 tc1uscg join:2005-03-09 Saint Clair Shores, MI | Whats the catch? So, pay off in installments? Got to wonder if you will have to sign on for a 2 year agreement to get that choice. There will be 2 pricing plans. 1 for those slipping them the plastic and those who opt for the monthly payments. Hmm.. gotta wonder whats going on in T-MO land. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Whats the catch? Yes you will, just like the More & Even More plans a few years ago. | |
|
 |  jagged join:2003-07-01 Boynton Beach, FL | What's going on is phone subsidies are killing everyone. T-Mobile introed non-subsidized plans and their costs fell by about 3%.
In a subsidized plan the cell phone carrier doesn't break even until 7-8 months into a customer's contract. Sometime it's a year.
Besides, if you were to get two GSIII phones on a family T-Mobile Value plan vs AT&T you'd be paying about $600 less over 2 years, get more minutes, and not have any data overage fees | |
|
 |  |  dnoyeBFerrous Phallus join:2000-10-09 Southfield, MI Reviews:
·Comcast
| Re: Whats the catch? true. And probably they can start an arm of tmobile for loans much like GM has GMAC for car loans. Then they can differentiate the two companies. One making profits like a loan company does and competing on that level, and one making profits like a phone company does and competing on that level.
Recent moves by tmobile have been so intelligent as to make me want to invest in that company. How long can it last though before they try to flog and deceive the customers for extra pennies again!? -- dnoyeB "Then said I, Wisdom [is] better than strength: nevertheless the poor man's wisdom [is] despised, and his words are not heard. " Ecclesiastes 9:16
| |
|
 |  | | The only difference between the Classic and the Value plan with the installments is you don't have to keep on paying extra for your phone after you have paid it off. Your bill goes down $10-$20 a month. | |
|
 |  | | That would be interesting to find out. I am wondering if T-Mobile just wants to go out of service in the USA? | |
|
 | | Hey It's easy to be that cocky now that your flush with AT&T cash and spectrum. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Hey Always got my own phones anyway. Had more choice and didn't have to use TMO's offerings. Plus feeling no compunction about rooting the phone. I don't care about speed, so I was using phones from Europe bought unlocked. Now since TMO is fiddling with 1900 band, they would have been just fine.
I'll probably get a Nexus 4 from Google next year. Not TMO. | |
|
 |  | | What planet are you living on? AT&T has absolutely nothing to do with t-mobile and certainly does not have access to AT&T cash or spectrum. You are way behind the curve, my friend. -- "A 3.4KHz bandwidth is more than sufficient to convey the messages." Mazillo August 1, 2009 | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  |  |
 n2jtx join:2001-01-13 Glen Head, NY | Contract So if you opt to pay the full price for the device up front will it be unlocked AND will you get to forgo a contract? If not, why? It would appear that the reason traditionally given for being locked into a contract and being SIM locked (recovering the device subsidy) would not apply.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. -- I support the right to keep and arm bears. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Contract The Value plan still requires a 2-year contract. I'm really not sure why, other than that they feel like they can. The main reason I'm with TMO is that my Even More Plus plan did not require a contract. | |
|
 |  |  gerick join:2001-01-17 San Antonio, TX | Re: Contract said by LostInWoods:The Value plan still requires a 2-year contract. I'm really not sure why It is my understanding that the contract is only required if you are buying the phone with the installment plan. Pay for the phone up front or BYOD, no contract. Want to take advantage of 20-month free financing, need contract. | |
|
 |  |  dnoyeBFerrous Phallus join:2000-10-09 Southfield, MI Reviews:
·Comcast
| I don't know what you mean by 'value' but T-Mobile's most inexpensive plans come without a contract. contract plans are more expensive presumably because they mostly carry subsidies. -- dnoyeB "Then said I, Wisdom [is] better than strength: nevertheless the poor man's wisdom [is] despised, and his words are not heard. " Ecclesiastes 9:16
| |
|
 |  |  | | Right now the contract lock in provides a decent discount vs off contract. The only problem I have with T-Mo right now is coverage in my neighborhood is non-existant, but then AT&T is the only one with decent coverage there. Verizon and Sprint are worse then T-Mo. Odd given that it is a highly developed suburb of DC. -- I voted for Snoopy! | |
|
 IPPlanManHoly Cable Modem Batman join:2000-09-20 Washington, DC kudos:1 | What about Sprint or Verizon? Why isn't T-Mobile saying: "You love your iPhone, but you hate Verizon (or Sprint)"? | |
|
 |  GooberPremium join:2000-12-17 Naperville, IL kudos:5 Reviews:
