 aaronwtPremium join:2004-11-07 Woodbridge, VA Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
1 edit | AOL? I can proudly say that I have never used their service. Even when I used dialup, before getting 5mbs cable speeds in 1997, I used EROLS for only a few dollar a month. I would have never even considered using AOL.
I certainly received enough of their crappy CDs. I probably could fill a 13 gallon trash can with the huge number of AOL CDs i threw away. | |
|
 |  | | Re: AOL? wooohooo good for you!! you never used them so what? | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: AOL? Anyone remember the warez bots on AOL?
(\/)ass (\/)ail
oh baby | |
|
 |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  1 edit | Re: AOL? I've wondered the same. I always thought that one person uploaded a file and there was a link to that file on AOLs server and all people did was pass the soft link around | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: AOL? it was either that or they had a LOT of email storage... back then gigabytes were very expensive. i can't imagine how they would accommodate terabytes of data back then. -- sbcglobal.net speedtest result 11/11/09 - 5256kbps | |
|
 |  Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
| Back before the CDROMS were given out, I used to raid the AOL floppy disks at my local computer shop and format them all.
I gave away alot of copies of Hugo House of Horror on those AOL disks.
Too bad they dont give out flash drives today. | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: AOL? Yep, good times. I got so many of the things in the mail that I hardly ever needed to buy a box of floppies. | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: AOL? Free AOL Floppy Disks rocked, besides buying one quality floppy disk for my school work (AOL disks were cheaply made) I don't think I ever bought floppy discs in the aol free floppy era lol | |
|
 |  |  |  |  | | Re: AOL? And remember when they sent out the CD's in those little flat metal boxes? I saved a few of those, although I never figured out what to use them for. I may still have them somewhere. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  spewakR.I.P DadkinsPremium join:2001-08-07 Elk Grove, CA kudos:1 Reviews:
·Clear Wireless
·SureWest Internet
| Re: AOL? Here is what I use one for: Coffee cup coaster on my Computer desk. -- The weekend is here, grab a can of beer!
| |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FiOS
| said by ISurfTooMuch:And remember when they sent out the CD's in those little flat metal boxes? I saved a few of those, although I never figured out what to use them for. I may still have them somewhere. Glad Im not the only lunatic who swore Id use them for something LOL | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: AOL? said by margaf77:Glad Im not the only lunatic who swore Id use them for something LOL Funny, at this moment, I feel exactly the same way!  | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FiOS
| Re: AOL? said by ISurfTooMuch:said by margaf77:Glad Im not the only lunatic who swore Id use them for something LOL Funny, at this moment, I feel exactly the same way! They were crappy but everyone was on there and God did I get laid alot from those chats : | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | Re: AOL? Damn, NOW I understand AOL's popularity! | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | | Ahhhh !!! How quickly we forget all those sweet fat girlz !!! | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| They made good DVD/CD mailers if you needed to send a bunch of files to someone (back in the day of slow dial up, Priority mail was faster!!) -- "Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini
| |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  | | I used mine to hold screws and washers. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  tim_kButtons, Bows, Beamer, Shadow, KaseyPremium,VIP join:2002-02-02 Stewartstown, PA kudos:7 | Yeah, some of them had nice containers. I've kept a few, especially the DVD cases. I just used one of the metal boxes last month. | |
|
 |  |  Reviews:
·Shaw
| lol, thank you so much for bringing back the hugo's house of horror memories!
I didn't use the floppies for that, at the time I didn't have internet, so I would take my raft of AOL and Compuserv floppies to the local library and download everything I could from sharewaregames.com on their 33.6 dial up connection.
