republican-creole
site Search:


 
   
story category
The Can Spam Failure
Four years later...
by Karl Bode Wednesday 08-Aug-2007 tags: spam
Back when the Can Spam Act was first being proposed, we, along with everybody else, pointed out that the likely result would be more spam, as its primary interest was to protect "legit" mass marketers. Lo and behold, some four years later, The New Yorker puts things in perspective:

In the year after the law was enacted, less than seven per cent of spam complied with the requirements of the legislation, according to MX Logic, an Internet-security firm. Last year, compliance with the law never even reached one per cent. Corporate technology administrators watched, often dumbfounded, as spam volumes jumped noticeably in October, and then again in November. Postini, a prominent Internet-security firm, stopped twenty-two billion messages from reaching the mailboxes of its thirty-six thousand clients in November alone. The company now intercepts twelve spam messages for every e-mail delivered.

In a 2005 report to Congress (pdf), the FTC, with a few caveats, suggested that the act was, in fact, working, and was an effective new legal tool. Techdirt, meanwhile, explores how the law doesn't do much legally for individuals (or shops eager to make a business out of suing spammers).

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
SierraRob

join:2007-01-10
Prather, CA

Why is this news?

Wow, an act of Congress that DIDN'T solve any problem, but simply helped some rich people get richer. Shocking!

Why is this even news?

DHRacer
Fire Survivor

join:2000-10-10
Lake Arrowhead, CA
Reviews:
·Charter
·Verizon Online DSL

1 edit

Re: Why is this news?

It's an obvious disconnect between political leadership and reality.

Oh, wait, that's normal these days.

It should be news because it's another piece of wasted legislation with less teeth than Grampa Simpson.

We can only hope that some sort of reality-check might one day occur in the various levels of U.S. Government, but when the only checks they are interested in keep coming from big business, it isn't likely to occur in anyone's lifetime.

Edits for spelling, etc.

cableties
Premium
join:2005-01-27

US bureacracy at work! I mean recess...

"Release the gif PDF Spam hounds!!!"

By george, I think the politicians made more money off this than the spammers. (And I mean by PAC monies, and greased palms...)

Romney2012
Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe in
Premium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4

Why would anyone here be surprised?

Weekly there are msg threads and posts here saying that the music companies don't have a prayer on stopping all those so-intelligent users who steal music and videos at will.

But these same posters will now say it is all the governments fault for not stopping spam. Well, I submit that the spammers are probably at least twice as technically adept as all these posters who brag about stealing music and how they can't be caught.

So what would make anyone think that ANY LAW the gov't passed is going to stop spam? But if the pols didn't try, then the whining would be incessant that the gov't isn't doing anything.
--
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page
clickie

join:2005-05-22
Monroe, MI

Re: Why would anyone here be surprised?

I don't agree with your comments, but I agree with a portion of your premise. Indeed, it's time that the internet community respond to a problem created by technology with a technological solution.

Seems to me that it would be a rather easy to implement something to permit the recipient to verify the identity of the sender. By giving levels of trust, it could be easy to filter mail appropriately either by the end reader or at the final MTA, whichever the recipient so desires. Once someone reports a breach of trust with a sender's credentials, that information can be stored to assist others.

Of course, does Postini, Microsoft, Google, Yahoo and a handful of large ISPs really want this problem solved? Effective spam filtering is either a money maker or a marketing point for these people, and solving the problem affects their bottom line.

pog
Premium
join:2004-06-03
Kihei, HI
Reviews:
·Hawaiian Telcom

Re: Why would anyone here be surprised?

said by clickie:

Seems to me that it would be a rather easy to implement something to permit the recipient to verify the identity of the sender.
Seems to me you need to read up on things a bit.

Such systems already exist and have for many years... all have flaws, some very serious, that make them universally unadoptable. The basic fact is that email was originally built around trust and good faith... so any attempt to secure it is going to involve a kludge.

There is no magic bullet... all solutions have varying levels of collateral damage and/or ineffectiveness.
--
My Site
clickie

join:2005-05-22
Monroe, MI

Re: Why would anyone here be surprised?

Seems to me you're making the assumption that I don't know about SPF or domainkeys, et al. They fail because they try to stop spam within the MTA and don't give enough control the recipient to determine the level of trust they're willing to accept. All that remains is the way you determine trust; X.509 certificates or various signature schemes.

The MTA is built around trust, but that doesn't mean the client has to impart the same trust. Using multipart MIME formatting makes it compatible with existing mail systems, and isn't any more of a kludge than HTML/rich text formatting.

major marco
Res Firma Mitescere Nescit
Premium
join:2003-02-13
Stepford, CA
said by Romney2012:

But these same posters will now say it is all the governments fault for not stopping spam. Well, I submit that the spammers are probably at least twice as technically adept as all these posters who brag about stealing music and how they can't be caught.
You're comparing apples to oranges. Spam -specifically, the unsolicited kind- is not useful by any stretch of the imagination. No matter how you slice it, unsolicited spam is 100% adulterated garbage. File sharing OTOH, isn't even anywhere near the ballpark of this discussion. Nobody shares spam or wants to.
--
The Toll

DufiefData

join:2006-06-13
Gaithersburg, MD

1 edit

A government program failed?! I'm SHOCKED!

I am shocked--SHOCKED!--that a government program has failed to do what it advertised! How could Mommy Government fail all the believers who longingly yearned for Her salvation?!

Simply SHOCKED!

Rogue Wolf
Ate Your Homework, And Framed The Dog

join:2003-08-12
Troy, NY

Only one thing is going to stop spam...

...people not buying things advertised in spam.

So long as it makes money, it doesn't matter what rules and laws you put in place- someone's going to get around them.
--
Let not the Demon in your thoughts.
Let not the Demon in your dreams.
Lest you should awake one morn,
And find the Demon within thee.

Monday, 04-Jun 06:28:31 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.