VP Announces Federal Broadband Funding First wave of $7.2 billion stimulus package unveiled today... A day after consumer advocates were painfully underwhelmed by their first glimpse of our national broadband plan, Vice President Joe Biden is spending today in Georgia -- announcing the first round of broadband stimulus funding. You'll recall that the government set aside $7.2 billion in broadband funding to help wire underserved areas. 2,200 different companies and organizations submitted proposals requesting more than $28 billion in funds -- obviously far more money than is available. Today, Biden will announce an initial $182 million investment in 18 projects across 17 states. The primary thrust of today's Biden press junket will be to highlight the potential job creation of that $182 million investment -- which is part of a larger $2 billion in infrastructure funding. Specifically, the Atlanta Journal Constitution says Biden today will highlight a 260 mile North Georgia Network Cooperative project connecting downtown Atlanta to North Carolina. That project will get roughly $33 million in funding, according to the local paper: As envisioned, the network will reach 42,000 households and 9,209 businesses and connect 245 community institutions, including public schools, universities, hospitals, and government facilities. . . The network will be built and owned by the North Georgia Network Cooperative, which is partly owned by Habersham Electric Membership Corp. and Blue Ridge Mountain Electric Membership Corp. The cooperative plans to charge Internet providers for access to the network so they could offer services over the lines, Abraham said. $2 billion of the $7.2 billion in broadband funding is expected to be doled out before February. The AP has a little more detail on the other projects that will get funding, including $25.4 million grant to the Biddleford Internet Corp., a partnership between the University of Maine and service providers (you'll recall that Fairpoint Communications lobbied to prevent them from getting funding). Here's another even broader list of where the funds are expected to go.
|
 | | Oh good.. Who is going to accept the money and do nothing this time... | |
|  |  WhatNowPremium join:2009-05-06 Charlotte, NC | Re: Oh good.. You may be right but is this not the setup most of the posters want. Provide the infrastructure and then let the ISP connect to it. The companies installing it are power companies not telcos. Hope it works and people in that area are hard working and independent so there is a chance it will work out. | |
|  |  | | Exactly- 7.5 Billion in tax money- Payday for the pimp-lobbyists- Politics as usual. THe FCC is just one of the govt whores being pimped by the lobbyists and we're paying the bill! | |
|  |  | | Quick, let's create a LLC startup for extending rural broadband and subcontract for Verizon, Comcast, others...
$$$$$$$$ -- Splat | |
|
 patcat88 join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY kudos:1 | typical graft Mr. Biden will announce Thursday in Dawsonville, Ga., $182 million of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act grants to go to 18 so-called "middle-mile" broadband projects in 17 states. "Middle-mile" refers to the critical link between the Internet backbone network and the local servers that connect to households.
Great, so now we are using tax dollars to compete against Level 3 and AT&T SLA bacbone services. Broadband to my home? forget about it! | |
|  |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: typical graft Uhh, guess you missed the point. In most cases L3 and AT&T don't HAVE backbone in these areas, or aren't willing to sell it to anyone at a decent price (less than $100 per megabit for a reasonable commit, i.e. less than 100 Mbps).
If these middle-mile projects are successful, they'll link cities (and thus last-mile ISPs) with cheap bandwidth. If a provider right now has to pay $5000 for a T3 and, as a result of this project, can get a 100 Mbps fiber port for $3000 per month, the bandwidth costs are decreased by about 70% per megabit and supply is increased by a factor of more than two. Let's say the ISP was selling 1.5 Mbps service for $50 per month. Now they can offer maybe 8 Mbps for $40... | |
|  |  |  | | Re: typical graft Exactly. The whole point is to shore up gaps, not overlap existing infrastructure. | |
|  |  |  patcat88 join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY kudos:1 | said by iansltx:If these middle-mile projects are successful, they'll link cities (and thus last-mile ISPs) with cheap bandwidth. If a provider right now has to pay $5000 for a T3 and, as a result of this project, can get a 100 Mbps fiber port for $3000 per month, the bandwidth costs are decreased by about 70% per megabit and supply is increased by a factor of more than two. Let's say the ISP was selling 1.5 Mbps service for $50 per month. Now they can offer maybe 8 Mbps for $40... And what part of capitalism will increase the speed? The indy ISP will just swallow the lower backbone cost as profit for investors, unless they are a charity. | |
|  |  |  |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: typical graft If the ISP has a 100 Mbit pipe when it had 45Mbit before, maybe it can introduce a 20 Mbit tier for $70 where their previous fatest tier was $60. Additionally, lower startup costs for bandwidth may lure competition into the area, which will either compete on price, features (speed) or customer service. If the ISP just pockets the profits (and they usually don't, because they have to live with their own internet nine times out of ten) then the profit margin for their service is higher than the norm. Economic theory (and practice) dictates that economic (above average) profit tends toward zero as barriers to entry tend toward zero. Lower bandwidth costs represent a lower barrier to entry; people are more likely to start a WISP if they can get a resellable 50/20 FiOS connection for $200 than if they have to pay $300 for a T1.
