site Search:


 
   
story category
WiMax Is (And Will Remain) A Niche Player
According to research firm Ovum
by Karl Bode Thursday 15-Oct-2009 tags: business · stats · world · wireless
Back in 2004, Intel was busy hyping WiMax as "the most important thing since the Internet itself," and blogs and technology analysts were prematurely proclaiming the wireless technology a third pipe competitor to DSL and cable. At the time we tried to temper some of that enthusiasm, noting that WiMax most likely would be a niche player in a very big pond. It's five years later and WiMax is, well, a niche player in a very big pond. According to a new study from research firm Ovum, it's likely to stay that way. Both here and abroad:

"Two thirds of the 300+ WiMax networks globally are in the emerging markets of Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, Middle East and Latin America," said Angel Dobardziev, practice leader at Ovum. "Yet, most emerging market WiMax operators currently have thousands, or tens of thousands of subscribers, rather than the hundreds of thousands of subscribers that they planned to have at this stage."

According to Ovum, WiMax hardware remains more expensive than other options, while economic conditions kept upstart carriers struggling for deployment funds. High costs have Ovum predicting that WiMax will account for less than 5% of the world's 1.5 billion fixed and mobile broadband connections by 2014. That would be just 5% of the total market one decade after Intel and analysts proclaimed it would be a major broadband competitor.

That said, the niche role WiMax plays will be important. Here in the States, Clearwire's deployments are playing a starring role as an alternative to incumbent phone company services, and are the backbone of several cable companies' wireless broadband plans. As we noted last week, WiMax 2.0 is scheduled for commercial availability sometime after 2011, promising speeds four times faster than the current incarnation.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Michael C

join:2009-06-26
Cedar Park, TX

It'll be a bigger player behind the scenes

I think the biggest area of WiMax adoption will be in point-to-point backhaul applications, such as cell tower connectivity for remote areas. I think as wireless usage continues to outpace coverage expansion, WiMax could allow for faster tower deployment by eliminating the right-of-way red tape required to lay fiber or copper.

RARPSL

join:1999-12-08
Suffern, NY

Re: It'll be a bigger player behind the scenes

said by Michael C:

I think the biggest area of WiMax adoption will be in point-to-point backhaul applications, such as cell tower connectivity for remote areas. I think as wireless usage continues to outpace coverage expansion, WiMax could allow for faster tower deployment by eliminating the right-of-way red tape required to lay fiber or copper.
There is however still the Red Tape required to deploy the Towers (Cell or WiMax) needed for the system often due to NIMBY Opposition. Also what speeds does WiMax offer as compared to Copper/Fiber Backhaul physical links?

skuv

@rr.com

Re: It'll be a bigger player behind the scenes

A lot of backhaul links for cell towers are still T1's for even the newest of towers. A lot of times, it is still fiber gear with T1's dropped off the fiber, but it's T1's nonetheless. Mostly depends on where the tower is located and volume of calls it would have.

WiMax could definitely make up for a few T1's between towers or back to the CO.
Samsonian

join:2007-06-15
WiMAX is a metro level wireless solution, not a point-to-point (PtP) wireless backhaul solution.

There are other products for that.

www.dailywireless.org/2009/09/14···ackhaul/'
www.dailywireless.org/2009/09/15···ackhaul/'
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

Re: It'll be a bigger player behind the scenes

But WiMAX has vendor interoperability. Your Canopy and whatever other backhaul you find is vendor lock in.
Samsonian

join:2007-06-15

Re: It'll be a bigger player behind the scenes

True enough.

But like I said, WiMAX is currently a point-to-multipoint, metro level wireless solution. Not a point-to-point (PtP) wireless backhaul solution.

Use the right tool for the job.

It'd be nice if those wireless backhaul products were standardized and interoperable as well, and eventually they will too. But it's not nearly as important today, as standardized/interoperable Base Stations (BS) and Customer Premise Equipment (CPE).

tiger72
SexaT duorP
Premium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1
Reviews:
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T DSL Service

Competition.

WiMax, if nothing else, is serving to foster competition. I believe it's a significant reason why Verizon is pushing for (premature) LTE deployment. It's why T-Mobile is rolling out 21mbps HSPA+. WiMax can even compete with wireline home internet alternatives like DSL.

More options in the marketplace is always better.
--
"What makes us omniscient? Have we a record of omniscience? ...If we can't persuade nations with comparable values of the merit of our cause, we'd better reexamine our reasoning."
-United States Secretary of Defense (1961-1968) Robert S. McNamara

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Interesting....

In 'theory', WiMAX was supposed to be less expensive, as it was built on open standards, and not old Bell/Telco proprietary info.

