site Search:


 
   
story category
Verizon Wants, Doesn't Want, New Spectrum?
FCC Points Out Seidenberg's Inconsistent Comments
by Karl Bode Friday 09-Apr-2010 tags: legal · fcc · business · wireless · Verizon Wireless Broadband
Verizon CEO Iven Seidenberg, who is on his way out as CEO of Verizon, might want to take back an interview he conducted this week, as it has given him nothing but trouble. Buried somewhere between his comments about wanting the iPhone to come to Verizon and his plans to hunt and throttle video users, Seidenberg made the comment that he thought there wasn't really much of a spectrum crunch after all -- and that he thought the FCC should stay out of managing spectrum. The FCC thinks those comments were rather strange, and in a blog post document countless instances where Verizon has stated the exact opposite:

The fact is, Verizon played a major role in building an overwhelming record in support of more mobile broadband spectrum, consistently expressing its official view that the country faces a looming spectrum crisis that could undermine the country’s global competitiveness. . .The National Broadband Plan record contains widespread agreement and a solid foundation of factual evidence on the need for the FCC to pursue policies that would free up 500 Mhz for mobile broadband by 2020.

Verizon, as usual, wants to have their cake and eat it too. They essentially spent much of the last two weeks saying they'd like to see all FCC authority gutted and talking about how the government should stay out of their business. Except of course when government can do something for it -- like imposing tougher regulation on competitors (blocking Google's acquisition of AdMob), forcing cable operators to give them access to exclusive local sports programming, expediting tower builds, etc.

Verizon's public comments and their actions have never been in sync, and while it's nice to see the FCC call out Verizon for these inconsistencies -- it would be nicer to see the agency do this across the board. Perhaps the FCC would like to highlight how Verizon pays lip service to rural broadband expansion, yet is busily ignoring or selling off huge swaths of rural America. Meanwhile, if Seidenberg really doesn't want the spectrum the FCC plans to free up -- perhaps some smaller, hungry competitor does?

view: topics flat text 
Post a:
sparky57

join:2003-05-18
New Bedford, MA

Seidenberg leaving Verizon

"Verizon CEO Iven Seidenberg, who is on his way out as CEO of Verizon"

What is your source that he's leaving?
Crookshanks

join:2008-02-04
Northeast PA
Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..

have their cake and eat it too....

Of course they want to have their cake and eat it too. Contrary to what most people think, big business actually welcomes regulation to an extent. They know that they can use their legions of lobbyists and political contributions to ensure that regulations get written to protect their existing business model and shut out competitors. It's also easier for a big business to comply with said regulations than it would be for a small upstart that can't afford legions of lawyers.

The fact that Verizon seeks to use the regulatory system to it's advantage should surprise no one. The fact that we let them get away with it should engage anybody who is informed enough to be engaged in the political process.
chronoss2009
Premium
join:2008-09-23
kudos:2

why not just gut democracy altogether

its not like ceos aren't calling the shots in America. PERHAPS its time to kick out obama and put in the JOE BIDEN for president
and then next up the mpaa chief

yea why not its good for you. YOU NEED THIS PAIN before you realize its a scam ALL OF IT
Crookshanks

join:2008-02-04
Northeast PA
Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..

Re: why not just gut democracy altogether

Minor nitpick, but the United States isn't a Democracy in the classical sense. It's a Constitutional Republic.

A better solution than gutting it would be to take it back -- no where is it written in stone that our choices are limited to those that work for big media (Democrats) and those that work for big industry (Republicans).

Of course the majority of the American people are too busy consuming opiates for the masses to even bother to vote, let alone get outraged by what's going on. As long as American Idol comes on when it's supposed to they won't get outraged enough to involve themselves in our political system. More's the pity.

BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN
said by chronoss2009:

its not like ceos aren't calling the shots in America. PERHAPS its time to kick out obama and put in the JOE BIDEN for president
and then next up the mpaa chief

yea why not its good for you. YOU NEED THIS PAIN before you realize its a scam ALL OF IT
How about making Ted Stevens President? He knows the internet isn't a truck.
Luminaris

join:2005-12-01
Waterford, VA

Re: why not just gut democracy altogether

Even though Ted Stevens looks like he was run over by a truck
Crookshanks

join:2008-02-04
Northeast PA
Reviews:
·Frontier Communi..
said by BF69:

How about making Ted Stevens President? He knows the internet isn't a truck.
But then Sarah Palin can't run as VP again unless she moves to a different state....

fifty nine

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
kudos:2

Spectrum

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?