Alternately, the ISP can preempt competition by...wait for it...lowering prices or raising speeds so a potential competitor wouldn't have a leg up by default.
For example, when Texas Lone Star Network came online (really online) recently, a nearby telephone cooperative switched to it and doubled DSL speeds for the same price, adding a low-end tier for those who needed it. | |
|
 koitsuPremium,MVM join:2002-07-16 Mountain View, CA kudos:13 | $7.2 dollars. quote: VP Announces Federal Broadband Funding First wave of $7.2 stimulus package unveiled today...
;D -- Making life hard for others since 1977. I speak for myself and not my employer/affiliates of my employer. | |
|  |  Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 | Re: $7.2 dollars. Actually that is what Joe Taxpayer has left over after being put over the barrel by the IRS. | |
|
 iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 | Link to the handouts? Can't seem to find where exactly all the project money went. If I could find a document (or documents) with all the info then I'd write up something concise explaining it all. But I can't :/ | |
|  |  | | Re: Link to the handouts? said by iansltx:Can't seem to find where exactly all the project money went. If I could find a document (or documents) with all the info then I'd write up something concise explaining it all. But I can't :/ I dont think is out yet. | |
|  |  |  | | Re: Link to the handouts? It's not, they'll give full details after the whole press song and dance.
I added an AP link above that had a few more winners listed, including funding for the private/public partnership in Maine Fairpoint had been lobbying to stop.... | |
|
 |  |  |  |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 | Re: Link to the handouts? Yeah, saw that. Doesn't include all eighteen projects though :/ | |
|
 |  ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium join:2002-03-03 Mullica Hill, NJ kudos:4 | said by iansltx:Can't seem to find where exactly all the project money went. If I could find a document (or documents) with all the info then I'd write up something concise explaining it all. But I can't :/ »Some details on where money went | |
|
 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD | Lame The "public option" comes to broadband. 
Why don't they just take the money and burn it, we'd at least get some better use of it. -- "Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service. | |
|  |  TransmasterDon't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus join:2001-06-20 Cheyenne, WY | Re: Lame said by pnh102:The "public option" comes to broadband.  Why don't they just take the money and burn it, we'd at least get some better use of it. Hush! ALGore will here you and want carbon offset money from you. -- I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man's reasoning powers are not above the monkey's. - Mark Twain in Eruption | |
|  |  Z80APremium join:2009-11-23 | No kidding...at least burning it would tighten the money supply so that in 5 years a dollar won't be worth only .12. | |
|
 | | broadband stimulus why is it that the tax payers have to fund this stupidity. isnt that what all those federal universal service funds for the past 15 years were all for? i dont know why someone who is on foodstamps or can barely pay their bills need to be on the internet? | |
|  mworks join:2006-06-13 Faison, NC | More money for the telco I see little that the money will improve. It isn't rolling out fiber to homes that don't have access. Installing long lines of fiber connecting points ? big deal. My brother has one of those running 10 foot outside his drive way. He can't get anything but dial up at 26k. Just because they run the fiber past homes does not mean they will connect them to it. | |
|  ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium join:2002-03-03 Mullica Hill, NJ kudos:4 2 edits | Some details on where money went
»www.broadcastingcable.com/articl···ners.php
Projects in Georgia, Maine, New York and South Dakota got the middle mile money from NTIA, while the Department of Agriculture's RUS program gave out middle and last-mile money (grants and loans) to Alaska, Hawaii, Colorado, Nebraska, Michigan, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma.
NTIA awarded the adoption money to New Mexico and Washington state, and the computer center funding to Arizona, Minnesota, Washington, Arizona and Massachusetts. Much more detail on individual awards here: »tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.co···ects.php
The following Middle Mile awards were made through the Department of Commerce:
· GEORGIA: North Georgia Network Cooperative, Inc., $33.5 million grant with an additional $8.8 million in matching funds to deploy a 260-mile regional fiber-optic ring to deliver gigabit broadband speeds, reliability, affordability, and abundant interconnection points for last mile service in the North Georgia foothills.
· MAINE: Biddeford Internet Corp. (d.b.a. GWI), $25.4 million grant with an additional $6.4 million in matching funds to build a 1,100-mile open access fiber-optic network extending to the most rural and disadvantaged areas of the state of Maine, from the Saint John Valley in the north, to the rocky coastline of downeast Maine, to the mountainous regions of western Maine.
· NEW YORK: ION Hold Co., LLC, $39.7 million grant with an additional $9.9 million in matching funds to build 10 new segments of fiber-optic, middle mile broadband infrastructure, serving more than 70 rural communities in upstate New York and parts of Pennsylvania and Vermont.
· SOUTH DAKOTA: South Dakota Network, LLC, $20.6 million grant with an additional $5.1 million in matching funds to add 140 miles of backbone network and 219 miles of middle mile spurs to existing network, enabling the delivery of at least 10 Mbps service to more than 220 existing anchor institution customers in rural and underserved areas of the state.
