didn't hurt the process. Since Sprint isn't a real telco anymore (Embarq is spun off), it has more in place with Cable than telco now. Well, United Telecom never really was part of the Bell System, so it's no wonder that it doesn't benefit from governmental largess in the same way that the Baby Bells do.
--
Everyday, thousands of new cars are delivered to their new owners with poorly-selected radio station presets. | |
|
| fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20 | Naaaa... att will eat up verizon first, qwest next, then sprint nextel in that order.. then it will end up as welcome to "the old at&t... |done!" | |
|
jgkolt
Premium
join:2004-02-21
Lakewood, OH
clubs: | sprint doesn't surprise me. Sprint needs to streamline and get back on track. I don't like sprint personally but they are becoming a weaker and weaker competitor.
--
www.LakeSemaJ.com | |
|
| 
brooklynman4
join:2004-09-07
Brooklyn, NY | Re: sprint They merged becuase both comapnies where going to fall so now there going to fall together. | |
|
BillRoland
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Ocala, FL
clubs:
·Cox HSI
| Not hard to believe Sprint hasn't really executed on anything in the last several years, no surprise that they didn't on this either.
The real question people should start asking is, with the loss of contract subscribers and government contracts, is there going to be enough money for a meaningful WiMAX deployment? I think Sprint is in more trouble than a lot of people want to admit, but that's for another topic.
--
"Don't steal. The government hates competition." | |
|
jjsk8r85
join:2005-02-17
Belleville, MI
| sprint and verizon are all the same nowadays... Sprint actually has the largest cdma network in the country, as verizon doesn't even own most of theirs. They are actually owned by specrasite/american towers inc.
Sprint phones will work anywhere verizon phones or alltel phone will work. The only difference is that sprint charges $5 for monthly "unlimited" roaming. However, sprint makes up for that by being much more leniant towards data usage than verizon. | |
|
|
en102
Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
1 edit | Re: sprint and verizon are all the same nowadays... Actually... doesn't that bragging right go to Alltel ?
As far as VZW goes with American Towers/Spectrasite... I think you mean the company that owns the physical site... not the gear. Co-location is more common than you think. | |
|
| 
PGHammer
join:2003-06-09
Accokeek, MD
clubs:
·Comcast
| Oh? Then why is it that Sprint has historically had issues in (of all places) metropolitan Las Vegas, Nevada (the linchpin of Embarq, post-spinoff) with their wireless service? True anecdote: I'm in Las Vegas for the Thanksgiving weekend, and me and my hotel roomie both have cell phones (he has Sprint, and I have VZW), and he needed to make a call (to another Sprint customer, incidentally). How come he had issues using his own Sprint cell phone, in Sprint's coverage area, and wound up using my VZW phone instead? (Even more hilarious, this is in 2005, so this was before the spinoff.)
While Sprint is more lenient toward DATA usage, that is not exactly a feature most non-business users choose a wireless carrier for. Most residential wireless users are looking for low-cost handsets, and then at coverage, and then at rates for that coverage. Cingular (now part of AT&T) has historically had the better handsets (mostly because of longer exclusive deals with Motorola for the RAZR and their progeny) and the best lower-end introductory rates; however, it's VZW that has the best coverage, and the best non-teaser voice rates (not to mention the best off-peak feature of any wireless carrier; specifically, unlimited night/weekend minutes). | |
|
radougherty
join:1999-07-23
Austin, TX
·RoadRunner Cable
| Don't forget good old land line services All the comments I see here are about wireless, which is probably a smaller part of the overall contract (the story link mentions private lines and secure e-mail). I've used network services from AT&T, MCI, BellSouth, SBC, QWest, UUNet, BBNPlanet, Savvis, Digex and Sprint (MPLS, PTP, frame relay, internet) for services and out of all three Sprint had to be the worst to work with. We ended up using them because the company that purchased us had a Sprint contract else we would have never picked them. | |
|
| 
Dread
Proud member of Scott's tots
Premium
join:2005-02-28
Bronx, NY | Re: Don't forget good old land line services Not a dumb move I think, they probably lose more by giving these guys "discounted service" | |
|
|
sephiroth_4
@geusnet.net
| I have both Cingular and Sprint Sprint does have the best network as data is 'clean' and voice is there not cutting in and out. Voice mails, missed calls, etc come in on time unlike my Cingular network activities. Cingular may have the lesser of 'dropped calls' but that's like it's mute when the call is static or hopping from network to network. I can't even begin to tell how many times that Cingular phones have made speakers go crazy because I'm hopping networks or getting a 2 day old voicemail. I don't know where people's bad experience are coming from...I get discounts, free phones, credits, etc all the time. Just call them up. Just recently I got some fees removed because my wife received a text message from one of those joke lines...no problem. I just wish everyone could have the same experiences (or admit to them) as I do with Sprint. | |
|
sephiroth4
@geusnet.net | The real reason is probably Sprint didn't want to conform to giving up information to the gov like AT&T protecting its customers. | |
|
Techman21
join:2005-04-14
Richmond, VA
| Did anyone actually read TFA? No where is cell service mentioned. So those of you complaining/arguing over such frivolous things should RTFA first.
This contract was for telecommunications in general. Meaning they get a poop load of cash to bring their stuff up to snuff. And yes cell service would be a part of that, but that is not the major aspect. They need to upgrade *everything*.
»www.gsa.gov/Portal/gsa/ep/conten···OVERVIEW
Personally I prefer Sprint over the machine that is Verizon. Verizon's customer service sucks to no end from what I understand. I get nothing but great service from Sprint at least the times I've called. I've dealt with Verizon thru my work and they are crappy when it comes to business solutions. | |
|
|
TTT1
@charter.com | Re: Did anyone actually read TFA? I'm really surprised they booted Sprint and not Qwest, Since Qwest doesn't have an international presence or POP's instead they have a partnership with Orange(Equant) | |
|
|
|
|
Sprint Left Out of Huge US Gov't Contract
