Search:  

 
 
   News
newer
story category iPhone speed test
Something simple to start with
(old news - 10:25AM Monday Jul 09 2007)
tags: wireless · software
It has come to our attention that the iPhone, while very capable, lacks Flash or Java, so it cannot use any of the many "speed test" programs out there. For your iPhone amusement, here is a little speed test page that will work on your iPhone browser: tinyspeedtest.html. (Our older text.dslreports.com/mspeed test also works, although it is more of a hack).

As expected, results show the EDGE network has very poor latency (around 500ms) for tiny requests. Our older mobile speed test shows iPhones on the AT&T subnet logging between 45kbit and 175kbit (average just over 100kbit) but with even higher full page request latencies - over a second.

Wifi connected iphones are logging PC/Mac-like speeds on this and other speed tests.

The high latency of EDGE is why even graphics-lite but function rich sites take a long time to load fully. During loading, the anemic EDGE capacity is rarely totally utilized. Instead, the phone spends a lot of time waiting around for EDGE to recognize yet another small request is pending (even just to check a timestamp on a graphic or CSS or js file), and carry back the small answer.

AT&T EDGE at even a very conservative 64kbit speed would have been quite adequate for even complex web pages if married to reasonable latency.

Supporting data for this article: 5800 samples of iphone users testing speed using our original "mobile speed test". "dwn" is in kilobits per second. The AT&T data network is at least 32.x.x.x

select avg(dwn),avg(latency),count(*) from
mobile_result,x2id where x2id.id=mobile_result.uaid
and mid>1633213 and
x2id.k like '%iphone%' and ip like '32.%';
+----------+-----------------+----------+
| avg(dwn) | avg(latency) | count(*) |
+----------+-----------------+----------+
| 109.2486 | 1.2144346246334 | 5805 |
+----------+-----------------+----------+
1 row in set (0.71 sec)

Feel free to post the results your iPhone manages to get on this new speedtest, tinyspeedtest.html.

Related:
  1. Fon: Connecting To Scarce Hotspots Now Easier
  2. New Technology Improves GPS Service for Cell Phones
  3. Boston Bans Boing Boing
  4. WeFi Simplifies Finding Wi-Fi
  5. Verizon Wireless Opens Their Network, Sort Of
  6. Verizon Wireless Preps 'Open Access' Tier
  7. Eye-phone: Information at your Fingertips
  8. IBM Software Could Enhance Mobile Browsing
Forums » iPhone speed test
view: topics flat text 
Post a:

Phoenix Gold
Hypocrite

join:2001-11-24
Faulkton, SD
clubs:

well it still looks cool

and i bet you look real cool using it.

function is overrated.

Mactron
el Camino Real
Premium
join:2001-12-16
CM94sv

Re: well it still looks cool

It does look cool. But is it really useful?
I would really be disappointed after spending that kind of cash. V2.0 has to do better...
--
If only the Verizon CSRs worked this well.
Time4aNAP
Premium
join:2007-04-09
Des Plaines, IL
·Speakeasy
·Comcast

said by Phoenix Gold See Profile :

function is overrated.
If any girl says that, she's just being polite.
thecalip

join:2002-08-22
New York, NY
I haven't see anyone using one. Only seeing them use it as portable video player. For a $600 portable video player, it's quiet expensive.

MysticGogeta
The Robot Devil
Premium
join:2005-03-14
League City, TX
clubs:
It would be like that one commercial of sprints mobile broadband vs AT&T there would be buzzards flying around you when you finally loaded a page lol
--
Team Discovery-Join the fight

Doctor Dan
Weapons Of Masturbation
Premium
join:2001-10-20
Papiopolis

Pokey is as pokey does

For a real thrill in "molasses ballet," try viewing a https page from a bank, etc. on it.

- Dan
--
"That which does not kill us makes us stranger."

tekmunki
Tekmunki
Premium
join:2001-12-06
Lake City, FL
clubs:
·Comcast

Question...

I was running this speedtest on Sprints network for comparison...

I get 396k (on evdo)...

but the latency reports back 1000ms 1000ms 0ms 0ms 1000ms... Mind you, this is directly using the phone browser.

I usually average around 100-150ms ping on my cell tethered to my PC. Anyone know why this speedtest reports back latency like this?
--
TekMunki
"There are 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't."

www.tekmunki.com

gdm
Premium,MVM
join:2001-06-15
Mchenry, IL
clubs:

Re: Question...