ahh... those were the days! | |
|
 |  |  |  | | Re: AOL? Those were the days indeed. Paying $39.95 a month for unlimited 33.6 dialup services from my ISP and another $29.95 for a dedicated POTS line.... *sigh* .... I miss those days | |
|
 |  RobIn Deo speramus, God Bless the USAPremium join:2001-08-25 Kendall, FL kudos:2 | AOL, back in the day, wasn't that bad. AOL v. 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 were great. Then 7.0-9.0 were terrible. | |
|
 |  |  aaronwtPremium join:2004-11-07 Woodbridge, VA Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
| Re: AOL? said by Rob:AOL, back in the day, wasn't that bad. AOL v. 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 were great. Then 7.0-9.0 were terrible. Except they wanted you to install their software. Which is the main reason I would not use them. | |
|
 |  |  |  RobIn Deo speramus, God Bless the USAPremium join:2001-08-25 Kendall, FL kudos:2 | Re: AOL? said by aaronwt:said by Rob:AOL, back in the day, wasn't that bad. AOL v. 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 were great. Then 7.0-9.0 were terrible. Except they wanted you to install their software. Which is the main reason I would not use them. Why? The service was kick ass. The chatrooms, the instant messaging, the "keywords". It's a great program, and great service. The later versions of the program made it terrible, but in the early days AOL was king, and for a very good reason - the service was great. -- CheckSite.us | YourIP.us | Reverseip.us | |
|
 |  |  |  |  aaronwtPremium join:2004-11-07 Woodbridge, VA Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
| Re: AOL? said by Rob:said by aaronwt:said by Rob:AOL, back in the day, wasn't that bad. AOL v. 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 were great. Then 7.0-9.0 were terrible. Except they wanted you to install their software. Which is the main reason I would not use them. Why? The service was kick ass. The chatrooms, the instant messaging, the "keywords". It's a great program, and great service. The later versions of the program made it terrible, but in the early days AOL was king, and for a very good reason - the service was great. Except I had great internet service without AOL for less. Although I only got online(not counting my Prodigy use in the early 90s) in 1995 with dialup and in 1997 moved to broadband and never looked back to dialup. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  VanPremium join:2009-07-08 New Orleans, LA | Agreed. Loved 3.0-5.0 used it all the time and was my basic introduction to the world of the internet socially and entertainment wise | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  | | AOL should be defined as a Virus 3,4,and, 5 were great?...have you ever tried to remove them? That crap was everywhere in the registry. However AOL did one thing for me....it got me into the habit of wiping clean the hard drive of every pc I bought. Now I just build my own desktops, but I still wipe new laptops.
Someday after Armageddon around 2 million years from now, the future cavemen will still be digging up AOL discs! -- BF69~~~Please stop suffocating gerbils! | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  VanPremium join:2009-07-08 New Orleans, LA | Re: AOL should be defined as a Virus I honestly never did because I always used them.
When I left AOL and went with broadband, I got a new computer because my old one died
So no, I never had the removal issue | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  |  |  Doctor FourMy other vehicle is a TARDISPremium join:2000-09-05 Dallas, TX | AOL is what could be called Digital Kudzu.
This is an application which places small files in every nook and cranny of a computer's OS. Any attempt at removal leaves some bits and pieces behind, which then forever (barring a reformat) interfere with other processes or applications . -- "The trouble with computers, of course, is that they are very sophisticated idiots." - Doctor Who (from Robot)
| |
|
 |  |  |  |  morboComplete Your Transaction join:2002-01-22 00000 Reviews:
·Charter
| Re: AOL? said by Rob: the service was great. it made the internet easy for people to jump into. a baby step. the walled garden, in that way, was helpful. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  patcat88 join:2002-04-05 Jamaica, NY kudos:1 | said by Rob:Why? The service was kick ass. The chatrooms, the instant messaging, the "keywords". It's a great program, and great service. The later versions of the program made it terrible, but in the early days AOL was king, and for a very good reason - the service was great. Never used AOL. But I remember when various companies advertised their keywords on TV, not their web address. I remember being angry some companies had keywords on AOL with NO HTTP website. If I did a Yahoo search for them I found a websites told you to goto the AOL keyword!!!!
