republican-creole
site Search:


 
   
story category
Will AOL's Implosion Ever End?
Latest remake involves laying off one third of staff...
by Karl Bode Friday 20-Nov-2009 tags: business · trouble · content
Tipped by S_engineer See Profile
AOL continues an interesting trip that took them from one of the largest and most powerful ISPs on the Internet, to a fractured and financially-troubled company with dreams of becoming an advertising giant. Of course most of their problems were caused by their inability to adapt to (or really in some cases even recognize) the broadband market -- something that was at least in part caused by former executive Lisa Hook, who went on to do amazing things with VoIP carrier SunRocket as well. With its spin off from Time Warner, the company this fall has undergone its latest in an endless line of evolution efforts, but has announced those changes will come with pink slips for about one third of AOL's employees, or about 2,300 workers.

view: topics flat text 
Post a:

aaronwt
Premium
join:2004-11-07
Woodbridge, VA
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

1 edit

AOL?

I can proudly say that I have never used their service. Even when I used dialup, before getting 5mbs cable speeds in 1997, I used EROLS for only a few dollar a month. I would have never even considered using AOL.

I certainly received enough of their crappy CDs. I probably could fill a 13 gallon trash can with the huge number of AOL CDs i threw away.

boogi man

join:2001-11-13
Jacksonville, FL

Re: AOL?

wooohooo good for you!! you never used them so what?
AntonyLingo

join:2009-10-28
Toronto

Re: AOL?

Anyone remember the warez bots on AOL?

(\/)ass (\/)ail

oh baby

John McClane
yippee ki yay
Premium
join:2005-03-19
Reviews:
·Comcast
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T U-Verse
·Vonage

Re: AOL?

hell yea. that was the easiest way to get your warez fix. i miss that. i've always wondered how AOLs mail servers were set up that they could handle that crazy amount of data being transfered all the time. i pry had gigabytes of data back in the day just sitting in my mailbox. never would delete it.
--
sbcglobal.net speedtest result 11/11/09 - 5256kbps
AntonyLingo

join:2009-10-28
Toronto

1 edit

Re: AOL?

I've wondered the same. I always thought that one person uploaded a file and there was a link to that file on AOLs server and all people did was pass the soft link around

John McClane
yippee ki yay
Premium
join:2005-03-19

Re: AOL?

it was either that or they had a LOT of email storage... back then gigabytes were very expensive. i can't imagine how they would accommodate terabytes of data back then.
--
sbcglobal.net speedtest result 11/11/09 - 5256kbps
AntonyLingo

join:2009-10-28
Toronto
Reviews:
·TekSavvy DSL
Back before the CDROMS were given out, I used to raid the AOL floppy disks at my local computer shop and format them all.

I gave away alot of copies of Hugo House of Horror on those AOL disks.

Too bad they dont give out flash drives today.
ISurfTooMuch

join:2007-04-23
Tuscaloosa, AL

Re: AOL?

Yep, good times. I got so many of the things in the mail that I hardly ever needed to buy a box of floppies.

MovieLover76

join:2009-09-11

Re: AOL?

Free AOL Floppy Disks rocked, besides buying one quality floppy disk for my school work (AOL disks were cheaply made) I don't think I ever bought floppy discs in the aol free floppy era lol
ISurfTooMuch

join:2007-04-23
Tuscaloosa, AL

Re: AOL?

And remember when they sent out the CD's in those little flat metal boxes? I saved a few of those, although I never figured out what to use them for. I may still have them somewhere.

spewak
R.I.P Dadkins
Premium
join:2001-08-07
Elk Grove, CA
kudos:1
Reviews:
·Clear Wireless
·SureWest Internet

Re: AOL?

Click for full size
Here is what I use one for:
Coffee cup coaster on my Computer desk.
--
The weekend is here, grab a can of beer!
margaf77

join:2000-12-22
Bayonne, NJ
Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FiOS
said by ISurfTooMuch:

And remember when they sent out the CD's in those little flat metal boxes? I saved a few of those, although I never figured out what to use them for. I may still have them somewhere.
Glad Im not the only lunatic who swore Id use them for something LOL
ISurfTooMuch

join:2007-04-23
Tuscaloosa, AL

Re: AOL?

said by margaf77:

Glad Im not the only lunatic who swore Id use them for something LOL
Funny, at this moment, I feel exactly the same way!
margaf77

join:2000-12-22
Bayonne, NJ
Reviews:
·Optimum Online
·Verizon FiOS

Re: AOL?

said by ISurfTooMuch:

said by margaf77:

Glad Im not the only lunatic who swore Id use them for something LOL
Funny, at this moment, I feel exactly the same way!
They were crappy but everyone was on there and God did I get laid alot from those chats :
ISurfTooMuch

join:2007-04-23
Tuscaloosa, AL

Re: AOL?

