 brianiscool
join:2000-08-16 Miami, FL | WoW HD in a little box lol | |
|
 |   Smith6612 Premium join:2008-02-01 united state | Re: WoW watch the video in full screen mode and see if the quality is better  | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  |   Smith6612 Premium join:2008-02-01 united state | Re: WoW I watched a few videos on YouTube in 720p and they looked a lot better than the fmt=18 quality. I watched this on a 30" 2530x1600 computer monitor. | |
|
 |  |  |  |   jazzy_
join:2004-01-27 Charleston, SC | Re: WoW Yeah the YT 720p looks great on a 24" 1920x1200 monitor. | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |   antdude A Ninja Ant Premium,VIP join:2001-03-25 | Re: WoW Any good YT samples to watch?  | |
|
 |  |
 |  |   LeftOfSanity
join:2005-11-06 Felton, DE | Re: WoW Really?
I barely ever go there. Once a week maybe. | |
|
 |  |  |   Tzale Proud Libertarian Conservative Premium join:2004-01-06 Sweden
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online
| Re: WoW said by LeftOfSanity :Really? I barely ever go there. Once a week maybe. People are different....
In my opinion, the best sites on the internet are this site, wikipedia, youtube and google.... If you don't count gmail as part of google, then that is the fifth site I rely upon heavily.
-Tzale -- Neoconservatives (G.W.B) are not true conservatives. A conservative believes in defending the Constitution. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - RON PAUL 2008 | |
|
 |  |  |  |   Tenorguy
@rr.com | Re: WoW BTW - that quote "first they ignore you...." is not from Ron Paul, its from Mahatma Ghandi. Do a search... | |
|
 |  |  |  |  |   Tzale Proud Libertarian Conservative Premium join:2004-01-06 Sweden
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online
| Re: WoW said by Tenorguy :
BTW - that quote "first they ignore you...." is not from Ron Paul, its from Mahatma Ghandi. Do a search... I know... Ron Paul 2008 was just a campaign slogan using that quote to express how I felt. I guess I should really take it down anyway. -- Neoconservatives (G.W.B) are not true conservatives. A conservative believes in defending the Constitution. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. - RON PAUL 2008 | |
|
 |  |  |
 |
 |   53059959 Temp banned from BBR more then anyone
join:2002-10-02 PwnZone
1 edit | Re: What about the tin can effect? thats exactly what the "high quality" setting offers, is 128kbps stereo mp3 audio
this has been around on youtube for a while
unless this has changed, your video has to be above a certain size like 640x480 or something close to that to be upgraded to high quality, otherwise it stays normal quality | |
|
 |  |   swhitney2003 I can't drive 55. Premium join:2003-06-13 NH clubs:  | Re: What about the tin can effect? ah okay, thanks. thats good to know. | |
|
 |   Smith6612 Premium join:2008-02-01 united state | The sound is much improved, going from 64kbps mono sound to at least 128kbps Stereo sound. | |
|
 |   dvd536 as Mr. Pink as they come Premium join:2001-04-27 Phoenix, AZ
| said by swhitney2003 :So, are they getting better audio going yet? I'm sick of the tin can effect where everything sounds hollow and 'tinny.' Nothing like hearing a hit classic rock song get destroyed by a youtube version where the audio is shot. Give me ATLEAST 128kbps stereo MP3 equivalent. Done on purpose to protect online music sales. -- When I gez aju zavateh na nalechoo more new yonooz tonigh molinigh - Ken Lee | |
|
  GOLFnSUN Enjoy the sun Premium join:2002-03-03 Avalon, NJ
·Sprint Mobile Broa..
·Comcast
4 edits | Can also make YouTube default to HD if video in that format You can also make YouTube high def video your default - if you login to YouTube and have a profile. It will then show YouTube videos in high def for any videos that support that level of quality.
»www.kottke.org/08/11/high-qualit···deo-hack
Set your default viewing quality to high: When you're logged in, go to Account / Playback Setup / Video Playback Quality and set the option to "I have a fast connection. Always play higher-quality video when it's available." Example of a YouTube HD video: »www.youtube.com/watch?v=w2O5n3qouIo
If you want to see it in HD, you may have to go to the youtube link and be logged in. The BBR embedded Youtube in this post might not be in HD. -- My BLOG .. .. Internet News .. .. My Web Page Ask yourself one question: 'Do I feel lucky?' Well, do ya punk? | |
|
 |   swhitney2003 I can't drive 55. Premium join:2003-06-13 NH clubs:  | Re: Can also make YouTube default to HD if video in that format You have to manually add &fmt=18 still. Looks good though | |
|
 |  |   freeman
@rr.com | Re: Can also make YouTube default to HD if video in that format What do u expect for something free lol. | |
|
 |   Smith6612 Premium join:2008-02-01 united state | For HD in the embedded players, you need to change the player's embed HTML for it to work. However when you do this, it messes up the player little bit and it prevents you from skipping or repeating a scene, and forces you to rewatch the video. | |
|
  dadkins Can you do Blu? Premium,MVM join:2003-09-26 Hercules, CA
·Comcast
1 edit | Look for this... When the video starts, look for the small popup and link...
