site Search:


 
   
story category
T-Mobile: 42 Mbps In 2011?
Manager meeting slide suggests as much...
by Karl Bode Tuesday 06-Jul-2010 tags: business · alternatives · bandwidth · wireless
Tipped by Gbcue See Profile
T-Mobile hasn't officially stated they're joining Verizon and AT&T in the push toward LTE yet -- but they're certainly pushing the HSPA standard about as far as it can go. The company's already in the process of very-quickly pushing out 21 Mbps capable (more like 10 Mbps in the real world) HSPA+ upgrades, and now TMONews has obtained a screen grab of a T-Mobile manager's meeting in Seattle that suggests the company will be pushing the standard toward 42 Mbps sometime next year. Of course T-Mobile needs oodles and oodles of backhaul to push those kinds of speeds out to users -- which is something that the company insists is a top priority.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:

toby
Troy Mcclure

join:2001-11-13
Seattle, WA

Coverage....

Increase the coverage instead please.

Clever_Proxy
Premium
join:2004-05-14
Chicago, IL

Re: Coverage....

they need to do both.

backhaul is pretty crappy in the areas that are already "3g".

coverage is too. so many places i still leech off of edge service in a supposedly 3g area.

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1
Reviews:
·T-Mobile US

Re: Coverage....


TMO 3g
Coverage and speeds work well for me!

They upgraded their backhauls a few weeks ago here in Saint Louis. Backhaul at work got upgraded about a month before the bachaul at home (even though my home is in the city, while work is in the 'burbs).

HSUPA is sucking, but hey, it's better than ATT!
--
"What makes us omniscient? Have we a record of omniscience? ...If we can't persuade nations with comparable values of the merit of our cause, we'd better reexamine our reasoning."
-United States Secretary of Defense (1961-1968) Robert S. McNamara
stanleycr1

join:2008-12-02
Ivor, VA
Agreed

Westofhere

join:2005-04-07
West Coast

Re: Coverage....

ditto x3

buddahbless

join:2005-03-21
Premium
Reviews:
·Comcast
·T-Mobile US

Re: Coverage.... CONCUR

Tmobile seems to forget there overall foot print is far behind for a company of there size all the small time prepaid carriers have the same or better coverage than Tmobile does.. and with them being GSM that does not make it any better. I think Verizon, for there next coverage and signal strength ad aim it @ tmoble instead of ATT. whats the point of 41 or even 21 mbps data traffic in a high populated are if 1 mile away theres no coverage at all. seems counter productive if you ask me..

Gbcue
Almost P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

Re: Coverage.... CONCUR

said by buddahbless:

Tmobile seems to forget there overall foot print is far behind for a company of there size all the small time prepaid carriers have the same or better coverage than Tmobile does.. and with them being GSM that does not make it any better. I think Verizon, for there next coverage and signal strength ad aim it @ tmoble instead of ATT. whats the point of 41 or even 21 mbps data traffic in a high populated are if 1 mile away theres no coverage at all. seems counter productive if you ask me..
Since T-Mobile only got many of their 3G licenses in late-2008 (due to the slow previous users to get off the frequency), I'd say they're doing a very good job of increasing coverage.
--
My Blog 2.0

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
T-Mobile 'will' need to increase coverage, or 42Mbps won't mean jack. Going from 16QAM to 64QAM means that you'd better have good signal, or speed won't be much better than HSPA 14.4.

I hate to quote Wiki, but..
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HSPA%2B
quote:
At cell edge and even at half the distance to the cell edge there may only be slight increase compared with 14.4 Mbit/s HSDPA unless a wider channel than 5 MHz is used.
--
Canada = Hollywood North

wdoa

join:2001-10-16
Spencer, MA
T-Mobile needs to beef up their coverage, but even where they have coverage, if you are outside of the city limits you will be lucky to have EDGE, much less 3g. Much of T-Mobile's network is still languishing in GPRS
brightico

join:2008-12-06
Hickory, NC
They seriously need to increase the coverage to match ATT. At my home I get the dreaded x on my signal strength but, when I force it to use ATT I get full strength.

