 GbcueAlmost P.E.Premium join:2001-09-30 Santa Rosa, CA kudos:8 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
2 edits | Not "As Fast" But *fastER* than "Verizon's upcoming LTE service (5-12 Mbps) and Clearwire (3-6 Mbps)"!
"a few extra megabits?" 42 mbps blows away most residential hard wired internet connections.
This is excellent news for the robust nationwide T-Mobile 3G HSPA+ network!
-- My Blog 2.0 | |
|
 |  | | Re: Not "As Fast" Is it 42Mb per subscriber or 42Mb per "channel"? | |
|
 |  |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 | Re: Not "As Fast" Per dual-carrier channel block.
Real-world performance fro tests at Telstra indicate that speeds will range between 9 Mbps and 25 Mbps. | |
|
 |  |  |  tiger72SexaT duorPPremium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO kudos:1 | Re: Not "As Fast" 9mbps is already readily achieved on all of the data cards. As long as they can upgrade the backhauls, I would venture a bet that 18mbps is going to be easily achievable on 42mbps hspa+ | |
|
 |  drewPremium join:2002-07-10 Port Orchard, WA kudos:6 | Who cares if you can get 42mbps if you can only get it in three markets. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: Not "As Fast" how do you figure? t-mobile has coverage to 90%+ of americans. thats far more than 3 markets. | |
|
 |  |  |  drewPremium join:2002-07-10 Port Orchard, WA kudos:6 | Re: Not "As Fast" That 90% of coverage has backhaul for 42mbps?
*buzzer sound* | |
|
 |  |  |  |  GbcueAlmost P.E.Premium join:2001-09-30 Santa Rosa, CA kudos:8 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
| Re: Not "As Fast" said by drew:That 90% of coverage has backhaul for 42mbps? *buzzer sound* And AT&T has the "fastest 3G", right. -- My Blog 2.0 | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  en102Canadian, eh? join:2001-01-26 Valencia, CA | Re: Not "As Fast" Most carriers can claim fastest - at some specific point in some specific locations.
AT&T 'had' fastest during some magazine speedtests. I suspect they're already off the top. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  Reviews:
·Comcast
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T U-Verse
·Vonage
| Re: Not "As Fast" said by iLive4Fusion:said by Gbcue:said by drew:That 90% of coverage has backhaul for 42mbps? *buzzer sound* And AT&T has the "fastest 3G", right. They do over a broader, national 3G footprint. riiiiiiiiight. you can put in a 3g network, but if it doesn't have the backhaul for it it's not much of a network. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | | said by iLive4Fusion:They do over a broader, national 3G footprint. But only if you stand in just the RIGHT spot, on one foot, and be sure to hold your phone JUST right, or you'll get no signal at all. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 | In all likelihood, everywhere that has HSPA+ now has the capacity for dual-carrier HSPA+ speeds when they come out.
Other areas (stuck on HSPA, EDGE or GPRS), not so much. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  | | Isn't T-Mobile running fiber to their towers for the 21+Mbps upgrades currently? | |
|
 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  tiger72SexaT duorPPremium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO kudos:1 | Re: Not "As Fast" ATT doesn't provide 3g to 90%+ of Americans either...
And frankly, based on speeds, neither does Verizon or Sprint. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T Wireless Br..
·ViaTalk
·Verizon Broadban..
| Re: Not "As Fast" said by tiger72:ATT doesn't provide 3g to 90%+ of Americans either... And frankly, based on speeds, neither does Verizon or Sprint. They all 3 do provide much better speed's than GPRS to most customers though. T-Mobile doesn't even have EDGE national yet so when the poor frequency 3G fall's back to the lesser poor 1900mhz GSM, many customer's are left with poor GPRS signal. -- 2010 Ford Fusion Sport | |
|
 |  |  | | said by drew:Who cares if you can get 42mbps if you can only get it in three markets. after 5gb when the rate goes to about $1 a meg who will want to have 42mbps? | |
|
 |  |  |  tiger72SexaT duorPPremium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO kudos:1 Reviews:
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T DSL Service
| Re: Not "As Fast" said by Joe12345678:said by drew:Who cares if you can get 42mbps if you can only get it in three markets. after 5gb when the rate goes to about $1 a meg who will want to have 42mbps? T-Mobile doesn't charge overages. They rate-cap. And it's 10GB, not 5GB. -- "What makes us omniscient? Have we a record of omniscience? ...If we can't persuade nations with comparable values of the merit of our cause, we'd better reexamine our reasoning." -United States Secretary of Defense (1961-1968) Robert S. McNamara | |
|
 |  |  sapoCruising Down Memory LanePremium join:2002-09-16 Sacramento, CA kudos:1 | You should at least bother to look at the coverage map. -- Bratwurst und kaese | |
|
 |  |  |  drewPremium join:2002-07-10 Port Orchard, WA kudos:6 | Re: Not "As Fast" I'm familiar with T-Mobile's coverage.
