The Great Internet ObamalypsePresidential inauguration breaks bandwidth records, but not networks ( old news - 09:47AM Wednesday Jan 21 2009) tags: Video · business · bandwidth · content · networkingTipped by nklb  We've frequently discussed and debunked the "exaflood," a term coined by the same think tank that brought you intelligent design, created in part to justify a shift to metered billing and decreased regulation in the sector. More real was the one-day Internet Obamalypse, with Arbor Networks reporting that most carriers saw their core network traffic jump anywhere from five to forty percent yesterday during the Presidential inauguration. "This multi terabit per second flood represents one of the single largest one day spikes in Internet traffic since ATLAS Internet Observatory monitoring began five years ago," says Arbor's Craig Labovitz. Traffic generated by the inauguration "handily" beat the last Internet traffic record set by the US Open. Akamai yesterday confirmed an Internet record with 7 million active simultaneous streams. Among ISPs, Arbor says the traffic surge centered on Flash (TCP port 1935) and UDP port 8247 (CNN streaming), noting that Flash traffic spiked by more than 60% in most providers and by 400% in a few of the larger cable operators. The company says that the infrastructure of at least two unnamed ISPs couldn't handle the strain -- showing clear failures and traffic drops during the traffic peaks. Despite the failures of the two anonymous ISPs, the Internet as a whole seemed to have handled the load rather well. Wireless networks probably felt a heavier strain, with AT&T saying they invested $4 million just to boost capacity for the day. In Washington DC, Verizon reported call volume five times higher than normal. They also note that Verizon Wireless DC customers sent/received 2.9 million SMS messages between 10am and pm yesterday. Despite the preparation, users on several major carriers reported dropped calls and other disconnects. Related:- Joost Beta Now Available To All
- What's Behind Slow FiOS HD Deployment?
- AT&T Slingbox 3G Fine Print Returns...
- ISPs Distance Themselves From British Telecom
- Cogeco Metered Billing Goes Live, Confuses Customers
- Google Starts Discussion About Speeding Things Up
- Google Voice Ban Is Clear Network Neutrality Violation
- What Network Neutrality Is REALLY About
|
  fatmanskinny Premium join:2004-01-04 Wandering
·Comcast Digital Vo..
·Comcast
1 edit | I am not surprised.... This man has changed the game regarding how all presidential elections are ran going forward and the internet will play a huge part in it.
On another note, I have a feeling that this will only inspire more companies to move towards metered billing. I wouldn't be surprised if it begins to hit business and enterprise accounts. -- Satan is always busy. He makes bad things look good and good things look bad! Watch that Devil. | |
|  |   elios
join:2005-11-15 Springfield, MO | Re: I am not surprised.... can i have rollover megs? | |
|  |  |  jc100
join:2002-04-10
| Re: I am not surprised.... What about meg specials. This month, get 100MB so you can stream one news video online!! Act now, as others only get a 25MB cap. Want GB's, well those will cost you an arm and a leg. Amazing, how the price of bandwidth has gone down, but what we pay, continues to rise. It'd be like taking a car from 1995 and appreciating it based on the cost of making it from then to now. 11,000 car in 1995 now should sell for probably 15,000. The components would be much less to make all these years later, if redone. Yet, why not boost the price. It makes perfect nonsense, errr sense, right? | |
|  |  |  |  KodiacZiller
join:2008-09-04 73368 | Re: I am not surprised.... LOL and how about a package with "unlimited IM's?" The regular package will be $.10 per IM.  | |
|  |  |  |  |  jc100
join:2002-04-10 | Re: I am not surprised.... No no no! It's an IM charged BASED on letters used on the regular, standard package. Unlimited IM's come with a hidden 500 MSG limit. Exceed it and they terminate your connection. | |
|  Kearnstd Elf Wizard Premium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ
| i know this i think the Websense server where i work crashed yesterday, because the CNN stream window the FB section went from blocked to refresing the comments at the time the usage peaked. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|  |  jester121
join:2003-08-09 Lake Zurich, IL | Re: i know this Our websense server happily blocked dozens of requests to a number of streaming video sites, just like any other day.  | |
|  |  |  |   R4M0N Brazilian Soccer Ownz Joo
join:2000-10-04 Glen Allen, VA | Nice jab at other people's beliefs As if that little tidbit about intelligent design added anything significant to the article.