·Dish Network
| Re: What about Sprint or Verizon? said by IPPlanMan:Why isn't T-Mobile saying: "You love your iPhone, but you hate Verizon (or Sprint)"? GSM/CDMA -- How nice. This country is being run by a broken record repeating the same two words over and over. Cretin. | |
|
 |  tiger72SexaT duorPPremium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO kudos:1 | During his speech announcing this, Legere accidentally said "Sprint" before correcting himself to say "ATT". He excused himself saying that Sprint would be the easy one to go after. | |
|
 | | t-mobile current value plan customer I've been on tmobile value plan a year , and I was wondering If I go to a mobile store and get a phone on the installment plan and I pay it off in two months will my contract still be less than a year ? | |
|
 |  tc1uscg join:2005-03-09 Saint Clair Shores, MI | Re: t-mobile current value plan customer said by xmarklive:I've been on tmobile value plan a year , and I was wondering If I go to a mobile store and get a phone on the installment plan and I pay it off in two months will my contract still be less than a year ? Good point. There could be a EPF (Early Payoff Fee) penalty . I'm sure they will think of ways to make you "pay" one way or the other.  | |
|
 |  |  jagged join:2003-07-01 Boynton Beach, FL | Re: t-mobile current value plan customer no such thing as a free ride | |
|
 |  |  |  AlakarFacts do not cease to exist when ignored join:2001-03-23 Milwaukee, WI | Re: t-mobile current value plan customer It's actually a very good deal. I've bought a couple of phones using T-Mobiles installment plan. It's interest free and you can pay it off early without penalty. -- "Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom; it is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." William Pitt the Younger | |
|
 |  |  | | I got a Note 2 on installment, and the sales rep that did my paperwork said that I can buy the phone, put it in $20/month installments, or just pay it off whenever I like. No penalties. Plus I get a $100 mail-in rebate from Samsung/T-mo. Once I get that $100 in the bank, I'll be using that in addition to the difference I haven't paid yet to pay off my phone completely. | |
|
 |  |  | | You pay the extra $20 for 20 months but if you give them the $400 two months into the contract they will take the additional $20 off but you will still be in contract for the rest of the two years. | |
|
 |  |  |  tc1uscg join:2005-03-09 Saint Clair Shores, MI | Re: t-mobile current value plan customer They are going to get you one way or another. You have to pay for your phones over an extended period of time or up front but, your monthly service plan will cost the same regardless so even if they don't need to make up for shelling out full price to the manufacture for the equipment, they won't lower the service plans? So, other then fudging the numbers to make them look good to the investors (less money going out to pay for the phones), I don't see the point of all this. Americans love credit as much as some like their crack so some who kick the habit will see there is no benefit to them (the customer) to pay monthly installments on the phone. Over time, what may happen is people who would normally get a high end phone will drop back down to those 10 key flip phones. Then the likes of HTC, Motorola, Apple will turn the screws on TMO to get more highend product out the door or provide a cheaper smart phone that people seem to be addicted to (which we will never see that happen with apple). JMO but it sounded good in my head.  | |
|
 |  cdruGo ColtsPremium,MVM join:2003-05-14 Fort Wayne, IN kudos:7 | said by xmarklive:I've been on tmobile value plan a year , and I was wondering If I go to a mobile store and get a phone on the installment plan and I pay it off in two months will my contract still be less than a year ? No. Value plans are still bound by a 2-year contract. There is no penalty to pay off a EIP (equipment installment plan) early, however you must pay off the entire plan for all devices purchased under that plan at the same time. (e.g. you and your spouse both get a SGIII, you have to pay off the balance on both at the same time). Any amount more than the monthly payment but less than a complete payoff is just applied as a credit to your account and would be applied towards your next bill.
If you want no contract then you'll have to buy your phone with a credit card or cash straight up and go with a Monthly4G or other prepaid plan. | |
|
 | | They way it should be... And this is exactly how it should be. Buy the device you want and then get the service you want.
Let the subsidies stop across the board then let the true market value of these phones start settling in. The days of a $500 phone will be done. | |
|
 |  LinklistPremium join:2002-03-03 Longport, NJ kudos:5 | Re: They way it should be... said by Skippy25:And this is exactly how it should be. Buy the device you want and then get the service you want.
