  cpayne5
join:2004-01-06 Amissville, VA | Latency Latency should also be mentioned here, as it is a large piece of the Rev A upgrade. It should drop to below 100ms. -- Hail To The Redskins | |
|
 |  ccoggle
join:2001-08-06 Salt Lake City, UT | Re: Latency Has anyone actually seen a deployment schedule for rev A? | |
|
 |   Karl Bode News Guy join:2000-03-02 | Thanks, added. | |
|
 |   cpayne5
join:2004-01-06 Amissville, VA
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| Here's a pic showing the type of latency improvement Rev A brings. -- Hail To The Redskins | |
|
 |  |   Jon Geb Wal-Mart Sucks
join:2001-01-09 Novi, MI | Re: Latency Wow, I'm very impressed. I might replace my current internet connection with this. | |
|
 |  |  |
 |   rawgerz In Debt we trust Premium join:2004-10-03 Grove City, PA | Who knows why latencies are so high? 100Ms is much better compared to 200-500ms spikes. | |
|
 |   rachelsfx
join:2004-09-27 Pensacola, FL
·Cox HSI
| A friend managed to download 165 gigs over VZ and 125 gigs over Sprint on his biz accounts with EVDO.
Unlimited is unlimited.
He called VZ and he told them, "I have 12 cellphones with my biz account. If you cancel my service, I'll go with T-Mobile."
"But, sir, that is a $2400 liquated damage charge."
"So? I pay $5k a month already. What's $2400?"
This guy managed to even negotiate a discount on his 12 cells for his biz with some manager that dropped his bill about $1k a month. | |
|
 |   Jon Geb Wal-Mart Sucks
join:2001-01-09 Novi, MI | I got the service today. Speeds are 600-1300kps with latecy around 150ms to google.com.
Very impressed. Its my primary service now. | |
|
 |  |   rawgerz In Debt we trust Premium join:2004-10-03 Grove City, PA | Re: Latency If the average ping is 150 I'm not so impressed, 80-110 would sway me into buying. but maybe it changes with different towers -- "Hows your French toast?" "Smelly and ungrateful, but this AMERICAN toast is great!" | |
|
 |  |  |   Jon Geb Wal-Mart Sucks
join:2001-01-09 Novi, MI | Re: Latency Works good with EQ2 and WOW. | |
|
 |  |  |   Jon Geb Wal-Mart Sucks
join:2001-01-09 Novi, MI | Are you still on dialup? Many cable connections still get around 100ms pings. | |
|
 |  |  |  |   rawgerz In Debt we trust Premium join:2004-10-03 Grove City, PA | Re: Latency Yup since cable is 2 miles down the road (but it's 20ms pings). And the towers around here are only GSM last I checked. -- "Hows your French toast?" "Smelly and ungrateful, but this AMERICAN toast is great!" | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |   Jon Geb Wal-Mart Sucks
join:2001-01-09 Novi, MI | Re: Latency Once Rev A is launched completely by mid 07' pings will be around 50ms. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |   rawgerz In Debt we trust Premium join:2004-10-03 Grove City, PA
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| Re: Latency I called Sprint today and they said that my area is still PCS, or 144kbps but had a note at the bottom saying service should be EVDO by the end of this year. So looks like it's still a waiting game. -- "Hows your French toast?" "Smelly and ungrateful, but this AMERICAN toast is great!" | |
|
  Michieru zzz zzz zzz Premium join:2005-01-28 Miami, FL
·Speakeasy
| nice This card would obviously have to sport a usb 2.0 port. Looking at the bars in the picture of the article he only had one bar and still got pretty fair speeds. I would like to see how much it is with full bars. If the USB does not become a bottleneck for the bandwidth coming in.
As for deployment of REV A. I believe it's by the end of the year since they have accelerated it.
Here is that article >> »www2.sprint.com/mr/news_dtl.do?id=12900 | |
|
 |   inteller Sociopaths always win.
join:2003-12-08 Tulsa, OK
·Cingular Wireless
| Re: nice said by Michieru :This card would obviously have to sport a usb 2.0 port. no it wouldn't. USB 1.0 is 12Mbps max and the max throughput you are going to see is only 3.1mbps, but you'll get more like 700kbps so 1.0 could handle it just fine. However, 2.0 interfaces are so plentiful now they would probably only do 2.0 -- "WHEN THE LAUGH TRACK STARTS THEN THE FUN STARTS!" | |
|
 |  |   Michieru zzz zzz zzz Premium join:2005-01-28 Miami, FL | Re: nice Well I been reading comments that USB 2.0 has 480mbps max transfer but in real world results you only see 48mbps max. So I would assume the same would apply to usb 1.0.
That's why I thought it should obviously sport a usb 2.0 port. | |
|
 |  |  |   inteller Sociopaths always win.
join:2003-12-08 Tulsa, OK
·Cingular Wireless
| Re: nice clever hiding of numbers. if you only see a tenth of the bandwidth you'd still see 1.2mbps which is a LOT more than you'll be averaging with this card. People think they are going to see 3.1mbps but lets not kid ourselves. You'd have to be the only one on that tower in perfect conditions. -- "WHEN THE LAUGH TRACK STARTS THEN THE FUN STARTS!" | |
|
 |  |  |  |   Michieru zzz zzz zzz Premium join:2005-01-28 Miami, FL | Re: nice Obviously but at the same time you won't want to have any bottle necks either. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |   inteller Sociopaths always win.
join:2003-12-08 Tulsa, OK | Re: nice i don't think your USB mouse and keyboard are going to cause any bottlenecks. Your flash memory reader wont either. -- "WHEN THE LAUGH TRACK STARTS THEN THE FUN STARTS!" | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |   Michieru zzz zzz zzz Premium join:2005-01-28 Miami, FL | Re: nice You don't seem to understand what I am saying.
