You Say Privacy Invasion, We Say Behavioral AdvertisingAOL, Google, look to pre-empt privacy regulation and ease your worried mind... ( old news - 10:22AM Thursday Nov 01 2007) tags: business · privacy · consumersThis week the FTC held a two-day meeting on behavioral advertising. Such get-togethers are frequently sparse when it comes to consumer advocates, but yesterday a group of them urged the FTC to create a "do not track" list aimed at protecting your privacy. In the hopes of keeping any new privacy regulation at bay (aka protecting their advertising revenue), both AOL and Google announced new efforts aimed at "educating" users on the benefits of targeted advertising. Google has launched a new YouTube privacy channel aimed at explaining their data collection methods and privacy practices (with some really nice stick figures). AOL, meanwhile, says they'll be using technology from recently acquired Tacoda to allow users to opt out of targeted ads based on their Web surfing habits. Of course, the company's new system will first inform customers why they shouldn't. From a press release: "Our goal with this program is to engender greater trust for targeted advertising by communicating with consumers in a more visible way, and by providing them more information about their choices," said Curt Viebranz, President of Platform-A. "AOL believes that doing more to explain to users the choices they have over the way their data is used, and helping them exercise those preferences will help them feel more in control." You're in control. You can trust AOL and Google. Feel better now?
Related:- Wednesday Evening Links
- NSA Still 'Overcollecting' American Data
- Big Brother Probably Used Deep Packet Inspection
- NebuAD Officially Closes
- T-Mobile Systems Hacked?
- BitBlinder: Like TOR, But Faster
- Phorm Fighting Tightening Balance Sheet AND Critics
- Cable's 'Canoe' Plan Takes On Water
|
 
ztmike
Mark for moderation
Premium
join:2001-08-02
Michigan City, IN
 ·Comcast
1 edit | Googlebad Looks like i might need to get a new homepage and search site.
I don't like the idea of some huge corp. saving my IP and cookie information.
What about Gmail?
--
"I am the worst president in US history, I'm either stupid or dumb most of the time, but people still believe me." George W. Bush | |
|  | | | | Madmick
join:2002-12-12
East Northport, NY | Re: Googlebad If Google wants to track me, PAY ME MOTHERFOCKERS! | |
| | | | 
cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
 ·Verizon FIOS
| Re: Googlebad said by Madmick  :If Google wants to track me, PAY ME MOTHERFOCKERS! They are. They are providing you a service at no cost to you. If you don't like them tracking you, don't use their service. You are free to start your own search service that crawls the internet and indexes just about everything. Probably won't be as good but at least it will be private. You are also able to get your own e-mail service. If you don't want them targeting ads to you based on the content, then pay for your own. | |
| | | | | 
imanogre
join:2005-11-29
Mcdonough, GA
 ·AT&T DSL Service
·AT&T Southeast
| Re: Googlebad said by cdru :said by Madmick :If Google wants to track me, PAY ME MOTHERFOCKERS! They are. They are providing you a service at no cost to you. If you don't like them tracking you, don't use their service. You are free to start your own search service that crawls the internet and indexes just about everything. Probably won't be as good but at least it will be private. You are also able to get your own e-mail service. If you don't want them targeting ads to you based on the content, then pay for your own. Very nice reply. Too many people want something for nothing nowadays. It's refreshing to see people who actually understand how our system of commerce works. | |
| | | | | 
GeneStarwind
join:2001-12-13
Fairfax, VA
| But it's another thing to provide free, no-frills service for an extended period of time (building up the reputation of an ad-free, dependable multi-service provider), and then suddenly shift gears in the aforementioned manner once your customer base is large enough (as if they're doing so poorly financially, to begin with: »ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g3f7···8SKFQJ00). Sounds more like an effective bait maneuver than anything else. | |
| | | | | | 
cork1958
Cork
join:2000-02-26
Fruitport, MI
·Verizon Online DSL
·Charter Pipeline
1 edit | Re: Googlebad said by GeneStarwind :But it's another thing to provide free, no-frills service for an extended period of time (building up the reputation of an ad-free, dependable multi-service provider), and then suddenly shift gears in the aforementioned manner once your customer base is large enough (as if they're doing so poorly financially, to begin with: » ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g3f7···8SKFQJ00). Sounds more like an effective bait maneuver than anything else. A well planned one at that, huh? Just took a little time and a ton of fanboys spreading the word on how great they are!! Never have cared for Google/Gmail and we all KNOW about AOL! There's a couple other items that have a ton of fanboys spreading things I've never cared for to begin with also.
--
The Firefox alternative.
