 |
 |  |
 |  |   tiger72 SexaT duorP Premium join:2001-03-28 Kansas City, MO clubs: | Re: Rhode Island? if it's not a typo, their results are wayyy off and they need to re-examine their data. | |
|
 |  |  |   amarryat Verizon FiOS
join:2005-05-02 Marshfield, MA
| Re: Rhode Island? said by tiger72 :if it's not a typo, their results are wayyy off and they need to re-examine their data. How do you figure? | |
|
 |  |  |  |   Vamp 5c077 Premium join:2003-01-28 MD
·Verizon FIOS
| Re: Rhode Island? said by amarryat :said by tiger72 :if it's not a typo, their results are wayyy off and they need to re-examine their data. How do you figure? So you fall into the 80+ (over 90+ for MA) percent of people that have OVER 256mbps??
 -- 15/15 FIOS || MSN Msgr: scott001^gmail_com | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |   amarryat Verizon FiOS
join:2005-05-02 Marshfield, MA
edit: May 30th, @07:13AM
| Re: Rhode Island? One chart is showing % of connections over 5mbit, and the other is showing % of connections below 256kbit. Makes sense to me. I guess the m versus the k in 256? I glossed right over that. I guess if that was not a typo, then all those percentages should be about 100! | |
|
 |  damox Premium join:2002-01-07 Olympia, WA
·Comcast Formerly ..
| What's surprising is that New Jersey which has a higher population density than Rhode Island (2nd in the US) and has the second highest median income of all fifty states, is not even in the top ten for fastest broadband connected states! -- DAMOX Proud to be a member of Team Discovery | |
|
 |  |   dennismurphy Put me on hold? I'll put YOU on hold Premium join:2002-11-19 Parsippany, NJ
·Optimum Online
| Re: Rhode Island? said by damox :What's surprising is that New Jersey which has a higher population density than Rhode Island (2nd in the US) and has the second highest median income of all fifty states, is not even in the top ten for fastest broadband connected states! .... not all that surprising, believe it or not.
While parts of NJ are incredibly densely packed (here's looking at you Hoboken), there's still a bunch of farmland and forestry. There are still parts of NJ where high speed broadband tops out at 1.5mbit -- or worse.
Surprising, I guess, because Cablevision covers most of NJ, and they offer 15mbit as a standard package with their Optimum Online service. | |
|
 |  |  |  |
  jbgroup1 Undercover Brother Premium join:2000-05-04 Beltsville, MD | Curious How is the District of Columbia in both lists? | |
|
 |   tenpin784 I Went To The Dark Side?
join:2001-03-30 New Durham, NH
·Metrocast Communic..
| Re: Curious said by jbgroup1 :How is the District of Columbia in both lists? Cause it can have both 27% faster then 5mb, yet 17% slower then 256K.
Thats only 44% of the population, which falls between 256k and 5mb (if they have interwebs) | |
|
 |  axus
join:2001-06-18 Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Cox HSI
edit: May 29th, @11:11AM
| DC is pretty well split between its 4 corners: SE NE NW SW. It's more of an east/west dichotomy but that's the general outline. Southeast DC is very poor, lots of crime, and a general crappy place to be. Northeast/middle is more middle class, and has sporadic availability of services. Parts of northeast approach southeast, though. Central and West are expensive and rich. No FiOS though, even though the Verizon Center is close to all that!
So, the poor and under-served go with dialup. The rich will get the most expensive option available. All that money spent on lobbyists has to go somewhere! | |
|
 |  |   whfsdude Premium join:2003-04-05 Washington, DC | Re: Curious Also lots of DC cannot be served by RCN like Northwest as RCN does not have the right-of-way to dig up the streets in historic neighborhoods (eg. Capitol Hill). | |
|
 |  |  |   FiL Premium join:2005-08-16 Silver Spring, MD | Re: Curious When I lived at the Woodner in Columbia Heights, DC, the enire 1500 units were RCN. They've got a biggg lock on NW. | |
|
  Archivis Your Daddy Premium join:2001-11-26 Earth | Who cares Honestly. | |
|
 |   CoxCable4 banned from most servers for cheating
join:2002-10-02 PwnZone | Re: Who cares these stats are important. they re-affirm that the mid-atlantic and new england are the smartest, most well connected states.
everyone else can go pick our f'in cotton | |
|
 |
 |   TK Junk Mail Go ahead, make my day Premium join:2002-03-03 Margate City, NJ clubs: | Re: Michigan said by Mommy52062 :
Where is Michigan They only list the top and bottom states in the report. Nothing in the middle. | |
|
 |  |
 |
 |   chd176
join:2003-01-10 Winfield, AL | Re: PDF report attached I'm suprized that Alabama isn't on the list for the slowest. That's kinda odd. -- 10,000/768 CenturyTel PPPoE DSL line (really 5,000/768 ) | |
|
 |  |   agb
| Re: PDF report attached It only calculates from % on line. So, Alabama people who do go on-line have good connection. So, it could be just those 10 people all have fast connections  | |
|
  Skeedatl Ah, push it - push it real good Premium join:2007-12-26 The Cloud edit: May 29th, @11:29AM
| Pointless statistics There are plenty who choose price over speed and went for the dirt cheap $15-$20 DSL or Cable lite offerings.