I suspect the following is currently why they're stating HW is expensive:

1. Lack of volume
2. Intel is the big backer, and needs to make money (they did post good quarter report).
3. Lack of competition (make money before the telcos have LTE deployed)

I personally think that if WiMAX was decently deployed (w/o caps, or decently high caps), many local DSL/Cable companies would have competition.
For ~$40/month, I'd consider it.
--
Canada = Hollywood North
Samsonian

join:2007-06-15

WiMAX is cheaper

I'm not buying this. I've seen several hardware vendors and operators say that WiMAX equipment is cheaper than 3G, both on the BS and CPE side (USB dongles are no more than $50). In spite of the fact that 3G has been around longer and has more scale and volume.

This is partly because of the patent situation. 15-20% of the device's price is royalties to various patent holders. Qualcomm has made billions in net profit off this insanity, and everybody else would like to as well. The thing is, the patent situation isn't going to get better for LTE. It looks just as bad as 3G, if not worse.

www.slideshare.net/pacificleo/mo···ue-chain'

Why would almost every greenfield/emerging operator be choosing WiMAX over cellco technology?

Without a customer base on legacy technology, you'd pick the cheapest and most capable technology available.

That's WiMAX.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Re: WiMAX is cheaper

I suspect Intel needs to pay back for its investors on WiMAX, and cost will be high until there's decent competition.

BillRoland
Premium
join:2001-01-21
Ocala, FL
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Cox HSI

Different day, same stuff

We get it, seriously. WiMax is a niche player, LTE is King Kong, AT&T is evil, Verizon is a visionary (just ask FairPoint customers), Charter sucks, and Google (Beta) is all that is Right and Good™ in the universe. Oh, almost forgot, the FCC doesn't have an accurate broadband map, a plan or a clue, the Exaflood is a myth, and network neutrality may be the biggest issue mankind has ever faced.

There, I think I summed up the weekly news here for the past 3 years.
--
"Don't steal. The government hates competition."
Beyond AM. Beyond FM. XM

dellsweig
Extreme Aerobatics
Premium,MVM
join:2003-12-10
Campbell Hall, NY
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Vonage

Re: Different day, same stuff

said by BillRoland:

We get it, seriously. WiMax is a niche player, LTE is King Kong, AT&T is evil, Verizon is a visionary (just ask FairPoint customers), Charter sucks, and Google (Beta) is all that is Right and Good™ in the universe. Oh, almost forgot, the FCC doesn't have an accurate broadband map, a plan or a clue, the Exaflood is a myth, and network neutrality may be the biggest issue mankind has ever faced.

There, I think I summed up the weekly news here for the past 3 years.
:)

DaveDude
No Fear

join:1999-09-01
New Jersey
kudos:1
yup

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:29
Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech

1 edit
WiMax is a niche player, LTE is King Kong, AT&T is evil, Verizon is a visionary (just ask FairPoint customers), Charter sucks, and Google (Beta) is all that is Right and Good™ in the universe. Oh, almost forgot, the FCC doesn't have an accurate broadband map, a plan or a clue, the Exaflood is a myth, and network neutrality may be the biggest issue mankind has ever faced.
I'd like to personally apologize for boring you.

If I could, I'd like to make a formal request that you submit links to stories you'd prefer to read about.

w0g
o.O

join:2001-08-30
Springfield, OR

Media running stories just to downplay WiMAX's potential

I've been reading the links DSLreports posts for news, and what it seems like to me is there are a few sources bashing WiMAX with nothing really to back it up. Reading some of them sounds like it was wrote by some PR company for the LTE supporters. Right now I wouldn't trust that any of the analysists and news about WiMAX trouble or LTE being so ever awesome. It will be successful.
ke4pym
Premium
join:2004-07-24
Charlotte, NC
Reviews:
·Verizon Broadban..
·VOIPo
·RoadRunner Cable
·Northland Cable ..
·Packet8

Re: Media running stories just to downplay WiMAX's potential

said by w0g:

I've been reading the links DSLreports posts for news, and what it seems like to me is there are a few sources bashing WiMAX with nothing really to back it up. Reading some of them sounds like it was wrote by some PR company for the LTE supporters. Right now I wouldn't trust that any of the analysists and news about WiMAX trouble or LTE being so ever awesome. It will be successful.
So how long do you give a technology to become successful before you declare it dead? 10 years is a long time to be out and about and still not have much market share.

ccallana
Huh?
Premium,VIP
join:2000-08-03
Folsom, CA

Re: Media running stories just to downplay WiMAX's potential

said by ke4pym:

said by w0g:

I've been reading the links DSLreports posts for news, and what it seems like to me is there are a few sources bashing WiMAX with nothing really to back it up. Reading some of them sounds like it was wrote by some PR company for the LTE supporters. Right now I wouldn't trust that any of the analysists and news about WiMAX trouble or LTE being so ever awesome. It will be successful.
So how long do you give a technology to become successful before you declare it dead? 10 years is a long time to be out and about and still not have much market share.
Actually, 10 years isn't a long time for new standards like this....