I get 661kbps on att 3G network. The latency is the same as what you are getting. either 0ms or 1000ms.

AnonProxy
Proxy of Anon
Premium
join:2001-05-12
ß

Re: Question...

Due to a wait state in the way the network handles requests.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·DSL EXTREME
·DSL EXTREME

Tethered ZX-20 on AT&T 3G over bluetooth

Latency:313ms 312ms 344ms 1125ms 313ms 296ms 329ms 328ms 297ms 328ms

Speed: 499kbps

Latency is a bit high... but then again, I'm on the other side of the country

$ tracert i.dslr.net

Tracing route to i.dslr.net [209.123.109.176]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 149 ms 130 ms 151 ms 172.26.248.2
2 149 ms 156 ms 152 ms 172.26.248.2
3

$ ping i.dslr.net
PING i.dslr.net (209.123.109.177): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 209.123.109.177: icmp_seq=0 ttl=46 time=218 ms
64 bytes from 209.123.109.177: icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=203 ms
64 bytes from 209.123.109.177: icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=218 ms

----i.dslr.net PING Statistics----

justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
Brooklyn, NY

Re: Question...

yep that looks about right. Latency for icmp ping at 200ms would mean higher latency to completely fetch a null file.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Re: Question...

Most definately.
bignate

join:2005-12-05
Austin, TX
on my att 8525 on 3G i have seen as high as 900kbps down, 290kbps up, and about 100ms avg ping time.

but on average i would say it is more like: 770 down, 260 up, 130ms ping
nnaarrnn

join:2004-09-30
Nitro, WV
happens with sprint from handsets, especially if you're in a building or moving. I have the same issue with my 700wx, except when attached to an external antenna which is outside my office.

justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
Brooklyn, NY

Host:
IPv6
Webmasters and Dev..
Business Connectiv..
Home/Office setup ..
Console/Handheld g..
said by tekmunki See Profile :

but the latency reports back 1000ms 1000ms 0ms 0ms 1000ms... Mind you, this is directly using the phone browser.

That browser (some phone browsers) are unable to do sub-second timings so you either get a full second, or zero seconds. Sorry. I should be able recalculate an average latency from 10 latencies like that, though, so all is not lost.

tekmunki
Tekmunki
Premium
join:2001-12-06
Lake City, FL
clubs:
·Comcast

Re: Question...

said by justin See Profile :

said by tekmunki See Profile :

but the latency reports back 1000ms 1000ms 0ms 0ms 1000ms... Mind you, this is directly using the phone browser.

That browser (some phone browsers) are unable to do sub-second timings so you either get a full second, or zero seconds. Sorry. I should be able recalculate an average latency from 10 latencies like that, though, so all is not lost.
That makes sense. Thanks. I was using IE/WM5 on a Moto Q. Using tethering and a Vista PC, I get around 200-250ms.
--
TekMunki
"There are 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't."

www.tekmunki.com
Time4aNAP
Premium
join:2007-04-09
Des Plaines, IL
·Speakeasy
·Comcast

Latency with TCP can be very different from latency with ICMP. That's my guess.

Personally I don't get why so much attention is paid to latency. I know that it's a big deal for gamers. Are 95% of all Internet users there just for games?

Any IP latency pales in comparison to the latency caused by the multiple DNS lookups that have become the norm on most popular websites. Everything else that I care about can be buffered.

justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
Brooklyn, NY

Host:
IPv6
Webmasters and Dev..
Business Connectiv..
Home/Office setup ..
Console/Handheld g..

edit:
July 9th, @12:30PM

Re: Question...

Click for full size
here is why. To "complete" loading a page, even a well designed one like news.yahoo.com, there are too many requests to do all in parallel (on default configured browsers) and some requests wait, or are caused by, the completed loading of previous requests.

Anything with terrible latency multiplies perceived loading time many times as the serial nature of some of the request blocks involves waiting for the turnaround multiple times.

The DNS issue is different and IMO less important, if you use a site you've previously used, it is probably cached (unless the site uses a variety of different and annoying ad services which always seem to involve new DNS lookups).

Anyone based overseas using US sites immediately recognizes how annoying a high latency connection becomes, and that involes usually no more than a 250ms turnaround. If a wireless network tends to offer 500ms or more latency then you are standing the equivalent of 24,000 miles away from the site. This can be annoying if you're actually standing on a san francisco street, trying to load news.yahoo.com.

Blasterbator
Sent By Grocery Clerks

join:2001-02-20
Jackson, MS
·Cox HSI


edit:
July 9th, @10:58AM

Finally...