I usually expect trolling in the comments section. | |
|  |   Shamayim I already have a Messiah. Premium join:2002-09-23 | Re: Nice jab at other people's beliefs Intelligent Design? I read the article - what are you referring to? | |
|  |  |   nklb Premium join:2000-11-17 Ann Arbor, MI clubs:
| Re: Nice jab at other people's beliefs I think he's referring to the very first sentence (bold highlighting mine):
said by DSLR article :
We've frequently discussed and debunked the "exaflood," a term coined by the same think tank that brought you intelligent design, created in part to justify a shift to metered billing and decreased regulation in the sector -- for all your Linux questions | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  lesopp
join:2001-06-27 Land O Lakes, FL | Obamalypse or gawking, no difference. | |
|  |  |   disconnected
@snet.net
| Re: Nice jab at other people's beliefs said by lesopp :Obamalypse or gawking, no difference. I'd say this whole situation is an "Obamination." Get me outa' this country!  | |
|  |  |  |  wtansill Ncc1701
join:2000-10-10 Falls Church, VA
| Re: Nice jab at other people's beliefs said by disconnected :I'd say this whole situation is an "Obamination." Get me outa' this country! If you really feel that way, tickets are available for purchase at airline counters at any airport in the country, or via any number of online reservation sites. -- "In every generation, there are those who want to rule well - but they mean to rule. They promise to be good masters - but they mean to be master." --Daniel Webster
| |
|  |  |  |  |   BabyBear Keep wise ...with Night-Owl
join:2007-01-11 | Re: Nice jab at other people's beliefs Just done forget your Passport. Make sure you get to the airport 2+ hours ahead of your flight. Take off your shoes, and no liquids over 3 oz.  | |
|  |  |  |  |   aSic application specific Premium join:2001-05-17 Wakulla, FL clubs: | but i want the government to give me my tickets as a handout... hell, they fly the illegals back to where they came from! two tickets please. -- Teamwork is a lot of people doing what I say. | |
|  |  Desdinova
join:2003-01-26 Gaithersburg, MD
| I think it was very appropriate. I want national policy to be decided on measurable situations whose impact on the culture and its populations can be measured and tested, not on beliefs. ID is not a fact and won't be until it can be proven and those results replicated by any who also attempt to test it.
That folks choose to believe it is fine and I wish more power to them. But any organization that that starts pushing their beliefs (and "belief" and "believe" are defined as certitude without evidence) are demonstrating an agenda that is suspect and which makes ALL their assumptions and conclusions suspicious as well. I'm pretty sure that that's the point Karl was making. | |
|  |  |   R4M0N Brazilian Soccer Ownz Joo
join:2000-10-04 Glen Allen, VA
·Comcast
| Re: Nice jab at other people's beliefs said by Desdinova :I think it was very appropriate. I want national policy to be decided on measurable situations whose impact on the culture and its populations can be measured and tested, not on beliefs. ID is not a fact and won't be until it can be proven and those results replicated by any who also attempt to test it. That folks choose to believe it is fine and I wish more power to them. But any organization that that starts pushing their beliefs (and "belief" and "believe" are defined as certitude without evidence) are demonstrating an agenda that is suspect and which makes ALL their assumptions and conclusions suspicious as well. I'm pretty sure that that's the point Karl was making. Not to make this into a creationism/evolutionism discussion (it wasn't), your standards would also disqualify the big bang theory, thus disqualifying a whole bunch of other theories that depend on it.
At some point both evolutionists and creationists alike have to rely on "believing" since neither theory can be proven. | |
|  |  |  |   Matt Gone playing Dragon Age Origins Premium join:2003-07-20 Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..
| Re: Nice jab at other people's beliefs said by R4M0N :said by Desdinova :I think it was very appropriate. I want national policy to be decided on measurable situations whose impact on the culture and its populations can be measured and tested, not on beliefs. ID is not a fact and won't be until it can be proven and those results replicated by any who also attempt to test it. That folks choose to believe it is fine and I wish more power to them. But any organization that that starts pushing their beliefs (and "belief" and "believe" are defined as certitude without evidence) are demonstrating an agenda that is suspect and which makes ALL their assumptions and conclusions suspicious as well. I'm pretty sure that that's the point Karl was making. Not to make this into a creationism/evolutionism discussion (it wasn't), your standards would also disqualify the big bang theory, thus disqualifying a whole bunch of other theories that depend on it. At some point both evolutionists and creationists alike have to rely on "believing" since neither theory can be proven. Big Bang has a lot more backing it up than ID? Look up the Cosmic Background Radiation ... | |
|  |  |  |   Valya6
@teksavvy.com
| quote: "At some point both evolutionists and creationists alike have to rely on "believing" since neither theory can be proven."
