 | | COMPETITION! MORE,MORE,MORE! | |
|
 |  mrchrisOut and aroundPremium
join:2002-10-01
North Babylon, NY | Re: COMPETITION! So is RR in Cablevision territory and Comcast in Roadrunner territory. | |
|
 KfedkaPremium
join:2005-05-06
Spokane, WA | We Love competition Thats the way it should be. It what made capitalism better than communism. Competition is a way forward to expansion and growth. | |
|
| | Ofcourse Of course it's logical to crush your competitors with a GOOD service.
Even at matching price points I think it's a better value to go with FiOS rather than U-Crap. | |
|
 Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium
join:2002-03-03
USA
kudos:4
1 edit |  Verizon already in area; don't see Verizon moving in ...
Some may think that this is an indication that Verizon may try to take Fios national and become a major overbuilder around the country. I just don't see that happening.
Verizon was already in the DFW area.
quote:
Verizon will extend its fiber-optic lines into neighborhoods covered by AT&T in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, a region the two companies share, Verizon said Monday. The company said it might do the same in other parts of the United States.
In areas where they already have a major presence, they may try and expand within the area. But in cities where they aren't doing landline business already, I don't see them moving in on other incumbents.
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page | |
|
|  ptrowskiGot Helix?Premium
join:2005-03-14
Putnam, CT
kudos:4 | Re: Verizon already in area; don't see Verizon moving in ... Verizon is in RI, let them come over the line to CT please! | |
|
| | | Please come to coastal North Carolina--Wilmington would love to have Verizon here in Wilmington plus Verizon has a call center here, Please God--SEND FIOS AND VERIZON TO US INSTEAD OF COPPER AT&T | |
|
| | | VZ is also in the LA area around Long Beach and a couple smaller areas. I could see them cherry picking some of the higher end suburbs or apt complexes around there. I dont think it would be much of a reach for them. | |
|
| |  PhilRojo SolPremium
join:2001-06-11
Camarillo, CA
kudos:2 | Re: Verizon already in area; don't see Verizon moving in ... Let's face it. The majority of people want FiOS. | |
|
| | |  en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Re: Verizon already in area; don't see Verizon moving in ... Verizon has offers what cable has today... only with fiber to the house, and the ability for higher data rates.
Verizon offers what people are asking for (not all, but in general what people want).
AT&T offers a TV service, but has many restrictions and not a clean build.
FiOS = Fiber , it works or it doesn't. Replace the line if the line is bad.
VDSL = POTS on VDSL --
Canada = Hollywood North | |
|
| | | |  wa2ibmPremium
join:2000-10-10
San Jose, CA
 ·SONIC.NET
| Re: Verizon already in area; don't see Verizon moving in ... A glimmer of hope for Silicon Gulch?
VZ (formerly GTE) is the LEC for Los Gatos and Morgan Hill, both 'bedroom' communities for the San Jose/Silicon Valley area. I'm located in the Almaden Valley area of San Jose, just a couple of miles from Los Gatos. I'm currently on an AT&T RT for sonic.net DSL, but would love to see VZ come 'over the line' in my direction. I see U-Verse terminals going in all over the San Jose area, but none in my area yet.
I can hope, can't I? | |
|
| | | | | en102Canadian, eh?
join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA | Re: Verizon already in area; don't see Verizon moving in ... Fortunate for you (maybe).
I'm in Santa Clarita, which is a 100% SBC/AT&T city 
Over the hill into North Hills, my inlaws as in a Verizon 'pocket' of Verizon in Los Angeles/San Fernando Valley.
--
Canada = Hollywood North | |
|
|  tiger72SexaT duorPPremium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1
 ·T-Mobile US
| said by Romney2012:... where they don't already have a presence. Some may think that this is an indication that Verizon may try to take Fios national and become a major overbuilder around the country. I just don't see that happening. Verizon was already in the DFW area. quote:
Verizon will extend its fiber-optic lines into neighborhoods covered by AT&T in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, a region the two companies share, Verizon said Monday. The company said it might do the same in other parts of the United States.
In areas where they already have a major presence, they may try and expand within the area. But in cities where they aren't doing landline business already, I don't see them moving in on other incumbents. They weren't sharing the same cities however. Much like Cox and Time Warner share DFW, and Comcast and TWC share Kansas City, ATT and Verizon share the metroplex along county and city lines.
In other words, Verizon is in fact going into areas where it had no actual presence, and is laying new lines down in ATT areas which it previously had no access to, and provided no services in.
--
"What makes us omniscient? Have we a record of omniscience? ...If we can't persuade nations with comparable values of the merit of our cause, we'd better reexamine our reasoning."