These stats don't tell anything other than who is the up-sell juggernaut. | |
|
 |  bogey780
join:2004-03-19 Covington, LA | Re: Pointless statistics I agree. It should be what is available to them. Youcan't make someone choose a >2Mb/s connection. | |
|
 |  openbox9
join:2004-01-26 Navarre, FL
·AT&T Southeast
·Mediacom
| Bingo. And that's a key point that comes up every time the "I hate this country and we're a third world nation" individuals begin complaining. A majority of consumers simply don't care about throughput. They want to be able to e-mail their family, check their bank account, and surf some good porn. Of which, the $15-20 DSL or cable lite offerings are more than sufficient. | |
|
 EPS
join:2008-02-13 Hingham, MA | MA Hm, I wonder what caused Massachusetts' percentage to fall so much. | |
|
 |  BosstonesOwn
join:2002-12-15 Everett, MA clubs:
·Comcast Formerly ..
| Re: MA Probably the fact that most of the tech industry here is losing workers at a decent clip.
That coupled with people sick and tired of comcasts current rate hikes.
I know I went to DSL because of this very same reason. Although I got 3/768 from verizon , it's cheaper and doesn't kill my vpn constantly because of thier stupid bit torrent crap. -- "It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!" | |
|
  TK Junk Mail Go ahead, make my day Premium join:2002-03-03 Margate City, NJ clubs:
·Comcast
edit: May 29th, @11:38AM
| DSLReports gets a mention in the report
DSLReports gets a mention in the DDOS section of the report.
Popular broadband Web site DSL Reports was also targeted by a DDoS attack in March 2008. According to an article in The Register(7) the attack traffic was primarily comprised of open-connection requests from a distributed set of IP addresses – at least 1,100 systems were believed to have taken part in the attack. 7 - » www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/19···_attack/ -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|
  BinaryXtreme
join:2004-04-20 Sparks, NV | NEVADA! Nevada is spankin' the Net. Only one in or even near the west coast is surprising. | |
|
 hoersche
join:2008-01-21 Iowa City, IA | Typo? On the slowest list, the criteria says "% <256 Mbps". I am guessing they really mean Kbps.
256 Mbps...that would be great! | |
|
 |  cyberbeing
join:2005-02-18 Sacramento, CA
·SureWest Internet
| Re: Typo? Washington State and Virginia top the list of US states with the largest percentage of connections observed at 256 Kbps or below. However, in contrast to the International list, only 21% of Washingtons connections are slow. The connection percentage quickly drops below 20%, as Virginia has the next largest percentage of narrowband connections, with 18%. Yep, it's a typo on the image in the PDF. | |
|
  woody7 Premium join:2000-10-13 Torrance, CA
·DSL EXTREME
| hmmmm.... I live in California, and it isn't in the top ten,go figure ....California does better than most countries yet our broadband sux. I live a city with a mean housing value of 500k + / -,some in the millions, and I only have 2 choices,DSL or Time warner. Half the city is verizon, and half the city is att. att says there isn't a market for their "project" lightspeed, and I am not served by Verizon.go figure. -- BlooMe | |
|
 |  See 13 replies to this post |
|
  cypherstream There's no place like 127.0.0.1
join:2004-12-02 Reading, PA clubs:
·Cingular Wireless
edit: May 29th, @11:58AM
| Nice report... not It's corrupted, dugg, slashdotted, or something?
Better yet, can anyone tell me how PA did?
Edit: nevermind, thanks TKJunkmail for your PDF attachment post. | |
|
 majortom1029
join:2006-10-19 Lindenhurst, NY | hmm I am guessing Long island and some parts of nyc having cablevision helped with getting ny in the top . Then add the fios deployments into that . | |
|
  MisterMarcus
join:2001-11-10 San Diego, CA
·RoadRunner Cable
| Not an accurate measure... of true saturation.
What I'd like to see is:
- Highest connection speed offered - Percent of state acreage availability
For example, if 10Mbps is available to 90% of the state, I'd want to see that.
Because if I assume that 1,000,000 households is the total, I can reasonably assume (with some margin of error) that 900,000 households could get that speed.
From there I would want to see: - Percent of users on less than 1Mbps (in my opinion, that's basically not broadband if you're in this percentile) - Percent of users on less than 5Mbps - Percent of users on 10Mbps
When you use all these percentages as hard numbers and compare to other states, it gives you a true picture of which states are really "wired" versus those that get a bad rap because of their population (or lack thereof). | |
|
 |   Guspaz Guspaz Premium,MVM join:2001-11-05 Montreal, QC
·Colbanet
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| Re: Not an accurate measure... I'd agree, to a certain extent. I'm surprised Canada isn't there. That means we have less than 15% of our internet users on 5mbit+ broadband.