Latency has always been my biggest gripe about EDGE.

Depending upon what city I'm in, I get 128Kbps to 256Kbps "speed" with EDGE on my Nokia E50, but it's the latency of the EDGE network that hampers the web browsing experience.

I'd like to compare the tracert to a particular website between EDGE and my traditional Internet connection.

djrobx

join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
·AT&T U-Verse
·RoadRunner Cable
·Time Warner VOIP
·DSL EXTREME

Err, EDGE isn't THAT bad...

On my Blackjack, I see speed tests up to around 240kbps, and latency as low as 200ms when the phone is on EDGE.

The behavior you describe (~60kbps, 500ms latency) is almost exactly what I used to see from my older EDGE capable phones. I'm told this is because they were not class 10 EDGE, but my HTC 3125 that performed poorly claimed to support class 10.

For whatever reason, our 3G capable Blackjack and 8525s perform MUCH better on the Edge network.
--
Laser eye surgery rocks! I love frickin' laser beams.

justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
Brooklyn, NY

Host:
IPv6
Webmasters and Dev..
Business Connectiv..
Home/Office setup ..
Console/Handheld g..

Re: Err, EDGE isn't THAT bad...

said by djrobx See Profile :

The behavior you describe (~60kbps, 500ms latency) is almost exactly what I used to see from my older EDGE capable phones. I'm told this is because they were not class 10 EDGE, but my HTC 3125 that performed poorly claimed to support class 10.
Does anyone know if iphone is Edge class 10 capable, and confrmed as operating at 240kbit ?

kfsutops
Premium
join:2002-08-19
Brandon, FL
clubs:
·RoadRunner Cable

You must have something there. My Blackjack is the same thing. I get on average about 200k on edge.

Closer to 1000k when on the 3g network.

I haven't (and probably won't) run this speedtest they are talking of.

Edge isn't so bad on my blackjack...there definitely is some latency going on though.
--
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots"

gdm
Premium,MVM
join:2001-06-15
Mchenry, IL
clubs:

Re: Err, EDGE isn't THAT bad...

I agree my BJ works pretty good in Edge areas. I will test it later tonight. To me ATT's EDGE works better then Sprints or Verizon non EVDO areas.
bignate

join:2005-12-05
Austin, TX

Re: Err, EDGE isn't THAT bad...

my att 8525 on EDGE gets about 175 down, and 80 up but with avergae ping times of 500-600ms...8(

huntml

join:2002-01-23
Mullica Hill, NJ
True. But there's A LOT more EDGE only area on ATT's map than there is 1XRTT on Sprint's and VZ's maps.

gdm
Premium,MVM
join:2001-06-15
Mchenry, IL
clubs:

Re: Err, EDGE isn't THAT bad...

True but I do go to places that are rural and when I had verizon it worked for crap. With ATT I at least get email and I can surf the web mainly for scores and weather.

huntml

join:2002-01-23
Mullica Hill, NJ

Re: Err, EDGE isn't THAT bad...

It's like everything else, whatever works for you.

I live in metro PHL, and Sprint (my carrier) and ATTW both have 3g deployed in this area, and actually ATT is on average a bit faster. So if it was only about speed in my home market (and I didn't mind paying a bit more for speed, being capped, and not being able to stream stuff to my phone, etc....), ATTW wouldn't be a bad choice for me.

But when I go visit family in rural VA I can still get 3g while my sister gets very slow EDGE (like dialup speed).

ATTW won't even show their 3g coverage on their national map: you have to zoom in to like street level before they'll show it!

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

Re: Err, EDGE isn't THAT bad...

just enter the state (no city, zip or street)
after it shows the state, click on 3g.
--
Canada = Hollywood North

justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
Brooklyn, NY
Yeah actually I looked at the dump of our older mobile speed test, and iPhones are logging between 48kbit and 175kbit max over EDGE (I ignored all the wifi connected examples), but with even worse recorded latencies. Interesting.

Bink63
It's fuk-u, doo me
Premium
join:2002-10-06
Everywhere

Re: Err, EDGE isn't THAT bad...

I can't get this to run on my Sprint CrackBerry 8830.

I click the start button and get no activity and the ????? remain between the latency and speed labels.

Regards,

Randy
--
Go Sox, and take Grossman with you!!!!
»www.uspctechs.com

justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
Brooklyn, NY

Re: Err, EDGE isn't THAT bad...

yeah blackberrys suck for anything like this. All the web pages pass via a proxy server in canada, and the blackberry browser is broken with almost no javascript capability at all.

