The Bandwidth Crunch BogeymanThe capacity FUD rarely comes from actual techs... ( old news - 04:23PM Wednesday Sep 19 2007) tags: business · bandwidth · networkingBroadband industry lobbyists and PR departments have ceaselessly predicted a bandwidth crunch that never seems to arrive, usually because they're trying to justify a new policy or rate hike, stave off regulation or in the case of hardware vendors, sell network management hardware. While this stage play continues, techs and people studying these networks say everything is fine. The Star Tribune has an interesting article on the research of Andrew Odlyzko, who tracks Internet growth from the University of Minnesota and notes that growth is actually slowing. Odlyzko makes all of his research data freely available at this website: In spite of the widespread claims of continuing and even accelerating growth rates, Internet traffic growth appears to be decelerating. In the United States, there was a brief period of "Internet traffic doubling every 100 days" back in 1995-96, but already by 1997 growth subsided towards an approximate doubling every year CO1998, and more recently even that growth rate has declined towards 50-60% per year. While that's still significant, it's nowhere near the apocalyptic catastrophe being hoisted upon the public by think tankers with policy agendas. "Somehow, I get the feeling that the technology guys have a lot better handle on this than the lobbyists and the politicians," notes Mike Masnick over at Techdirt. Related:- Exaflood Pseudo-Scientists Need A New Gimmick
- Cox Scraps App-Specific Throttling Trials
- Cisco: Average Connection Consumes 11.4 GB Per Month
- Neutrality Rules Won't Impact Investment
- Metrocast Offers Fiber To The Home
- Comcast Still Fighting FCC Throttling Sanction
- Sandvine: P2P Now Just 20% Of Internet Use
- AT&T: No, We Didn't Misconfigure Our 3G Network
|
 Asmodeus
join:2004-05-26 Spring Valley, CA | enough! who in this world can get these clowns to just shut up already about the perceived notion that bandwidth is running out... BE QUIET YOU FOOLS! | |
|   MrMoody Carbon Based Lifeform
join:2002-09-03 Smithfield, NC | Shortage Because a perceived shortage increases the price, just like gasoline, etc. | |
|   McLovin Chicka chicka yeah Premium join:2005-06-12 Fairbanks, AK clubs: | QoS I agree with the fact that the reality of a shortage isn't there.
But if we are pushing for net neutrality to get rid of QoS and packet priority, then the "series of tubes" are going to have to get bigger. | |
|  Sammer
join:2005-12-22 Canonsburg, PA | All about Greed! The only ones talking about the non-existent bandwidth crunch are those with greedy motives. | |
|  |  |  |  |  bmn ? ? ? Premium,ExMod 2003-06 join:2001-03-15 hiatus | Re: All about Greed! Quoting a psychopath... Interesting way to make a point. | |
|  |  |  |   MrMoody Carbon Based Lifeform
join:2002-09-03 Smithfield, NC | Re: All about Greed! Yeah, manipulating commodity markets is good for everyone, just ask Enron. And Exxon. | |
|  SylphFi Premium join:2007-06-07 Moses Lake, WA
·Spectrum Communica..
| Tubes Considering all the dark fiber still out there, DOCSIS 3, copper circuit bonding, and improvements in Wifi/WiMax, the tubes are looking good. The bandwidth crunch could happen, but only because of all the egocentric Mafia-wannabe bot farmers (Storm, I am looking at you). Though, the ISP's really have no one to blame but themselves for letting this happen, and not quarantining infected machines. Thankfully, some (Qwest, and Zipp, for example) are starting to pay attention. | |
|   wifi4milez Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace
join:2004-08-07 New York, NY
·Verizon FIOS
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·RoadRunner Cable
·BroadVoice
| I cant say I 100% agree with this..... While I wouldnt say there is an imminent "crunch" approaching, I can tell you that I understand why rates are being increased and so forth. I have personally been involved in upgrading the capacity of all your favorite ISP/telco/mobile networks, in many places around the country. Companies such as Internap, ATT, Yipes, Tmobile, RCN, Cogent, and many others have been requesting that we rapidly provide them additional OC12's, OC48's, and OC192's to increase capacity. These circuits are not cheap either, so the fact that everyone claims rate hikes are unnecessary is ridiculous. Anyone who expects rates to stay the same, or even get lower, clearly has no idea how telecom works. -- я люблю Денди! | |
|  |  cmaenginsb Premium,MVM join:2001-03-19 Palmdale, CA
| Re: I cant say I 100% agree with this..... I guess it comes down to why these providers are adding capacity. In almost all cases it is because they are adding customers, you can't add customers and not add the capacity to support them. The cost of doing this is built into their cost of providing service to the new customers, so unless their existing customers start using more bandwidth there is no need for a rate increase.
As someone from the ISP industry, I have not seen the average use per customer jump that much. | |
|  |  |   wifi4milez Big Russ, 1918 to 2008. Rest in Peace
join:2004-08-07 New York, NY
·Verizon FIOS
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·RoadRunner Cable
·BroadVoice
| Re: I cant say I 100% agree with this..... said by cmaenginsb :I guess it comes down to why these providers are adding capacity. In almost all cases it is because they are adding customers, you can't add customers and not add the capacity to support them. The cost of doing this is built into their cost of providing service to the new customers, so unless their existing customers start using more bandwidth there is no need for a rate increase. As someone from the ISP industry, I have not seen the average use per customer jump that much. Dont get me wrong, its not that the average user is consuming that much more than before. It more about the fact that there are simply more users on the network who have high bandwidth needs. Most carriers are adding capacity so they can better serve their customers (which is good), however, the cost of being able to provide higher tiers of service must be passed on. Generally speaking, the first batch of (business) customers who purchase services after an upgrade end up paying for it in some way. Back in the 90's many dot.com carriers had a "build it and they will come" mentality, and that is why most of them are long gone. Today, you are hard pressed to find a carrier that will build into a new location without already having the business (ie. signed contracts from a customer) to pay for running and splicing fiber, and all the equipment necessary to serve the customers. Its all about $ folks, and if there is no foreseeable rate of return it just aint happening! -- я люблю Денди! | |
|  |  |  |  Skippy25
join:2000-09-13 Hazelwood, MO | Re: I cant say I 100% agree with this..... You need to also factor in the shear fact that overtime everything gets cheaper to provide. If broadband does not, then it is 100% a management problem. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  newf7
join:2007-09-11 Brampton, ON | Telecom's not the only game in town. The power grid could be used and would provide a huge increase in bandwidth at considerably lower cost than upgrading telecom networks. | |
|   GlenQuagmire Giggidy Giggidy Giggidy Goo Premium join:2004-02-16 Grand Rapids, MI | $$$$ As long as their is money to be made by ISP's their will always be enough bandwidth -- Yes, its stuck in a windows this time. | |
|  |  | |  |
|
|