 GlenQuagmireGiggidy Giggidy Giggidy GooPremium join:2004-02-16 Grand Rapids, MI | T-Mobile Chick The T-Mobile chick is hot, she make me want to buy a phone. -- Yes, its stuck in a windows this time. | |
|
 |  Alky join:2001-08-12 Cleveland, OH | Re: T-Mobile Chick Yeah, it's not Catherine Zeta Jones, but I would definitely buy a phone from her. Or anything else, for that matter:) | |
|
 |  |
 |  KrisnatharokCaveat EmptorPremium join:2009-02-11 Earth Orbit kudos:3 | Definitely a convincing commercial. I like how they are using Apple's commercial style against them. -- Will WWIII start today? | |
|
 |  | | I agree with that. The Motorcycle Pink outfit is not bad to look at.
As for the Speed of the network its hard to say. I now have T-Mobile and it obviously is much faster than Sprint 3G and VZW 3G. It seems to be at AT&T 3G and alleged 4G HSPA+, if it can be called that.
Now the big thing is it faster than WiMax and LTE. My G2 operates at a faster D/L here in Minneapolis/St. Paul than my boss Wimax Epic and Mifi Spot.
Until data is released who cares. The question of speeds will continue to be what market group can spin the facts to their carriers way. | |
|
 |  | | In case you want to know her name, it is Carly Foulkes.
 | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: T-Mobile Chick Google her. You'll find some.. ummm interesting pics.  | |
|
 |  Reviews:
·Mobilicity
·voip.ms
| dont know where your standards are at .. I dont think she is half as hot as most of the girls in the school I went to...
Anyways, back on topic ... I had T-Mobile for 3 years. Their network is stark slow and their agents are misinformed, rude and to talk to them you need to hold the line for an hour!!!
Take T-Mobile's "even more plus" everything plan - its $90. The same plan from H2O (shares ATT network .. .and this SIM card is available at best buy stores) - is for $50. Go to albertsons and look at the "gift cards" section. You will find some more providers - $50 for that plan using T-Mobile network. When I showed this to the tmobile store agent and told her they use tmobile network, her reply was "their network is bad, ours is good" ?!?!?!??!?!? Common sense FTW! And not only her, the whole store said the same thing.
Network: T-Mobile sucks. I didnt have reception in many palces where verizon had a clear reception.
Call drops: This is an everyday routine with tmo. Sometimes callers get sent directly to my voicemail. No, its NOT my phone's fault. Mine is an unlocked Nokia handset -and I used this in 3 continents (europe, north america, asia) and it works perfectly.
The positive points of tmo: 1. The mobile internet is $10 a month. Works on 3G. 2. Cheap international calls. 3. Better than ATT. | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  | | T-Mobile signal just sucks where you're at. It's the same for me at the office (deep inside the concrete and steel dungeon), and sometimes in the boonies.
At least they're doing something about it such as WiFi calling for no extra cost -- unlike AT&T. | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: T-Mobile Chick Network is fairly solid in Ohio as well. Also H2O uses TMO and of course they'll tell you that the H2O network sucks. They don't want you using an MVNO they want you as THEIR customer directly. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: T-Mobile Chick TMO does NOT cover anything outside of the metro markets that is a given and has been said for years. And they NEVER will. ATT is the same way. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  Reviews:
·WOW Internet and..
| Re: T-Mobile Chick TMO does NOT always roam. That is up to ATT. There are areas in Ohio where TMO NEVER roamed onto another GSM network until just now. You could pick up the T network in certain areas but only 911 calls were able to be completed. NOT actual voice calls. | |
|
 |  |  ztmikeMark for moderationPremium join:2001-08-02 Michigan City, IN | I wasn't aware T Mobile offered service in Canada? | |
|
 |  |  |  djdanskaRudie32Premium,MVM join:2001-04-21 kudos:4 | Re: T-Mobile Chick No wonder he had poor reception then!  | |
|
 |  |  |  Reviews:
·Mobilicity
·voip.ms
| Lol. no. I was in LA and moved to canada 3 weeks ago. ATT sucked in LA - their 3g was ... well worse than dialup.
TMO was also bad but I was stuck with them because I owned my phone.
In my opinion the best of the lot is probably sprint - since they use verizon network and doesnt tamper the phones. Also, verizon was the fastest I ever saw in wireless internet.
I understand most of you are GSM fans - in that case go with a TMO reseller. If you arent a GSM fan, then sprint / verizon ... | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  djdanskaRudie32Premium,MVM join:2001-04-21 kudos:4 | Re: T-Mobile Chick And I tried sprint here. They sucked here in chicago for data speeds, connection reliability, and crappy coverage in the more rural parts of the state where my tmobile phone worked fine. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |
 | | Claims How can they claim this when most of their marks are still on EDGE. | |
|
 |  GbcueAlmost P.E.Premium join:2001-09-30 Santa Rosa, CA kudos:8 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
| Re: Claims Not the top 100 cities.
As it's been said once, I'll say it again.
T-Mobile is in the business to make money, not stretch their network paper thin (ala AT&T) to every corner of the country. As such, they focus primarily on major metropolitan areas and a wide surround. -- My Blog 2.0 | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Claims I'll Gauss Arkansas isn't it. | |
|
 |  |  en102Canadian, eh? join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA | If you have 800MHz spectrum in a market - then you will be deploying to many rural areas - its a requirement of having cellular / 800MHz spectrum (higher percentage of users per market requirement). 1900MHz (T-Mobile/Sprint/MetroPCS) carriers have a much lower requirement.
