Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category TelcoTV, Broadband Film Rentals Don't Scare Cable (Yet)
Studying the habits of the elusive American couch potato...
(old news - 02:23PM Friday Apr 04 2008)
tags: Video · competition · business · cable · telco
The Convergence Consulting Group is in their sixth year of studying the habits of that not-at-all-rare beast: the American couch potato. The group just released two new reports focusing on on the online viewing habits of U.S. and Canadian consumers, and the battle of the triple play between cable and telcos. The general gist? Alternative video delivery outfits (Xbox 360, Vuze, AppleTV) aren't remotely ready to run with the big dogs, and cable VoIP continues to take off at a faster pace than TelcoTV.

Click for full size
We spoke to Convergence analysts, who tell us cable operators now control more than 80% of the VoIP market, and will provide phone service to 19% of the nation's phone customers by the end of this year. The phone companies, in part due to the broader effort of building out TV infrastructure, will only have 4% of all paying TV customers by the time 2009 begins (in contrast to 2% last year).

Convergence tells us the RBOCs lost 8% of their residential phone customers in 2007, and will lose the same percentage in 2008. We've previously noted that AT&T, Verizon, Qwest and Embarq are collectively losing roughly 2.6 million landline customers per quarter, with a large chunk of those users heading for cable VoIP or going cell only.

Cable operators have started to see some impact from telcoTV, but the impact isn't terrifying operators just yet. Cable lost just 1% of their customer base in 2007, and Convergence says satellite operators won't lose market share until 2010. Cable operators are winning the triple play race, and continue to add more residential broadband customers per year than the baby bells. The group confirms the obvious slowdown in total residential broadband user additions, noting there were a million fewer new customers added in 2007 than in 2006.

As for broadband-based competition to traditional TV models, the group calls bypassing entrenched players and selling direct to customers "an economic dead end." That's not to say that online video isn't growing, but the majority of viewing is of short clips, and only 2% of TV ad revenue was from online sources. There is growth in online film & TV viewing, and Convergence analyst Bram Eiley tells us they think Apple will be the online download rental leader within 18 months. But compare Apple to the major broadcast industry:
The average TV subscriber home pays $64/month and watches 250 hours of TV, equating to $.25/hour. Apple's run-rate for TV shows ($2 price) sold in 2006 was just 200,000 episodes per TV show, in 2007 this declined to 160,000 episodes per show (per show revenue is underwhelming, equating to an average 30 second TV ad).
Most films come to Apple 30 days after brick and mortar and mail rental outfits have them. iTunes/AppleTV limitations also annoy many users. Meanwhile, other options like the Xbox 360 have seen some success, but there's only 9 million 360's in the market as of the end of 2007. Whether we're talking rental or sales, the reach, film selection and feature set just isn't there yet to do major damage to traditional delivery.

Online represented 2% of US Movie/TV sales in 2007 and we forecast 3% for 2010.
-Convergence Consulting
"Selection is a problem, ease of use 'can' be a problem but thats not the main issue, and we don't think download time is a big issue either," says Eiley. "What we are saying is that on the rental side is that mail, kiosk, store and cable VOD are all major competitors to online...on the sales side it's mainly that you can't buy most new movies through Apple." The market share breakdown illustrates the chasm between hype and reality:
We forecast Stores will represent 44% of 2010 US Movie/TV Rental market revenue, Mail 37%, Kiosks 11% and Online 7%; from 71%, 25%, 4%, and 1% respectively in 2007. Online represented 2% of US Movie/TV sales in 2007 and we forecast 3% for 2010.
What about established broadcasters pushing whole-heartedly into the online distribution arena? "There is no current economic rationale for Broadcasters & Cable Networks to abandon traditional TV or attempt to accelerate a transition to a total online model," says the group. "To do so would put $66 billion in traditional TV advertising revenue and $30 billion in cable, satellite, telco TV provider programming fees at risk."

Though the numbers illustrate that the death of traditional TV will be slow in coming, growth in online video advertising should be strong. Convergence says that Broadcaster, local station and cable networks made $1.4 billion (2% of total ad income) in 2007, a number that should grow to $6.4 billion (8%) in 2011. Convergence also estimates that while 9% of their user bases watched full TV episodes online in 2007 (6% in 2006), 14% will in 2008, 19% in 2009, and 23% for 2010.

One thing not studied is the impact piracy is having on all of these business models. It's again here the elephant in the room, something we've noticed previously when eyeballing industry, blog, and media analysis of TV trends. That's an oversight, given that all of these companies are competing with piracy for user attention. Eiley tells us they may include piracy in future reports.

Related:
  1. FiOSTV Tops Cable
  2. Tracking FiOS TV Bundle Price Changes
  3. Should Cable Operators Offer Wireless?
  4. Pittsburgh City Council Approves FiOS Franchise
  5. What Network Neutrality Is REALLY About
  6. WSJ Thinks Verizon Could Buy DirecTV
  7. Cable Industry: Shucks, Guess Nobody Wants CableCARDs
  8. Comcast Internet Video Launching Before Year End
Forums » TelcoTV, Broadband Film Rentals Don't Scare Cable (Yet)
view: topics flat text 
Post a:
SilverSurfer

join:2007-08-19

No Brainer Here

Of course BB rentals don't scare cable. With ISPs throttling/blocking/capping left & right, why would they be scared?
jc100

join:2002-04-10

Re: No Brainer Here

Personally, I wouldn't get voip if you gave it to me for free. I for one enjoy having a phone service if the power goes out or my internet is down. Call me crazy but voip really isn't that good. At least where I live, a local landline without long distance is much cheaper with voip. Maybe if long distance were added, the cost would be a bit higher. Still, in my mind, I'd rather have the landline. To answer the question, well why don't you use your cell if the phone is down, it's simple. I got a cell but the home phone is still best. If I recall properly, voip being a cable phone, eliminates you from using the data services of a land line (Fax, dialup, etc). I might be wrong on that, and please correct me. Even if I am, the fact voip sucks with 911 is enough of a deterrent, too.
bamabrad

join:2006-01-27
Port Orange, FL

New Business model

Needs to include the CDN to persuade them to loosen their grip of their control-or at least share the wealth to include each others needs.

mod_wastrel

join:2008-03-28

Gotchas...