If you are in a location that you can get higher than 1.2mbps you obviously would never benefit from those speeds because of the bottleneck transfer through usb. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |   cwy1980 Premium join:2004-08-10 New London, CT clubs:
| Re: nice After reading this thread I am not sure where you are getting your math at. The USB 1.1 supported max transfer (aka Full Speed USB) is 12Mbps.
The max transfer speed sprint thinks users will hit is only 3.1 Mbps...just over a quarter of the available bandwidth provided by a Full Speed USB device. There should be NO problem at all for USB 1.1 compliant devices to be able to handle EVDO-A implementations.
However, I think it will probably come as a USB 2.0 device just because that future-proofs it a little better. -- Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy | |
|
 |  Semi75
join:2006-01-03 Waddy, KY | While this device is sorely needed and long past due it still is not Rev A compatible so if you are lucky enough to get the upgrade in the next few months new equipment will be needed. | |
|
 ricep5 Premium join:2000-08-07 Jacksonville, FL | The current cards use USB already I just trialed the Sprint Novatel EVDO PC card and when you insert it in XP it reports as a "USB Controller" first, then as a "Serial Communications Device" so the fact they have an external version is not all that surprising. | |
|
 |   jaxdomino
join:2001-12-01 Jacksonville, FL | Re: The current cards use USB already USB IS a serial interface. USB = Universal Serial Bus. | |
|
 |  |  ricep5 Premium join:2000-08-07 Jacksonville, FL
·Comcast Formerly ..
·AT&T CallVantage
·AT&T Southeast
| Re: The current cards use USB already said by jaxdomino :USB IS a serial interface. USB = Universal Serial Bus. Serial Communications Device = a modem, in this case it set up a COM port.
Not all USB devices are modems.
I was pointing out that the PC Cards are already using an internal USB interface, so having an external USB interface is not a big reach. | |
|
 |  |  |   jaxdomino
join:2001-12-01 Jacksonville, FL
·Axvoice
| Re: The current cards use USB already Actually all serial devices communicate. They don't have to be modems. You are correct that all USB devices are modems, but all serial devices do communicate. It is a communications bus. Sorry, just the network admin in me came out, since I do this for a living. Not trying to dog you, just wanted to make sure no one got confused reading your post. | |
|
  inteller Sociopaths always win.
join:2003-12-08 Tulsa, OK | Who gives a crap anyways..... Cingular's HSDPA is blowing away anything Sprint and verizon can offer.
but don't take my word for it.
»/mspeed?results=1 -- "WHEN THE LAUGH TRACK STARTS THEN THE FUN STARTS!" | |
|
 |   Michieru zzz zzz zzz Premium join:2005-01-28 Miami, FL | Re: Who gives a crap anyways..... HSDPA won't last long with what Sprint-Nextel has under there sleeve. | |
|
 |  |   inteller Sociopaths always win.
join:2003-12-08 Tulsa, OK
·Cingular Wireless
| Re: Who gives a crap anyways..... oh do pray tell, what does the redneck bastard offspring SexTel have up its sleeve? WiMAX? give me a break. The upgrade path is everyone is going to WCDMA because Qualcomm says so. CDMA2000 is dead and so is GSM. Qualcomm bought Flarion and you will see the FlashOFDM technology used in WCDMA2billion or whatever the f-. -- "WHEN THE LAUGH TRACK STARTS THEN THE FUN STARTS!" | |
|
 |  |  |   Michieru zzz zzz zzz Premium join:2005-01-28 Miami, FL
·Speakeasy
| Re: Who gives a crap anyways..... Although I don't know exactly the technology being used. Wimax can deliver speeds up to 70Mbps unlike FlashOFDM delivers 3mbps.
Although I did read that FlashOFDM can reach speeds of 54mbps it still does not reach the speed WiMax does and as both technologies continue to improve in the future maybe then we would compare.
The only advantage I see with HSDPA is that it's a software install and can run on current tower equipment.
By the way what's up with the redneck bastard comment it sounds like you have a grudge against them. | |
|
 |  |  |  |   rawgerz In Debt we trust Premium join:2004-10-03 Grove City, PA
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
| Re: Who gives a crap anyways..... said by Michieru :Although I don't know exactly the technology being used. Wimax can deliver speeds up to 70Mbps unlike FlashOFDM delivers 3mbps. Sure, on paper only. Just like how 802.11B has rates up to 11Mbps, but only delivers as much as 5.5  -- "Hows your French toast?" "Smelly and ungrateful, but this AMERICAN toast is great!" | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |   Michieru zzz zzz zzz Premium join:2005-01-28 Miami, FL
·Speakeasy
| Re: Who gives a crap anyways..... Actually 802.11B I was only able to get at max 300KB/sec while transferring between wireless to LAN. So I think it's much less than that. Unlike 802.11G which says 54Mbps but you only see 3.0MB/sec.
So if anything the max I would at least expect from WiMax is around 6-10MB/sec. With FlashOFDM lower I would assume at around 3-7MB/sec. But those are guesstimates obviously. | |
|
 |
|
 |