Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
Ultra-Wideband
480Mbps desktop use and beyond
(old news - 02:50PM Monday Dec 06 2004)
tags: wireless · networking
Ultra-Wideband is a radio modulation technique that primarily gets noted for its potential to offer blazing speeds at very short ranges (consumer gear is expected in 2005). But the technology's full application is far broader, from increasing the bandwidth of coaxial networks to new forms of radio frequency identification (RFID) technology.

By using UWB over coaxial, a company named Pulse~LINK recently demonstrated how they can offer cable providers more bandwidth (1 gigabit downstream, 580 megabits upstream per node). This week a company named Ubisense announced they're using UWB to detect movement and track objects in three dimensional space.

Long has Uncle Sam been slammed for moving slowly with the technology, concerned with its potential to interfere with global positioning systems in particular (see 2002 Nasa pdf report). A recent study out of the UK also raised questions about whether or not UWB could have a negative impact on third generation UMTS wireless networks.

These concerns and standards disputes have kept the technology somewhat grounded until just recently. Despite these concerns, analysts argue the technology is probably as promising as much more hyped new technologies (Wimax) will ever be - though obviously for different applications.

The most immediate application will be as a competitor for Bluetooth; UWB's emergence part of the reason the Bluetooth Special Interest Group recently released a three year blueprint claiming they'd be tripling the technology's bandwidth.

According to execs at the recent Intel Developer forum, products using Wireless USB and Ultra-Wideband are expected in 2005, offering consumers between 480Mbps and 1Gbps short-range speeds to the desktop.

Related:
  1. AT&T Network Can't Handle Slingbox For iPhone?
  2. AT&T Slingbox 3G Fine Print Returns...
  3. New Docs Show FCC Glossed Over BPL Flaws
  4. Did AT&T's Bad Week Kill Their iPhone Exclusivity Extension?
  5. Breakdown of 3G Network Speeds, Reliability
  6. AT&T's 'Blogger Guy' Faces Public Backlash
  7. AT&T Offers Update On 7.2 Mbps HSPA
  8. Broadband Derailed By Fears Of Mutant Garlic
Forums » Ultra-Wideband
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

XBL2009
------

join:2001-01-03
Chicago, IL

1 edit

Is it real ?

This could change broadband in the United States if this is for real and the cable companies are willing to serve it up.

rustednuggs

join:2002-01-07
Indianapolis, IN

Re: Is it real ?

What about broadband over powerlines? It is faster right?

MarkyD
Premium
join:2002-08-20
Oklahoma City, OK
clubs:
·Cox HSI

Re: Is it real ?

said by rustednuggs See Profile:

What about broadband over powerlines? It is faster right?
Noo. It's actually quite slow compared to even standard DSL.
(at least the trials that have been going on...)
Broadband over Power lines is going nowhere fast...
RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:
·XMission

said by rustednuggs See Profile:

What about broadband over powerlines? It is faster right?
Power lines are designed for 60 Hz signals, not 1,000,000,000 Hz signals. Add in the fact that UWB can take up to 250,000,000 to 500,000,000 Hz of spectrum, you get all sorts of losses and smearing that are in the realm of third or fourth year engineering or physics and require a bit more math than A+B=C. Add in the fact that we are talking pulses (very high frequency harmonics to keep it clean), you fast reach the point of no signal at all on a power line. Plus it is a low power radiated standard, not a transmission line standard.

This will be more for your home wireless LAN replacement.
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
Most likely will be watered down to 100 Mbps anyways, as 1Gbps is the speed for the node, not each user.

AthlGrond
Premium,MVM
join:2002-04-25
Aurora, CO
·Comcast

Re: Is it real ?

said by en102 See Profile:

Most likely will be watered down to 100 Mbps anyways...
Or lower. This may just be a great way for them to save money, rather than improve service. (They may choose to improve service if there is some competition forcing them to...)
--
"I drank what?" -Socrates

Corvus
Flaming Tards Since 2003
Premium,VIP
join:2003-11-26

said by en102 See Profile:

Most likely will be watered down to 100 Mbps anyways, as 1Gbps is the speed for the node, not each user.
1Gbps per node? Must be an error somewhere because even Docsis 1.0 has 5Gps downstream per node. Docsis 3.x (still early stages) should be able to provide 6.3Gbps downstream per node and 200Mbps per channel.
--
Jesus saves, but only Buddha makes incremental backups.
Pictor Guy

join:2004-06-21
Sammamish, WA

Radio Modulation?

UWB is modulation??? Huh? Can I turn in my VHF FM radio for a VHF UWB radio?

Seems kinda premature to promote UWB when people seem so quick to turn up noses over over 802.16 or 802.20.

MxxCon

join:1999-11-19
Brooklyn, NY
clubs:

how short...

is short range?
distance from my mouse to my computer?
or 2 computers in a basement and a living room?
or something else?
--
[Sig removed by Administrator: Signature can not exceed 20GB]

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02

Re: how short...

10 meters....thirty feet.....
Queasy

join:2004-01-20
Lawrenceville, GA

That might be enough to get me to switch to cable

I dumped cable a few years back after MediaOne/AT&T/Comcast screwed my internet and TV billing so bad that I had to spend hours on the phone with one lying CSR after another. If they could get 100mb/s at the current prices, I'd switch in a heartbeat...at least to the internet service.
davidcb13

join:2004-02-06
Branchville, NJ

Re: That might be enough to get me to switch to ca

yea you and the rest of this community this is no where near a reality.

yoyoyowhatsup

@aol.com

1 edit

Sweet

nice kool kicks cant wait.
Forums » Ultra-Wideband


Monday, 30-Nov 03:44:04 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.