 | | Eh.. It'll add capacity because no one is rushing to get satellite Internet... | |
|
 |  BF69Premium join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN | Re: Eh.. Before thinking about getting new customers perhaps they should be trying to keep CURRENT customers. I think everyone that only has satellite as a choice for internet knows that satellite sucks. There aren't these long lines of people who can't get satellite internet because of capacity issues. They don't want the sucky service in the first place. | |
|
 |  |  tshirtPremium,MVM join:2004-07-11 Snohomish, WA kudos:3 Reviews:
·Comcast
| Re: Eh.. said by BF69:............trying to keep CURRENT customers. I think everyone that only has satellite as a choice for internet knows that satellite sucks. . That model doesn't work for Satellite internet because customers only stay if there NO other "faster than dial up" service available. Happiness is not required, but if you've lived where dial up is still 9600/14k then dish SOUNDS good. the profit is in selling the dish and install to people beyond the reach of wired. As soon as they aren't captive anymore they'll leave when their current contract. | |
|
 mogamer join:2011-04-20 Royal Oak, MI | Need more satellites They would have to launch 2 or 3 more satellites like ViaSat-1 in the next five years if they want satellite internet to be practical and competitive. And I sure don't see that happening. So, sat internet will continue to be a "last resort" service. | |
|
 |  andybPremium join:2003-05-29 SW Ontario kudos:1 | Re: Need more satellites Another (called Jupiter) is being launched next year | |
|
 |  |  mogamer join:2011-04-20 Royal Oak, MI | Re: Need more satellites said by andyb:Another (called Jupiter) is being launched next year That is a Hughes satellite though. I should have said ViaSat needs 2 - 3 more in five years to be competitive. There will be two high capacity satellites spread out over two customer bases. That will help out a bit, but each service needs the amount of satellites I mentioned. And the previous poster was right, the satellite providers know they have their customers "by the balls". It's so bad that people rejoice when they can get crappy 1.5/512 dsl or get 4G with it's ultra low caps.
The fact that satellite internet can get new users through government subsidies, shows how bad government policies involving broadband is. | |
|
 pnh102Reptiles Are Cuddly And PrettyPremium join:2002-05-02 Mount Airy, MD | Wrong Approach :)
quote: Physics will continue to dictate that satellite broadband will suffer significantly latency ...
Now see, these guys are taking the wrong approach to solving this problem:
»www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xdbPhnfFEI
Happy Monday! -- "Net Neutrality" zealots - the people you can thank for your capped Internet service. | |
|
 Reviews:
·Millenicom
·HughesNet Satell..
| Hughesnet vs. Wildblue I sure am glad Wildblue got into the Satellite market, ever since they did, Hughesnet has been making small improvements to their service which have now turned into several Large improvements coming one or two every couple of weeks. Thanks Wildblue for helping make my provider better, hehe. -- HughesNet elite plan/.74 dish w/1watt trans. / 9000 modem / 3 computers on a linksy's wired network | |
|
 |  Reviews:
·Air Advantage
·HughesNet Satell..
| Re: Hughesnet vs. Wildblue said by zeddlar:I sure am glad Wildblue got into the Satellite market, ever since they did, Hughesnet has been making small improvements to their service which have now turned into several Large improvements coming one or two every couple of weeks. Thanks Wildblue for helping make my provider better, hehe. i've been consistently getting downloads speeds of 300 kb/s on the 1mb plan even during the fap free time. can't complain about that | |
|
 BiggA join:2005-11-23 EARTH Reviews:
·Comcast
| 3G Where is there left that can't get AT&T or Verizon 3G? Those two companies should really market to the ultra-rural with 50GB or higher plans for areas that have low bandwidth utilization, and just lock them down to the nearest five towers or something... As it is though, you can at least get good internet access, even if the caps are too low to download much of anything. | |
|
 |  | | Re: 3G my house. No 3G. Tennessee. Zoom in on the verizon map (Verizon ois the *only* service available here) and look at North Middle Tennessee. Those maps are lies anyway....
I have a 50ft antenna with a Wilson Wide band antenna and all I can get is voice and 1X internet. 
(any suggestions?) | |
|
 |  |  Reviews:
·Air Advantage
·HughesNet Satell..
| Re: 3G said by mickier:my house. No 3G. Tennessee. Zoom in on the verizon map (Verizon ois the *only* service available here) and look at North Middle Tennessee. Those maps are lies anyway....
I have a 50ft antenna with a Wilson Wide band antenna and all I can get is voice and 1X internet. 
(any suggestions?) verizon's coverage maps are a joke. they may in theory have the largest coverage map, but when that coverage barely gets you 1 bar of service, it's essentially useless. | |
|
 |  |  BiggA join:2005-11-23 EARTH | Do you have a repeater with the PCS band for EVDO? | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: 3G said by BiggA:Do you have a repeater with the PCS band for EVDO? I have the Standard repeater that came in the kit. I upgraded the antenna to try to get a better signal than the panel antenna. I called their tech support and dude told me if I cannot see 3G on my phone I won't get it with an antenna. He said you can't boost nothing.... -- JUST SAID Kiss My A$$ to Hughesnet HELLO Millenicom!!! My saviour! | |
|
 |  |  |  |  BiggA join:2005-11-23 EARTH | Re: 3G Correct, but 100% of Verizon sites have EVDO, unless you are roaming. It may be in the PCS band, where you'd need more gain than on the CLR band. | |
|
 Simba7I Void Warranties join:2003-03-24 Billings, MT | Interesting.. Although the latency still stinks, it'd be worth a test drive. If they'd increase the speeds and give their customers a decent size cap (250GB or larger), I'd be interested.
Satellite still stinks.. But this might make a tastier alternative instead of getting FAP'd to death by HughesNet. | |
|
 |  Reviews:
·Millenicom
·HughesNet Satell..
| Re: Interesting.. If the FAP is your problem with Hughesnet then any cell service is not going to solve your problems, even Sprint's unlimited plan caps at 50GB a month and I can get that pretty easily on Hughesnet without fapping out. Granted you have to rely on the free hours ALOT to get that much but it is easily possible with the new speeds if you have the upper tier plans. The only two places cell service can actually beat Hughesnet on is price and latency. Oh and in some cases, customer service but I think that is fixing to change alot for the better with Hughesnet. -- HughesNet elite plan/.74 dish w/1watt trans. / 9000 modem / 3 computers on a linksy's wired network | |
|
 | | spot on Karl Bode's assessment is spot-on with my experience. Latency and cost are satellite's boat anchors.
When co-renting a house my senior year in college, we couldn't get anything but satellite for broadband. The prices were so high that we laughed and lived with dialup.
My mother-in-law lives way outside of Santa Barbara and has satellite because it's her only option. She barely gets Verizon cell coverage, but nothing else is in range. Her satellite Internet connection is barely usable half of the time, and at best gets sub-DSL speeds with horrendous latency. | |
|
 |  | | Re: spot on "When co-renting a house my senior year in college, we couldn't get anything but satellite for broadband. The prices were so high that we laughed and lived with dialup."
I think I would have to do the same thing. There's no way in heck I'd be suckered into paying that much for that little speed and bandwidth!! -- The Firefox alternative. »www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/ | |
|
 | | Ka is a new technology. ViaSat 1 is opening a new BW door The author may want to consider the differences between Ku and Ka band throughput speeds. This new generation service is focused for poorly served areas not Manhattan. The author writes as if we are in 1990 considering analogue to digital. There is a vast difference and "fiber-like" is closer to reality... the article quoted 15 year old Ku and C-band technology....way off. Study of the new EutelSat European speeds and that of YaSat would be a better compaison. Dangerfield "got no respect" but he was not everywhere and anywhere. | |
|
 |  | | Re: Ka is a new technology. ViaSat 1 is opening a new BW door So with no DSL, or Cell phone coverage I've been waiting for the new satellite to launch. Should I wait even longer for Jupiter or go Via sat? | |
|
 |
|