The following Public Computer Center awards were made through the Department of Commerce:
· ARIZONA: Arizona State Library, Archives and Public Records, $1.3 million grant with matching funds of $320,000 to enhance existing facilities in more than 80 public libraries throughout the state. The project expects to deploy more than 1,000 computers to meet growing demand.
· MASSACHUSETTS: City of Boston, $1.9 million grant with matching funds of $477,000 to expand computer and Internet capacity at the city's main library and 25 branches, 16 community centers, and 11 public housing sites.
· MINNESOTA: Regents of the University of Minnesota, $2.9 million grant with matching funds of $741,000 to enhance broadband awareness and use for residents in four federally-designated poverty zones in Minneapolis and St. Paul.
· WASHINGTON: The Inland Northwest Community Access Network (Tincan), $1.3 million grant with matching funds of $753,000 to establish three new public computer centers and expand 14 existing centers throughout Spokane's poorest neighborhoods to serve more than 5,000 additional users per week.
The following Sustainable Broadband Adoption awards were made through the Department of Commerce:
· NEW MEXICO: New Mexico State Library, $1.5 million grant with an additional $591,000 in matching funds to increase broadband adoption and promote computer literacy and Internet use among vulnerable populations, Hispanic and Native American users, small businesses, and entrepreneurs through trainings and outreach statewide.
· WASHINGTON: The Inland Northwest Community Access Network, $981,000 grant with an additional $728,000 in matching funds to increase broadband adoption through basic and advanced computer skill training, as well as community-based outreach campaigns to highlight the benefits of broadband for vulnerable populations in Spokane.
The following Last Mile and Middle Mile awards were made today through the U.S. Department of Agriculture:
· ALASKA: Anchorage, Rivada Sea Lion, LLC, $25.3 million grant with $6.4 million of leveraged funds; 4G high-speed broadband internet service availability to more than 9,000 unserved locations in a 90,000 square mile area where these Southwestern Alaska inhabitants are living at subsistence level.
· HAWAII: Big Island Broadband/Aloha Broadband, Inc., $106,503 loan with matching funds of $87,405 to bring broadband services to an unserved area in the northern part of the islands where there are nearly 600 residents and businesses.
· COLORADO/NEBRASKA: Peetz, Colorado, Peetz Cooperative Telephone Co., $1.5 million grant; expansion of existing infrastructure utilizing a combination of technologies. This project will make broadband service available to as many as 550 locations in the service area.
· MICHIGAN: The Chatham Telephone Company, $8.6 million grant to bring high speed DSL broadband service to remote, unserved businesses and households within its rural territory; service that is comparable to the DSL service provided in its more populated areas.
· NEW HAMPSHIRE: Bretton Woods, The Bretton Woods Telephone Company, $985,000 grant for 20 Mbps two-way broadband service to all potential customers and stimulate tourism in the area to substantially improve the local economy. This Fiber to The Premise service will be available to more than 400 locations.
· NEW YORK: Potsdam, Slic Network Solutions (Nicholville Telephone) a grant of $4.3 million and loan of $1.1 million for a 136-mile fiber optic network reaching into five towns in rural Franklin County. This all-fiber network will deliver broadband voice, and IPTV services to remote rural areas. The network will offer service to more than 6,500 locations.
· OHIO: North Central Ohio Rural Fiber Optic Network, Consolidated Electric Cooperative, $1,034,413 grant and $1,399,499 loan; and matching funds of $1,225,000. The funding is integral to a smart grid initiative and broadband service based on an open-connectivity fiber optic backbone network.
· OKLAHOMA: Southeast Oklahoma, The Pine Telephone Company, $9.5 grant with an additional $4.6 million in private funds to provide services to an entirely remote, rural, unserved and severely economically disadvantaged community. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
| |
|  | | So basically.... Basically these projects are laying more backbone structure for future deployments? If that's the case then it's a very good start in the right direction. | |
|  MordhemLove it, Hate it. join:2003-07-10 Baltimore, MD | Give it to us free if we are paying for it I will never get this, the government flips the bill with tax money, so that companys then can over charge us to pay for it? Fuck if we payed for it in taxes then hell it should be free, hell if the goverment was trust worthy they could provide us intenet access and charge us in taxes the actual cost of providing the service, aka like $4 -- "Thats Daddy Comcast to you Ma'bell." "I love TV but god dam don't burn my house down" "Comcast subscribers have been giving local new channels high ratings watching Verizon set peoples houses on fire" "Now Thats TV" | |
|  |  | | Re: Give it to us free if we are paying for it But this isn't access that the money is being used for. It's creating more back bone infastructure. | |
|
 iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon Online DSL
| Meh Some of the money is being used for heavy-duty fiber construction that probably wouldn't have taken place nearly as quickly, and will probably lower bandwidth costs dramatically. However a few of the things I saw were for companies that aren't serving customers very well right now, with no guarantee that they'd serve them any better later :/ | |
|
 | |
|
|