AOL used to BE the internet!!! | |
|
 |  |  |  |  Reviews:
·Hargray Cable
| said by Rob:said by aaronwt:said by Rob:AOL, back in the day, wasn't that bad. AOL v. 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 were great. Then 7.0-9.0 were terrible. Except they wanted you to install their software. Which is the main reason I would not use them. Why? The service was kick ass. The chatrooms, the instant messaging, the "keywords". It's a great program, and great service. The later versions of the program made it terrible, but in the early days AOL was king, and for a very good reason - the service was great. Word up. Yes it did rule. When your the first chat room that works in town you rule. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  | | said by Rob:said by aaronwt:said by Rob:AOL, back in the day, wasn't that bad. AOL v. 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 were great. Then 7.0-9.0 were terrible. Except they wanted you to install their software. Which is the main reason I would not use them. Why? The service was kick ass. The chatrooms, the instant messaging, the "keywords". It's a great program, and great service. The later versions of the program made it terrible, but in the early days AOL was king, and for a very good reason - the service was great. There was NEVER ANYTHING GOOD about their service or their proprietary, crap software. In the early days, there were simply to many 'tards who didn't know and didn't want to know what they were doing. It was all a matter of hand holding. Not to mention, there wasn't 850,000,000 different dial up ISP's, at first. -- The Firefox alternative. »www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/ | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  OlegBellsouth FastaccessPremium join:2003-12-08 Birmingham, AL 2 edits | Re: AOL? said by cork1958:In the early days, there were simply to many 'tards who didn't know and didn't want to know what they were doing. It was all a matter of hand holding. Not to mention, there wasn't 850,000,000 different dial up ISP's, at first. There are still too many of those tards using AOL like it's the best thing ever made and people like this know crap about how to use a computer you have to come to their house and teach them how to send an e-mail or how to use MS Office. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  aaronwtPremium join:2004-11-07 Woodbridge, VA Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
1 edit | Re: AOL? WOW! I just looked on the AOL site. They charge between $10 a month and $26 a month for dial up. And the $26 a month gives you Mcafee and Up to $10,000 identity theft insurance coverage and Up to $1,000 PC Hardware insurance coverage.
What a rip off!
Then they have backup, dial up access. No thanks, I use a cellular broadband modem for backup and get 1 to 3mbs download speeds.
I'd rather have no service than even consider using dial up. Not that I have a modem in any of my desktops. I don't even think my laptops have a modem, well I think my oldest one might. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  OlegBellsouth FastaccessPremium join:2003-12-08 Birmingham, AL 1 edit | Re: AOL? Yea that is a mess with AOL.I can get hardware insurance coverage from SquareTrade for up to 3 years for less than $20 as for Mcafee security suit they offer if i wanted it i could of gotten it for free from my ISP and dentity theft insurance coverage is not needed if you are careful. Edit: Forgot to say if i needed Dial-Up ISP i could get it for $5.95 unlimited. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | said by Oleg:said by cork1958:In the early days, there were simply to many 'tards who didn't know and didn't want to know what they were doing. It was all a matter of hand holding. Not to mention, there wasn't 850,000,000 different dial up ISP's, at first. There are still too many of those tards using AOL like it's the best thing ever made and people like this know crap about how to use a computer you have to come to their house and teach them how to send an e-mail or how to use MS Office. the thing is those people should never be allowed to touch a pop3 client to begin with. webmail is good enough for 90% of the users out there imo.
if i didnt use Thunderbird id almost wish residential service ISPs to get rid of pop3 and only use their webmail portals lol. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  OlegBellsouth FastaccessPremium join:2003-12-08 Birmingham, AL | Re: AOL? I know how to use a mail client,but for me Webmail will do. | |
|
 |  |  joakoPremium join:2000-09-07 /dev/null kudos:5 | 2.7 for Mac! | |
|
 |  |  Reviews:
·Hargray Cable
| said by Rob:AOL, back in the day, wasn't that bad. AOL v. 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 were great. Then 7.0-9.0 were terrible. I second that. AOL in the day brought the internet to the masses. I know some will say they did whatever but I had zero choices in my hood for years until net zero came along. I used net zero for big down loads at night. LOL. Think I got 4.2 kbs up from AOLs 2.7-3.2. You kiddies don't know the thrill of getting a 56k modemn. LOL. | |
|
 |  DownTheShoreJust Say No To NewtsPremium join:2003-12-02 Beautiful NJ kudos:10 | said by aaronwt:I can proudly say that I have never used their service. Even when I used dialup, before getting 5mbs cable speeds in 1997, I used EROLS for only a few dollar a month. I would have never even considered using AOL. Goody for you. You get a gold star. 