Here in Hickory NC we only get 3G in a small 5 mile radius in the center of the city which is pretty much useless since no one lives here only businesses. That's the only 3G we have for about 100 miles in any direction.

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1
sell them some 850 or 700 spectrum and they'll no doubt be happy to.
cooldude9919

join:2000-05-29
Cape Girardeau, MO
kudos:5

Backhaul

Wonder what kind of pipes they would need at the towers? 100mbps?, or i wonder if we are takling 1gbps?

Gbcue
Almost P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

Re: Backhaul

said by cooldude9919:

Wonder what kind of pipes they would need at the towers? 100mbps?, or i wonder if we are takling 1gbps?
Probably 100mbps, or multiple 100mbps lines.
--
My Blog 2.0
xenophon

join:2007-09-17

1 edit
Clearwire is now doing 100Mbps backhaul in some places and says they'll need 500Mbps in future just to sustain many users at about 6-10Mbps. I'm able to peak to about 15Mbps but they market it "up to 6Mbps with bursts to 10".

»Clearwire adding backhaul

Even if the radio could be capable of 1Gbit it means nothing if the backhaul and spectrum aren't there. Tmob will use it as a marketing thing but they won't likely deliver it to many users at once. I wonder if they even have enough spectrum.

I do think it's great that Tmob pushes the envelope, even if it's just a card to play.

iLive4Fusion
Premium
join:2006-07-13
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T Wireless Br..
·ViaTalk
·Verizon Broadban..

Re: Backhaul

said by xenophon:

Clearwire is now doing 100Mbps backhaul in some places and says they'll need 500Mbps in future just to sustain many users at about 6-10Mbps. I'm able to peak to about 15Mbps but they market it "up to 6Mbps with bursts to 10".

»Clearwire adding backhaul

Even if the radio could be capable of 1Gbit it means nothing if the backhaul and spectrum aren't there. Tmob will use it as a marketing thing but they won't likely deliver it to many users at once. I wonder if they even have enough spectrum.

I do think it's great that Tmob pushes the envelope, even if it's just a card to play.
T-Mobile and Sprint both have coverage problems. Great they both have speed. Now they need network coverage like VZW and AT&T.
--
2010 Ford Fusion Sport

Gbcue
Almost P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

Re: Backhaul

said by iLive4Fusion:

said by xenophon:

Clearwire is now doing 100Mbps backhaul in some places and says they'll need 500Mbps in future just to sustain many users at about 6-10Mbps. I'm able to peak to about 15Mbps but they market it "up to 6Mbps with bursts to 10".

»Clearwire adding backhaul

Even if the radio could be capable of 1Gbit it means nothing if the backhaul and spectrum aren't there. Tmob will use it as a marketing thing but they won't likely deliver it to many users at once. I wonder if they even have enough spectrum.

I do think it's great that Tmob pushes the envelope, even if it's just a card to play.
T-Mobile and Sprint both have coverage problems. Great they both have speed. Now they need network coverage like VZW and AT&T.
Nah, as it's been said before, T-Mobile focuses on the urban areas. Since I practically never leave one, I don't care if T-Mobile increases their 3G coverage. It works fine for me already. Just got to wait for their HSPA+!
--
My Blog 2.0

iLive4Fusion
Premium
join:2006-07-13
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T Wireless Br..
·ViaTalk
·Verizon Broadban..

Re: Backhaul

said by Gbcue:

said by iLive4Fusion:

said by xenophon:

Clearwire is now doing 100Mbps backhaul in some places and says they'll need 500Mbps in future just to sustain many users at about 6-10Mbps. I'm able to peak to about 15Mbps but they market it "up to 6Mbps with bursts to 10".

»Clearwire adding backhaul

Even if the radio could be capable of 1Gbit it means nothing if the backhaul and spectrum aren't there. Tmob will use it as a marketing thing but they won't likely deliver it to many users at once. I wonder if they even have enough spectrum.

