site Search:


 
   
story category
USF: Uncle Sam's Blank check
Fred Goldstein picks apart everyone's favorite slush fund
by Karl Bode Saturday 20-Dec-2008 tags: legal · competition · fcc · coverage · business · Politics
Fred Goldstein has an interesting read on the dysfunction that is the Universal Service Fund (USF), which you pay into via your VoIP and phone bills. While it's intended to be a way to bring telecom services to schools and rural communities, it has long been a poorly managed slush fund. "If the best-laid plans often go astray," asks Goldstein, "what happens to sloppily-laid plans that are not even carefully supervised?" You'll see a number of proposals next year to expand the USF to cover broadband in 2009, many of which probably won't bother to reform the system first.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
rradina

join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO

Move to a rural area; get fiber!

Amazing what USF is funding. Fiber to rural homes! Who would have guessed. I'm sure these are exceptions but if it smells like Illinois politics, it probably is.

And watch out when they apply it to high speed Internet!
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

Re: Move to a rural area; get fiber!

The USDA funds all the rural Fiber, not the USF. USF can not be used for anything except pots.
rradina

join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO

Re: Move to a rural area; get fiber!

From the article (who knows if it's true but...):

Border to Border got a $23 million loan (about $150,000 per line!) from the Rural Utilities Service in 2003 to install a fiber optic network. This is paid back by USF to the tune of $164 thousand per month. That’s over a thousand dollars per line per month.
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

1 edit

Re: Move to a rural area; get fiber!

said by rradina:

From the article (who knows if it's true but...):

Border to Border got a $23 million loan (about $150,000 per line!) from the Rural Utilities Service in 2003 to install a fiber optic network. This is paid back by USF to the tune of $164 thousand per month. That’s over a thousand dollars per line per month.
said by »edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2007/···.101.htm :

[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 47, Volume 3]
[Revised as of October 1, 2007]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 47CFR54.101]

[Page 102-103]

TITLE 47--TELECOMMUNICATION

CHAPTER I--FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (CONTINUED)

PART 54_UNIVERSAL SERVICE--Table of Contents

Subpart B_Services Designated for Support

Sec. 54.101 Supported services for rural, insular and high cost areas.

(a) Services designated for support. The following services or
functionalities shall be supported by federal universal service support
mechanisms:
(1) Voice grade access to the public switched network. ``Voice grade
access'' is defined as a functionality that enables a user of
telecommunications services to transmit voice communications, including
signalling the network that the caller wishes to place a call, and to
receive voice communications, including receiving a signal indicating
there is an incoming call. For the purposes of this part, bandwidth for
voice grade access should be, at a minimum, 300 to 3,000 Hertz;
(2) Local usage. ``Local usage'' means an amount of minutes of use
of exchange service, prescribed by the Commission, provided free of
charge to end users;
(3) Dual tone multi-frequency signaling or its functional
equivalent. ``Dual tone multi-frequency'' (DTMF) is a method of
signaling that facilitates the transportation of signaling through the
network, shortening call set-up time;
(4) Single-party service or its functional equivalent. ``Single-
party service'' is telecommunications service that permits users to have
exclusive use of a wireline subscriber loop or access line for each call
placed, or, in the case of wireless telecommunications carriers, which
use spectrum shared among users to provide service, a dedicated message
path for the length of a user's particular transmission;
(5) Access to emergency services. ``Access to emergency services''
includes access to services, such as 911 and enhanced 911, provided by
local governments or other public safety organizations. 911 is defined
as a service that permits a telecommunications user, by dialing the
three-digit code ``911,'' to call emergency services through a Public
Service Access Point (PSAP) operated by the local government. ``Enhanced
911'' is defined as 911 service that includes the ability to provide
automatic numbering information (ANI), which enables the PSAP to call
back if the call is disconnected, and automatic location information
(ALI), which permits emergency service providers to identify the
geographic location of the calling party. ``Access to emergency
services'' includes access to 911 and enhanced 911 services to the
extent the local government in an eligible carrier's service area has
implemented 911 or enhanced 911 systems;
(6) Access to operator services. ``Access to operator services'' is
defined as access to any automatic or live assistance to a consumer to
arrange for billing or completion, or both, of a telephone call;
(7) Access to interexchange service. ``Access to interexchange
service'' is defined as the use of the loop, as well as that portion of
the switch that is paid for by the end user, or the functional
equivalent of these network elements in the case of a wireless carrier,
necessary to access an interexchange carrier's network;
(8) Access to directory assistance. ``Access to directory
assistance'' is defined as access to a service that includes, but is not
limited to, making available to customers, upon request, information
contained in directory listings; and
(9) Toll limitation for qualifying low-income consumers. Toll
limitation for qualifying low-income consumers is described in subpart E
of this part.
(b) Requirement to offer all designated services. An eligible
telecommunications carrier must offer each of the services set forth in
paragraph (a) of this section in order to receive federal universal
service support.
said by »edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2007/···54.7.htm :

[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 47, Volume 3]
[Revised as of October 1, 2007]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 47CFR54.7]

[Page 102]

TITLE 47--TELECOMMUNICATION

CHAPTER I--FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (CONTINUED)

PART 54_UNIVERSAL SERVICE--Table of Contents

Subpart A_General Information

Sec. 54.7 Intended use of federal universal service support.

