T-Mobile Unveils New, Cheaper 'Unlimited' Plans

So far, no problems with the Sprint network that Virgin rides on.

TMO CANNOT roam!!!! That's why they want to acquire roaming rights from ATT in their "break-up" agreement with them WHEN the deal falls through...PLZ do your research before you start spitting nonsense

Doesn't VIRGIN use SPRINT's network?
Yeah, no thanks. All my friends who had sprint stopped coming to my house cause they couldn't get signal. Wonder if I could sue sprint for ruining numerous friendships for me?
And what does VIRGIN charge for unlimited talk+text+data? $60.

Wonder if I could sue sprint for ruining numerous friendships for me?

Yeah, no thanks. All my friends who had sprint stopped coming to my house cause they couldn't get signal. Wonder if I could sue sprint for ruining numerous friendships for me?

Doesn't VIRGIN use SPRINT's network?
Yeah, no thanks. All my friends who had sprint stopped coming to my house cause they couldn't get signal. Wonder if I could sue sprint for ruining numerous friendships for me?
And what does VIRGIN charge for unlimited talk+text+data? $60.

TMO has coverage in your home as long as you have a wireless router and the phone has Wireless UMTS/UMA calling enabled on it. Works great!

their UMA phones actually are like i said about 50-90%. They're moving ALL of their phones to that thus- why they're pushing smart phones and Androiod. UMA works GREAT. But your setup will NOT work wile your out of your home area. My UMA calling will. It works in anywhere i have an open Internet Connection or know the password to the router where I'm at. I can even connect to the Internet at Nordstroms Department Stores, hotels, and much more. Something you can't do on yours.

Dear T-Mobile: go visit virginwirelessusa.com.
Come back after you do your reading.

Thanks,
-The USA

Virgin Mobile has a history of launching programs their network can't support (Optimus V, MC760 "unlimited" internet).

Way to completelly miss the point. My t-mobile phone works just fine on at&ts network (my Touch Pro 2 is unlocked) - but it doesn't get 3g service on it because they use different frequencies.

I didn't miss the point. You remade my point. They just can't shut down the 3G network if it affects current contracts. You must not know how mergers with contracts work do you?

yes they do. They have to leave all services and prices in place if their network does NOT work with current TMO phones that are on the market in contract. If someone's phone does NOT work on the ATT network then TMO's network must be kept in place. T could not just shut the network down or start moving things around.

That is an option but must people won't just upgrade to get the new phone when their current price is lower than what ATT's price will be. Granted my plan price would the same after said and done---but i don't want to give up my UMA calling.

VZ has just as many dead spots as ATT. VZ only focuses on the areas they service and could careless than any others. If they had it their way; they'd kill off all of their remote areas for cell service as well. They only obtained those networks when buying out Airtouch and Dobson's Cell One, and GTE Mobility. They took Alltel only because they needed to extend some of their native coverage that already sucked.

I have TMO and I don't see anything going wrong with the deal if and when it move forward.

not true. All you are doing with that spreading FUD! If you sign up under a contract with TMO and ATT takes over ATT MUST legally give you what your contract states unless YOU upgrade your services (renew contracts).

T just can't change your terms; They buy your contract and everything else.

I'm not. I'm starting the facts. You fail to see them. And if you leave after the merger- then you pay the ETF. Just by a company buying your current contract does NOT allow you out of your ETF.

Those customers that accept the new offers are just stupid to take them right away instead of waiting their current contract out. And service being degraded? Proof please or are we just trying to spread more fud with this? ATT has one of the better networks; the only thing that killed their network was the whole iPhone thing and the fanboys jumping on them like they were the new slice bread.

And greener pastures? VZ? LMAO! Just as bad as ATT. Sprint? VERY Limited network their AiRavz don't work like they claim; and customer service is just as bad. Also if you call in with too many complaints against service; they send you a nasty gram and ask you to leave. You'll also be asked to pay your ETF because its in their contract. That's always a good thing and greener pastures right? But have you ever heard of that its not always green on the other side? I'm sure you and others will find that out.

Where is your proof that TMO will degrade after ATT? You have any actual proof besides what you claim?

I'm sure you don't. And incompetence of Apple? LMAO! Smart one! Gotta cut someone down for that eh? And yes any network that added the amount of customers ATT did that fast will crash and just as fast. That's proven. Should we go back to see how the Wireless network work? They work like any other network;They are a SHARED service. You add too many customers too fast the network will fall. That is just common sense that you seem to lack in that department.

And greener pastures? LMAO! Yah Sprint; cheap service that doesn't work; VZ; high prices and customer service that is just as bad and best part is- still out sources 90% of their company. Great company eh?!? But I'm sure you enjoy giving your money to a company that supports out sourcing your credit card information and other billing information to other countries.

That sounds very familiar to a certain other GSM carriers data cap.

Okay. Time to promote VZW now eh?