Time Warner CEO: Streaming HBO 'Not Ready for Prime Time'
AKA, I don't Want There to Be a Standalone HBO Option
HBO's HBO Go
broadband streaming service is currently only available to customers who not only have a cable subscription, but also only to those whose ISPs have struck an arrangement with HBO. And while Netflix says they assume that such a standalone offering is inevitable for HBO
, HBO has repeatedly insisted such an offering isn't sustainable (read: we don't want to lose the huge subsidies we get from cable operators). In yet another attempt to pooh pooh the idea of a standalone HBO streaming service, Time Warner CEO Jeff Bewkes insists that there is no standalone option because it's "just not ready for prime time
"Given the content we're making at [Warner Bros.], the simple answer is that the concept of a subscription broadband network isn't that ready for primetime," Bewkes said on Time Warner's earnings call Wednesday...While Bewkes left the door open for Time Warner to revisit the idea of developing a direct-to-consumer broadband version of HBO, he said the company remains focused on supplying content to existing TV networks and subscription video on demand services. "I don't want to rule it out exactly," Bewkes said.
Of course what Bewkes means but can't say is that HBO standalone isn't "ready for prime time" because they simply don't want it to be. A standalone HBO streaming option would only be appealing to the TV cord cutters Bewkes likes to insist don't exist. For a supposed nonexistent and inconsequential segment of users, companies certainly spend a lot of time ensuring that cord cutters don't grow further. Time Warner and HBO will bend of course, it's just a question of when.
Re: HBO Go is nice for content, but quality is not as good.
said by ArrayList:I doubt it. Because it's not about your available bandwidth or caps, it's about their available bandwidth and how much they pay for it.
they could let you choose what quality you use. Some of us don't have caps and will never have caps.
They probably want to keep a consistent quality level and using ABR to downgrade the quality when bandwidth is lower on the customer end, and keeping their bandwidth costs down.
Santa Monica, CA
·Time Warner Cable
Re: Why it don't work
said by Skippy25:It will stutter, stall, fade, pixelate, or otherwise demonstrate internet-based routing issues common to all streaming sites. And that's before the ISP issues and "neutral" protocols.
Please elaborate on your "when the streaming pipeline fails miserably" comment.
Its not that streaming video protocols and players can't be made to overcome 99.9% of these failures - but I've yet to see any sites supporting same, or players, out-of-the-box, so robustly configured, or allowing the consumer to make such settings if they were even available.
Standalone hbo will probably not happen Hbo is probably looking to sell their service through an existing service. They probably don't want to get lost in the black hole of the Internet when cable disappears. My guess is someone like amazon, apple, google or Microsoft offers them some dollars to sell their services as an add on to their existing services. My bet is on amazon. Netflix is best set up to do it, but they don't seem to show any interest in add on programming.
Amazon super prime with ESPn and hbo for 20 a month would probably get a lot of people cutting their cords and canceling Netflix.