Considering that, in Ontario and Quebec (the two most populous provinces), the basic (non-lite) speed for DSL and cable is both 7mbit, that's a bit odd.
I think the most likely thing is that, since DSL is more popular than cable by a decent margin, and Bell just moved from 5mbit to 7mbit, none of those 5mbit customers are getting counted. After all, they say users who ACHIEVED 5mbit or higher. Actual throughput on a 5mbit DSL line is ~4.3mbit, and on cable is slightly under 5. So 5mbit cable/DSL doesn't count as 5mbit to Akamai's stats. | |
|
  rit56
join:2000-12-01 New York, NY | More of the same It seems every three months or so someone comes out with a report giving the US a different ranking. What does one believe? | |
|
 LumpyDaMoose
join:2007-08-28 Lynn Haven, FL
·Knology
| Delaware?! I was at our other plant in Newark, DE 15 months ago to set up a VPN and couldn't even GET a broadband connection. Slow DSL was sort of available, but we were beyond the 18K' limit. Which they didn't tell me until after I made the trip up there. Comcast wanted something like $50,000 to run a 200' line under existing pavement. Oh, I'm sure it's fast-- they have so few people with broadband there's no reason for it to be slow! | |
|
 damox Premium join:2002-01-07 Olympia, WA
·Comcast Formerly ..
| Washington State has always seemed a bit backwards I'm not from here, but have lived hear in Washington on and off since 1975, and I've noticed that this state seems to be behind so much of the country in so many things! -- DAMOX Proud to be a member of Team Discovery | |
|
 |  shoan
join:2006-02-27 Benton, AR
| Re: Washington State has always seemed a bit backwards I'm willing to bet that the climb in dial up was from people getting more PC's and finding out that the major ISP's think that they are not profitable to serve. The people are out there in droves that have no broadband. Please don't respond back if you are going to preach about sat. broadband or move to the city you hillbilly's . | |
|
 |  |  damox Premium join:2002-01-07 Olympia, WA
·Comcast Formerly ..
| Re: Washington State has always seemed a bit backwards I'm sure you're right. I guess I'm surprise because Washington is above the U.S. average in population density, and twenty-fifth overall. More surprising, however, are District of Columbia (tops in population density) and Illinois (eleventh in population density)! The only thing I can figure is that both DC and Chicago (which is where I'm from originally) have many poor people who can't afford broadband. States like Wyoming, the Dakota's, New Mexico and Idaho surprise me because they are at the bottom in terms of population density, but didn't make the list of the slowest states. -- DAMOX Proud to be a member of Team Discovery | |
|
 |   Erik
@qwest.net
| The thing is, Qwest offers the lowest cost high speed net connection in this state...at 256kbs. Since a lot people use Qwest as their phone service, and if they want an internet connection, they just go with the best priced option offered by the company. Also, I think it's the cheapest option available if you want a high speed connection without having to bundle it with other services and you aren't a Qwest customer... | |
|
  MnK
@comcast.net
from: Core0000 
| You know what I almost hope for? I hope some day Russia starts beating us in broadband speeds and broadband penetration because thats one thing you could really use to throw in the face of every person in government.
I can just see it now I'll just scream
"The damn commies have better internet than us!"
And the US army will start laying fiber down my street just to catch up.
O what a world that would be. | |
|
 |  zed260
join:2007-09-30 Cleveland, TN | Re: You know what I almost hope for? china will beat Russia in broadband
china is already more wired then Russia | |
|
  delawareanon
@comcast.net | Stay away from lower delaware Im pretty sure that number for delaware is for the upper part of the state where its comcast and fios the lower percent is most likely medicom at the lower end of the state so beware. | |
|
  WA Resident
@Level3.net
| WA state has 100Mbps Fiber! Hmm, actually here in WA we have had 100Mbps all fiber connections straight to the home since a few years ago and all for under $40 bucks per month!
The county PUDs (at least 3 that i know of)have built out and continue to build out the fiber optic network connecting businesses and homes alike. They sell access rights to whatever ISP wants to offer service. Most ISPs offer lower speeds but at least one is offering 100Mbps but they have a cap of 25Gb transfer per month limit. This particular ISP had no caps a couple of years ago.
The next county across the river offers lower speeds but they also offer TV programming as well as phone service over fiber.
The particular county where i live offers fiber optics, high speed wireless internet (where fiber isn't available) and soon to come, TV programming.
I still don't have fiber right here but it's only a matter of weeks since they are almost finished laying all the fiber down and getting it working.
»www.dccn.net/
»www.localtelonline.com/drf.htm
»www.gcpud.org/zipp.htm
»https://fiber.chelanpud.org/euedu/
»www.donobi.com/services/fiber/grant_county/
| |
|
 |
|
 |