site Search:


 
   
story category
Verizon: 100Gbps Routes in 2010
2009 will be spent testing faster core network
by Karl Bode Tuesday 10-Feb-2009 tags: bandwidth · networking
In 2007, Verizon said they'd completed the industry's first field test of 100 gigabits per second (Gbps) core optical transmission, running FiOSTV content on a 312-mile network route between Tampa, Florida and Miami. In 2008, Verizon and Siemens announced that they've nearly doubled that distance record, sending a 100 Gbps transmission on a single wavelength for more than 1,040 kilometers (646 miles) over field fiber. While Verizon had previously stated the shift from 40 Gbps to 100 Gbps core network technology will be exponentially quicker than the move from 10 Gbps to 40 Gbps -- it looks like real world 100Gbps core links won't be a reality until 2010, according to Network World.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Packetloss
Premium
join:2002-07-01
Harrisonburg, VA

Caps R Fun

Awesome reach your monthly cap within mere minutes!

(When they put one in place like everyone else has)

cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
kudos:5
Reviews:
·Frontier FiOS

Re: Caps R Fun

This is for traffic on the backbone, not to individual subscribers. If anything, this goes to provide even more capacity to delay even the need for caps.

While the competition is complaining that they don't have enough capacity, that net neutrality is a bad thing as it will overburden their network, and finding ways to slow down or limit their customers, Verizon appears to be doing The Right Thing™.

53059959
Temp banned from BBR more then anyone

join:2002-10-02
PwnZone

peering

Now if only someone will decide to peer with verizon. I rarely ever see my route travel over uunet these days.

baineschile
2600 ways to live
Premium
join:2008-05-10
Sterling Heights, MI

Wow

I can hit Time Warners Cap in less than a second. Sweet!

Dan
Trailer Park Supervisor
Premium
join:2002-12-17
Eh?

Backbone not consumer speeds.

I think they are referring to backbone technology, not consumer products.
--
Karma

baineschile
2600 ways to live
Premium
join:2008-05-10
Sterling Heights, MI

Re: Backbone not consumer speeds.

Youre right of course, its just fun to always bring up internet caps no matter what news is presented.

capper

@rr.com

Re: Backbone not consumer speeds.

Everything will be capped even our salary you will see.
dsless

join:2001-05-16
Pittsburgh, PA

Re: Backbone not consumer speeds.

Except Taxes
Pv8man

join:2008-07-24
Hammond, IN
LMAOROFCMP

laughing my ass off rolling on floor crapping my pants.

Good one "Dan"
you just made my day better
JSM88

join:2000-12-20
Falls Church, VA

ah, the refreshing taste of no caps

of course, unlike cable customers, Fios users have no caps, just a beautiful open field of untrammeled bandwidth - and somehow verizon's network has not come crashing to a halt, nor has their balance sheet.

dennismurphy
Put me on hold? I'll put YOU on hold
Premium
join:2002-11-19
Parsippany, NJ

Re: ah, the refreshing taste of no caps

I dunno ... my uncapped Optimum Online BOOST cable service seems to be a pretty beautiful field too.

Not *all* cable providers suck ... just most of 'em.

fifty nine

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
kudos:1
For now.

Cable had no caps until recently.

Don't worry, caps are coming. Maybe not now, maybe not next year, but when Verizon corners the market, I'm willing to bet money that they'll start seeing the "value" of caps.

nixen
Rockin' the Boxen
Premium
join:2002-10-04
Alexandria, VA

Re: ah, the refreshing taste of no caps

said by fifty nine:

For now.

Cable had no caps until recently.

