 clickie
join:2005-05-22 Monroe, MI
| Not On My Phone They Won't If someone wants to give up privacy in exchange for monetary consideration, I think that's their right to do that. But the second my phone company or ISP makes the unilateral decision that I *must* do that in order to be a customer, then I'm no longer a customer. I wish them luck in collecting the ETFs (if they'll even apply).
Creating opt-out methods, while possibly effective, doesn't work for me. Yet again this is an instance of corporate America and scumbag marketers hoping the public simply doesn't notice. I notice, and I think the highest value demographics notice and they'll do this at their own peril.
One reason this works in other countries is because they have a different payment structure. In some European countries, incoming calls are free because they're paid for by the calling party. The advertising makes carrying the phone and the attendant service very cheap or free. Here, the payment structure is to gouge the consumer as if wireless service is a luxury. | |
|
 |  openbox9
join:2004-01-26 Navarre, FL
·AT&T Southeast
·Mediacom
| Re: Not On My Phone They Won't said by clickie :I notice, and I think the highest value demographics notice and they'll do this at their own peril. What makes you say that? I would think that most teens and twenty-somethings are used to being plastered with ads and won't much care.said by clickie :incoming calls are free because they're paid for by the calling party. As well they should be in the US as well, but I'm guessing mobile network providers will transition to flat-rate billing before they'll re-wicker their billing systems to handle billing only the caller.said by clickie :as if wireless service is a luxury. It is. | |
|
 |  |  EPS
join:2008-02-13 Hingham, MA
| Re: Not On My Phone They Won't The problem with caller-only billing is landlines. I have unlimited local calling, and my cell-phone is registered to my area code and local calling area.
In Europe and other places, landline to mobile phones usually carries higher charges, and are never a local call.
Of course, possibly Verizon could introduce free inter-network calling between its cellular and landline customers, but that would still exclude everyone on other carriers in the local calling area- and what of ILECs that don't have a wireless subsidiary? | |
|
  TMMerlin The Devil made me do it
join:2003-06-19 Oxford, MI
·EarthLink
| Customers need to "change there lifestyle back to normal" If customers just use the "damn phone for a phone" all this crap goes away ! However, if one insists on songs, games, GPS, email, Internet browsing and pic exchange .. then the customer is left wide open to abuse by the carriers.
Sprint just "hates to love me" .. $30/mo and virtually unlimited usage ..My V3M produces crystal clear calls when I need it. Oh ..my unlimited starts at 7 PM inside that $30/mo and free roaming.
Oh well .. my laptop does great for all of the above except phone calls.
LMAO -- Some people hear their own inner voices with great clearness and they live by what they hear. Such people become crazy but they become legend. | |
|
 userBeavis
join:2004-01-31 Pleasant Hill, MO
| nail in the coffin I've been a Sprint PCS customer for over 10yrs but I'll drop those suckers in a heartbeat with the first unsolicited ad I receive!
We need a national "leave me the F**K alone" registry. Nearly every quantifiable aspect of my life is under constant collection, usage and scrutiny. I'm getting tired of trying to keep up with all of it...who has time to analyze every privacy policy they receive? | |
|
 |   tc1uscg
join:2005-03-09 Saint Clair Shores, MI
·Comcast
·WOW Internet and C..
·VoiceEclipse
| Re: nail in the coffin said by userBeavis :I've been a Sprint PCS customer for over 10yrs but I'll drop those suckers in a heartbeat with the first unsolicited ad I receive! We need a national "leave me the F**K alone" registry. Nearly every quantifiable aspect of my life is under constant collection, usage and scrutiny. I'm getting tired of trying to keep up with all of it...who has time to analyze every privacy policy they receive? Your too funny. Go to someone else.. They all will do it now.. So, guess, good luck?  | |
|
  pnh102 Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty Premium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD | Wrong Con
Privacy Concerns?
I would say a much worse con would be you having to pay to receive the ads, as we now do with cable TV. -- This isn't fair! I was only supposed to hate just ONE presidential candidate! | |
|
  Skeedatl Ah, push it - push it real good Premium join:2007-12-26 The Cloud | Brahhhhhhhh ha ha ha...brahhhhhhh ha ha ha ha quote: ...the potential for a reduced phone bill...
Thanks for the belly laughs. | |
|
 |  Kearnstd Elf Wizard
join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ
| Re: Brahhhhhhhh ha ha ha...brahhhhhhh ha ha ha ha reduced monthly rate is what they mean. you still get hit for the SMS fees and Data usage that goes up with the delivery of said ads. so they make more money but on TV they can say its cheaper per month(taxes and fees may apply).... -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
 |  |
 |  |   Skeedatl Ah, push it - push it real good Premium join:2007-12-26 The Cloud | Re: Brahhhhhhhh ha ha ha...brahhhhhhh ha ha ha ha Uh huh. | |
|
 mrkag
join:2007-01-22 Kensington, MD
| Sprint coverage Perhaps Sprint should focus on expanding their network, instead of annoying their customers.
I carry a Sprint BlackBerry for work and a Verizon Treo for personal use. It's amazing the places where I get 0 bars on the Sprint, and get half, or even full, bars on the Verizon. | |
|
  AllenHarkleroad
@frontiernet.net moderated: July 12th, @09:22PM
| Sprint Sprint [mod edit --- fatness --- rest of the message removed, and removed in multiple other places you've been spamming your site and copy/paste text] | |
|
 |  vannyx Premium join:2003-07-07 Bronx, NY
| Re: Sprint Man anywhere i see a story about sprint. i see all these negative customer complaints. But once being a reseller of sprint,verizon and att, ive had to deal with alot of customer complaints. Across the board its the same things. the number one complaint with sprint was customer service issues. But never really any service or courage issues. But then again i was working in Westchester NY. Verizon got the least amount of complaints but ATT with its more bars in more places got the most service complaints, about as much bill complaints as sprint. I had one customer who canceled his ATT service, they held on to his deposit about 1000 bucks for almost 4 months after. We always called billing and get transferred 20 times. It was crazy. So why dont i see the same posts for ATT ( lets not get started on tmobile). Why is in in style now to just bash one company ? | |
|
 |  birdfeedr Premium join:2001-08-11 Warwick, RI | Frontier must love you.
"74.43.133.251 www.sprint-really-sucks.com Host unreachable" | |
|
 |   fcisler Premium join:2004-06-14 Riverhead, NY
| you've posted this once (or more) before and been called out.
Sprint didn't screw you out of a dime. Stop claiming they did.
You signed a contract and agreed to pay the price. Was it expensive? Yes! But you didn't do your homework and shop around beforehand. That's your fault, not sprints.
I'll equate it to leasing a honda versus a porsche. In your scenario, they both got you point a to point b (internet) and were able to do 65 mph (3mbit) - but for whatever reason, you chose the porsche.
You being an idiot does NOT equal sprint screwing you. Now if you had PROOF (and not the phone company telling you) and i mean like an internal sprint memo showing what sprint was charged - then MAYBE, just maybe you would have a case.....but your stupidity does not count as sprint screwing you. | |
|
 |  DarnellP
join:2004-10-12 Las Vegas, NV | Mr. Harkleroad,
Please get a life ASAP! That is all. | |
|
 |  EPS
join:2008-02-13 Hingham, MA | I think we get it by now- you don't need to post this on EVERY SPRINT-RELATED COMMENT SECTION ON THE INTERNET...
Seriously, what do you do, just search "Sprint" in Google News and reply to every single article where you can? | |
|
 voipdabbler
join:2006-04-27 Kalispell, MT
| This model may die soon in Europe. This model may well die in Europe, too, if the EU press reports are correct about EU regulators approving US-style billing for all services, both incoming and outgoing. Apparently, EU regulators are seriously considering allowing US-style billing to avoid raising rates again. If approved, expect EU regulators to limit any advertising that isn't paid 100% by the advertiser/cellular company. (Poor EU consumers if the billing change is approved, this action may temporarily delay a rate-hike for the time being, but more will be coming down the road, plus the EU consumer will begin paying for incoming calls and txting for the first time. It's a lose-lose situation for consumers there.) | |
|
 |
|
 |