Damn, NOW I understand AOL's popularity!

38632383

join:2009-09-25
Houston, TX
Ahhhh !!! How quickly we forget all those sweet fat girlz !!!

KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
They made good DVD/CD mailers if you needed to send a bunch of files to someone (back in the day of slow dial up, Priority mail was faster!!)
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini

Nightshade
Premium
join:2002-05-26
Salem, OR
I used mine to hold screws and washers.

tim_k
Buttons, Bows, Beamer, Shadow, Kasey
Premium,VIP
join:2002-02-02
Stewartstown, PA
kudos:7
Yeah, some of them had nice containers. I've kept a few, especially the DVD cases. I just used one of the metal boxes last month.
wilburyan

join:2002-08-01
Reviews:
·Shaw
lol, thank you so much for bringing back the hugo's house of horror memories!

I didn't use the floppies for that, at the time I didn't have internet, so I would take my raft of AOL and Compuserv floppies to the local library and download everything I could from sharewaregames.com on their 33.6 dial up connection.

ahh... those were the days!
AntonyLingo

join:2009-10-28
Toronto

Re: AOL?

Those were the days indeed. Paying $39.95 a month for unlimited 33.6 dialup services from my ISP and another $29.95 for a dedicated POTS line.... *sigh* .... I miss those days

Rob
In Deo speramus, God Bless the USA
Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
kudos:2
AOL, back in the day, wasn't that bad. AOL v. 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 were great. Then 7.0-9.0 were terrible.

aaronwt
Premium
join:2004-11-07
Woodbridge, VA
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

Re: AOL?

said by Rob:

AOL, back in the day, wasn't that bad. AOL v. 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 were great. Then 7.0-9.0 were terrible.
Except they wanted you to install their software. Which is the main reason I would not use them.

Rob
In Deo speramus, God Bless the USA
Premium
join:2001-08-25
Kendall, FL
kudos:2

Re: AOL?

said by aaronwt:

said by Rob:

AOL, back in the day, wasn't that bad. AOL v. 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 were great. Then 7.0-9.0 were terrible.
Except they wanted you to install their software. Which is the main reason I would not use them.
Why? The service was kick ass. The chatrooms, the instant messaging, the "keywords". It's a great program, and great service. The later versions of the program made it terrible, but in the early days AOL was king, and for a very good reason - the service was great.
--
CheckSite.us | YourIP.us | Reverseip.us

aaronwt
Premium
join:2004-11-07
Woodbridge, VA
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

Re: AOL?

said by Rob:

said by aaronwt:

said by Rob:

AOL, back in the day, wasn't that bad. AOL v. 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 were great. Then 7.0-9.0 were terrible.
Except they wanted you to install their software. Which is the main reason I would not use them.
Why? The service was kick ass. The chatrooms, the instant messaging, the "keywords". It's a great program, and great service. The later versions of the program made it terrible, but in the early days AOL was king, and for a very good reason - the service was great.
Except I had great internet service without AOL for less. Although I only got online(not counting my Prodigy use in the early 90s) in 1995 with dialup and in 1997 moved to broadband and never looked back to dialup.

Van
Premium
join:2009-07-08
New Orleans, LA

Agreed. Loved 3.0-5.0

used it all the time and was my basic introduction to the world of the internet socially and entertainment wise

S_engineer
Premium
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL

AOL should be defined as a Virus

3,4,and, 5 were great?...have you ever tried to remove them? That crap was everywhere in the registry. However AOL did one thing for me....it got me into the habit of wiping clean the hard drive of every pc I bought. Now I just build my own desktops, but I still wipe new laptops.

Someday after Armageddon around 2 million years from now, the future cavemen will still be digging up AOL discs!
--
BF69~~~Please stop suffocating gerbils!