Don't worry, caps are coming. Maybe not now, maybe not next year, but when Verizon corners the market, I'm willing to bet money that they'll start seeing the "value" of caps.
Around here, cable has *always* had caps of one sort or another.
--
The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt. -- Bertrand Russell

cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
kudos:5
Reviews:
·Frontier FiOS
said by fifty nine:

Don't worry, caps are coming.
That's what they've always said even back in the DSL days. And we're still waiting. Apparently tomorrow or next year never gets here.
Celia

join:2001-12-05
Chicago, IL

Re: ah, the refreshing taste of no caps

We live in today, the cap of verizon lives in tomorrow. so we kinda dont share the same day...

fifty nine

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
kudos:1
Back in the day, I had RoadRunner and RCN and there were no caps either. I kept hearing how "shared capacity isn't an issue."

Now it's become an issue and here come the caps.

Verizon has no caps now because they want to woo cable customers. When they don't have that need anymore, that's when the time for caps will be just right.

cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
kudos:5
Reviews:
·Frontier FiOS

Re: ah, the refreshing taste of no caps

said by fifty nine:

Verizon has no caps now because they want to woo cable customers. When they don't have that need anymore, that's when the time for caps will be just right.
Verizon has no caps now because they have no need for caps. They have plenty of capacity and are being proactive with keeping up with current and future demands.

There will always be churn with cable companies and other competitors. They will always be wooing customers to come over from cable. So by your logic, Verizon shouldn't ever have to implement caps then.
JSM88

join:2000-12-20
Falls Church, VA
See - this is the very essence of Cable's thinking - that they can keep screwing with their customers and eventually Verizon will join them. The logic does not follow. Now if you were saying that eventually the cable folks will disappear and vz will own the market (and be able to institute caps due to the lack of market forces to the contrary - the cable infrastructure won't disappear - either they will lose so many customers (and video subscriptions as iptv takes over) that they will be bought out for the value of their infrastructure(discounted) by someone who knows how to compete for consumers $ or they will begin to compete themselves.

One thing that won't happen is VZ owning the market all to itself - we may appreciate their approach to broadband today, and may even reward it by showing preference to their model - but the ultimate outcome for them, at best, is owning a competitive, truly national, network (and the concomitant revenues), not a monopoly.

FTTC

join:2008-10-01
Mount Rainier, MD

fiostv only

its only for fiostv cool! what about the internet!

fifty nine

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
kudos:1

Re: fiostv only

Internet is a byproduct of FiOS. Verizon only got into FiOS because they want to sell TV.

SLD
Premium
join:2002-04-17
San Francisco, CA

Pretty scary

That they are bragging of implementing 100Gbps links is scary - most of the links are 10Gbps or less. When you consider that many datacenters have customers with a 1Gbps or 10Gbps link, one or two racks can saturate a link if the data flow is directed thus.
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:1

Re: Pretty scary

said by SLD:

When you consider that many datacenters have customers with a 1Gbps or 10Gbps link, one or two racks can saturate a link if the data flow is directed thus.
Considering the datacenters aren't saturating backbones with existing 40 Gbps capacity, I don't think there will be too much of a problem with backbones upgraded to 100 Gbps.

SLD
Premium
join:2002-04-17
San Francisco, CA

Re: Pretty scary

I'm just saying that they are woefully underlinked right now, and 100Gbps isn't that high for a backbone if it is heavily used for video or filesharing. One of my clients was spitting out 850Mbps last weekend all by himself, and his site is only in the top 8000.
openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:1

Re: Pretty scary

said by SLD:

One of my clients was spitting out 850Mbps last weekend all by himself, and his site is only in the top 8000.
I'm assuming that 850 Mbps was peak and also spread across multiple backbones.

SLD
Premium
join:2002-04-17
San Francisco, CA

Re: Pretty scary

It held for quite a few hours, and over one provider, so possibly one backbone to a point.

skuv

@rr.com
said by SLD:

I'm just saying that they are woefully underlinked right now, and 100Gbps isn't that high for a backbone if it is heavily used for video or filesharing. One of my clients was spitting out 850Mbps last weekend all by himself, and his site is only in the top 8000.
They just wouldn't be using a single 100Gbps link for each backbone connection from site to site. They have DWDM, which means that can deploy 32, 40, or 80 100Gbps wavelengths on each leg. I imagine currently they are running several 40Gbps wavelengths per leg. Providers that are using 10Gbps backbone links have them bundled and are approaching 10x10 bundles.

cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
kudos:5
It's (relatively) easy to implement a 10Gbps link across a rack or datacenter. Find me a pair of datacenters that have a 100Gbps link several hundred miles apart and I'll be impressed.
nitzan
Premium,VIP
join:2008-02-27
kudos:2
said by SLD:

That they are bragging of implementing 100Gbps links is scary - most of the links are 10Gbps or less. When you consider that many datacenters have customers with a 1Gbps or 10Gbps link, one or two racks can saturate a link if the data flow is directed thus.
Hence cometh the logical conclusion- a data center that sells you a 10GBit port is obviously overselling their capacity. Overall I think it's much better for a data center to have 1000x 100Mbit racks than 10x 10Gbit racks. They'd still be overselling capacity either way, but with 100Mbit racks a few rogue machines won't bring the entire data center down. With 10Gbit racks it's enough for ONE to be taken over to seriously put a dent in your day.
Cyber2lz

join:2001-11-15
Odessa, FL

Where

are all those chicken littles that predicted V*'s demise over the "risky" Fiber decision three years ago.

Still waiting.................... oh, no takers !!!! hmmmm
--
The Light Pipe is the Right Pipe !!!
xlimitx

join:2001-12-31
Wilkes Barre, PA

True QAM

Whoa, they'll be able to offer even more channels in True QAM instead of False QAM! Weee!
houghe9

join:2008-02-27
Lexington Park, MD

i love it!!!

they are building brand loyalty. i think getting screwed over by low caps and poor customer service for years will make people jump ship immediately when they eventually get fios.

those i know that have it swear by it. whenever i get it i will remember the times with cable when they screwed with bit torrent* and, let the cable installer sleep on my couch. I will celebrate!!!!

*i dont use bit torrent but i will never forget!!!

tmh

@comcast.net

Botnets will really have some teeth

at 100Gbps, DDoS attacks can really have an impact, even on the biggest targets.

Mike_

join:2003-06-24
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Reviews:
·Verizon Wireless..
·Comcast
·AT&T U-Verse

Hmm...

No one notices the sadness in this. They perform a field test in Florida, were Verizon offers no tv/internet service of any kind. Will they ever get here to create some true pricing/channel-lineup/bandwidth competition with Comcast?
--
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Unless you know what you're doing.

bradentonfios

@verizon.com

Re: Hmm...

Hmm, Fios has been deployed in the Tampa Bay area. Hillsbourough, Pinellas, Pasco, Polk, Manatee, and Sarasota counties.

bradentonfios

@verizon.com
Verizon's service area is around the Tampa Bay Area. Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco, Polk, Manatee, and sarasota Counties all have fios in them.

OSIU
Where is my "change"?
Premium
join:2003-11-12
00000
Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL

1 edit
said by Mike_:

They perform a field test in Florida, were Verizon offers no tv/internet service of any kind.
Are you sure about that?

»www.fiberexperts.com/florida-fios.html

Mike_

join:2003-06-24
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Reviews:
·Verizon Wireless..
·Comcast
·AT&T U-Verse

1 edit

Re: Hmm...

Ah sorry I didn't make that specific enough. I meant the entire Florida East Coast. Not even U-verse has yet to be deployed. Seems to be Comcast / Cox(Northern Florida) territory (excluding satellite providers of course)
--
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Unless you know what you're doing.

funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Yarmouth Port, MA
kudos:5

Simpsons' Did It?

Not to be discouraging to Verizon, but hasn't Comcast been doing this too?

Wags

@verizon.net

fios scmios

Now if they would do something for us in the deteriorating copper areas, with no hope of fios within the next 20 years

abcdefghijk

@verizon.net

Re: fios scmios

They will do something for you....

Sell you to the highest bidder.

Saturday, 11-Feb 23:50:44 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online! © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.