Obviously, though, it met the needs of milliions who were not at "smart" as you. -- Patriotism is not waving a flag, it is living the ideals
I want to retire to the Isle of Sodor and ride the trains. | |
|
 |  | | Ohhhhhh you must be 1337. | |
|
 |  | | i never used em either cause i didnot have to but on the other hand my father uses it and he loves it. he has very little computer knowledge unlike us here and is in his 80's now.for him and lots of others AOL works great and is easy. us guys who have knowledge just use firefox or whatever with our ISP connection which we all know is more complicated than the AOL solution. | |
|
 |  OlegBellsouth FastaccessPremium join:2003-12-08 Birmingham, AL | I have used AOL back in 99 after i have found there are better Dial-Up ISPS i have quit using it. | |
|
 |  carmas join:2003-07-31 Floral Park, NY | Poor old AOL....
They were my first on-line experience in the very early '90's! I had a (very) expensive DEC 386 PC running Windows 3.1, a "blazingly fast" US Robotics 14400 modem, and a 14" (color!) CRT.
Got very frustrated early on with problems dialing-in during peak times, (hello OptimumOnline?!) and switched to ATT WorldNet a few years later. (with a big speed increase to 33.6!)
The early, simple years. Still pretty amazed with FTTH and my FIOS's speed. We've come a long way. (too bad we're no longer the cutting edge)
Drew
| |
|
 |  KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | i will admit i had AOL back in the pay by the hour days. i remember when they went unlimited and the line was always busy.
they did a great thing in their time, get people online with a somewhat userfriendly interface compared to even Prodigy.
nowdays they are the floater that cant be flushed. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
 | | LOL AOL should of bought out a cable company when they were making the big bucks. Look at them now suffering each day. Sooner or later they will not support their AOL software anymore and only become a web portal. Their only small income probably comes from dial up customer's and people that use aol instant messenger. Good reddens AOL. | |
|
 |  See 10 replies to this post |
|
 | | AOwho.... Do they even still exist? And they even have 4600 workers left!!! | |
|
 |  ThrowDemsOutIf you can't convince 'em, confuse 'emPremium join:2002-03-03 Mullica Hill, NJ kudos:4 | Re: AOwho.... said by AlexNYC:Do they even still exist? And they even have 4600 workers left!!! Yes. As nothing more than a web portal, like MSN, or Yahoo. And the only reason they still exist is because of all the non-techies and the aged that still have AOL email addresses and can't stomach the upset of changing their email addresses.
»www.aol.com/ -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page
| |
|
 |  |  | | Re: AOwho.... If they still try to sell their dial-up service I can see it now: Get AOL dial-up and get complimentary bell-bottom pants and a disco ball or lava lamp. Woot ....  | |
|
 |  |  MoropoPremium join:2002-07-28 Miami | How does people still using their email address provide them revenue?
Do you have to pay to have an aol email?
Just wondering. | |
|
 |  |  | | Free AOL
* AOL email (@aol.com or customized) * Online customer support * AOL all-in-one software * NOTE: Does not include Internet access or live customer support.
OR $25.90 for AOL DIAL-UP. | |
|
 KearnstdElf WizardPremium join:2002-01-22 Mullica Hill, NJ | If AOL where a Turd..... Then time warner could be accused of leaving behind the biggest floater the world has ever seen. just cant flush AOL away even in all their failure. -- [65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports | |
|
 woody7Premium join:2000-10-13 Torrance, CA | hmm...... So much for "death by a thousand cuts"  -- BlooMe | |
|
 |  iansltx join:2007-02-19 Golden, CO kudos:2 Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon Online DSL
| Re: hmm...... Yeah, at this rate it should only take a few dozen...
That said, once AOL gives up being an ISP altogether (sells their bialup customers to Earthlink) I think they may have something with their backbone network and content. Engadget, TUAW, etc. are all AOL brands. | |
|
 | | Hilarious I think it is hilarious how some bubble head at Time Warner who obviously knew nothing about the internet (is it like a fishing net or a hair net oooh the internet) bought AOL at it's absolute peak in price. Why would a consumer continue to pay 25 bucks for dialup as broadband was being rolled out left and right in every major metro at not much more in price and now all over the place. It did not take a genius to see that cable would win based on $ to performance. | |
|
 |  See 8 replies to this post |
|
 |
 |  | | Re: No kleenex for Lisa Hook Continues to fail upward... | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: No kleenex for Lisa Hook But who's the bigger fool: her for her failures or the companies that continue to hire her?