I do think it's great that Tmob pushes the envelope, even if it's just a card to play.
T-Mobile and Sprint both have coverage problems. Great they both have speed. Now they need network coverage like VZW and AT&T.
Nah, as it's been said before, T-Mobile focuses on the urban areas. Since I practically never leave one, I don't care if T-Mobile increases their 3G coverage. It works fine for me already. Just got to wait for their HSPA+!
But in a lot of metro area's they suck coverage wise too like Here.
--
2010 Ford Fusion Sport

Gbcue
Almost P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

Re: Backhaul

Looks like T-Mobile's robust 3G covers 'Hoover, AL' fine.
--
My Blog 2.0

iLive4Fusion
Premium
join:2006-07-13
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T Wireless Br..
·ViaTalk
·Verizon Broadban..

Re: Backhaul

said by Gbcue:

Looks like T-Mobile's robust 3G covers 'Hoover, AL' fine.
Try "West Jefferson, AL 35130

And outdoor's their "slobust" network is "ok" but it's once you step in the building where the fun begins
--
2010 Ford Fusion Sport

BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN
said by Gbcue:

Nah, as it's been said before, T-Mobile focuses on the urban areas.
And with that attitude they'll be out of business within 10 years.

FBGuy
yippee ki yay
Premium
join:2005-03-19

Re: Backhaul

urban areas cover over 90% of the population.

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1

Re: Backhaul

and their spectrum holdings reinforce that position.
It's not a coincidence that the 1900 networks (Sprint and TMO) focus on the cities, while the 850 network (Verizon) is rural.

Physics and economics are amazing things.

iLive4Fusion
Premium
join:2006-07-13
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T Wireless Br..
·ViaTalk
·Verizon Broadban..
said by BF69:

said by Gbcue:

Nah, as it's been said before, T-Mobile focuses on the urban areas.
And with that attitude they'll be out of business within 10 years.
I'd give it 5, and AT&T barely made it and they are just now realizing that their previous urban only attitude would drag them down. Well up until this year.
--
2010 Ford Fusion Sport

FBGuy
yippee ki yay
Premium
join:2005-03-19
agreed. t-mobile is an urban cellular provider. that is just what they do well.

wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY
said by cooldude9919:

Wonder what kind of pipes they would need at the towers? 100mbps?, or i wonder if we are takling 1gbps?
Most wireless providers are extending Ethernet to the cell towers whenever possible. This allows them to very easily upgrade the bandwidth without dropping in a new circuit. If a pure play ethernet circuit is installed then they can go from 100Mbps to 1000Mbps in a matter of minutes. However, if they use an underlying TDM circuit (DS3, OC3, etc) then they are obviously capped out at 45Mbps, 155Mbps, and so on.
--

"You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves."
-Abraham Lincoln-



KA3SGM
- -... ...- -
Premium
join:2006-01-17
West Chester, PA
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
·Cricket Broadband
Click for full size
said by cooldude9919:

Wonder what kind of pipes they would need at the towers? 100mbps?, or i wonder if we are takling 1gbps?
This kind of pipe, Zayo Bandwidth.

»www.zayo.com/bandwidth/solutions···backhaul

It's dedicated leased fiber Ethernet from tower to switch.

In Southeastern PA T-Mobile is installing these cabinets like crazy on all of their 3G sites.
--
ROCK 'TIL SUNSET

SlickEnW
Premium
join:2003-01-21
Seattle, WA

tmobile

was good people when I had them for 4-5 years before getting my first gen iPhone (unlocked for their network). If that whole spectrum issue wasn't a factor, i'd have an iPhone 4 (factory unlocked) on their network too. The prices were much better than ATT's.

Gbcue
Almost P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8

Robustness!

Wow, T-Mobile's nationwide 3G network is going to be the most robust of any US cellular networks!
--
My Blog 2.0

iLive4Fusion
Premium
join:2006-07-13
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T Wireless Br..
·ViaTalk
·Verizon Broadban..