This. In spades.
Atheism is just as much a faith as Christianity/Judaism/Islam is. And I for one am glad! | |
|  |  |  |  |   Noah Vail Premium join:2004-12-10 Lorton, VA | Re: Nice jab at other people's beliefs said by Valya6 :
Atheism is just as much a faith as Christianity/Judaism/Islam is. Every bit as much as celebacy is a sexual act. NV -- I support Little League RollerBall. | |
|  |  |  |   karlmarx
join:2006-09-18 iraq
·Fairpoint Communic..
| Personally, I subscribe to the Flying Spaghetti Monster theory. The point Karl was making, is that the same people who don't believe in evolution, are again trying to cram more lies about the internet. Look at it this way, we EXIST, because by defition, the odds are we WILL exist. There are 500 Million Stars in the Galaxy, and most of them probably have planets. There are 100 Million Billion Galaxies in the universe, Thus, there are 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars in the universe. The fact that a LAB can CREATE the basic building block of life through random chemical reactions, shows that we are just the end result of a random chemical reaction. There is no 'greater purpose' in life, we exist simply because the odds are that we WOULD exist. Sure, a lot of people get scared when they think that we are nothing more than a collection of random chemicals, which is why religion was formed in the first place. But those who can see beyond their own ignorance, accept life for what it is, a random act of the universe, no 'god', no 'greater purpose', just randomness, are the ones who can drive our understanding of the universe. If we ceased to exist tomorrow, guess what, the universe wouldn't care. The earth is 4.5 Billion years old. Religion, by the most accurate estimates, started about 20,000 years ago. Religion has existed for 1/450,000th of the age of the earth. All religious people are just emotionally crippled people, who just can't accept the reality of the world. -- The happiest countries are the most secular. The struggle AGAINST corporations is the struggle FOR humanity! | |
|  |  |  |  |   brandon Some truth included in this post. Premium join:2003-03-31 Hurley, MS
·AT&T Southeast
| Re: Nice jab at other people's beliefs said by karlmarx :All religious people are just emotionally crippled people, who just can't accept the reality of the world. Hooray for bigotry! | |
|  |  |  |  |  |   R4M0N Brazilian Soccer Ownz Joo
join:2000-10-04 Glen Allen, VA
·Comcast
1 edit | Re: Nice jab at other people's beliefs said by brandon :said by karlmarx :All religious people are just emotionally crippled people, who just can't accept the reality of the world. Hooray for bigotry! Not only that but he's making a "scientific" point with very liberal use of logical leaps that, quite frankly, wouldn't fly in most scientific circles.
His response to my post was quite interesting considering the fact that I did not discredit those who believe in evolutionism, just pointed out that at some point both camps have to resort to believing something that can't be proven, which is a fact.
Whether that point comes much later in evolutionism than in creationism is irrelevant when applying scientific standards for proving something as fact. | |
|  |  |  |  |   funchords Hello Premium,MVM join:2001-03-11 Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype
1 edit | said by karlmarx :Thus, there are 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars in the universe. The fact that a LAB can CREATE the basic building block of life through random chemical reactions, shows that we are just the end result of a random chemical reaction. First, a lab cannot create the basic building block of life through RANDOM chemical reactions.
Second, that I lab can create a basic building block of life through a specific process doesn't mean anything, either.
The fact that CPR or defibrillators can restore the beat to a heart (save life) or that murderers and executioners exist (take life) says nothing to prove or disprove the entire set of religious beliefs.
said by karlmarx :There is no 'greater purpose' in life, we exist simply because the odds are that we WOULD exist. Prove it.
said by karlmarx : Sure, a lot of people get scared when they think that we are nothing more than a collection of random chemicals, which is why religion was formed in the first place. Perhaps. It's plausibly a reason of why it "catches on."
said by karlmarx : But those who can see beyond their own ignorance, accept life for what it is, a random act of the universe, no 'god', no 'greater purpose', just randomness, are the ones who can drive our understanding of the universe. But how well does randomness work out in real life? Do you practice randomness? Or do you have a plan? Do you go to school? Do you pay your bills? Do you eat or sleep at times that accommodate what you will be doing later?
Do we build structures randomly? Do we just put the roads wherever?