It took almost that long for USB to be widely adopted. Same with PCI. Standards acceleration is moving quicker these days, but to roll out a completely new ecosystem takes time, to get people to agree to switch off of what they know takes time...

So this is not entirely unusual at all...
--
"We are half-hearted creatures, fooling about with drink and sex and ambition when infinite joy is offered us.... We are far too easily pleased." C.S. Lewis

DaveDude
No Fear

join:1999-09-01
New Jersey
kudos:1
Reviews:
·ViaTalk
·Vonage
·Comcast
said by w0g:

I've been reading the links DSLreports posts for news, and what it seems like to me is there are a few sources bashing WiMAX with nothing really to back it up. Reading some of them sounds like it was wrote by some PR company for the LTE supporters. Right now I wouldn't trust that any of the analysists and news about WiMAX trouble or LTE being so ever awesome. It will be successful.
Being backed by all the top players sounds like a pretty good analysis to me. Withall current wireless carriers except for one are choosing LTE as the upgrade path, and none choosing wimax it makes an obvious statement. Plus LTE was specificly designed so GSM and Cdma carrier could move to it.
--
They Live... We Sleep...

“Spreading the wealth around” never results in a better outcome for people. It always results in destruction.


MooJohn

join:2005-12-18
Milledgeville, GA
I swear another link to this article appeared in a news headline here at DSLR just a few days ago but I can't seem to find it now.

Anyway,

quote:
"Yet, most emerging market WiMax operators currently have thousands, or tens of thousands of subscribers, rather than the hundreds of thousands of subscribers that they planned to have at this stage."
Compared to the ZERO current subscribers using LTE? We keep hearing about how well LTE is going to do like it's a certainty. Sounds a lot like Obama's Nobel prize to me.
--
John M - Cranky network guy
Sammer

join:2005-12-22
Canonsburg, PA
Agreed the spread of F.U.D. about WiMAX means someone else is afraid if WiMAX does do well they'll lose money.

AccessDelray

@bellsouth.net
I agree. What WiMAX will become is standards for a collection of asset-based community development technologies which can be deployed today that will directly benefit workforce development, education, the environment and socio-economic issues that plague our local communities and governments daily in today's economy. The introduction of WiMAX technologies will act as a catalyst and pioneer/sustain these types of programs and services that will ultimately benefit our communities and drive participation by the large incumbents as newer technologies are introduced in the marketplace.

»www.digitalcommunitiesblogs.com/···_nation/

WiMax Sucks

@optonline.net

Wimax schimax

LTE will rule. Nuff said.
Eek2121
Lovin Verizon FIOS

join:2002-10-12
Newton, NJ
Reviews:
·Service Electric..

Sprint...

It really depends on how much sprint is involved. We may have varying opinions on sprint (I dumped them for verizon wireless), but if they can partner with clearwire and deliver on that "third pipe" promise we may actually break the monopoly/duopoly situation in the US. After all, eventually the underdog DOES get tired of being the underdog, right?

INsano

@clearwire-wmx.net

Wimax

Yes...LTE has big backers. But I'm not going to be able to get LTE for $27.50 a month.

Price? I get the "6mb" Clearwire tier here in Portland, this has no monthly bandwidth cap. Speeds range from 3-12mb/s down. I have a USB dongle plugged into my laptop that serves as my home and mobile internet connection.

6 months ago, Qwest was still trying to charge $39.99/month for 1.5mb DSL. Now it's $14.99/month for them. Competition, as others have mentioned, is a good thing for consumers.

Also, I think it's worth noting, that while yes, it's nice to have faster speeds(LTE, WiMax2), most consumers don't need it. If they can stream YouTube, that's pretty much the most they'd need. So while LTE has higher theoretical speeds, the price difference may be a large factor for WiMax. In the same way you can get 100mb cable now, but most people have 8-12mb. They're not going to pay $120 a month for that upper tier because they don't really need it.

Yesbut

@ntelos.net

Re: Wimax

Good point for the present but as more device are brought to market and video communications become a standard with options like live IP high definition broadcast television the demand will swell. Of course it will all need backhaul and infrastructure. They could not possible grow LTE 4g very fast anyway it will bring down a switch or overload a base station radio point with streaming data at those speeds in saturated markets. Perhaps Sprint has a good idea with WiMax rolling out now. Very curious.

Saturday, 11-Feb 10:07:51 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online! © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.