 
Hazy Arc
join:2006-04-10
Greenwood, SC | Oopsie! Did anyone else notice the terms in the screenshot posted with the article in the "Related Searches" field? Tits and ass...nice!!! | |
|
 | shorej
Premium
join:2002-07-22
Wichita, KS | Re: Oopsie! They also mis-spelled "Embarq" on the 5th "Related Search" from the top. I've seen that spelling used before for Embarq so perhaps it's a new marketing ploy...  | |
|
| 
dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
| said by Hazy Arc  :Did anyone else notice the terms in the screenshot posted with the article in the "Related Searches" field? Tits and ass...nice!!! not to mention ass lick 
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth | |
|
factchecker
@cox.net | Avoid DNS redirection all together... If you can use them, use the following public DNS servers:
4.2.2.1
4.2.2.2
4.2.2.3
4.2.2.4
4.2.2.5
4.2.2.6
Or, if you are inclined to, try OpenDNS. | |
|
| seropith
Rou
Premium
join:2002-11-12
El Paso, TX
clubs: 
 ·Embarq
| Re: Avoid DNS redirection all together... So these are public servers, or servers for customer user?
OpenDNS adds a few ms response time.
We should be able to use the ISP's DNS server. Not some servers that we are not technically supposed to use (4.2.*) or sign up for stuff like opendns.
said by factchecker :
If you can use them, use the following public DNS servers:
4.2.2.1
4.2.2.2
4.2.2.3
4.2.2.4
4.2.2.5
4.2.2.6
Or, if you are inclined to, try OpenDNS.
| |
|
| | 
powerspec88
Premium
join:2007-03-11
Harrisonville, MO
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·AT&T Yahoo
| Re: Avoid DNS redirection all together... said by seropith :So these are public servers, or servers for customer user? OpenDNS adds a few ms response time. We should be able to use the ISP's DNS server. Not some servers that we are not technically supposed to use (4.2.*) or sign up for stuff like opendns. said by factchecker :
If you can use them, use the following public DNS servers:
4.2.2.1
4.2.2.2
4.2.2.3
4.2.2.4
4.2.2.5
4.2.2.6
Or, if you are inclined to, try OpenDNS.
You don't have to sign up for opendns, just put in 208.67.222.222 and 208.67.220.220 and off you go.
I still use my ISP's DNS servers as its 8ms to them or 60ms to opendns or 4.2.2.x and i see no difference between them and my ISP DNS servers. | |
|
| |
dvd536
as Mr. Pink as they come
Premium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
| said by seropith :So these are public servers, or servers for customer user? OpenDNS adds a few ms response time. We should be able to use the ISP's DNS server. Not some servers that we are not technically supposed to use (4.2.*) or sign up for stuff like opendns. said by factchecker :
If you can use them, use the following public DNS servers:
4.2.2.1
4.2.2.2
4.2.2.3
4.2.2.4
4.2.2.5
4.2.2.6
Or, if you are inclined to, try OpenDNS.
opendns also has redirects!
--
You can never be too rich, too thin or have too much Bandwidth | |
|
| | |
factchecker
@cox.net
| Re: Avoid DNS redirection all together... said by dvd536 :opendns also has redirects! Those can be turned off on their end through their website. I'd recommend them only if you don't want to use the Level3 DNS servers (why I said, "if you are inclined to"). | |
|
| | | | 
Pichin
join:2001-07-01
Altamonte Springs, FL | Re: Avoid DNS redirection all together... and what is a level 3? | |
|
| | deleteme
join:2002-04-22
Chicago, IL | I think 4.2.2.* is technically Verizon's DNS (although IP lookup says it's Level3)
...anyway, they are wide-open, and several other ISPs don't seem to think twice about telling their customers to use them when their own DNS is messed up. | |
|
| | |
factchecker
@cox.net
| Re: Avoid DNS redirection all together... said by deleteme :I think 4.2.2.* is technically Verizon's DNS (although IP lookup says it's Level3) Yes, they belong to Level3, but they are run as a public service to the internet since they are so easy to remember. They are anycasted, so when you use an 4.2.2.x address, you will be routed to the nearest server. | |
|
kd6cae
P2p Shouldn't Be A Crime
join:2001-08-27
Lancaster, CA
 ·RoadRunner Cable
·DSL EXTREME
| some other good DNS servers you can use Here are a few more DNS servers that I believe to be good and clean DNS servers. Note these latency wise are favorable to users in California, but I think anyone can use them. Other clean DNS servers welcome.
SpeakEasy Los Angeles DNS: 64.81.45.2
University of California Riverside DNS1: 138.23.146.213
University of California Riverside DNS2: 138.23.226.101
Also, I'm not totally sure but I believe at present anyway Cox San Diego has clean DNS at 68.6.16.30 and 68.6.16.25. Hope that helps. | |
|
|
| seropith
Rou
Premium
join:2002-11-12
El Paso, TX
clubs:
·Embarq
| Re: Thanks! said by gatorkram :Thanks for some site wide attention to our plight over at the Embarq forum. I for one hope they put up some clean servers soon. Even one clean server would go a long way in helping silence those of us who object to the whole dns redirection. Well, it does appear the opt out feature is working correctly. | |
|
| | 
JeepMatt
Delaware Fios
Premium
join:2001-12-28
Wilmington, DE | Re: Thanks! Can someone tell me why this is an issue to anyone???
--
"ONE team - ONE city - ONE dream!!" | |
|
| | | seropith
Rou
Premium
join:2002-11-12
El Paso, TX
clubs:
·Embarq
| Re: Thanks! said by JeepMatt :Can someone tell me why this is an issue to anyone??? Sure. If I run a services that at times requires a server side DNS lookup based on a client request, and it answers positive for a failed query, surely, you can see how this could break the functionality of some of the services I run.
However, the issue has been fixed by embarq. | |
|
| | | |
tuaris
You Clicked on the Apple
join:2001-10-19
Naples, FL
1 edit | Ad Blocking DNS Servers While the public 4.2.2.x are good, I like use my own personal ad/malware blocking DNS servers.
Feel free to use them, they are open to the public:
74.95.62.68
71.249.184.157
207.59.120.156
If you come across an ad that isn't blocked, let me know and I'll ad it in.
(Of course you'll see an ad from me, but at least it's always the same)
--
»www.pacyworld.com | |
|
|
|
|
·
Thanks!