Van
Premium
join:2009-07-08
New Orleans, LA

Re: AOL should be defined as a Virus

I honestly never did because I always used them.

When I left AOL and went with broadband, I got a new computer because my old one died

So no, I never had the removal issue

John McClane
yippee ki yay
Premium
join:2005-03-19
Reviews:
·Comcast
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T U-Verse
·Vonage

Re: AOL should be defined as a Virus

formatting your computer is one of those things i do every 6 months.. tends to freshen things up.

S_engineer is right though, if you don't want to deal w/ crapware just learn to build your desktop machines.
--
sbcglobal.net speedtest result 11/11/09 - 5256kbps

Doctor Four
My other vehicle is a TARDIS
Premium
join:2000-09-05
Dallas, TX
AOL is what could be called Digital Kudzu.

This is an application which places small files in every nook and cranny of a computer's OS. Any attempt at removal leaves some bits and pieces behind, which then forever (barring a reformat) interfere with other processes or applications .
--
"The trouble with computers, of course, is that they are very sophisticated idiots." - Doctor Who (from Robot)

morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
Reviews:
·Charter

Re: AOL?

said by Rob:

the service was great.
it made the internet easy for people to jump into. a baby step. the walled garden, in that way, was helpful.
patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1
said by Rob:

Why? The service was kick ass. The chatrooms, the instant messaging, the "keywords". It's a great program, and great service. The later versions of the program made it terrible, but in the early days AOL was king, and for a very good reason - the service was great.
Never used AOL. But I remember when various companies advertised their keywords on TV, not their web address. I remember being angry some companies had keywords on AOL with NO HTTP website. If I did a Yahoo search for them I found a websites told you to goto the AOL keyword!!!!

AOL used to BE the internet!!!

Corehhi

join:2002-01-28
Bluffton, SC
Reviews:
·Hargray Cable
said by Rob:

said by aaronwt:

said by Rob:

AOL, back in the day, wasn't that bad. AOL v. 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 were great. Then 7.0-9.0 were terrible.
Except they wanted you to install their software. Which is the main reason I would not use them.
Why? The service was kick ass. The chatrooms, the instant messaging, the "keywords". It's a great program, and great service. The later versions of the program made it terrible, but in the early days AOL was king, and for a very good reason - the service was great.
Word up. Yes it did rule. When your the first chat room that works in town you rule.

cork1958
Cork
Premium
join:2000-02-26
said by Rob:

said by aaronwt:

said by Rob:

AOL, back in the day, wasn't that bad. AOL v. 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 were great. Then 7.0-9.0 were terrible.
Except they wanted you to install their software. Which is the main reason I would not use them.
Why? The service was kick ass. The chatrooms, the instant messaging, the "keywords". It's a great program, and great service. The later versions of the program made it terrible, but in the early days AOL was king, and for a very good reason - the service was great.
There was NEVER ANYTHING GOOD about their service or their proprietary, crap software. In the early days, there were simply to many 'tards who didn't know and didn't want to know what they were doing. It was all a matter of hand holding. Not to mention, there wasn't 850,000,000 different dial up ISP's, at first.
--
The Firefox alternative.
»www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/

Oleg
Bellsouth Fastaccess
Premium
join:2003-12-08
Birmingham, AL

2 edits

Re: AOL?

said by cork1958:

In the early days, there were simply to many 'tards who didn't know and didn't want to know what they were doing. It was all a matter of hand holding. Not to mention, there wasn't 850,000,000 different dial up ISP's, at first.
There are still too many of those tards using AOL like it's the best thing ever made and people like this know crap about how to use a computer you have to come to their house and teach them how to send an e-mail or how to use MS Office.

aaronwt
Premium
join:2004-11-07
Woodbridge, VA
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

1 edit

Re: AOL?

WOW! I just looked on the AOL site. They charge between $10 a month and $26 a month for dial up. And the $26 a month gives you Mcafee and Up to $10,000 identity theft insurance coverage and
Up to $1,000 PC Hardware insurance coverage.

What a rip off!

Then they have backup, dial up access.
No thanks, I use a cellular broadband modem for backup and get 1 to 3mbs download speeds.

I'd rather have no service than even consider using dial up. Not that I have a modem in any of my desktops. I don't even think my laptops have a modem, well I think my oldest one might.