-United States Secretary of Defense (1961-1968) Robert S. McNamara | |
|
| | | said by Romney2012:Some may think that this is an indication that Verizon may try to take Fios national and become a major overbuilder around the country. I just don't see that happening. No, but if they were smart, they would. Verizon has major leg up on all of the other providers in America. And that comes from someone who works for one of them. | |
|
| | gateguyPremium
join:2001-02-12
Reisterstown, MD Reviews:
 ·Verizon FiOS
| Re: Verizon already in area; don't see Verizon moving in ... said by NetAdmin1:No, but if they were smart, they would. Wall Street would punish the stock severely in the near-term.
--
Without data, it is just an opinion | |
|
| | | | | Re: Verizon already in area; don't see Verizon moving in ... said by gateguy:Wall Street would punish the stock severely in the near-term. That's true, but that's because Wall Street is chocked full of idiots looking for short term gains... Unfortunately, investing is viewed the same way going to the Casino is viewed. | |
|
plat2on1
join:2002-08-21
Hopewell Junction, NY | awesome i live in a verizon black hole in my town. 2 frontier CO's surrounded 360 degrees by verizon territory. this is a good sign they may just build over the whole area. | |
|
| | They are Welcome Here I hope they come into the Qwest controlled markets (Denver, Boise and other cities). 
Qwest needs a good kick in butt. They don't want to do anything to upgrade their network and if they had their way I'm sure it would stay that way for another 20 years. | |
|
| | | Re: They are Welcome Here Maybe, if we are lucky, Verizon will just buy Qwest...probably just wishful thinking. | |
|
| | | said by jdjbuffalo:I hope they come into the Qwest controlled markets (Denver, Boise and other cities). Qwest needs a good kick in butt. They don't want to do anything to upgrade their network and if they had their way I'm sure it would stay that way for another 20 years. Good luck with that. Boise is "rural" by Verizon standards. Hell if Boise was Verizon territory they probably wouldn't even have the 7 Mbps DSL that Qwest offers where possible. Probably Denver, Phoenix and Seattle are the only places Verizon would care about. | |
|
| | Frisco Resident I live in Frisco and it is currently split 1/2 verizon 1/2 at&t. I live on the at&t side unfortunately and they just rolled the sub-par u-verse by my door. Had guys going door-to-door to recruit for weeks and all I had to do was convince them that I actually "understand" how inferior "advanced" offering was and they left me alone. I will be the first verizon sub on the block if verizon brings fios to my door and I imagine many would follow. | |
|
| | | Re: Frisco Resident I am a Frisco resident, too. I can't wait for this to happen. An internet article I've found claimed that the building permits for Allen are already in process, and that service should be active within 12 months.
No word on whether Frisco and north Plano will be on the same schedule or not. | |
|
| | | | Re: Frisco Resident Plano = $$$$$
I'm sure that Verizon would not hesitate much to offer service there. I've been to my corp office there a couple of times. | |
|
| | | said by bradb007:I live in Frisco and it is currently split 1/2 verizon 1/2 at&t. I live on the at&t side unfortunately and they just rolled the sub-par u-verse by my door. Had guys going door-to-door to recruit for weeks and all I had to do was convince them that I actually "understand" how inferior "advanced" offering was and they left me alone. I will be the first verizon sub on the block if verizon brings fios to my door and I imagine many would follow. You might have convinced the temp guy / girl hired to promote the services but you sure as hell have not convinced the moron in a suit making the decisions. | |
|
| | WOW! This is great news! It’s nice to see the phone companies respond to marketing demand. I don’t have a landline; don’t need one. I do, however, have a cell phone and broadband. I’m calling today!! | |
|
 morboComplete Your Transaction
join:2002-01-22
00000 | one way attack AT&T can't really fight back by deploying in VZ territory. or at least it will be much more difficult due to the technology disadvantage... | |
|
| EPS
join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA | Re: one way attack Good point- Verizon owns the copper network in Verizon territory, which I would assume would make deploying U-Verse to those areas difficult. | |
|
|  dvd536as Mr. Pink as they comePremium
join:2001-04-27
Phoenix, AZ
kudos:4 | said by morbo:AT&T can't really fight back by deploying in VZ territory. or at least it will be much more difficult due to the technology disadvantage... They could if they'd dump their tired old technology and went TRUE FTTH!
--
When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee | |
|
| | Remember State-wide Franchising? Remember the state-wide franchising debate a while back?