I've said it again and again: it's not about what you can do; it's about who you know. This especially applies at the executive level. As long as those who hire someone see an increase in the price of the stocks they hold, they're happy. So what if the company burns to the ground. By then, they're cashed out and on to the next venture. Sure, the employees get screwed, but that doesn't matter. After all, they're disposable, and, since they don't come to the shareholders' cocktail parties, they're also invisible, just liabilities on a balance sheet. | |
|
 |  |  morboComplete Your Transaction join:2002-01-22 00000 | time to short NSR... | |
|
 |  MaggsPremium join:2002-11-29 Woodside, NY Reviews:
·RCN CABLE
| $1.5 million is paltry, that is very little for the C-Suite. -- Hello, is anyone out there. | |
|
 ricep5Premium join:2000-08-07 Jacksonville, FL | Ho Hum Slow news day. AOL lays off a few and the rants begin.
AOL-TW was hindered by a consent decree with DOJ as terms of their merger. That decree forbid them from supplying voice or live TV content via their AOL client.
AOL-TW was also hindered by the "last mile" problem that faced all ISP transitions to broadband. The DOJ order forbid them from creating their own last mile due to very intense lobbying from Telecom USA.
Hubris also got in the way internally at AOL-TW, as the AOL management attempted and ultimately failed at running TW. An example was the attempt to move TW Corporate from Exchange to AOL Mail.
AOL was the necessary component to get Apple Pie USA connected and transitioned to the internet. While most considered them an ISP, they were really a content delivery system that used dial up. | |
|
 Vamp9190Premium join:2002-02-11 Chantilly, VA kudos:1 | You've Got Mail My wife has an AOL email and still uses the software every day. Their streaming music channels are good.
Nice to not have to pay a monthly fee for the broadband portal now....after years of paying $10,$15,20+ a month, it feels like you are getting value back.
Yeah, their hq offices here in Ashburn have been a ghost town for a long time, actually Raytheon is moving 5000+ people in during Spring 2010. | |
|
 |
 |  heat84Bit Torrent Apologist join:2004-03-11 Fort Lauderdale, FL | Re: Wikipedia Graph There's still 5 million AOL subscribers? No way.
I didn't get into the internet until Netzero and the free-with-ads ISP era. '99 I guess. I found many ways to get free-without-ads. -- Bit Torrent is my DVR. | |
|
 |  RoboticsSee You On The Dark SidePremium join:2003-10-23 Louisa, VA Reviews:
·Comcast
| Looks like Sony Music and google/youtube's recent graph. -- Long you live and high you fly and Smiles you'll give and tears you'll cry and all you touch and all you see, is all your life will ever be. | |
|
 | | It wouldn't be accurate to say they ignored broadband... ...that's why they bought Time-Warer which turned out to be a great move on their part (and why they even still exist right now and why their stock holders from back then have anything worth anything).
What they failed to do (and I'll say thank goodness they never did) was leverage Time-Warner cable and force their customers to migrate to AOL. I know when I had Time-Warner I was scared they do just that. And since I had no alternative I would've just had to swallow it. | |
|
 |  FixManTxPremium join:2005-02-06 75038-6869 | Re: It wouldn't be accurate to say they ignored broadband... I had TWC/Roadrunner back then and I was afraid of exactly the same thing. At the time I was doing computer work for a friend and had worked on a few client's computers with AOL installed. On a couple of occasions we ended up having to format and re-install Windows to get rid of AOL. I absolutely wanted no part of any ISP that forced me to install software just to get online. At that time I would have had no choice since the phone lines barely supported 28.8 dialup and DSL was not even available where I lived.
Thankfully I now have Verizon FIOS which gives me some of the fastest residential internet available in the country and I don't have to have any cumbersome software installed on my computers.