Re: Robustness!

said by Gbcue:

Wow, T-Mobile's nationwide 3G network is going to be the most robust of any US cellular networks!
Not robust, its the smallest nationwide network in the US and will remain that way unless they focus on coverage. AT&T can have a much faster network than T-Mobile if they focused on a handful of market's.
--
2010 Ford Fusion Sport

Gbcue
Almost P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

Re: Robustness!

said by iLive4Fusion:

said by Gbcue:

Wow, T-Mobile's nationwide 3G network is going to be the most robust of any US cellular networks!
Not robust, its the smallest nationwide network in the US and will remain that way unless they focus on coverage. AT&T can have a much faster network than T-Mobile if they focused on a handful of market's.
Nah, as it's been said before, T-Mobile focuses on the urban areas. Since I practically never leave one, I don't care if T-Mobile increases their 3G coverage. It works fine for me already. Just got to wait for their HSPA+!
--
My Blog 2.0

iLive4Fusion
Premium
join:2006-07-13

Re: Robustness!

But they don't even cover a lot of metro area's. I mean come on, Sprint has way more 3G coverage than T-Mobile..
--
2010 Ford Fusion Sport

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1

Re: Robustness!

What metro areas aren't covered by TMO 3g?

iLive4Fusion
Premium
join:2006-07-13
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T Wireless Br..
·ViaTalk
·Verizon Broadban..

Re: Robustness!

said by tiger72:

What metro areas aren't covered by TMO 3g?
Well not sure if this is considered a Metro area, but freaking Panama City Beach, FL one of FL's hottest tourist attractions are still on GPRS!
--
2010 Ford Fusion Sport

Shack

join:2002-01-17
Bloomington, IN
It is ridiculous to call a network robust just because it works well in your market.

airtouch25

join:2007-05-22
united state

Re: Robustness!


No actually it's ridiculous to obsess over coverage in areas you'll never use it and pay hefty monthly fees while you're at it.

Carrier marketing teams got you by the balls and brainwashed into thinking you need to pay more when you really don't.

It's one thing to have poor coverage where you need it and another to preoccupy yourself about coverage in Yellowstone National Park when you spend 99% of your life in Miami, FL.

Speaking of 3G coverage, T-Mobile is not too far behind AT&T in terms of the actual population covered. A few more metro areas and they'll be neck and neck.


The Limit
Premium
join:2007-09-25
Greensboro, NC
kudos:2
Verizon has a vastly superior, robust coverage area compared to T-mobile.

RULE THE AIR. lulz.
--
Do or do not, there is no try! - Yoda

FBGuy
yippee ki yay
Premium
join:2005-03-19

Re: Robustness!

verizon also has a cap on their data plans.
munky99999
Munky

join:2004-04-10
canada
Reviews:
·Cybersurf Intern..

OMG SO FAST

Except for the part where you have insanely low caps and high prices.

42mbps means nothing if you can only download 500megs/month.
42mbps means nothing if it costs $50/second.

They need to build out in capacity and coverage. Not speed. Make it so there are fewer people per tower.
--
--
if (value == 0)
return value;
else
return 0;

wifi4milez
Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace

join:2004-08-07
New York, NY

Re: OMG SO FAST

said by munky99999:

Except for the part where you have insanely low caps and high prices.

Tmobile is one of the lower cost providers here in the States.
sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH
kudos:1
said by munky99999:

Except for the part where you have insanely low caps and high prices.

42mbps means nothing if you can only download 500megs/month.
42mbps means nothing if it costs $50/second.

They need to build out in capacity and coverage. Not speed. Make it so there are fewer people per tower.
To be fair T-Mobile has eliminated overage fees, although I think their 10 GB cap is rather paltry. If you go over the cap you're throttled to 2G speeds. You'd think they'd have a better way of handling power users, like letting them download to their heart's content during non-peak hours.

FBGuy
yippee ki yay
Premium
join:2005-03-19
what caps? do you have a link? i have no caps on my data through t-mobile.

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1
TMO doesn't charge overages, and their caps are 5gb/10gb. Not sure where you're getting these arbitrary numbers from.

monk

@rr.com

i have

i have tmobile and they suck more stuff they want to get you for so who cares

Sunday, 03-Jun 12:40:24 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.