Hmmmmmm
This could get very interesting! | |
|
| | Cherry Picking Its discrimination on the part of these LEC's
Going after populated areas to make the most $.
and not even building a carrier class network on top of it.
shame on at&t and verizon !!!!!!!! | |
|
| PhilRojo SolPremium
join:2001-06-11
Camarillo, CA
kudos:2
1 edit | Re: Cherry Picking Because a private company should lose money wiring 1 or 2 areas in the boonies. | |
|
| |
| |
See 8 replies to this post |
|
| | | i think it is a wonderful idea to wire places were MONEY WILL BE LOST THE FASTEST and help the companies go into debt and STOP DEPLOYING ANY FIBER. this logic MAKES PERFECT sense to me.
companies are going to this 'cherry picking' becuase it makes sense to do it, especially when the cost of deployment is very high. why pick an area that has poor return on investment over one that has a better ROI? i think anyone with a sound mind would pick areas that makes sense financially, but apparently some people don't understand this concept. | |
|
| | | | Re: Cherry Picking I didnt know that it was OK for them to cherry pick-- does your state utilities commission know - you better tell them | |
|
| | | EPS
join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA | Re: Cherry Picking In Massachusetts? All franchising is done on a town basis, so of course Verizon has the right to not go into towns it doesn't want to. If we had a statewide franchise, maybe the state would have an excuse to force them to deploy elsewhere, but statewide franchises bring other problems. | |
|
 ztmikeMark for moderationPremium
join:2001-08-02
Michigan City, IN | Rescue me Verizon Maybe I'll get lucky and have Verizon move in on my town..which is controlled by Atat and Comcast, 10 miles into the next city..and there is Verizon .. 
--
www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdYueIC1pjM | |
|
| iansltx
join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2 Reviews:
·Verizon Online DSL
 ·Comcast
| Re: Rescue me Verizon Hmm, the problem is, I'm in a VZ town but too far out for DSL. Well, there's also the fact that the phone lines are screwy around here. So TWC is the only HSI option at the moment.
And no, I don't expect out town of 10k is gonna get FiOS any timesoon. Too far from a major network hub. | |
|
JohnAPremium
join:2003-09-16
Pittsburgh, PA | Why Not?
IIRC, when some of these towns (with partial VZ service) granted their TV franchise (before statewide came about), they requested that Verizon wire the whole town. | |
|
 TsumePremium
join:2004-02-23
Johnson City, TN
·Comcast
| What would really burn AT&T... is if they wired San Diego county. There isn't a single Verizon sub here. AT&T's only competition for their subpar service is COX, which isn't too bad, but if FiOS came here... EVERYONE would be on Verizon overnight.
It would be a good way to show AT&T "Hey, you f*cked up by being cheapskates and not upgrading. Look how much of your money we have now! HAHAHA" | |
|
wa2ibmPremium
join:2000-10-10
San Jose, CA
1 edit | A glimmer of hope for Silicon Gulch? Oops - incorrect post - | |
|
 alchav
join:2002-05-17
Palm Desert, CA |  Let's see FiOS or U-Verse?
| |
|
| | New homes in the East Well this is a little too East for me, but I am glad that it is getting started here.
For now I am with TWC with a soild 10/1.
--
Avatar by: dandelion | Disarm you with a smile. | Tell me, tell me what you're after. I just want to get there faster. | |
|
| | Come to Qwest terrirory. get to it Verizon! come to Tucson! and kill Qwest and Cox! | |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK | Verizon vs AT&T would be good for consumers.... ... which is why it won't happen. Verizon already has services in some areas in Texas, I think this is where FIOS will go. Don't expect them to expand out into exclusive at&t areas--- they sure don't want at&t in theirs. | |
|
| | | Re: Verizon vs AT&T would be good for consumers.... As cheap as AT&T is, I doubt if they would even try to get into Verizon's areas. | |
|
| | | | Re: Verizon vs AT&T would be good for consumers.... said by tdouglas22:As cheap as AT&T is, I doubt if they would even try to get into Verizon's areas. Hell, AT&T isn't even trying to get into Bellsouth areas. 
--
Saving the world keeps me busy. However, I find Earth very primitive from my home planet of Krypton.
-Supergirl | |
|
| | | | said by tdouglas22:As cheap as AT&T is, I doubt if they would even try to get into Verizon's areas. I live in northwest Keller close to AT&T territory, and I get junk mail from AT&T frequently trying to get me to switch to AT&T. I can't figure out why AT&T is spending money marketing to a FiOS customer by pitching 1.5Mbps DSL when I already have 15Mbps from VZ. Maybe they think their price of $29 for "naked" DSL will make me jump ship... | |
|
mapper
join:2008-04-07
Fairfax, VA Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
| at&t in Verizon territory Now wouldn't that look funny, at&t VRADs in Verizon territory... Verizon customers would not be pleased. For at&t to come out and do the same thing into Verizon territory would be a uphill battle because of its slower speeds and use of existing infrastructure(like using old copper pair wiring). But at&t maybe able to compete in areas like Vermont/New Hampshire(now under Fairpoint Comm.), and other non FiOS Verizon territory to extend the reach of VDSL, where Verizon has neglected to put in. Its a thought. | |
|
|
|