I'd get FiOS TV from Verizon, but I'm afraid they'd screw up my bill every month, and I don't want the hassle.

Dogfather
Premium
join:2007-12-26
Laguna Hills, CA
·Cox HSI
·Verizon FIOS
·Cox VOIP
·ViaTalk
·RoadRunner Cable
·MegaPath
·Verizon west (ex G..
·Time Warner VOIP


4 edits

Sure online media doesn't scare them

That's why cable operators are trying to normalize traffic shaping as well as running anti net-neutrality ads 24/7.

»youtube.com/watch?v=oPIYxtjLFeI


Meanwhile cable has little to fear form the telcos. At least in Verizon's case, they're raising prices like crazy. Since FiOS got deployed in my area, they're raised HSI rates 3 times and it's now more expensive than comparable service from the cable operator. And while video programming charges are a bit less, they've taken such large increases in hardware fees that any price benefit has vanished. Then there is POTS where cable is sucking off subs right and left.

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest

Re: Sure online media doesn't scare them

The Anti-Net neutrality ads are such BS. If there was truth in advertising, the ad would have to say "if Net Neutrality is blocked/banned/prevented, you will pay 5X as much to us!!! Mu-ha-hah-hah-ha!" (Evil laugh)

Because that's what it's really all about. The right to rape, pillage, and steal at will.

Double-dip? Hell, we're talking triple-dip,quad-dipping or worse!
--
"Regulatory capitalism is when companies invest in lawyers, lobbyists, and politicians, instead of plant, people, and customer service." - former FCC Chairman William Kennard (A real FCC Chairman, unlike the current Corporate Spokesperson in the job!)

Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA

HBO vs NetFlix

Ok, so it's not broadband rentals (yet), but my wife and I were just discussing the rising costs for HBO the other day. We've gotten HBO free for quite a few months due to ongoing problems that our cable company wasn't able to resolve. We were discussing whether it was worth it to keep HBO once our free months expired.

On one hand, we really did enjoy the movie selection that HBO offered. On the other hand, the $14.95 per month that HBO costs could pay for a NetFlix 2 DVD-per-month plan with cash to spare. And NetFlix has a much better movie selection. Toss in a video store trip and a stop by our local library's video rental area and I really don't see the reason to pay for one of the movie channels on cable.

In this case, cable could have an easy win. Their video-on-demand functionality is light years ahead of any non-cable-provider. However, the high costs per channel mean that I am unlikely to pay for anything other than the basic package.
--
-Jason Levine
Support a children's charity. Buy a calendar. Shooting For A Cause
Jason's Toolbox | PCQandA.com
BosstonesOwn

join:2002-12-15
Everett, MA
clubs:
·Comcast

Re: HBO vs NetFlix

I was discussing the same with my wife. The cost is just crazy , its costing way to much to live and these rate increases are killer.

I really am starting to see why piracy and people stealing cable and satellite are growing. The costs are growing faster then their incomes , and some people don't want to go with out their "extras".
--
"It's always funny until someone gets hurt......and then it's absolutely friggin' hysterical!"

morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:
·Charter Pipeline
·AT&T Southwest

Re: HBO vs NetFlix

said by BosstonesOwn See Profile :

costing way to much to live and these rate increases are killer.

snip

people don't want to go with out their "extras".
:D that's when you cut off your service.

KoolMoe
Aw Man
Premium
join:2001-02-14
Annapolis, MD
clubs:
·Verizon FIOS
·Speakeasy

Re: HBO vs NetFlix

Yeap. We switched from Comcast to FiosTV about a year ago, largely cause the same 'package' was about $10/month cheaper. Then also dropping HBO, we're paying about $25 - $30 a month less than we were with Comcast. I miss HBO but it's just not worth the price.
KM

dr3yec

join:2002-12-19
00000
·CableOne

cable needs to be worried!

I do 75% of my watching shows on the net. Cable tv is just to much for my blood. I haven't had cable in my house in at least 10 years. And to be frank. I will never ever have them in my house again. There prices are just out of touch. Compared to all the free programs on the net. Cable has one use. INTERNET!

Cliff Robertson

@rr.com

Nothing to fear?

Too late.

We don't use cable tv or satellite. The idea of paying $55 or more per month to get one specific channel is just obscene. TelcoTV, which promised to compete, charges more.

We'll subscribe anew, when a vendor has the courage to provide ala carte channel subscription. We'll probably spend more than $55, but we won't be paying for ESPN.

Until then, we'll do without, and Netflix / Redbox fills our evenings.

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest

We are not afraid. We control the pipes. We will win.

"We have everything under control. Nothing to see here.... Move Along."
Forums » TelcoTV, Broadband Film Rentals Don't Scare Cable (Yet)


Monday, 30-Nov 16:55:32 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.