See 8 replies to this post

TK Junk Mail
Go ahead, make my day
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Margate City, NJ
clubs:
I like the results of the tinyspeed test on my Comcast HSI connection:
Latency:
24ms
21ms
30ms
27ms
20ms
28ms
25ms
21ms
23ms
21ms

Speed:
27744kbps

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
My Samsung ZX-20 is rated as as Class 10 EDGE device... best I've receieved through tethering was ~146kbps ... of course, I've only tried it a couple times, as 3G is finally deployed here.
--
Canada = Hollywood North

biggbrother
Premium
join:2001-11-07
Providence, RI

I just ran that "Small Speed Test" on my HTC MDA on the T-Mobile Edge network and I got 173 kbps but crazy latency of 958ms.. with up to 1231ms at times.
--
"Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them." -- George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four.
ignatiuskc

join:2006-02-13
00000

edit:
July 9th, @11:39AM

Edge

What's the surprise? Edge is slower.
ossito16

join:2004-07-31
Whiting, IN

Chance for Treo or Blackberry

Well to me this all seems like a bust for the iphone. The hype created sold the initial phones. I think either Treo or Bberry can go for the kill in the smartphone war. All someone needs to come up with is a small well-built phone, with qwerty, REAL wifi, 2+ megapixel camera/video, gps, 1gb memory, and tons of 3rd party applications. Release to all carriers and the fight will have been won for good.

exocet_cm
Signal 26's Rock
Premium
join:2003-03-23
New Orleans, LA
clubs:

Re: Chance for Treo or Blackberry

This is why I am keeping my Crackberry.
bignate

join:2005-12-05
Austin, TX

i have been wondering about memory in smart phones for a while. i have an 8525 and i love it but it only has about 50mb of useable space on it. with the small size and cheap cost of memory these days i just cant understand why they dont put a couple gig of memory in these smartphones today.
ossito16

join:2004-07-31
Whiting, IN

Re: Chance for Treo or Blackberry

said by bignate See Profile :

i have been wondering about memory in smart phones for a while. i have an 8525 and i love it but it only has about 50mb of useable space on it. with the small size and cheap cost of memory these days i just cant understand why they dont put a couple gig of memory in these smartphones today.
Luckily for me I have the Treo 650 and I can just slap in a 1gb sd card and load itup with games, music, etc.

tigers

join:2001-01-14
Irmo, SC

iphone test

Well I just ran it twice here on my iphone. Got 5/5 bars on the signal strength in downtown Columbia, SC.

1st Test:
Latency:
3457,264,178,219,644,6062,471,2600,1177,297

Speed: 350kbps

Second Test
Latency:
1391,596,627,595,539,617,625,709,577,617

Speed: 108kbps

I don't know why the first test showed such a higher speed. I'm definitely not connected to wi-fi or anything.

justin
Australian
join:1999-05-28
Brooklyn, NY

Re: iphone test

The first test had awful latencies, perhaps some of the 10 parallel test transfers failed leading to an optimistic speed.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
3G does a bit better
Latency:427ms 190ms 180ms 250ms 180ms 180ms 242ms 177ms 206ms 174ms

Speed: 680kbps
--
Canada = Hollywood North

jgkolt
Premium
join:2004-02-21
Lakewood, OH
clubs:

iPhone version 2

We knew there would be huge hype for this iPhone, that was a given. They are leaving it open to have the iPhone version 2 to make up all that they are lackign now. As a consumer i hate this since they release a product that they know will be outdated when they sell it. Now on thier side the more phones they sell the less expensive the r and d will be so they can bump up to the next version with little cost and sell it with large profits. thats how i see it.
--
www.LakeSemaJ.com

Titus Pullo
I came, I saw, I slept

join:2004-06-26
·Embarq

Re: iPhone version 2

said by jgkolt See Profile :

We knew there would be huge hype for this iPhone, that was a given. They are leaving it open to have the iPhone version 2 to make up all that they are lackign now.
The margin on this thing, if you're to believe the scuttlebutt, is a stockholders dream now. Hype was key, because ver. 2 won't have it (unless it flies out of Jobby Jobs arse during a keynote). They'll leverage some sort of convergence and add the oh-so-obviously missing features of ver 1. Toss in the old more storage trick (and gouging you for it with ridiculous markups on flash memory), and it'll be stockholders day part 2. I'll stick with a standard cell and my Macs.
--
The woman from 1984 put down her hammer for an iMac®, iPod® & iPhone®

Need BB

join:2001-12-21
Westwood, MA

Re: iPhone version 2

Verizon Wireless EVDO Rev. A:

Latency: 200ms120ms121ms120ms110ms120ms130ms120ms120ms140ms
Speed: 1922kbps
--
AWD Turbo Power
petecellar

join:2002-10-15
Philadelphia, PA

No Flash or Java?

