Sprint Officially Launches LTE in Another 22 Markets
Or, More Accurately, Parts of 22 New Markets
writes in to direct our attention to the fact that Sprint has announced
that they've launched LTE service in another twenty two new markets, including Miami, New Orleans, Raleigh, North Carolina, and Tampa, Florida. As always the usual Sprint launch caveats apply: many users had seen signal in these locations for some time as Sprint brings signals online for testing well before a commercial launch. Said launches aren't always what you'd call comprehensive
either; only around 40% of towers have been LTE approved in the Miami launch market. The launches bring Sprint's LTE market total to 110. The company aims to offer LTE to 200 million people by the end of this year.
said by sprint user :The Airrave comes from the factory with a .75mb upload cap as default. They have you install it ahead of your router...
If what everyone is worried about is speed learn to turn on wi-fi. I pick up free wi-fi from fast food restaurants, coffee shop's and even most malls and department stores. Also when at home with low signal call and ask about sprints femto cell connect to your high speed internet and you are good to go.
You have to log into it web interface and uncheck QOS protocols. Sprint or the manual made no mention of this.
I've had 2 Airrave femtocells kill themselves now. Both were hooked up to my racks voltage regulater and battery backup. When it works, it does a decent job. But its still a crap shoot.
Sprint said 4g wimax was available in detroit back when i signed up 1.7 years ago. It turns out they only had 1 tower in the whole city equipped to this day. I have no faith in a large city wide roll out of LTE. Its all PR and lies.
I have an S2 from sprint in the metro detroit area.
download rate off of the speed test app averages about 8kb. Thats driving from north of the city, all the way past down river along I94 and I75.
It timeouts when passing through downtown Detroit. Worst decision ever to go to sprint 1.7 years ago. 3 more months and I am back at VZW. My wallet will be raped every month, but at least I will have service. (my work iphone4s on vzw does great around metro Detroit)
Re: T-Mobile 3G Faster Than Sprint 4G LTE
said by josephf:Yes, if you're in one of the areas that Tmobile covers with HSPA. Otherwise, you're on EDGE.
25Mbps is a rare occurrence on Sprint, even though it can happen. Most places you will not get anywhere remotely close to that speed with Sprint.
With T-Mobile 3G HSPA+ you can routinely get significantly faster speeds than Sprint in the real world.
Credit where credit is due, Sprint is upgrading all (well, 99 percent) of their towers with LTE, and they're refarming their old 800 IDEN frequency as well. I think the initial use for 800 will be 1x, but eventually it will be used for LTE once the handsets become available.
Up in the bay area, I have gotten 25/8 with -106 while driving down the freeway, too.
Re: T-Mobile 3G Faster Than Sprint 4G LTE
said by josephf:And if you want to talk about the present, if you're not on Tmobile HSPA right now, you'll probably never get LTE.
If you want to talk about the future rather than the present, T-Mobile's LTE is faster than Sprint's LTE in the real world.
Re: flip a switch ?
said by xenophon:800mhz 1x is already broadcasting from some NV towers, but that is going to become the norm once iden is completely shut down.
iDen will be shut down end of this month. Some sources say 800Mhz voice/1x will be turned on starting in July but not all at once, which most recent phones can receive. Is not clear if 800 LTE will be turned on at same time or soon after when 800Mhz LTE phones are released sometime this year.
800 LTE is a different animal, of course. I'm not sure if there will need to be additional equipment installed for that or not. New handsets, of course.
New York, NY
| Okay, riddle me this, racing fans. Currently I'm in midtown Manhattan, and I receive Sprint LTE. The signal strength is perfectly decent, 60% on my Tri-Fi, which is four out of six bars. In addition, the upload speed is actually ABOVE the maximum spec of 3mbps, running around 7 mbps. But the download speed? Miserable!! Take a look:|
Meanwhile I'm picking up the WiMax perfectly fine with the Tri-Fi, with speeds smack dab in the middle of Sprint's average claimed specs for the service:
WiMax with faster download than LTE?? What's going on???