A carrier that receives federal universal service support shall use
that support only for the provision, maintenance, and upgrading of
facilities and services for which the support is intended.
rradina

join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO

Re: Move to a rural area; get fiber!

In all of that, where does it say that these services cannot be provided by a fiber optic network?
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

Re: Move to a rural area; get fiber!

said by rradina:

In all of that, where does it say that these services cannot be provided by a fiber optic network?
A carrier that receives federal universal service support shall use
that support only for the provision, maintenance, and upgrading of
facilities and services for which the support is intended.
It would be upto the FCC to enforce that rule. There is also this self certifying thing that you only use USF money on supported services. »edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2007/···.809.htm

Sec. 54.202 Additional requirements for Commission designation of

eligible telecommunications carriers.

* * * * *

(e) All eligible telecommunications carriers shall retain all
records required to demonstrate to auditors that the support received
was consistent with the universal service high-cost program rules. These
records should include the following: data supporting line count
filings; historical customer records; fixed asset property accounting
records; general ledgers; invoice copies for the purchase and
maintenance of equipment; maintenance contracts for the upgrade or
equipment; and any other relevant documentation. This documentation must
be maintained for at least five years from the receipt of funding.
rradina

join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO

Re: Move to a rural area; get fiber!

I've lost your point. Are you still claiming that running fiber optic to rural homes would not qualify for USF funds? Is the guy that wrote the article is not reporting the truth? I've yet to see how the information you've posted disputes his claim.

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:30
I believe the USF's e-rate system funds some broadband, but only for schools?

Romney2012
Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe in
Premium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4
said by rradina:

Amazing what USF is funding. Fiber to rural homes! Who would have guessed. I'm sure these are exceptions but if it smells like Illinois politics, it probably is.

And watch out when they apply it to high speed Internet!
As the article points out - these ultra rural areas used to have wireless telephone access at much cheaper costs. But since the USF doesn't subsidize wireless access, companies sprang up to suck down USF fees to wire these areas best served by wireless solutions.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk?

pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

Re: Move to a rural area; get fiber!

said by Romney2012:

As the article points out - these ultra rural areas used to have wireless telephone access at much cheaper costs. But since the USF doesn't subsidize wireless access, companies sprang up to suck down USF fees to wire these areas best served by wireless solutions.
Good point. In many out-of-the-way places outside of the USA, the primary means of communication is cell phone with no landline options available. I don't see why we could not do something like that here.
--
Blagojevich / Madoff 2012!

keyboard5684
Sam

join:2001-08-01
Pittsburgh, PA
Reviews:
·Armstrong Zoom ..

Re: Move to a rural area; get fiber!

In many rural areas, like where I live, there is no cell coverage. I guess I do not see it. Maybe what others consider rural (where there are stop signs instead of street light) is different?

Rural is where there are, yes middle class, that live in locations which barely have basic services. There is definitely no cable, pots is sloppy, and cell is a lower grade if any signal at all. People raise there children in those areas just like anyone else would except there may be more room.

So in rural areas I disagree. The primary means in rural areas is indeed pots since there is no cell coverage but there is pots coverage everywhere due to USF.
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

Re: Move to a rural area; get fiber!

said by keyboard5684:

Rural is where there are, yes middle class, that live in locations which barely have basic services. There is definitely no cable, pots is sloppy, and cell is a lower grade if any signal at all. People raise there children in those areas just like anyone else would except there may be more room.
And then the kids run to the cities when they turn 18 to escape a 3rd world existence.
rradina

join:2000-08-08
Chesterfield, MO
I'm not sure what your point is. Rural areas offer many freedoms that urban areas don't. For instance, if kids want to take a hike through the woods, they have to do things like Boy Scouts in the urban areas. In rural areas, they simply go into their back yard. Fishing? No problem in rural areas. How about a kid riding a motorcycle or four-wheeler, not a chance in urban areas. I grew up in a rural area and there are many advantages to living in the "country". That said, I now live in an urban area because of employment opportunities and, yes, things like major sports teams and high-speed Internet access.

If I want to provide my kids some of the experiences I knew as a kid, I have to take them somewhere and explain nature to them. This costs money. If rural people want high-speed Internet access, it too will cost money or may not be possible.

People choose to live in places based on their likes and dislikes. If you choose to live in a rural area, enjoy the many advantages and please stop asking for subsidies to bring things urban folk take for granted. Some things are only possible in high-density population centers. For instance -- TRAFFIC; if you are just dying for a TRAFFIC JAM in rural America, you're going to have to MOVE.