»www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/ | |
| | | | | |
cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
·Verizon FIOS
| said by GeneStarwind :But it's another thing to provide free, no-frills service for an extended period of time (building up the reputation of an ad-free, dependable multi-service provider), and then suddenly shift gears in the aforementioned manner once your customer base is large enough I have only used gamil a few times in the past but hasn't GMail always had some type of text ads along the side? Google search has long had ads either at the top of the search listing or along the side. In both cases they are easily removed (well, at least hidden) using ad blocking software or a extension like Google Customize.
Even if they provided the service gratis without even ads and suddenly started showing ads, it still costs you nothing monetarily. It costs you some privacy theoretically, but even then I think the privacy you have "lost" wasn't there to begin with; it was just presumed to be there.
Anyways, it's their service and they can do as they wish. While there may be a policy shift after a long period of having their service one way, the service is still continuing to be free (as in money). It's not like they gave away the service for free for years and then one day locked down everything and demanded actual money in order to get access back holding everyone in hostage in the process. | |
| | | | | | | | 
swhx7
Premium
join:2006-07-23
Elbonia
·RoadRunner Cable
| Whenever you interact with a website, you are giving data such as your IP address and browser info, and maybe picking up some cookies if you haven't turned off this feature. All this is hard to avoid but harmless.
You can opt out of advertising, targeted or not, by using software that blocks unwanted servers, such as Adblock Plus or a customized hosts file.
Gmail and similar services are a special case. You have to register, login and accept cookies to use the service. If you use the same company's sites for searches or other services (e.g. Yahoo search and Yahoo mail), they will probably together all the data on your actions on the sites, and mail contents etc., into a profile. | |
| SilverSurfer
join:2007-08-19
1 edit | Irrelevant I use No Script and AdBlock Plus, which combined together, works so that I don't see any "behavioral advertising" nor do any web pages I read participate in google analytics. And when the browser is closed down the cookies/cache are flushed. Boo hoo. | |
| | | | 
Hazeleyze
join:2003-05-09
Wauseon, OH
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by SilverSurfer :I use No Script and AdBlock Plus, which combined together, works so that I don't see any "behavioral advertising" nor do any web pages I read participate in google analytics. And when the browser is closed down the cookies/cache are flushed. Boo hoo. Same here. | |
| |
swhx7
Premium
join:2006-07-23
Elbonia
·RoadRunner Cable
| I don't believe in blocking ads indiscriminately. It is a good thing for sites to make money with ads, and I don't mind seeing them, when they aren't obnoxious.
I do block servers that don't meet my standards for privacy and non-intrusiveness. This includes companies that track users from site to site; third-party Javascript; and anything that flashes, blinks, zooms or is otherwise animated.
If everyone followed this kind of policy, we could have nice advertising on the web, sites could be supported, without the annoyances. | |
| | | SilverSurfer
join:2007-08-19
| Re: Irrelevant said by swhx7 :I don't believe in blocking ads indiscriminately. It is a good thing for sites to make money with ads, and I don't mind seeing them, when they aren't obnoxious. I do block servers that don't meet my standards for privacy and non-intrusiveness. This includes companies that track users from site to site; third-party Javascript; and anything that flashes, blinks, zooms or is otherwise animated. If everyone followed this kind of policy, we could have nice advertising on the web, sites could be supported, without the annoyances. You hit the nail on the head right there with the obnoxious flashing ads that are enough to put someone into an epileptic seizure. If all ads were as serene and calm as the kind found on the Gmail page, I wouldn't feel the need to "indiscriminately block," to use your terminology. But unfortunately, my threshold for obnoxious, pop under/pop over/pop above ads has been breached and now I just block everything. | |
|
swhx7
Premium
join:2006-07-23
Elbonia
·RoadRunner Cable
| Opt out of tracking means being tracked as opt-out person Think about how it would work if you asked not to be tracked across the web. How would ad services know which users not to track? Presumably you would pick up a special cookie, and the ad servers would then be instructed to disregard your data.
Who would trust this? And doesn't it seem ripe for mistakes, abuse and inconvenience?
Obviously you're better off with your own technical countermeasures, but this opt-out list may be the next best thing for technically naive users who don't know the tricks.
What this doesn't address is internet providers collecting and selling customers' data. It's harder to avoid that, and an opt-out is especially needed - or better yet a prohibition of the practice. | |
| TheMG
join:2007-09-04
Edmonton, AB
1 edit | They say "targeted advertising"? I say "AdBlock Plus ftw"!!! | |
| 
Bleet
@comcast.net
| Learn to block adds from your router. Adblock is fine for 1 computer.
I run a network with 5+
Blocking sites with a host file at the ROUTER is way better.
I am running add block+ for 1 week after the host file filter was applied I have blocked 4 adds with ABP. I have not seen 1 add in that week just "cannot connect" errors in the spot where adds should have been  | |
| | | | | |
|
|
·