...and the battery is soldered in.

What the hell are people paying for?

FiL
Premium
join:2005-08-16
Silver Spring, MD

Re: No Flash or Java?

The look...

People just like having button-less pieces of crap up against their faces.

The Linux based phone looks REAL good; if it drops, I'm buying it off the break. Thats a phone people could actually USE, and look kinda cool while at it...:)

coolnessfactor

@Miami.EDU

like oh em gee! it's got to be the totally kick ass and reliable service from the Deathst... err Ma Bel.... err AT&T and the totally crazy coolness factor!
GunnarDanne

join:2002-12-02
Crown City, OH

3g

My new RAZR pulls down 3g most of the time. Sites load nearly as fast as they would on my pc. Occasionally it connects through EDGE and uh.. yea...
mrvoice

join:2001-02-22
Northridge, CA

IPHONE & Slow Network

For me to switch. They better get the new Iphone 2.0 hardware to support 3G. Second, offer other carriers in addition to AT&T (Cingular is the Worst)

Make Iphone work with Sprint's EVDO Network and you've got a deal.

Broadband speed with Verizon with also be cool. But none of this GSM phone garbage.

It's a nice toy, but too pricey and low performance. I'll keep my $39.99/mo free incoming minutes 24/7 from sprint Thank You very much.

en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA
·DSL EXTREME
·DSL EXTREME

Re: IPHONE & Slow Network

Yuck... Sprint has the worst coverage in So-Cal. I'd be roaming on Verizon Wireless all the time.

Personally I'd take AT&T's 3G over EVDO..

I'll keep my $50 for 2 lines with 750 minutes + rollover (2600+ 2800 'bonus' rollover).

I'll admit.. I'd take Sprint over Verizon Wireless though (too much bad history in Northridge for me).
--
Canada = Hollywood North

DPain
Premium
join:2004-02-19

Re: IPHONE & Slow Network

Lil off topic :P but here is a speed test with my brand spanking new mogul from sprint.. cant wait for evdo revision A

Need BB

join:2001-12-21
Westwood, MA

edit:
July 9th, @10:45PM

Re: IPHONE & Slow Network

REV A is super. My pings are usually between 80-150ms which is good enough for VOIP and gaming.

»/linequality/nil/2244946

--
AWD Turbo Power

DPain
Premium
join:2004-02-19


edit:
July 9th, @11:34PM

Re: IPHONE & Slow Network

Rgr..I haven't tried to tether it yet and test my pings in game.. but it's something to consider... if I do get decent speeds and latencies once rev A comes out will cancel my backup dsl line which is basically costing me same as sprint's cheapest data plan 15.00

RadioDoc
Sortofadog
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
Chicago, IL
·AT&T Midwest

More HSDPA results for you

Here's another AT&T 3G data point for you:

Latency:
240ms
230ms
241ms
250ms
250ms
261ms
240ms
230ms
261ms
250ms

Speed:
660kbps

This is with my LG CU500V tethered to my laptop and only one "bar" signal.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange.

barqsdrinker
What Can I Photograph Today?
Premium
join:2001-02-26
Apo, AE
clubs:

Is this reasonable??

First off, with the last post being on the 11th of July, I hope that someone will see this message.

I am currently stationed in Kuwait in the middle of the desert. My only option is via 3G service and using my cellphone as a modem. (Interestingly enough, the 3G is down and only EDGE is working right now.) From what I've been told, the tower that I connect to only has a "radio shot" to the next tower. There are multiple towers all with radio relays for about 60 km until it reaches towers that are cabled.

I also understand the route back to DSLR is quite a physical haul (9 timezones, oceanic cable, etc).

So my question is: does this result from the iPhone test look reasonable as tested from here in Kuwait??

Latency:
2161ms
1085ms
972ms
936ms
916ms
853ms
975ms
1137ms
921ms
960ms

Speed:
86kbps

Many thanks!
--
Thanks for reading!
Forums » iPhone speed test

Saturday, 26-Jul
18:05:28
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
8th year online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.republican-creole