I always wondered how long AOL could keep up mailing all those "free" CD's in fancy metal boxes and sticking them in just about every magazine I bought. No wonder they had to charge the prices they did for their dial up service. | |
|
 |
 |  | | Re: pr****y Why the edit? Is that the name of an ISP that must never be mentioned on this board? | |
|
 |  |  | | Re: pr****y bah yea. i guess it don't matter it was prodigy internet -- sbcglobal.net speedtest result 11/11/09 - 5256kbps | |
|
 RoboticsSee You On The Dark SidePremium join:2003-10-23 Louisa, VA Reviews:
·Comcast
| America Off Line I see quite a few in here saying AOL had/has great service lol Explain why for years it was known as America Off Line.
I did tech support for several large gaming sites (a few are still out there but have merged into one) If a problem came in and their service provider happened to be AOL, both these company's had separate sheets just for AOL users, to announce the issue with AOL and our gaming sites.
But that is history now. I will admit they are great at babying their clients to make any and everything so easy. (with all the software they shoved down their throats). But hey...people loved it.
Oh well enough said...I hope they sink completely some day! (of course I'm proud to say I never nor would have even thought of using them as an ISP...you got to be kidding lol) -- Long you live and high you fly and Smiles you'll give and tears you'll cry and all you touch and all you see, is all your life will ever be. | |
|
 TransmasterDon't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus join:2001-06-20 Cheyenne, WY | Oh The Humanity Today AOL laid off their last employee....can a govermant bail out be far behind. | |
|
 Reviews:
·Comcast
| Sinking Ship...sinks? Did the people working there really NOT see this coming? I used the free aol disc to sign up when Net Zero was free 
Then it was a nightmare to cancel from being charged when the trial was up. (For AOL not Net Zero) | |
|
 PeteC2Got Mouse?Premium,MVM join:2002-01-20 Bristol, CT kudos:5 Reviews:
·AT&T Yahoo
1 edit | I had AOL before it was AOL...before the Internet was common Hate to admit that I can not remember the name, but I had them back when it was actually an on-line service promoted by Tandy (Radio Shack), and was the direct fore-runner to what became AOL. This is back when Compuserve was king, and AOL became a very decent (if distant second) challenger, at a tastier price. I remember being on AOL when they began featuring forays into this thing called the "World Wide Web"...and something called a "browser"...(not IE!)...thinking "If I could only get a 14,400 baud modem!"
At any rate, at one time, not only was AOL a decent enough service, it really was one of the more innovative as well. Obviously AOL became irrelavant years ago now, but there was a time... -- Deeds, not words | |
|
 |  |
 Reviews:
·Comcast
·Comcast Digital ..
| In a few years..... DSLR will be asking the same question of Twitter and Facebook. They are just "free", updated versions of AOL chatrooms. Wait until FB and Twitter start rrrr charging for a "membership" fee. -- Satan is always busy. He makes bad things look good and good things look bad! Watch that Devil. | |
|
 | | Hmmm... Who's a good candidate for being an AOL customer?
Well, how about all of those people who live in rural areas "served" by Verizon? (till Vz sells 'em off anyway) | |
|
 |  tim_kButtons, Bows, Beamer, Shadow, KaseyPremium,VIP join:2002-02-02 Stewartstown, PA kudos:7 Reviews:
·Armstrong Zoom ..
| Re: Hmmm... said by mod_wastrel:Who's a good candidate for being an AOL customer? Well, how about all of those people who live in rural areas "served" by Verizon? (till Vz sells 'em off anyway) There are cheaper and better dialup ISP's. -- RIP my babies Buttons 1/15/94-2/9/07, Beamer 7/24/08, & Bows 12/17/94-10/11/09 | |
|
 1 edit | Bulk. I once ordered 300 cd's from aol. They sent them & they arrived within a week. Used a gutter nail to nail bout 100 of them to the wall (down the middle in the spindle hole) for fun, from time to time someone came to me with an AOL problem & i fixed it using that stack. Tossed it in the recycle bin about 2 years ago.
I had slim flexible video game style & regular jewel cases from kmart, mail & target, paper cases, partial paper cases..... They really went berserk with the packaging & sheer number of discs sent out.
- A -- LETS GO METS! | |
|
 |
|