Linklist
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Longport, NJ
kudos:5

Re: Spectrum

said by fifty nine:

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?
Seidenberg is afraid most of the new wireless spectrum that would be made available won't go to Verizon. That would make more competition to Verizon's dominant position in the US. If Verizon can't get the spectrum, they would prefer it not be made available at all.

BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN

Re: Spectrum

said by Linklist:

said by fifty nine:

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?
Seidenberg is afraid most of the new wireless spectrum that would be made available won't go to Verizon. That would make more competition to Verizon's dominant position in the US. If Verizon can't get the spectrum, they would prefer it not be made available at all.
Well the spectrum would be auctioned. After spending billions on the 700 Mhz spectrum and billions on FiOS development, investors are probably worried about spending billions more. Which means at&t would likely get much of the new spectrum and Verizon doesn't want that. If the FCC had talked about 2025 or 2030 then Verizon probably be all for it.
mdrift

join:2003-08-15
Spokane, WA
said by Linklist:

said by fifty nine:

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?
Seidenberg is afraid most of the new wireless spectrum that would be made available won't go to Verizon. That would make more competition to Verizon's dominant position in the US. If Verizon can't get the spectrum, they would prefer it not be made available at all.
True, but considering the US Government owns the spectrum he has nothing to say about it, other than, ``I see your $15 Billion and raise you to $20 Billion!''

BF69
Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN
said by fifty nine:

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?
Hell they haven't used ANY of the 700 MHz spectrum they bought 3 years ago.

RARPSL

join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY

Re: Spectrum

said by BF69:

said by fifty nine:

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?
Hell they haven't used ANY of the 700 MHz spectrum they bought 3 years ago.
I agree. There should be a "Use It or Lose It" provision in the Auction Terms. If you do not use the Spectrum (as opposed to warehousing it to keep others from using it) within a designated period of time, it should be confiscated and resold with you being ineligible for bidding for it again and also ineligible for a refund on your purchase.

tim_k
Buttons, Bows, Beamer, Shadow, Kasey
Premium,VIP
join:2002-02-02
Stewartstown, PA
kudos:25

Re: Spectrum

said by RARPSL:

said by BF69:

said by fifty nine:

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?
Hell they haven't used ANY of the 700 MHz spectrum they bought 3 years ago.
I agree. There should be a "Use It or Lose It" provision in the Auction Terms.
To be fair, Verizon is going to use it for their LTE network, but it's taking time to get it out there.
--
RIP my babies Buttons 1/15/94-2/9/07, Beamer 7/24/08, & Bows 12/17/94-10/11/09

RARPSL

join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY

Re: Spectrum

said by tim_k:

To be fair, Verizon is going to use it for their LTE network, but it's taking time to get it out there.
IOW: They are warehousing it (as I stated) and claiming they they will eventually use it [with no firm "will be in use by date"] - Meanwhile not CURRENTLY using it or allowing anyone who would/could use it NOW from being able/allowed to use it. They have been sitting on it for 3 years and have done NOTHING with it except to prevent it from being used.

Linklist
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Longport, NJ
kudos:5

Re: Spectrum

said by RARPSL:

said by tim_k:

To be fair, Verizon is going to use it for their LTE network, but it's taking time to get it out there.
IOW: They are warehousing it (as I stated) and claiming they they will eventually use it [with no firm "will be in use by date"] - Meanwhile not CURRENTLY using it or allowing anyone who would/could use it NOW from being able/allowed to use it. They have been sitting on it for 3 years and have done NOTHING with it except to prevent it from being used.
And what is a REASONABLE period of time to put an asset you paid BILLIONS for in to use? I think the FCC says 10 yrs. You say what?

digiblur
Premium
join:2002-06-03
Louisiana
said by BF69:

said by fifty nine:

Is there a clear, defined plan for use of the spectrum (not just an outline like the broadband plan is), or is this yet another spectrum grab for telcos?
Hell they haven't used ANY of the 700 MHz spectrum they bought 3 years ago.
And they are sitting on tons of other spectrum. If you're in Verizon's world then correct there is no crunch on spectrum due to the licenses they have.
--

SouthWest Louisiana PC Users Group »www.swlapcug.com
Big Dawg 23

join:2002-03-27
Northfield, MN
Keep in mind until June 2009 many electronics were still operating. Then they still had an additional delay before they could begin testing LTE on the 700MHZ. According to what VZW continues to say they are still on course for 30 LTE markets in 2010.

Gbcue
P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8

500MHz

I'm sure T-Mobile will gladly take 500MHz of spectrum!
--
My Blog 2.0

Thursday, 23-May 14:25:40 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.