Let the subsidies stop across the board then let the true market value of these phones start settling in. The days of a $500 phone will be done. It definitely would reduce the price, over time, for all these overpriced smartphones. And people would stop upgrading every 2 yrs like clockwork as well. -- A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves money from the public treasury. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: They way it should be... I upgrade about every 6 months and resell my old phone for a good portion of the cost of the new one. It would kill my hustle...  | |
|
 |  axus join:2001-06-18 Washington, DC | I think it's great that different businesses can offer different plans. People might have different ideas about "the way it should be".
These phones really do cost a lot to produce and repair. I think T-mobile is taking a good approach here, they can make more money making loans for equipment than they can subsidizing it. And people like me can buy a Nexus 4 outright without feeling that I lost out on subsidy savings. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: They way it should be... said by axus:These phones really do cost a lot to produce and repair. No they don't. | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: They way it should be... Then start building the phones yourself, since it isn't expensive. Problem solved. | |
|
 | | Getting out of the postpaid market What it sounds like to me they are getting out of the post a market and moving over to prepaid. | |
|
 |  Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·MegaPath
| Re: Getting out of the postpaid market They've been making more $$$ on their prepaid side. They don't lose on the equipment when its paid for up front. Unlike you get a post-paid customer, pays 3 or 4 bills, runs 5-6 up and never pays, got a great phone basically FREE and took it else where. TMO is sitting with the debt. I don't blame them. | |
|
 |  |  FBGuyPremium join:2005-03-19 Evanston, IL Reviews:
·Comcast
·T-Mobile US
| Re: Getting out of the postpaid market said by TBusiness:Unlike you get a post-paid customer, pays 3 or 4 bills, runs 5-6 up and never pays, got a great phone basically FREE and took it else where. how does this work? subsidized phones are usually locked to the carrier. | |
|
 | | ? Keeping the same price for plans and dropping the subsidy while locking in a contract seems like a lose lose to the customer.
Shouldn't customers demand lower plan prices in exchange for the loss of subsidy or am I missing something?... | |
|
 |  | | Re: ? Read the article or check out t-mobile's value plans, they are about $20 cheaper than the subsidized classic plans, the value plans actually save you money in the long run. | |
|
 Reviews:
·Optimum Online
| Prepaid I think Tmo is starting to realize the value behind focusing their costs in running the network and leaving the handset nitpicking up to the consumer, following on the European wireless industry model. Since the advent of Android and rooting, the add-ons most carriers have gotten used to cashing in on (ringtones, music download, etc) have all but dried up. | |
|
 |  |
 |  Lone WolfIndependent Voter, Buy Gold and GunsPremium join:2001-12-30 USA kudos:1 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
·Comcast
| said by Network Guy:I think Tmo is starting to realize the value behind focusing their costs in running the network and leaving the handset nitpicking up to the consumer, following on the European wireless industry model. Since the advent of Android and rooting, the add-ons most carriers have gotten used to cashing in on (ringtones, music download, etc) have all but dried up. +1
Bingo, you hit the nail on the head. -- Another 4 years of Hope and Change. The rich will still get richer and the poor get an Obamaphone and Food Stamps. lol
| |
|
 Reviews:
·Insight Communic..
·WOW Internet and..
| T-Mobile is lame They only offer 2G service where I live. Verizon has LTE, AT&T has HSPA+ with plans to offer LTE (it's live about 15 minutes away), and Sprint has 3G with plans to offer LTE "in the coming months" (officially on the list). Come on T-Mobile, quit living in the past and step it up. -- My posts are of my own opinion, not my employer's. | |
|
 |  | | Re: T-Mobile is lame "months coming" could be 1month to years with Sprint's time table. They still have not deployed in major cities where they should be focused. | |
|
 |  |  tiger72SexaT duorPPremium join:2001-03-28 Saint Louis, MO kudos:1 | Re: T-Mobile is lame Yeah I find it humorous complaining about T-Mobile and then advocating for Sprint in the same sentence. | |
|
 |  NYGiants join:2012-08-31 Bowling Green, VA | Same as me, spotty 2G (T-Mobile) as Verizon and AT&T both have a form of 4G in my area. Even in the cities around me (Richmond) (Fredericksburg) are 3G. They are also behind on LTE deployment by 90, 100, and 440 markets (t-mobile has zero). | |
|
 |  jagged join:2003-07-01 Boynton Beach, FL | if you're in the boonies don't expect much from T-Mobile | |
|
 C0deZer0Oc'D To Rhythm And PolicePremium join:2001-10-03 Tempe, AZ | Good idea, but not that great for end users Particularly if you've yet to have a phone that has actually remained useful after that first year. Pretty much every phone I've ever had from every carrier I've ever had just seemed to fall apart after that first year. Either its ability to retain a signal would deteriorate, or it would drop calls constantly. So this wouldn't really benefit me any more than a subsidized phone on a contract either. -- Because, f*ck Sony | |
|
 |  See 9 replies to this post |
|
 aztr0 join:2007-10-28 Brooklyn, NY Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·DIRECTV
| T-Mobile hopes that this helps differentiate them in ... "T-Mobile hopes that this helps differentiate them in the market moving forward."