Pick a market where AT&T / VZW have only 1900MHz... their coverage is of that area is limited to more urban areas (think Northwestern California) - AT&T/T-Mobile/Sprint all have limited coverage. Cell carriers USCC/VZW cover most of it as a requirement of holding the cellular license. | |
|
 |  |  |  |
 warwick join:2009-06-05 Hollywood, FL | Great Now if only Verizon.W would place Selma Hayek in a commercial....  | |
|
 |  | | Re: Great Nods in agreement. | |
|
 | | I'm not getting the big deal about speed... ...my smartphone won't keep up with EVDO... I'd rather see higher caps and lower overage charges. And broader coverage. | |
|
 |  en102Canadian, eh? join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA | Re: I'm not getting the big deal about speed... For a mobile phone / smart phone - I tend to agree. Pricing and coverage means more to me than the top end. | |
|
 | | Who knows Given statement "Based on independent, third-party drive test data for Top 100 U.S. Markets(on a population-weighted basis)" they could have selected top 100 cities with fattes...er.. most weight-challenged population. And technically they'd be telling the truth  -- Hyperom: Rants about life, politics, technology | |
|
 | | These discussions are pointless All you get is people claiming to either agree or disagree with the results based upon their 2 year old experience with said carrier.
Then everyone chimes in with their anecdotal claim how T-Mobile only had GPRS data in their grandmas basement last year when they tried it last therefore the results are rigged or invalid.
In my area T-Mobile is the fastest but that's probably cause Verizon doesn't have 4G here yet, Sprint doesn't have 4G here yet and ATT's network is completely overloaded and overcapacitated. But that is the case with all carriers depending on your area.
| |
|
 |  chuckkk join:2001-11-10 Warner Robins, GA Reviews:
·Cox HSI
| Re: These discussions are pointless I must not be in the top 100 markets. T-Mobile voice is OK, BUT the data service (supposedly 3G) is very poor. Strangely enough, about a year ago, it was fast and reliable. To get decent data speed and reliability, I have to go to the west edge of town, (Different Cell) or enable Wi-Fi. The problem seems to be location/cell related, and even thought the signal indication is 3-4 bars (4 is max on a G1) the data service is almost unusable. | |
|
 |  Reviews:
·Verizon Wireless..
| I totally agree with you here! I have had a cell phone since I got my first one from Bell Atlantic mobile when I used to live in Plattsburgh, NY. I been with them since of course after the merge with GTE and Airtouch through the years. I work on the railroad that doesn't follow major interstates. Through all the years I have owned many different phones as technologies evolved. Worked with many other fellow workers on other carriers. To tell everyone the truth as far as cell coverage and 3g coverage nationwide Verizon Wireless is king! I currently working in Willard, OH with perfect 3g signal and a co worker here has no service with AT&T what so ever! But to tell you the truth the Verizon 3g in most big cities has really slowed in the past year with all of the infusion of all the droids but as far as I am concerned the coverage is what I consider a big plus. My two cents. | |
|
 pkorx8 join:2003-06-19 San Francisco, CA | Corporate Telecom/Wireless in America Another example of how if they have enough advertising dollars to say anything repeatedly in PR campaigns, whatever they are saying will magically be true.... same thing with the 4G media blitz from these same companies. | |
|
 NyQuil Kid8f The Nyquil Kid join:2001-01-06 Brick, NJ | 3G in NJ My T-Mobile connection is pretty good - I am almost dead center between NYC and Philly so that would account for the decent connection.
As for corporate telecom, I'll take that over government owned - if the government handled all facets of telecom, we'd probably still be using rotary phones with party lines and having to turn a crank. Thanks, but I'll take corporate telecom over that any day.
[8F] The NyQuil Kid -- [8F] The NyQuil Kid comes into town not looking for trouble... n00bz gang up, but he ain't seein' double,... pulls and draws, his deagles two... n00bz litter the ground you know it's true. | |
|
 |  | | Re: 3G in NJ I'm NJ too, 3G is spotty. Along with their poor voice signal indoors, I wouldn't use them if I had a choice. T-mobile drops more calls here that Sprint, Verizon and at&t. It depends on where you are. Everyone is not going to have same experience. The WIFI calling is a plus where I don't get a signal. | |
|
 VanPremium join:2009-07-08 New Orleans, LA | Much like how AT&T says that 99% of their customers don't go anywhere near their 2gb cap....but uh....somehow many people online and in real life seem to come close every single month | |
|
 dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ kudos:4 | Who cares As long as there are caps, who cares how fast it is. * y a w n * | |
|
 Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
| If you're standing right next to the tower I live less than 5 miles from a "Top 100" market and T-Mobile phones don't even work in my house. Walk outside and you are graced with that wonderful EDGE.
T-Mobile is desperate. They lie about having 4G. They have a tiny network. Even though their prices are lower, people continue to choose Verizon and AT&T over them. | |
|
 | | "Figures don't lie . . . . . . but liars figure." -Samuel Clemens | |
|
 | | caps are the spoiler What good is it to have the fastest network? It only means that you will reach your monthly cap that much faster. | |
|
 |
|