Oleg
Bellsouth Fastaccess
Premium
join:2003-12-08
Birmingham, AL

1 edit

Re: AOL?

Yea that is a mess with AOL.I can get hardware insurance coverage from SquareTrade for up to 3 years for less than $20 as for Mcafee security suit they offer if i wanted it i could of gotten it for free from my ISP and dentity theft insurance coverage is not needed if you are careful.
Edit: Forgot to say if i needed Dial-Up ISP i could get it for $5.95 unlimited.
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ
said by Oleg:

said by cork1958:

In the early days, there were simply to many 'tards who didn't know and didn't want to know what they were doing. It was all a matter of hand holding. Not to mention, there wasn't 850,000,000 different dial up ISP's, at first.
There are still too many of those tards using AOL like it's the best thing ever made and people like this know crap about how to use a computer you have to come to their house and teach them how to send an e-mail or how to use MS Office.
the thing is those people should never be allowed to touch a pop3 client to begin with. webmail is good enough for 90% of the users out there imo.

if i didnt use Thunderbird id almost wish residential service ISPs to get rid of pop3 and only use their webmail portals lol.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports

Oleg
Bellsouth Fastaccess
Premium
join:2003-12-08
Birmingham, AL

Re: AOL?

I know how to use a mail client,but for me Webmail will do.

joako
Premium
join:2000-09-07
/dev/null
kudos:5
2.7 for Mac!

Corehhi

join:2002-01-28
Bluffton, SC
Reviews:
·Hargray Cable
said by Rob:

AOL, back in the day, wasn't that bad. AOL v. 3.0, 4.0, 5.0 and 6.0 were great. Then 7.0-9.0 were terrible.
I second that. AOL in the day brought the internet to the masses. I know some will say they did whatever but I had zero choices in my hood for years until net zero came along. I used net zero for big down loads at night. LOL. Think I got 4.2 kbs up from AOLs 2.7-3.2. You kiddies don't know the thrill of getting a 56k modemn. LOL.

DownTheShore
Just Say No To Newts
Premium
join:2003-12-02
Beautiful NJ
kudos:10
said by aaronwt:

I can proudly say that I have never used their service. Even when I used dialup, before getting 5mbs cable speeds in 1997, I used EROLS for only a few dollar a month. I would have never even considered using AOL.

Goody for you. You get a gold star.

Obviously, though, it met the needs of milliions who were not at "smart" as you.
--
Patriotism is not waving a flag, it is living the ideals

I want to retire to the Isle of Sodor and ride the trains.

battleop

join:2005-09-28
00000
Ohhhhhh you must be 1337.
gorehound

join:2009-06-19
Portland, ME
i never used em either cause i didnot have to but on the other hand my father uses it and he loves it.
he has very little computer knowledge unlike us here and is in his 80's now.for him and lots of others AOL works great and is easy.
us guys who have knowledge just use firefox or whatever with our ISP connection which we all know is more complicated than the AOL solution.

Oleg
Bellsouth Fastaccess
Premium
join:2003-12-08
Birmingham, AL
I have used AOL back in 99 after i have found there are better Dial-Up ISPS i have quit using it.
carmas

join:2003-07-31
Floral Park, NY
Poor old AOL....

They were my first on-line experience in the very early '90's! I had a (very) expensive DEC 386 PC running Windows 3.1, a "blazingly fast" US Robotics 14400 modem, and a 14" (color!) CRT.

Got very frustrated early on with problems dialing-in during peak times, (hello OptimumOnline?!) and switched to ATT WorldNet a few years later. (with a big speed increase to 33.6!)

The early, simple years. Still pretty amazed with FTTH and my FIOS's speed. We've come a long way. (too bad we're no longer the cutting edge)

Drew

Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ
i will admit i had AOL back in the pay by the hour days. i remember when they went unlimited and the line was always busy.

they did a great thing in their time, get people online with a somewhat userfriendly interface compared to even Prodigy.

nowdays they are the floater that cant be flushed.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports
brianiscool

join:2000-08-16
40303
kudos:1

LOL

AOL should of bought out a cable company when they were making the big bucks. Look at them now suffering each day. Sooner or later they will not support their AOL software anymore and only become a web portal. Their only small income probably comes from dial up customer's and people that use aol instant messenger. Good reddens AOL.