Perhaps there's something to the idea that an intelligence greater than our own capacity to understand is at work. And, perhaps not. But there's an awfully lot of balance in this randomness, and those two concepts are dissonant.
said by karlmarx :If we ceased to exist tomorrow, guess what, the universe wouldn't care. The earth is 4.5 Billion years old.
Probably. I am persuaded that it's a solid enough estimate.
And we know that, why? Because it aligns with other theories? We have no first-hand accounts. We have a very young science capability that is constantly disproving itself -- one that's been around for only a few HUNDRED years.
said by karlmarx :Religion, by the most accurate estimates, started about 20,000 years ago.
So the belief in a God is as old as man. That doesn't say much for your theory. 
Look, if God made us, he also made us curious seekers of explanations to our existence. If there is no God, we're still curious seekers of explanations to our existence.
said by karlmarx : All religious people are just emotionally crippled people, who just can't accept the reality of the world. All religious people are are just people who are seeking very common, normal answers as to "Who are we?" and "Why are we here?"
Anyone who thinks they have a grasp on the reality of the world -- one way or another -- is ignoring man's consistent ability to conclusively proclaim the final truth -- only to be later proven wrong. -- Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon -- KJ7RL ... Should we pay those who are "too big to fail" more money to ensure they stay that way? ... | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  wierdo
join:2001-02-16 Tulsa, OK
·Future Nine Corpor..
·Teliax VOIP
| Re: Nice jab at other people's beliefs said by funchords :Prove it. The onus is not on someone who disbelieves to prove the non-existence of God, it falls to the person who asserts His existence to prove that He does.
I've seen no evidence of His existence (other than our own existence, which is more an illustration of the large chance of improbable events happening somewhere in the vastness of our universe.
Additionally, labs have in fact created amino acids through nothing but recreating the conditions on earth at the approximate time of life's beginning. The chemical soup happened to be conducive to that end.
On topic, yesterday some network operators were saying their traffic was twice normal, not 40 or 50 percent higher, but I suppose that largely depends on what sort of network you're talking about. ISPs that cater mostly to businesses probably saw a greater increase. -- It's wierdo, not weirdo. Yes, I know that's not the 'proper' spelling of the similar english language word.  | |
|  |  |  |  |  |   karlmarx
join:2006-09-18 iraq
·Fairpoint Communic..
| #1 : Just check the interweb, life is being RANDOMLY created everywhere
#2 : 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Stars in the Universe If 1 in 10 has planets (very low estimate), then there are 50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 Stars with Planets If 1 in 100 has a planet in the life zone (water, etc) then there are 500,000,000,000,000,000,000 Planets that CAN support life If only 1 in 10,000 has the makeup to create life, then there are 5,000,000,000,000,000 Planets that can support life If only 1 in 100,000 have INTELLIGENT life, then there are 5,000,000,000,000 (5 TRILLION places where there are life.
If we use just the milky way (5,000,000,000) stars, then there are 1 Planets that support intelligent life
But, if ANY of those numbers are off (and scientists are proving that 1 in 2 stars have planets, and 1 in 10 has a planet in the life zone Then there are 50 Intelligent Civilizations in our galaxy Seeing that the galaxy is 70,000 light years across, odd are that intelligent life is about 1,200 light years away, and we've been listening for what, 50 years?
#2 : So, I've PROVEN that we exist, because quite simply, the ODDS state that we exist.
#3 : Religion is a NATURAL OUTTAKE of a social culture. Humans NEED other humans to survive, simple as that. Not just for breeding, but because we EVOLVED that way. Simply put, living in a culture is more likely to increase your population size, because that's how evolution works. Religion 'catches on' because, by definition, 1/2 the people have an IQ under 100. I'd be willing to bet, the smarter you are, the less LIKELY you are to be religious.
#4 : We are human, we try to make order. You are transferring the feeling that you have 'control' over what happens into the belief that 'something' is making it not random. If you died in a car accident tomorrow, is that GOD, or is that a random event? I would argue it's the latter, just that circumstances led you to be killed. I challenge you to show me a SINGLE event that 'God' caused. You can't, because you have 'faith', which is a falsifiable belief that some external source is the cause of a random event.
#4: The earth is 4.5 billion year old, because we can measure the LOGICAL DECAY of radioactive isotopes, thus, we KNOW how long the half life is, and we can LOGICALLY conclude that the earth is as old as we think it is.
#5: Umm, we are curious, because, that is a SURVIVAL TRAIT. The curious person improves their environment, thus, allowing their genes to be passed onto the next generation. Curiosity exists because it was a RANDOM MUTATION that allowed it's holders to breed better. As simple as that.
