jaykaykay
 | I don't know diddly about one lens or another, but I do know art when I see it. I know this is supposed to be a macro, and it is, but it's also super artistic. hey mods · » Monday August 7th, @11:01PM
|
quibbly
 | Thank you jaykay. I try to improve with each image. Have to say, Macro is a hard area. Too bad the equipment is sooooooo expensive. hey mods · » Monday August 7th, @11:28PM
|
Gemologist
 | It isn't the lens. The Sigma 105mm macro produces as much detail as Canon or any other 90/100/105mm macro lens. Judging from the shot it looks more like lack of DOF and camera shake to me is what caused the missing details. hey mods · » Tuesday August 8th, @01:25AM
|
quibbly
| might be lack of dof but no camera shake. Using tripod and electronic shutter release. Seems every macro comes out this way. Is it possible the lense is defective? hey mods · » Tuesday August 8th, @01:42AM
|
Gemologist
| Possible but I honestly doubt it. It looks much more like user error to me. Try leaving the EXIF intact on a few so I can see what settings you are using. hey mods · » Thursday August 10th, @03:01AM
|
Stooges Fan
 |
Incredible shot.hey mods · » Sunday November 4th, @05:05AM
|
) 