DooD

join:2002-02-10
Jacksonville, FL

Re: Move to a rural area; get fiber!

Firstly, you live in Chesterfield - at least that's what it says under your name. You're not that far from rural area - what 20 min? 30? If you want to take your kids camping every weekend all weekend long and run around the woods, it doesn't cost you that much - travel time or money.

Now my father on the other hand, who lives in a rural area in Texas, doesn't even have a choice for decent broadband. As for dial-up, on a good day he connects at 28.8. Cable (not even TV), DSL, not even ISDN (that option is reserved for the local school only) are options. He's about to get royally screwed by satellite for a whole 768k at over $100 a month - plus equipment rental and contract.

Point is I just don't see your comparison of cost of nature exposure vs broadband all that accurate - ie saying all they have to do is pay money for it like you have to pay money to "explain nature to" your kids.
voipdabbler

join:2006-04-27
Kalispell, MT
LOL, a pipe dream. The US can't even deliver cellular service to most rural areas. Nationwide, we probably have one of the worst cellular penetration rates of the developed world. We have less than a 50% penetration rate in the Rural Service Areas--the feds don't even like publishing data that shows just how poorly they've managed cellular licensing. The last data they were willing to publish, only 150 of the 428 Rural Service Areas had any type of cellular service. The problem, the feds auction spectrum and issue licenses to carriers in these areas but then don't police; as a result, you've got major carriers who own licenses for rural spectrum and they only erect towers for roaming by customers in urban markets but offer no local services. Having the license, they can also block the efforts of rural communities to get a carrier in to their area for real local service. It's about time the USF be disbanded. There's certainly no money coming to rural ares. It's all going into the deep pockets of large, greedy companies.

pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

Dissolve the USDA

In addition to this BS and welfare for farmers who don't grow things, the USDA is now financing home loans in rural areas.

»news.google.com/news?rlz=1C1GGLS···N&tab=wn

The only people who get such loans are those who cannot qualify for bank loans (and sadly that's been a pretty low bar). So in addition to wasting money on unprofitable rural broadband and phone service, we're now setting the stage for the next great loan bailout.

The USDA, outside of the FDA, has far outlived its usefulness.
--
Blagojevich / Madoff 2012!

ArnoldZiffle

@comcast.net

Re: Dissolve the USDA

said by pnh102:

In addition to this BS and welfare for farmers who don't grow things, the USDA is now financing home loans in rural areas.
So buy a farm and you too could be living the easy life. Just fill out some USDA paperwork and start collecting your checks.

pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD

Re: Dissolve the USDA

said by ArnoldZiffle :

So buy a farm and you too could be living the easy life. Just fill out some USDA paperwork and start collecting your checks.
I don't even have to live on a farm.

»www.nypost.com/seven/12122007/ne···4457.htm
--
Blagojevich / Madoff 2012!

linicx
Caveat Emptor
Premium
join:2002-12-03
United State
Reviews:
·Cass Communicati..
·CenturyLink
USDA or another arm of the governrment has been financing homes in rural America for sixty or more years. The only thing that changes is the name of the office that does the paper work. Not everyone who applies for a loan, gets one and not everyone who applies for a loan is a farmer.

The farm loan program needs serious adjusting, but small town farmers that fall on hard times need loans a lot more than the billion dollar farms that are getting millions each year to not grow
--
Mac: No windows, No gates, Apple inside
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1
said by pnh102:

The USDA, outside of the FDA, has far outlived its usefulness.
Shhhhh! The sucess of USDA funded FTTH is a mainstay of Broadband Reports's news beat.
Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA

Fix for USF High Cost Fund

The High Cost Fund is appropriately named because it encourages ridiculously high costs, unfortunately everyone who contributes to the USF pays for that. The fix is to immediately cap the HCF at $2.5 Billion for next year and reduce the total another half billion every year for five years until the HCF and its high costs are eliminated entirely. Now that would be real change.
mlcarson

join:2001-09-20
Las Cruces, NM

Rural America deserves better

Rural America deserves better than the USF. Urban America generally gets a choice of at least DSL or Cable broadband whereas rural America generally has no option at all. Dialup 28.8K is not broadband access.

The federal government should step in as they did with the Rural Electric Administration (REA) in the 1930's. The same excuses that were used back then by the private utility companies regarding the cost of servicing rural companies are being used by the carriers today. Private companies don't need to continue to duplicate the infrastructure in the urban areas to provide more and more competition when the infrastructure doesn't even exist yet in rural areas.

Why not wire up rural America with fiber once with federal assistance and then let the private carriers have access to it?
justgold79

join:2008-01-13

Mob Family Gambino Made 20 million$ from the USF

»www.nydailynews.com/archives/new···mil.html

Monday, 04-Jun 06:43:12 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.