Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category The FCC Gets Bombarded With Broadband Opinions
Everybody, at once, chimes in on new broadband plan...
01:29PM Wednesday Jun 10 2009 by Karl Bode
tags: competition · fcc · coverage · business · Politics
Uncle Sam this week opened the door to public comment on the government's new national broadband policy, and has quickly piled up more than three hundred of them from all manner of corporations, consumer advocates, corporate policy front organizations, random ninnies, and consumers. As you might expect, the responses range from a desire to see the United States government deploy a massive wholesale fiber network -- to comments pretending that there's no broadband problems that need fixing.

Consumer advocacy firm Free Press issued a comprehensive filing (pdf) asking the FCC to go back and seriously study all of their policy decisions since the 1996 Telecommunications Act to see if they actually helped anybody (other than incumbents). The Government of Japan chimed in as well, apparently confident after (like France) they took our since-discarded idea of local-loop unbundling and made it work.

Of course carriers like AT&T, Clearwire and Verizon are well represented in the comments, as are content operators like Google and hardware vendors like Cisco. All of the major corporations who commented are of course more than willing to expand broadband to every nook and cranny -- provided they get funding from the government and Uncle Sam doesn't impose any tough government regulation on industry.

It's that last bit that's going to make crafting a new broadband policy tricky. One of the biggest reasons we've had no broadband policy over the last decade is because major carriers like AT&T, Verizon and Comcast have spent millions to ensure that we don't. We've spent the last decade hearing how deregulation of the telecom sector leads naturally to broadband utopia -- and that all government regulation leads naturally to disaster.

Yet despite unprecedented deregulation in the sector over the last decade -- competition remains largely non-existent in many markets. The United States is ranked nineteenth in terms of average advertised download speed, fifteenth in terms of penetration (per 100 inhabitants) and seventeenth when it comes to the average monthly cost of a broadband subscription. Whatever your position on how it's accomplished, we can do better.

Related:
  1. USF: Uncle Sam's Blank check
  2. FCC Votes To Investigate Wireless Industry
  3. Comcast Can Officially Get Even More Gigantic
  4. Connected Nation Takes Inside Track On Minnesota Mapping, Too
  5. Echostar Joins Push For Lower Broadband Definitions
  6. What Network Neutrality Is REALLY About
  7. FCC: We're Halfway Done With National Broadband Plan
  8. 'Data Driven' FCC Still Using Ancient Data?
Forums » The FCC Gets Bombarded With Broadband Opinions
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Bit
Premium
join:2009-02-19
00000

Only those with the most money will get their voices heard

Welcome to politics as usual.
--
POKE 65495,1

Goober
Premium
join:2000-12-17
Naperville, IL

"every book and cranny"

lol.
JSRoman
Premium
join:2005-03-10
Callahan, FL


1 edit

These are comments from Comcast

»gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retr···20219851

Pages of intereset to folks here - pg 19,63-65

I'm sure there are more but do your own digging.

--
»www.seabee.navy.mil

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

Re: These are comments from Comcast

said by JSRoman See Profile :

»gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retr···20219851

Pages of intereset to folks here - pg 19,63-65

I'm sure there are more but do your own digging.

Comcast's comments look Ok to me. They don't look like they were designed to help them keep a monopoly in areas they serve.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page

IowaStudent
Premium
join:2008-08-21
Grinnell, IA

256kbps by 2010??

Wow, They have a goal of having 100 of the Largest Cities serviced with 256 kbps? by 2010?
Someone tell me what they where thinking?
jimbo2150

join:2004-05-10
Youngstown, OH

Re: 256kbps by 2010??

said by IowaStudent See Profile :

Wow, They have a goal of having 100 of the Largest Cities serviced with 256 kbps? by 2010?
Someone tell me what they where thinking?
"If we lower peoples' expectations enough, they won't care."
--

- "Techie" Jim

Pashune
Inhaling at 675 KB per sec.
Premium
join:2006-04-14
Gautier, MS
·CableOne
·AT&T Southeast

Re: 256kbps by 2010??

said by jimbo2150 See Profile :

said by IowaStudent See Profile :

Wow, They have a goal of having 100 of the Largest Cities serviced with 256 kbps? by 2010?
Someone tell me what they where thinking?
"If we lower peoples' expectations enough, they won't care."
That must mean by 2020, we should be back on 56k.
--
ISP: CableOne 3 mbit/300 kbit

Bit
Premium
join:2009-02-19
00000

1 edit
What do you mean? Didn't you get the memo, Time Warner says customers want to pay more and get less. We are just lacking the proper indoctrination education.
--
POKE 65495,1

TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast

said by IowaStudent See Profile :

Wow, They have a goal of having 100 of the Largest Cities serviced with 256 kbps? by 2010?
Someone tell me what they where thinking?
If you read a little further, you would have seen they had the same goals for "all other cities" and for all rural areas as well in the same timeframe. It was just that they broke down ALL their recommendations in to those 3 categories.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page

IowaStudent
Premium
join:2008-08-21
Grinnell, IA

Re: 256kbps by 2010??

Ah I misunderstood, I would hope the 256 kps is for areas where it is either Dial-Up or Satellite As, If I ever had to use less then what I have now (3 Mb Cable) I'd go crazy! but if all you ever had was Dial Up, then it would be an inprovment
Bob61571

join:2008-08-08
Washington, IL
256Kbps by 2010 for the 100 Largest Cities?!
Hmmmm?!?

They really know to set the bar high, don't they?
Lowest speed broadband that I see marketed is 768Kbps.

Maybe, they're in a time warp, and are living in 1999.
jester121
Premium
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL
·surpasshosting
·ViaTalk


1 edit

LMAO....

From »gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retr···20220379

This post is from Marjorie Lundquist, Ph D, a self-proclaimed Bioelectromagnetic Hygienist from Milwaukee.
"If the FCC refuses to inform the Congress that it is unable to develop a plan to accomplish the desired objective of providing 'robust broadband services' to all citizens and business safely, in the absense of needed research into the momentum-transmitting effects of radio-frequency fields, then I will have to conclude that the FCC is functioning within the USA as a terrorist organization and should be reported as such to the Department of Homeland Security, and should be treated as such by that agency!"
Thank God for freedom of speech.

EDIT: Even funnier is that she cited all of her own articles and work in the endnotes. Thanks for a great afternoon of laughs, Marjorie!

yolarry

join:2007-12-29
Creston, WV

I hope I get 256kb in 2011

and less legacy too
SuperWISP

join:2007-04-17
Laramie, WY

This is an op-ed piece, not a news story.

And it is heavily biased against ISPs. It also fails to note that "Free Press" is not a public interest group at all. It is funded by, and is essentially a lobbying arm of, Google -- a large, monopolistic corporation which invades Internet users' privacy (it reads GMail users' mail and is the largest source of spyware tracking cookies on the Net).

neowulf

join:2000-10-20
Port Orange, FL


4 edits

FBI CALEA

The FBI really is pushing hard for CALEA in whatever plan, a 8 page broadband policy report with CALEA being every other word...

Connected Nation report really had me sick, I mean they spend half their report defending themselves from the bad press they have received.

The MPAA one is pretty much what you would expect all about the horrors of piracy, and how we need to make sure ISP's can check users data to make sure they aren't breaking any copyright laws.

The Walt Disney Company; there should be no network neutrality in any plan.

Edit: My bad Connected Nation also have a 100 page report, that basically says most people who don't have broadband don't want broadband, or don't have a computer, while only 14% say not available in their area.
Forums » The FCC Gets Bombarded With Broadband Opinions


Saturday, 28-Nov 22:33:13 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole