 |
 | 
RockCake
Premium
join:2005-07-12
Woodbridge, VA | Re: Oh darn. Another week, another lawsuit. What else is new? | |
|
| | |
| | | Shoreline
Your Freedom Fries Are Stale
join:2003-09-29
Santa Clara, CA
| Re: Oh darn. There were, for example, plenty of South Park, Daily Show, and Adult Swim videos on YouTube, which were all promptly removed, citing Viacom copyright.
I see Viacom possibly winning a lawsuit, but for nothing even remotely close to a billion dollars, since that is beyond excessive for any supposed "copyright infringement". | |
|
Meehowski
join:2002-04-16
New York Mills, NY |  Oh my.........
| |
|
nasadude
join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD | more american competition at it's best alright! twice on the same day - perfect example of the american way of doing business: don't compete on price, product or service, sue their @sses!
ain't America great? | |
|
| 
Cabal
Premium
join:2007-01-21
Boston, MA
| Re: more american competition at it's best said by nasadude  :don't compete on price, product or service, sue their @sses! Which category does illegally using the copyrighted works of others for profit fall under? (Note: for reference, this is still theft.)
Just because someone is stealing from your store doesn't mean you business model is flawed. It means you put a big guy with a baseball bat at the front of the store and protect your assets.
--
Interested in open source engine management for your Subaru? | |
|
| | nasadude
join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
 ·Comcast
| Re: more american competition at it's best said by Cabal :Which category does illegally using the copyrighted works of others for profit fall under? (Note: for reference, this is still theft.) Just because someone is stealing from your store doesn't mean you business model is flawed. It means you put a big guy with a baseball bat at the front of the store and protect your assets. Bzzzzzzzztttt! Sorry, wrong answer - copyright infringement is infringement, not theft. What got "stolen"? Did the appearance of a clip on youtube make the clip disappear from viacom archives?
I'm not arguing viacom doesn't have the right to take legal action, just pointing out that this appears to be the current, default action that all the big media companies take in these circumstances.
And I'm also sorry, but it does appear big media business strategy is flawed for the digital age. The sooner they realize that and stop suing the bejesus out of anyone that does something they don't like, the sooner they will start making MORE MONEY. | |
|
| | | |
| | | 
manfmmd
Premium
join:2003-01-14
Earth
clubs:
 ·AT&T Southwest
| said by nasadude :said by Cabal :Which category does illegally using the copyrighted works of others for profit fall under? (Note: for reference, this is still theft.) Just because someone is stealing from your store doesn't mean you business model is flawed. It means you put a big guy with a baseball bat at the front of the store and protect your assets. Bzzzzzzzztttt! Sorry, wrong answer - copyright infringement is infringement, not theft. What got "stolen"? Did the appearance of a clip on youtube make the clip disappear from viacom archives? I'm not arguing viacom doesn't have the right to take legal action, just pointing out that this appears to be the current, default action that all the big media companies take in these circumstances. And I'm also sorry, but it does appear big media business strategy is flawed for the digital age. The sooner they realize that and stop suing the bejesus out of anyone that does something they don't like, the sooner they will start making MORE MONEY. What got stolen? Copyrighted works. Ask around the DI Forum and ask them if they consider the "theft" of their photographs to be stealing? 99.99% of them will come back and tell you that it IS "theft". Just because the copyrighted works are owned by "BIG BUSINESS", doesn't mean that they're not protected.
--
huh? | AIM | The beauty of ignorance is indescribable. | |
|
| | | | karlmarx
join:2006-09-18
Nashua, NH
·Fairpoint Communic..
| Re: more american competition at it's best But you can't just throw out the word 'theft', when a COPY does not deprive the original owner of a work. The correct word is 'infringement', and the supreme court ruled that infringement is NOT THEFT. They are two totally different things, and trying to describe it as 'theft' puts a negative connotation on an act that is truly victimless. Let's call it what it is, copyright infringement, not theft. The penalties for copyright infringement are ALWAYS civil, not criminal. Trying to make a civil crime into a criminal crime is just not right.
--
Stick it to the MAN. Support your local torrent sites. Proudly providing 100mb of upstream for all your TV, Movie, and MP3 needs. | |
|
| | | | nasadude
join:2001-10-05
Rockville, MD
·Comcast
| said by manfmmd :What got stolen? Copyrighted works. Ask around the DI Forum and ask them if they consider the "theft" of their photographs to be stealing? 99.99% of them will come back and tell you that it IS "theft". Just because the copyrighted works are owned by "BIG BUSINESS", doesn't mean that they're not protected. Well as much as you would like it to be theft and as much as the media industry would like it to be theft, IT IS NOT THEFT.
The law says it is copyright infringement (assuming it meets the req'ts and is not parody, comment, educational or other fair use). If you want to call it theft, get the law changed.
and a pirate is a person that robs people on the high seas. | |
|
| | 
cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
 ·Verizon FIOS
| said by Cabal :Which category does illegally using the copyrighted works of others for profit fall under? (Note: for reference, this is still theft.) Technically I believe Google's responsibility is to comply with a DMCA take down notice. Google themselves did not post the video, a user did. If Viacom submitted a DMCA request and it wasn't followed, then we have a case. --
Go Colts | |
|
| | 
jap
Premium
join:2003-08-10
038xx
·Verizon Online DSL
| said by Cabal :Which category does illegally using the copyrighted works of others for profit fall under? (Note: for reference, this is still theft.) Suits are civil, theft is tried in criminal courts.
As of last year, overt filesharing of copyrighted material (within the US) is a crime, but by the endusers sharing the files, not by hosting servers. Hosts are exposed on the civil side if they they fail to exhibit due-diligence in notification and take-down.
People have been abusing the distinction *way* to much of late. | |
|
| 
Derspankster
Premium
join:2003-02-12
Marion, OH
·RoadRunner Cable
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by nasadude :alright! twice on the same day - perfect example of the american way of doing business: don't compete on price, product or service, sue their @sses! ain't America great? Agreed. It's a lot easier that way. Plus, you don't have to get off your dead asses to do anything. Just pick up the phone and call your lawyers.
--
I thought I made a mistake once but I was wrong | |
|
| 
pnh102
Reptiles Are Cuddly And Pretty
Premium
join:2002-05-02
Mount Airy, MD
| said by nasadude :sue their @sses! This is a pretty open and shut case. Viacom owns the content in question and can direct how said content should be distributed.
--
Only SHATNER is Kirk. | |
|
| | russotto
join:2000-10-05
Collegeville, PA | Re: more american competition at it's best You're right that it's open and shut, but not for Viacom. Google has safe harbor protection under DMCA section 512 provided they respond to takedown requests. So Viacom can pound sand. | |
|
| | | 
ff1324
Where did the time go?
Premium
join:2002-08-24
On Four Day
| Re: more american competition at it's best said by russotto : provided they respond to takedown requests. Which Viacom has made and YouTube has not complied with those requests. You might remember where YouTube was supposed to filter their content to catch Viacom content? Yeah...they aren't.
--
The funny thing about firemen...night and day they're always firemen
»www.stlfire.com | |
|
| | | | russotto
join:2000-10-05
Collegeville, PA | Re: more american competition at it's best There's no requirement in the DMCA to filter any content to take advantage of the safe harbor. It's up to the copyright holder to send a takedown notice for each alleged infringmenet. | |
|
| | | | |
ff1324
Where did the time go?
Premium
join:2002-08-24
On Four Day
| Re: more american competition at it's best Considering that YouTube agreed in early February to remove all of Viacom's material and to enact filtering software to prevent posting of Viacom's content...it would seem that Google has been given notice.
--
The funny thing about firemen...night and day they're always firemen
»www.stlfire.com | |
|
| | | | | | 
FiL
Premium
join:2005-08-16
Silver Spring, MD
| Re: more american competition at it's best for MAYBE a couple of clips...but Google/ YouTube isn't above the law.
They still have to comply with how the rules. Meaning every infraction Viacom sees has to be a accompanied with a notice of removal. Thats prolly thousands of infringments, but still, they each have to have notices. Hence why it was said "Viacom can pound sand" and Google's in a safe harbor. They DID in fact TRY to filter out content, ven content they weren't "notified" about. Yep, pound away. | |
|
| | | | | |
| | | 
Neyland85
join:2003-02-04
North Augusta, SC | Wouldn't Viacom have to prove they lost revenue due to these clips being on YouTube? No, I don't know.. that's why I'm asking.... | |
|
| Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ | because people watching on Youtube is just so harmfull, whats viacom going to do next? sue Tivo because downloads and Tivo both remove ads.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
| | RayW
Premium
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
clubs:
·XMission
| Re: more american competition at it's best said by Kearnstd :whats viacom going to do next? sue Tivo because downloads and Tivo both remove ads. Did not someone try something like that a few years ago?
--
I am not lost, I find myself every time. | |
|
| fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
| What I don't understand is why do they always go for the un-reasonable amounts of money.. haven't they heard of restraining orders these days? or are they only reserved for the living together out of wedlock white trash I got pregnant and my dead beat boy friend is beating me class of citizens?
--
"Complaining is the least path of resistance for the self-reitchous and lazy ... those who also never take the time to point out a good fortune when the opportunity presents itself. It says a lot about one's moral character." - Unknown | |
|
Obliteration
Premium
join:2005-09-18
Somewhere
| I should be able to sue Viacom for emotional damage After hearing these news I almost went into shock. I'm suing them tomorrow for 1 Trillion in massive emotional damage.
It is all BS. 
--
"The constitution is just a goddamn piece of paper."-George W. Bush, Nov. 2005 | |
|
|
| 
Jehu
d1Sux
Premium
join:2002-09-13
MA
·Comcast
| Re: corporate jealousy said by morbo :yes, youtube must get their act together to appease viacom, but it's hilarious how all the existing players despise google and their unique approach to the market. I'm not sure profiting from other people's copyrighted works is really "unique."
I'm also not sure it's "greed" on the part of viacom to say "hey google, stop stuffing your pockets with cash based on our stuff."
If there's one thing the Google is great at, it's perpetuating the popular delusion that they are some kind of non-profit org. | |
|
| | |
| | |
Jehu
d1Sux
Premium
join:2002-09-13
MA
·Comcast
| Re: corporate jealousy said by morbo :it is funny that you believe the public is somehow delusional in their belief that google is a good company. It's funny that you think I said that.
And, of course they don't give away unfettered access to internet traffic. You have to pay them to get that kind of information. | |
|
| | | |
FiL
Premium
join:2005-08-16
Silver Spring, MD
| Re: corporate jealousy "It's funny that you think I said that"
uhh...you DID say that. Proclaiming "everyone thinks their a non-profit" really means people percieve them to be a 'good' company, or is there some other meaning as to why you would say "non-profit"?
w.e.
All I know is Google is one of those companies that really looks out for its employees and has helped transform the net into the powerful beast it is today. Or am I delusional? | |
|
| | | | |
Jehu
d1Sux
Premium
join:2002-09-13
MA
·Comcast
| Re: corporate jealousy yes, non-profit is not a qualifier of a good or bad company, just what the business agenda of a company is.
Google is a for-profit company. Their interests are to make money for Google. This does not make them a bad company. Google's money-making-mechanisms are so "transparent" that few average joes stop to think how they are bursting with cash.
Here's one way, throwing ads on a site (you tube) that Viacom alleges is infringing.
Google is not an Internet innovator (beyond a fine search engine), they are an advertising, analytics, trend, marketing innovator for Internet traffic. | |
|
decadent
Premium
join:2002-04-02
Piscataway, NJ | How to become millionaire? Buy YouTube ... | |
|
|
| lrtc
join:2004-06-05
Toronto | Re: Anyone not see this coming? Oh Ya I was waiting for this day! I hope a few more companies get together and sue them as well. | |
|
| | |
| apollo80
join:2002-01-31
Richmond, VA
| said by Nightfall :Gee, I know I wasn't the first person to say that YouTube would be a target if they were bought out. No one sued YouTube before because they didn't have anything. Now that Google has them, and they have a ton of cash, they are going to be a target of opportunity. While it's still breaking the law b/c of copyright infringement, no point in going after someone until they have money, then nail 'em.
To qoute Ed McMahon..."You are correct, sir!" | |
|
| averagedude
join:2002-01-30
Mesa, AZ
·Cox HSI
| said by Nightfall :Gee, I know I wasn't the first person to say that YouTube would be a target if they were bought out. No one sued YouTube before because they didn't have anything. Now that Google has them, and they have a ton of cash, they are going to be a target of opportunity.
exactly! | |
|
| hack4fun
pchelpers . lefora . com
Premium
join:2006-08-28
Taylors, SC
| said by Nightfall :Gee, I know I wasn't the first person to say that YouTube would be a target if they were bought out. No one sued YouTube before because they didn't have anything. Now that Google has them, and they have a ton of cash, they are going to be a target of opportunity. Exactly, is to not ironic that ViaCom which is not worth nearly as much as Google sues them over such petty s@#t! Really I going to write a book on how to sue people and win  | |
|
aboottime
@on.ca | About time these companies were taken to task on their shameful business practices.
I hope Viacom gets the entire 1 Billion. | |
|
koitsu
Premium
join:2002-07-16
Mountain View, CA
| One BEELLION dollars!!! ... | |
|
| fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20 | Re: One BEELLION dollars!!! You better remove this picture... I'm sure it's copyright owners will be knocking on your door very soon for a beelion dollars. | |
|
| Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ | yea but for one picture you can tell them to blow it out their ass.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
jyc76
join:2006-10-18
Beverly Hills, CA
·Rogers Hi-Speed
edit:
March 13th, @11:05AM
| Gilmore Girls/Youtube sued This just happened on Gilmore Girls too..
"
``The growth of YouTube, the growth of online, is so fundamental that these companies are going to be forced to work with and in the Internet,'' Schmidt said in an interview on ``Conversations with Judy Woodruff'' at Google headquarters in Mountain View, California.
"
The things is that these old media companies want it all locked down with DRM, usually Windows Media and restricted to Microsoft Windows XP or Vista. Oh you have Windows 98? Sorry...
When was the last time anyone actually watched a video on MTV's website since Youtube came out, without Digital Restrictions Management? On top of that, it was restricted to deny access to anyone outside of the US. | |
|
| 
Jwobot
join:2002-08-14
Utica, MI
·WOW Internet and C..
| Re: Gilmore Girls/Youtube sued said by jyc76 :When was the last time anyone actually watched a video on MTV's website since Youtube came out, without Digital Restrictions Management? On top of that, it was restricted to deny access to anyone outside of the US. Why the hell would any one visit MTV's website. ZING! | |
|
| | 
morbo
Complete Your Transaction
join:2002-01-22
00000
clubs:
edit:
March 13th, @12:37PM
| Re: Gilmore Girls/Youtube sued if your voice just broke and/or you just hit puberty, visit away! | |
|
| | 
Vathral
Premium
join:2002-08-26
New York, NY
clubs: | Last time I checked MTV, the site was purely flash based and caused even my C2D to jump up in CPU load greatly. | |
|
siouxmoux
@comcast.net | WTF Youtube an for-profit organization ?? When did Youtube Current Business Model made a Profit for Google?? | |
|
karlmarx
join:2006-09-18
Nashua, NH
·Fairpoint Communic..
| what is 'massive inentional' The only way I could buy that line, is if youtube actually told the kids to post copyrighted stuff. Otherwise, youtube is just a service, and deserves the safe harbor provisions. If Viacom wants to PROTECT their intellectual property, then they need to go through the proper channels, and file a DMCA request for EVERY SINGLE 'infringing' use. As long as youtube responds and deletes said requests, they are in the clear. They GOT the DMCA, now they have to live by it. It's NOT YOUTUBES job to filter stuff, it's VIACOM'S job to monitor, and respond to infringing materials.
--
Stick it to the MAN. Support your local torrent sites. Proudly providing 100mb of upstream for all your TV, Movie, and MP3 needs. | |
|
| 
brandon
Some truth included in this post.
Premium
join:2003-03-31
Hurley, MS
·AT&T Southeast
·CableOne
 ·Packet8
| Re: what is 'massive inentional' said by karlmarx :The only way I could buy that line, is if youtube actually told the kids to post copyrighted stuff. Otherwise, youtube is just a service, and deserves the safe harbor provisions. If Viacom wants to PROTECT their intellectual property, then they need to go through the proper channels, and file a DMCA request for EVERY SINGLE 'infringing' use. As long as youtube responds and deletes said requests, they are in the clear. They GOT the DMCA, now they have to live by it. It's NOT YOUTUBES job to filter stuff, it's VIACOM'S job to monitor, and respond to infringing materials. And it's because of the ridiculousness of requiring Viacom to police YouTube that the DMCA will be altered or this case will be an exception that goes in favor of Viacom. | |
|
Matt9
join:2004-01-29
New Bedford, MA
| ... No offense, but I agree with the lawsuit. I use YouTube everyday. I go there for music videos, TV clips, etc. etc. But I do recognize that it is illegal and it is copyright infringement. And so far, besides removing videos at the companies request, YouTube has really made no considerable effort to eliminate copyrighted videos; because that's how it makes its profits. I can easily see how this could be argued in court. | |
|
| 
KAD Imaging
Sansei Goju-Ryu Karate Do
Premium
join:2002-09-21
Hialeah, FL
·AT&T Southeast
| Re: ... said by Matt9 :No offense, but I agree with the lawsuit. I use YouTube everyday. I go there for music videos, TV clips, etc. etc. But I do recognize that it is illegal and it is copyright infringement. And so far, besides removing videos at the companies request, YouTube has really made no considerable effort to eliminate copyrighted videos; because that's how it makes its profits. I can easily see how this could be argued in court. Uh...HOW exactly is YT making profits off video clips?? Last I checked, uploads were free, downloads were free and no $$ changes hands at any time. They only option they have is the sidebar ads that are being blocked anyway?? I seem to be confused here. I've not given YT a cent since their inception.
That's like saying BitTorrent is profiting off their torrents?? 
--
Like Cars? Visit:
SportCompactMiami.com
forums.sportcompactmiami.com
blog.sportcompactmiami.com | |
|
| | Matt9
join:2004-01-29
New Bedford, MA
| Re: ... Traffic. Website hits. The advertisements all over YouTube's pages bring Google millions. The same way MySpace makes it's cash.
Everyone knows YouTube would die out if there was nothing but personal blog videos up there. They go there to see episode promnos, clips, music videos, things like that. That's all copyrighted. Remove that and nothing is left of YouTube. | |
|
|
dadkins
Land of Confusion
Premium,MVM
join:2003-09-26
Hercules, CA
·Comcast
edit:
March 13th, @11:50AM
| Ok Viacom... ... you struck a deal with Joost, where's the freakin content?
Lots of hype, no sunstance... WTF Chuck?
Start piping the ACTUAL content and just pound YT into the weeds.
I'll watch some of it... as long as it's worth a damn.
--
Think outside the Fox... Opera | |
|
pokesph
It Is Almost Fast
join:2001-06-25
Sacramento, CA
clubs: | spew tube AFAIK spewtube doesn't post copyrighted items, USERS do. so.. as said above, file a DMCA request to remove what belongs to viacom and thats that.
No need to sue.. oh wait, thats FREE (well less costly) advertising for viacom.. my bad | |
|
|
Viacom Sues Google/YouTube for $1Billion
·