It's sub-par. | |
|
 |  ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium join:2005-03-14 Putnam, CT kudos:4 | Right. Fast speed in 2 markets doesn't do much for the general population. | |
|
 |  |  GbcueAlmost P.E.Premium join:2001-09-30 Santa Rosa, CA kudos:8 Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
| Re: Not "As Fast" said by ptrowski:Right. Fast speed in 2 markets doesn't do much for the general population. I don't know what "2 markets" you're talking about, but they lit up 7 new markets yesterday alone. -- My Blog 2.0 | |
|
 |  |  |  tobyTroy Mcclure join:2001-11-13 Reviews:
·CenturyLink
| Re: Not "As Fast" said by Gbcue:said by ptrowski:Right. Fast speed in 2 markets doesn't do much for the general population. I don't know what "2 markets" you're talking about, but they lit up 7 new markets yesterday alone. I think T-Mobile is referring to super markets, as that is the footprint size.  | |
|
 |  |  |  |  tiger72SexaT duorPPremium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO kudos:1 | Re: Not "As Fast" Hrmm. The Dallas/Ft. Worth Metroplex seems to be a bit larger than a supermarket, but hey - who cares about reality? | |
|
 |  |  |  ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium join:2005-03-14 Putnam, CT kudos:4 | With 42 mb service? That is what I was referring to. | |
|
 |  |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon Online DSL
| HSPA+ 21 Mbps is live in a fair number of markets...more markets than Clear has outfitted with 4G service at this point if I'm not mistaken. Since it's kinda hard to push 21+ Mbps over copper (I GUARANTEE that T-Mo isn't using DS3s to haul their bandwidth), the sites that support HSPA+ right now will likely handle an upgrade to 42 Mbps just fine. | |
|
 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 | Re: Not "As Fast" It's supposed to be, yes. I believe the issue with WiMAX is building penetration or something similar. 2500MHz works wonders for near/non-line-of-sight connectivity...or, rather, just the opposite. | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  |  See 12 replies to this post |
 |  OCZThe Former Pocket join:2009-05-15 Saint Paul, MN Reviews:
·Virgin Mobile Br..
| said by Gbcue:But *fastER* than "Verizon's upcoming LTE service (5-12 Mbps) and Clearwire (3-6 Mbps)"! "a few extra megabits?" 42 mbps blows away most residential hard wired internet connections. Not to mention they aren't just a bunch of money greedy sack mouths that deprive you of every dollar and cent you've worked for. | |
|
 |  |  CjaicemanPremium,MVM join:2004-10-12 Parker, CO kudos:2 Reviews:
·Comcast Workplace
| Re: Not "As Fast" said by OCZ:said by Gbcue:But *fastER* than "Verizon's upcoming LTE service (5-12 Mbps) and Clearwire (3-6 Mbps)"! "a few extra megabits?" 42 mbps blows away most residential hard wired internet connections. Not to mention they aren't just a bunch of money greedy sack mouths that deprive you of every dollar and cent you've worked for. But they do have the smallest 3G network of the 4 national carriers. | |
|
 |  Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T Wireless Br..
·ViaTalk
·Verizon Broadban..
| said by Gbcue:But *fastER* than "Verizon's upcoming LTE service (5-12 Mbps) and Clearwire (3-6 Mbps)"! "a few extra megabits?" 42 mbps blows away most residential hard wired internet connections. This is excellent news for the robust nationwide T-Mobile 3G HSPA+ network! Now they need actual coverage to go a long with it. By 2011 LTE should be faster and WiMax already is capable of these speed's, the backhaul isn't I guess. -- 2010 Ford Fusion Sport | |
|
 jweekPremium join:1999-08-27 Reno, NV | backhaul??? "Granted, many users are more interested in coverage and reliability above of a few extra megabits per second"
how about a backhaul upgrade to existing footprint? still slow here! | |
|
 |  tiger72SexaT duorPPremium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO kudos:1 Reviews:
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T DSL Service
| Re: backhaul??? said by jweek:"Granted, many users are more interested in coverage and reliability above of a few extra megabits per second" how about a backhaul upgrade to existing footprint? still slow here! It's coming. Frankly, their backhaul when they rolled out their 3g service (just 2 years ago, btw) was underwhelming at best. They were still stuck on 2-3 T1's per tower. Deploying fiber to 20,000 towers takes a while. And they've been deploying it pretty quickly imho. -- "What makes us omniscient? Have we a record of omniscience? ...If we can't persuade nations with comparable values of the merit of our cause, we'd better reexamine our reasoning." -United States Secretary of Defense (1961-1968) Robert S. McNamara | |
|
 cchhat01The Guru join:2001-05-01 Elmhurst, NY | Ughhhh! Can anyone explain to me why there is such a huge latency in my neighborhood (elmhurst) with Tmobile 3G. I often run the Speedtest app on my phone and if I'm awake late in teh night I will see awesome speeds upto 1.8Mbps down and 1.3 mbps up. However during the evening around 6-10PM just when I would like to use my phone (while Im not at work), speeds are unbearable (around 200-400kbps down and about 70kbps up)... and the upstream is so shotty sometimes that I can see the upload test stutter on the SpeedTest.Net and the FCC Broadband Test App on my Nexus One. Is this grounds to complain to Tmobile to add more backhaul? I suspect there are a lot of Tmobile users in my area who are actually on the 3G tower... I simply would like to watch some videos using the YouTube and TEDMobile app without having the stuttering... Otherwise whats the point of paying for 3G when I cant use it like its meant to be used.
Chirag -- Chirag's Website | |
|
 |
|