#6: Why do you need the answer to "who we are", and "Why are we here"? I can tell you the answer. We are the end result of a random chemical reaction, which occurred about 3.5 billion years ago. Why are we here? See answer #2, we are here, because statistically, we SHOULD be here. Nothing 'supernatural' about it, we are the end result of a statistic. -- The happiest countries are the most secular. The struggle AGAINST corporations is the struggle FOR humanity! | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |   funchords Hello Premium,MVM join:2001-03-11 Washington, DC
·Verizon Online DSL
·Skype
| Re: Nice jab at other people's beliefs Good grief.
You're seeing the trees but missing the forest.
said by karlmarx :...and 1 in 10 has a planet in the life zone... Earth has life not because it orbits within some temperate zone, but because it has a significant magnetosphere.
Your numbers are, being generous here, doubtful -- I have no idea as to whether you're too generous or too conservative -- but the odds that you are embracing are -- odds are -- not even in the same zip code as "correct."
We're just not that smart yet. Damn -- we view the MW from the edge -- how the hell do we think we know how many stars there are? Must of our view is obfuscated by opaque matter! -- Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon -- KJ7RL ... Should we pay those who are "too big to fail" more money to ensure they stay that way? ... | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |   Noah Vail Premium join:2004-12-10 Lorton, VA
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by karlmarx :If only 1 in 100,000 have INTELLIGENT life, then there are 5,000,000,000,000 (5 TRILLION places where there are life.) And not one of them have anything to say.
We've spent 40 years, turning our most sensitive radio telescopes toward every pixel of the sky, looking for any non-natural noise source, between the hydrogen and hydroxyl lines of the spectrum.
If anyone had anything to say to anybody, they'd say it there. But there hasn't been a single event, anywhere in the sky, between 1420 MHz and 1662 MHz. In a crowded universe, we should have our choice of extraterrestrial stations to choose from.
I'm afraid we're long past the point of "Should have heard somethin' by now".
NV | |
|  |  |  |   furlonium Computer Over? Virus equals Very Yes?
join:2002-05-08 Bethlehem, PA
| said by R4M0N :said by Desdinova :I think it was very appropriate. I want national policy to be decided on measurable situations whose impact on the culture and its populations can be measured and tested, not on beliefs. ID is not a fact and won't be until it can be proven and those results replicated by any who also attempt to test it. That folks choose to believe it is fine and I wish more power to them. But any organization that that starts pushing their beliefs (and "belief" and "believe" are defined as certitude without evidence) are demonstrating an agenda that is suspect and which makes ALL their assumptions and conclusions suspicious as well. I'm pretty sure that that's the point Karl was making. Not to make this into a creationism/evolutionism discussion (it wasn't), your standards would also disqualify the big bang theory, thus disqualifying a whole bunch of other theories that depend on it. At some point both evolutionists and creationists alike have to rely on "believing" since neither theory can be proven. Definitely have to agree with this. Either you believe in an all-mighty superior being who has always been and created everything, or you believe that everything was created out of nothing in the blink of an eye.
I'll have to ask the FSM what he thinks. -- »www.myspace.com/intranet
I once had a dream that Sean Connery stayed at my apt., and he had his laptop with Win98 on it, and he knew how to connect to my wireless network. I don't do drugs  | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  Desdinova
join:2003-01-26 Gaithersburg, MD | Fair enough!  | |
|  |   james
join:2001-02-26 antarctica
| said by R4M0N :As if that little tidbit about intelligent design added anything significant to the article. Actually it did, it points out that there's one group of insane neo-cons who continuously pumps out misinformation and retarded ideas. | |
|  |  |   R4M0N Brazilian Soccer Ownz Joo
join:2000-10-04 Glen Allen, VA | Re: Nice jab at other people's beliefs Much better... THIS is the place for trolling. | |
|  |  |  |   james
join:2001-02-26 antarctica
1 edit | Re: Nice jab at other people's beliefs said by R4M0N :Much better... THIS is the place for trolling. So telling the truth in a relevant context is trolling now? I guess it might appear as trolling to you if you share the opinion of that group, but those guys are the ultimate trolls. There is absolutely no way they could literally believe the things they claim to, they're just saying it to stir up controversy. | |
|   Hazy Arc