See 10 replies to this post

AlexNYC

join:2001-06-02
Edwards, CO

AOwho....

Do they even still exist? And they even have 4600 workers left!!!

ThrowDemsOut
If you can't convince 'em, confuse 'em
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Mullica Hill, NJ
kudos:4

Re: AOwho....

said by AlexNYC:

Do they even still exist? And they even have 4600 workers left!!!
Yes. As nothing more than a web portal, like MSN, or Yahoo. And the only reason they still exist is because of all the non-techies and the aged that still have AOL email addresses and can't stomach the upset of changing their email addresses.

»www.aol.com/
--
My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page


AlexNYC

join:2001-06-02
Edwards, CO

Re: AOwho....

If they still try to sell their dial-up service I can see it now:
Get AOL dial-up and get complimentary bell-bottom pants and a disco ball or lava lamp. Woot ....

Moropo
Premium
join:2002-07-28
Miami
How does people still using their email address provide them revenue?

Do you have to pay to have an aol email?

Just wondering.
getstuff4les

join:2005-07-24
Riverside, CA
Free AOL

* AOL email (@aol.com or customized)
* Online customer support
* AOL all-in-one software
* NOTE: Does not include Internet access or live customer support.

OR $25.90 for AOL DIAL-UP.
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ

If AOL where a Turd.....

Then time warner could be accused of leaving behind the biggest floater the world has ever seen. just cant flush AOL away even in all their failure.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports

woody7
Premium
join:2000-10-13
Torrance, CA

hmm......

So much for "death by a thousand cuts"
--
BlooMe
iansltx

join:2007-02-19
Golden, CO
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Comcast
·Verizon Online DSL

Re: hmm......

Yeah, at this rate it should only take a few dozen...

That said, once AOL gives up being an ISP altogether (sells their bialup customers to Earthlink) I think they may have something with their backbone network and content. Engadget, TUAW, etc. are all AOL brands.

ChrisGg

@att.net

Hilarious

I think it is hilarious how some bubble head at Time Warner who obviously knew nothing about the internet (is it like a fishing net or a hair net oooh the internet) bought AOL at it's absolute peak in price. Why would a consumer continue to pay 25 bucks for dialup as broadband was being rolled out left and right in every major metro at not much more in price and now all over the place. It did not take a genius to see that cable would win based on $ to performance.

See 8 replies to this post

paperbag12
Premium
join:2009-10-23

No kleenex for Lisa Hook

She is doing just fine thank you very much

»people.forbes.com/profile/lisa-a-hook/56930

Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:29

Re: No kleenex for Lisa Hook

Continues to fail upward...
ISurfTooMuch

join:2007-04-23
Tuscaloosa, AL

Re: No kleenex for Lisa Hook

But who's the bigger fool: her for her failures or the companies that continue to hire her?

I've said it again and again: it's not about what you can do; it's about who you know. This especially applies at the executive level. As long as those who hire someone see an increase in the price of the stocks they hold, they're happy. So what if the company burns to the ground. By then, they're cashed out and on to the next venture. Sure, the employees get screwed, but that doesn't matter. After all, they're disposable, and, since they don't come to the shareholders' cocktail parties, they're also invisible, just liabilities on a balance sheet.

morbo
Complete Your Transaction

join:2002-01-22
00000
time to short NSR...

Maggs
Premium
join:2002-11-29
Woodside, NY
Reviews:
·RCN CABLE
said by paperbag12:

She is doing just fine thank you very much

»people.forbes.com/profile/lisa-a-hook/56930
$1.5 million is paltry, that is very little for the C-Suite.
--
Hello, is anyone out there.
ricep5
Premium
join:2000-08-07
Jacksonville, FL

Ho Hum

Slow news day. AOL lays off a few and the rants begin.

AOL-TW was hindered by a consent decree with DOJ as terms of their merger. That decree forbid them from supplying voice or live TV content via their AOL client.

AOL-TW was also hindered by the "last mile" problem that faced all ISP transitions to broadband. The DOJ order forbid them from creating their own last mile due to very intense lobbying from Telecom USA.

Hubris also got in the way internally at AOL-TW, as the AOL management attempted and ultimately failed at running TW. An example was the attempt to move TW Corporate from Exchange to AOL Mail.

AOL was the necessary component to get Apple Pie USA connected and transitioned to the internet. While most considered them an ISP, they were really a content delivery system that used dial up.