What makes this even weirder is that LTE does not have a large user load in NYC, so that is almost certainly NOT the explanation. But then what is??
So, at the moment, I'm using WiMax for most of my surfing and stream-playing, but whenever I have to upload something really large to my cloud I'm switching to LTE. Rather awkward and annoying. Just look at the LTE spec sheet under the Speeds tab at shop2.sprint.com/en/shop/why_sprint/4g/4g_lte_plan_details.html#tab_where?INTNAV=NET:MS:013113:4GLTE . Sprint indicates there that LTE download speeds should run roughly three times as fast as upload speeds. In my case, with 7mbps on my download side, that should be translating to about 21mbps download speed, which is consistent with what others are reporting in LTE areas where there is not yet a large user base. And yet I'm obviously getting nothing anywhere close to that; in fact I'm getting roughly a tenth of that; and I'm really stumped as to why.
said by supertbone:eHRPD? What's that? When eHRPD, whatever that is, is fully implemented, will the 3G specs change? At the moment, according to Sprint's specs, 3G minimum download should be 600kbps and minimum upload should be 350kbps. Will they be rolling out new 3G specs after eHRPD?
3G speeds have improved a little recently when they turned on eHRPD.
Re: I was finally was able to use LTE
said by criggs:I saw this happen in downtown Kansas City several months ago. LTE was running 8/2-3mbps for some of the time, and then dropped to .25-1/1-3mbps part of the time. This was with great LTE signal on a Galaxy Nexus. Wimax signal wasn't nearly as good on my Evo 4G, but I got a fairly stable 4/1mbps. The dropoffs in LTE speed seemed to be at random, and certainly didn't correlate with the number of users--I was there on a weekend during a snowstorm, and downtown was dead!
Okay, riddle me this, racing fans. Currently I'm in midtown Manhattan, and I receive Sprint LTE. The signal strength is perfectly decent, 60% on my Tri-Fi, which is four out of six bars. In addition, the upload speed is actually ABOVE the maximum spec of 3mbps, running around 7 mbps. But the download speed? Miserable!! Take a look:
"thats what i need, a digi cam for when i need to take pictures. im not going to go around taking photos and stuff." Julio
New York, NY
| How about this for a possible explanation.|
As previously indicated, I'm in midtown Manhattan, and my zip is 10022. If you take a look at the Sensorly Sprint 4G LTE coverage map for 10022 at »www.sensorly.com/map/4G/US/USA/S···#q=10022 , you will see that, while coverage is spotty, ranging, on a scale of 1 to 4, from 1 to 4 bars, that zip code essentially has LTE coverage now.
But if you look at the official Sprint map for the same location, at »coverage.sprint.com/IMPACT.jsp?q···ge%20map , you will see that Sprint is reporting coverage in that area ONLY from 3G and WiMax!
So here's my theory, and I am not a technical expert, so I'd be curious to know whether this theory is technically possible. Is it possible that the 'LTE' service in my area is, in fact, using the WiMax service and is merely grabbing it and rerouting it through the LTE network? This might also explain the fact that, while I'm getting the standard 1.5 mbps cap on the upload side when connected to WiMax, I'm NOT getting that same cap when switching to my area's 'LTE' service. (Obviously this message is largely relevant to those who are familiar with both LTE's and WiMax's technical specs and also aware of the WiMax 1.5m upload cap; it won't make much sense to anyone else.)
In addition, this also could explain why my upload speed is faster than my download speed. WiMax uploads, since their speeds are capped, are far less crowded and thus far more stable than WiMax downloads. Because of that, my 'LTE' back-door access to the WiMax network is giving me uncapped and blazingly fast uploads even as my download speed is pretty much identical to my WiMax connection.
By way of documentation, here's what I'm currently getting on my LTE connection:
And here's what I'm currently getting on my WiMax connection:
My LTE signal strength is now 100%, six bars out of six, with a signal strength of -81 dBm and a CINR of 12. My WiMax signal strength is 80%, five bars out of six, with a signal strength of -58 dBm and a CINR of 10. Maybe that will help some of you figure out what might be going on.