join:2006-04-10 Greenwood, SC | Count Us In I work for a school district as a network admin, and our 40mbps pipe slowed to a crawl around lunch time. A quick glance at Packeteer showed the culprit...CNN streaming.  | |
|  |  See 19 replies to this post | |
  joe h
@cableone.net
| I was there, complete chaos No internet service in DC after 8am on alltel. From 10am until around 4pm my calls were either dropped, or was given the network is busy message. Only three metro stations were open to control the 2 million people. I had a 5:30 flight, got in line at around 1:30, by 3:00 the metro authorities had lost all control, and by 4:30 I miraculously made it to national airport from the waterfront station. Cab service was backed up and non existant, and one of the bridges leading to the airport was closed to traffic so pedestrians could walk the five miles to the airport. DC police was almost non existant after 10am. And people started storming the fences around the national mall to get into the inauguration. Complete anarchy but it was a great time, and everything worked out. | |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  See 9 replies to this post | |
  Vchat20 Landing is the REAL challenge
join:2003-09-16 Warren, OH clubs:  | Multicasting! This is one reason why we need MULTICASTING people! Why is it network engineers don't band together and use this especially with all the supposed 'bandwidth crises' going on? | |
|  |  See 9 replies to this post | |
 |  PittsPgh
join:2003-08-21 Pittsburgh, PA
| CBS HD Live Feed Any stats from the CBS HD Live Feeds? That's what I was watching before I left for work, before noon. I probable watched it for about an hour and half yesterday. Jumping between the 7 different feeds. It was averaging around 315 KBs or 2.5 Mbs. Only big spikes was when I changed feeds would get a boost to around 1300KBs. The feed was flawless on my end looked great on my end full screen. Probably if I had still been watching past 12 noon it might have been different.
Paul note: I did save a couple screenshots of the Tomato graph. | |
|  |  |   Mari
@verizon.net
| No viewing problems Must give props to the ISP of the local Wi-Fi hotspot I was using just before Noon yesterday. (I'm guessing Comcast, though I don't know) Props to CBS too for awesome HD streams. It seriously felt like magic to be watching the inauguration in HD, untethered, on my netbook. | |
|  |  See 6 replies to this post | |
 dcdeadbeat
join:2008-10-07 Washington, DC
·Covad Communications
| No problems at all with AT&T, Verizon or Comcast in DC Hardly noticed the election at all on any of my network connections (T1s from Covad, Verizon Business). No problems with phone lines (VOIP from Verizon Business). No cable problems with the HD channels. No cell phone issues either and I have users with phones on all of the carriers.
There were only 1.2 million people at the inauguration. The usual phone and internet networks can easily handle that. So much worrying about 4 million people flooding the networks. Too bad it was all hype. It would have been an interesting wake-up call to see communications come to stand still in the nation's capital. As it turned out, it was just nothing more than just a small spike on the radar. Such a collapse of the networks would have made Congress take notice that we need to update our infrastructure. Now Congress will probably continue on, believing that the nation's infrastructure is adequate.
I guess we can only hope for the Feb. 17th wake up call.
All said and done it was just another freezing cold day in D.C. I saw more chaos after the iPhone was released. | |
|  |   jeffhambone Peace, through superior firepower
join:2002-02-02 Manassas, VA
·Comcast
| Re: No problems at all with AT&T, Verizon or Comcast in DC I got all-trunks-busy signals on both my VZW and VZ landline phones when I tried to call into Georgetown Tuesday afternoon. Eventually got through after a couple of tries each, but I guess the bridges from NoVA weren't the only things experiencing severe congestion.
OTOH, my Comcast connection misbehaved pretty much as it usually does nowadays... -- Son, there's only one thing you need to know: HEMI | |
|  |   jfmezei_anon
@vaxination.ca
| Arbor: anto net neutrality Arbor networks are the owners of Ellacoya, the makers of throttling boxes that spy on your data and decide to drop your packets left and right to disrupt your communications and prevent you from getting the bandwidth for which you are paying.
I have no respect for such a company. They are part of a gang hoping to make money by destroying the internet.
Instead of adding capacity, ISPs are wasting money buying boxes from these internet-wreckers.
User cares salesmen have more respect than Arbor. | |
|  brockalee
join:2003-08-17 Jacksonville, FL
·AT&T U-Verse
2 edits | The Inauguration... Where did you watch it? I had a hard time getting a good stream on the sites I went to.
CNN had a que, Fox wouldn't load, hulu was jerky... I ended up going to MLB.com. haha... Wow, the inauguration on a baseball site. Now that's reaching, but their stream was excellent! | |
|  | |  |
|
|