Vamp9190
Premium
join:2002-02-11
Chantilly, VA
kudos:1

You've Got Mail

My wife has an AOL email and still uses the software every day. Their streaming music channels are good.

Nice to not have to pay a monthly fee for the broadband portal now....after years of paying $10,$15,20+ a month, it feels like you are getting value back.

Yeah, their hq offices here in Ashburn have been a ghost town for a long time, actually Raytheon is moving 5000+ people in during Spring 2010.

Jason Levine
Premium
join:2001-07-13
USA

Wikipedia Graph

I found this graph on Wikipedia showing AOL's declining subscriber numbers:



Source: »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aol_s···ehistory

That's not a very nice picture for AOL.
--
-Jason Levine
Support a children's charity. Buy a calendar and/or a photo book. Shooting For A Cause

heat84
Bit Torrent Apologist

join:2004-03-11
Fort Lauderdale, FL

Re: Wikipedia Graph

said by Jason Levine:

I found this graph on Wikipedia showing AOL's declining subscriber numbers:

[att=1]
Source: »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aol_s···ehistory

That's not a very nice picture for AOL.
There's still 5 million AOL subscribers? No way.

I didn't get into the internet until Netzero and the free-with-ads
ISP era. '99 I guess. I found many ways to get free-without-ads.
--
Bit Torrent is my DVR.

Robotics
See You On The Dark Side
Premium
join:2003-10-23
Louisa, VA
Reviews:
·Comcast
said by Jason Levine:

I found this graph on Wikipedia showing AOL's declining subscriber numbers:

[att=1]
Source: »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Aol_s···ehistory

That's not a very nice picture for AOL.
Looks like Sony Music and google/youtube's recent graph.
--
Long you live and high you fly and Smiles you'll give and tears you'll cry
and all you touch and all you see, is all your life will ever be.
Taget

join:2004-07-29

It wouldn't be accurate to say they ignored broadband...

...that's why they bought Time-Warer which turned out to be a great move on their part (and why they even still exist right now and why their stock holders from back then have anything worth anything).

What they failed to do (and I'll say thank goodness they never did) was leverage Time-Warner cable and force their customers to migrate to AOL. I know when I had Time-Warner I was scared they do just that. And since I had no alternative I would've just had to swallow it.
FixManTx
Premium
join:2005-02-06
75038-6869

Re: It wouldn't be accurate to say they ignored broadband...

I had TWC/Roadrunner back then and I was afraid of exactly the same thing. At the time I was doing computer work for a friend and had worked on a few client's computers with AOL installed. On a couple of occasions we ended up having to format and re-install Windows to get rid of AOL. I absolutely wanted no part of any ISP that forced me to install software just to get online. At that time I would have had no choice since the phone lines barely supported 28.8 dialup and DSL was not even available where I lived.

Thankfully I now have Verizon FIOS which gives me some of the fastest residential internet available in the country and I don't have to have any cumbersome software installed on my computers.

I always wondered how long AOL could keep up mailing all those "free" CD's in fancy metal boxes and sticking them in just about every magazine I bought. No wonder they had to charge the prices they did for their dial up service.

John McClane
yippee ki yay
Premium
join:2005-03-19
Reviews:
·Comcast
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T U-Verse
·Vonage

1 edit

pr****y

yea yea i know its not related but all this nostalgia made me do it.

back when win98 came out there was an internet service signup program that came with the OS. one of the providers listed was pr****y internet(the later form of pr****y not the AOL-wannabe). well there was a huge flaw in the software that allowed a user to halt the subscription process (i think a combination of alt+shift+print screen) would make the application crash but not disconnect the modem. this would allow the user to use the regular internet for free. i think i did that for about 3 years before finally getting cable internet. was it wrong? probably. does it matter? no i was 15 i convince my parents that we got free internet for buying the computer. can you say gullible?
--
sbcglobal.net speedtest result 11/11/09 - 5256kbps
ISurfTooMuch

join:2007-04-23
Tuscaloosa, AL

Re: pr****y

Why the edit? Is that the name of an ISP that must never be mentioned on this board?