I still miss Stage6.  | |
|
 |   Smith6612 Premium join:2008-02-01 united state 1 edit | Re: Look for this... That may work, but it may not give the full HD/full HQ video. The fmt=18 or fmt=22 tricks work best. But if that does show, then yes you're right about looking for that. And long live Stage6! | |
|
 |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |   Pashune Inhaling at 675 KB per sec. Premium join:2006-04-14 Gautier, MS | Re: Look for this... There are many Stage6 alternatives out there but financially speaking, they struggle to stay alive... Well, at least the ones I've tried out. | |
|
 |  |
  Smith6612 Premium join:2008-02-01 united state | What a suprise! I posted the news about this on several forums last night, and I wake up this morning to find that DSLR has the news :P | |
|
 |
 |   Tzale Proud Libertarian Conservative Premium join:2004-01-06 Sweden
·Verizon FIOS
·Optimum Online
| Re: Looks good said by TOPDAWG :(youtube clip) video looks great. simply stunning....
thanks for posting an example....
-tzale | |
|
 |  |
 |  |
 |  Done_Posting Shoot to kill Premium join:2003-08-22 Toledo, OH
·buckeye cable
| Yes, many thanks for posting a working example. In full screen on my little 1280x800 laptop, this looked close to stuff I shoot in 720p with my Xacti HD1000! I would absolutely love to be able to upload straight to YouTube without having to transcode...
- Tate
-- Happiness is an OC-768 in your basement... | |
|
 |   BF69
join:2004-07-28 Camden, TN
| said by TOPDAWG :(youtube clip) video looks great. Looks good, but I'm not sure if I'd call 2.5 Mbps "HD". Technically that's not even SD quality. I mean a 480p DVD has bit rate of 8 Mbps. Maybe I'm missing something. | |
|
 tmc8080
join:2004-04-24 Floral Park, NY
| divx 6 and h.264 HD divx 6 or h.264 HD are the only ways to go.. they are already defacto HD codecs.. youtube will just have to choose between these two... choosing and obscure codec could have them in a position backing an hd-dvd style format which will leave a vacuum for other content hosting/streaming sites to fill the void and get it right. | |
|
  TwoCpus4me
join:2003-10-16 | Or You can ditch youtube, and use Vimeo which already is HD and much higher quality than youtube. | |
|
 |  duck9191
join:2005-01-09 Smiths Creek, MI
·Comcast
| Re: Or but with vimeo you can only upload 500meg or and 1 hd video per week unless you upgrade. i usually only upload 1 or 2 hd videos per week but its a pain waiting a week. sooner or later ill upgrade my account i guess.
i tried to upload a hd video to youtube last night, same one i put up on vimeo and its still only low quality. when i use the &fm=22 it goes to the original version. so i guess its only working for some videos right now. | |
|
  TOPDAWG Premium join:2005-04-27 Midland, ON | h I wonder how long once all videos are like this will studios start to sue even more. They already hate youtube but god if I can watch a show on there with the bad video quality but if you can make it HD it would not be so bad to watch something. | |
|
 cornelius785
join:2006-10-26 Worcester, MA
| this is good news i'm impressed by the quality of the videos.
it'll be interesting to see if the ISPs start doing more of ther complaining and anti-net neutrality stuff. i know people don't live on youtube, but the increased quality brings and increased bandwidth usage.
it's crossed my mind that there was also net-neutrality reason for doing this now, but that could be considered a conspiracy theory. | |
|
  wwdubbia
join:2002-06-03 Clinton, NY | Vimeo is where it's at Check out the HD stuff over at Vimeo.com and YouTube looks like it's stuck in 2002. | |
|
  fireflier Coffee. . .Need Coffee Premium join:2001-05-25 Limbo
·Skype
| Why bother? In time we'll all be capped so tightly that watching more than three YouTube HD videos in a month will cost an extra $10.  -- Tradition: Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid. --despair.com | |
|
 |   meowBB
join:2002-01-21 Hayward, CA | Re: Why bother? Exactly! | |
|
 Kord
join:2006-10-27
·RoadRunner Cable
| Not HD I just don't think they should claim the label HD. That is a standard by which TV is broadcast compared to SDTV. What they are doing here is just allowing higher resolution formats of data stream. -- I haven't failed, I've found 10,000 ways that don't work. | |
|
 papi4baby
join:2008-01-19 Callaway, MD | Woo hoo I'll be the first.
YAY CAPS. | |
|
  Guspaz Guspaz Premium,MVM join:2001-11-05 Montreal, QC
·Colbanet
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| Ugh I guess we're finally starting to see the fruits of the Google buyout; they're now able to take advantage of the fact that they have effectively unlimited bandwidth wheras before the cost of bandwidth was drowning YouTube in debt.
Anyhow, Flash video is already insanely CPU intensive, mostly due to the lack of hardware accelerated overlay support. For example, I can't fullscreen higher quality Flash video because my CPU (a 2.16GHz Core 2 Duo) apparently isn't fast enough.
Pushing Flash video to higher resolutions will only make this worse. I really wish Flash would add support for OpenGL and/or Direct3D as an output layer for video, this would solve so many of these problems. | |
|
 |   Viper007Bond Premium join:2002-09-26 Portland, OR
1 edit | Re: Ugh said by Guspaz :Anyhow, Flash video is already insanely CPU intensive, mostly due to the lack of hardware accelerated overlay support. For example, I can't fullscreen higher quality Flash video because my CPU (a 2.16GHz Core 2 Duo) apparently isn't fast enough. Odd, my not-too-much-faster 2.66GHz C2D that's also doing other things like Folding@Home on my GPU (uses ~10% CPU) as well as other things (20% load on average while doing nothing) can play this new format video fullscreen at 1920x1200 perfectly smooth. All the controls react perfectly, etc. | |
|
 |
|
 |