Welcome · log in · join

Feedback → Re: Multiple selection polls request

uniqs
5

Pacrat Old and Cranky MVM join:2001-03-10 Cortland, OH	Pacrat to Shanto20 MVM 2005-Mar-1 3:56 pm to Shanto20 Re: Multiple selection polls request My guess would be... •Priority •Available Programming Resources •Overall desireability Just because comparatively quite a few folks want it, does not mean it's going to happen.
	· actions · 2005-Mar-1 3:56 pm ·
Jehu Premium Member join:2002-09-13 MA	Jehu Premium Member 2005-Mar-1 4:41 pm said by Pacrat: Just because comparatively quite a few folks want it, does not mean it's going to happen. Yes, this is a forum for suggesting and discussing new additions. Only the powers that be in the end decide whether or not to actually implement a suggestion.
	· actions · 2005-Mar-1 4:41 pm ·
alien9999999 Your Head Looks Nice Premium Member join:2002-05-21 B-3000	alien9999999 Premium Member 2005-Mar-1 7:03 pm said by Jehu: said by Pacrat: Just because comparatively quite a few folks want it, does not mean it's going to happen. Yes, this is a forum for suggesting and discussing new additions. Only the powers that be in the end decide whether or not to actually implement a suggestion. ---> justin
	· actions · 2005-Mar-1 7:03 pm ·

Forums → The Site → Feedback	« [request] CLLI search filed in CO finder • Tweak and Speed tests hangin »
This is a sub-selection from [request] Multiple selection polls request