John McClane
yippee ki yay
Premium
join:2005-03-19

Re: pr****y

bah yea. i guess it don't matter it was prodigy internet
--
sbcglobal.net speedtest result 11/11/09 - 5256kbps

Robotics
See You On The Dark Side
Premium
join:2003-10-23
Louisa, VA
Reviews:
·Comcast

America Off Line

I see quite a few in here saying AOL had/has great service lol
Explain why for years it was known as America Off Line.

I did tech support for several large gaming sites (a few are still out there but have merged into one) If a problem came in and their service provider happened to be AOL, both these company's had separate sheets just for AOL users, to announce the issue with AOL and our gaming sites.

But that is history now. I will admit they are great at babying their clients to make any and everything so easy. (with all the software they shoved down their throats). But hey...people loved it.

Oh well enough said...I hope they sink completely some day!
(of course I'm proud to say I never nor would have even thought of using them as an ISP...you got to be kidding lol)
--
Long you live and high you fly and Smiles you'll give and tears you'll cry
and all you touch and all you see, is all your life will ever be.

Transmaster
Don't Blame Me I Voted For Bill and Opus

join:2001-06-20
Cheyenne, WY

Oh The Humanity

Today AOL laid off their last employee....can a govermant bail out be far behind.

BBBanditRuR
Dingbits

join:2009-06-02
Parachute, CO
Reviews:
·Comcast

Sinking Ship...sinks?

Did the people working there really NOT see this coming? I used the free aol disc to sign up when Net Zero was free

Then it was a nightmare to cancel from being charged when the trial was up. (For AOL not Net Zero)

PeteC2
Got Mouse?
Premium,MVM
join:2002-01-20
Bristol, CT
kudos:5
Reviews:
·AT&T Yahoo

1 edit

I had AOL before it was AOL...before the Internet was common

Hate to admit that I can not remember the name, but I had them back when it was actually an on-line service promoted by Tandy (Radio Shack), and was the direct fore-runner to what became AOL. This is back when Compuserve was king, and AOL became a very decent (if distant second) challenger, at a tastier price. I remember being on AOL when they began featuring forays into this thing called the "World Wide Web"...and something called a "browser"...(not IE!)...thinking "If I could only get a 14,400 baud modem!"

At any rate, at one time, not only was AOL a decent enough service, it really was one of the more innovative as well. Obviously AOL became irrelavant years ago now, but there was a time...
--
Deeds, not words

birdfeedr
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-11
Warwick, RI
kudos:5

Re: I had AOL before it was AOL...before the Internet was common

It was Apple Link before AOL.

»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AOL#History

fatmanskinny
Premium
join:2004-01-04
Wandering
Reviews:
·Comcast
·Comcast Digital ..

In a few years.....

DSLR will be asking the same question of Twitter and Facebook. They are just "free", updated versions of AOL chatrooms. Wait until FB and Twitter start rrrr charging for a "membership" fee.
--
Satan is always busy. He makes bad things look good and good things look bad! Watch that Devil.

mod_wastrel
Gone fishin'

join:2008-03-28

Hmmm...

Who's a good candidate for being an AOL customer?

Well, how about all of those people who live in rural areas "served" by Verizon? (till Vz sells 'em off anyway)

tim_k
Buttons, Bows, Beamer, Shadow, Kasey
Premium,VIP
join:2002-02-02
Stewartstown, PA
kudos:7
Reviews:
·Armstrong Zoom ..

Re: Hmmm...

said by mod_wastrel:

Who's a good candidate for being an AOL customer?

Well, how about all of those people who live in rural areas "served" by Verizon? (till Vz sells 'em off anyway)
There are cheaper and better dialup ISP's.
--
RIP my babies Buttons 1/15/94-2/9/07, Beamer 7/24/08, & Bows 12/17/94-10/11/09

FastiBook

join:2003-01-08
Newtown, PA

1 edit

Bulk.

I once ordered 300 cd's from aol. They sent them & they arrived within a week. Used a gutter nail to nail bout 100 of them to the wall (down the middle in the spindle hole) for fun, from time to time someone came to me with an AOL problem & i fixed it using that stack. Tossed it in the recycle bin about 2 years ago.

I had slim flexible video game style & regular jewel cases from kmart, mail & target, paper cases, partial paper cases..... They really went berserk with the packaging & sheer number of discs sent out.

- A
--
LETS GO METS!

Monday, 06-Feb 23:52:44 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online! © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.