What separated them was that they offered cheap/free devices at a cheap monthly rate albeit 2 year contracts.... was I wrong in that train of thought about this carrier? | |
|
 | | Reduced MRC??? So since the cost of the device is no longer subsidized, does that mean the rate plan rates will go down too? After all, if i need to pay for the entire device amount my self, the MRC should be less..... -- Insanity is living in a state of illusion. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Reduced MRC??? Duh, of course. | |
|
 Lone WolfIndependent Voter, Buy Gold and GunsPremium join:2001-12-30 USA kudos:1 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
·Comcast
| What Will They Do? I mean the people that think they are getting a deal by buying subsidized phones but are paying up to $3000 over 2 years for their $400 phone and service when they can buy a new unlocked phone and get full, unlimited service for about $40 monthly. Some people say can't afford to lay out $400 to $800 for a new phone so they get subsidized phones. These must be the same people that use Rent-A-Center for their furniture and appliances. 
»www.engadget.com/2010/02/23/edit···-of-thi/
Most American carriers partly recoup deeper subsidies on higher-end devices by requiring lucrative data plans, and as annoying as that is, I think that it's the closest we've come to nailing the real fix. The next step is to come to terms with the fact that, for all practical purposes, $0 and $100 are the same thing -- over the course of a two-year contract, the upfront sticker price you pay for a phone is trivial. Seriously, it's a drop in the bucket: total cost of ownership for a smartphone on any of the US nationals can run beyond $3,000 by the time your 24 months is up. European wireless companies began to halt subsidies a while ago. See »online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142···618.html -- Another 4 years of Hope and Change. The rich will still get richer and the poor get an Obamaphone and Food Stamps. lol
| |
|
 EGeezerGo CatsPremium join:2002-08-04 Midwest kudos:8 | Sounds like a good idea - if ... If they offer unlocked phones or allow BYO phones and reduce their monthly rate, it sounds great!
I'd mentioned the idea of offering a BYO phone - or buying from Verizon outright at list - to a Verizon manager who claimed they have to pay full retail for iPhones. My proposal was simple - if the phone costs $400, knock off all the price of the phone except $50 in the two year contract. That way they make $50 more than they would have made by subsidizing the phone to get a two year contract.
The response? "We're not in business to be a charity".
Strange comment indeed considering Verizon would make $50 more than under their present subsidy contract. -- Buckle Up. It makes it harder for the aliens to suck you out of your car.
| |
|
 |  C0deZer0Oc'D To Rhythm And PolicePremium join:2001-10-03 Tempe, AZ | Re: Sounds like a good idea - if ... I think the point is that if you have an unlocked or bring your own phone to use on their network, then you wouldn't have to pay that initial deposit,etc. So you'll be starting off at the rate of the plan. -- Because, f*ck Sony | |
|
 DSLuckyPremium join:2002-04-23 Maud, OK | Good thing in the long run.. I think this will be a good thing, as it will now show the true costs of the handsets, and will force manufacturers to lower handset prices. When the cost of the handset is hidden, mfg's can get away with charging 6-700 for a phone..That won't be the case if all carriers start going like T-Mobile.
Can't happen soon enough for me. | |
|
 monchisPremium join:2002-12-09 Los Angeles, CA kudos:1 | More straightforward. In my opinion, their value plans are more straightforward to their customers.
Basically, they tell you, you are going to pay an extra 15-20/month that goes towards paying off your phone.
Or feel free to pay it off now or whenever you're ready. 0 finance charges.
Value plans are cheaper than their classic plans as well by 20 bucks.
-- dslreports.com | |
|
 BiggA join:2005-11-23 EARTH | The larger carriers don't need to respond AT&T and Verizon have the networks. T-Mobile could be free, and most users wouldn't want it. | |
|
 |  See 7 replies to this post |
 |
|