<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;[XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!&#x27; in forum &#x27;Networking&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13265046</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 13:52:44 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2022 13:52:44 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13920483</link>
<description><![CDATA[Kirby Smith posted : I can't answer for foneguy, but I can report that my 502 is still working fine; present uptime is about 106 days since a power failure that eventually overcame my UPS capacity.  It presently has around 450 connections in various states and is using 4% of its CPU.  I don't run VPN thru it, so I cannot provide any experience there.<br><br>I run my Xincom in dual wan shared 70/30 mode between two DSL lines of different bandwidth.  I run Azureus bit torrent client set to use 50% of the total up bandwidth, and tie the appropriate mail server addresses to the appropriate WANs.  QOS gives priority to time service and surfing.<br><br>Bandwidth sharing of course cannot, at least with a 502, operate with precognition and actual sharing will depend on what different connections will supply or ask for.<br><br>kirby]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13920483</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 10:50:03 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13897502</link>
<description><![CDATA[tenpin784 posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/746600" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=746600');">foneguy9</a>:</SMALL><br><br>Setup on the Network with WAN port 1 for DSL(PPOE) and WAN Port 2 for Cable Modem. I can see I am using both WAN ports for DL and Web surfing.  I still need to see how I can tweak it any. <br>Connections are working with a Dlink DI614+ for Wireless.  <br><br>....<br><br>I'll put together the network diagram for all...<br> </DIV>Foneguy, <br><br>How you making out with this?? You said your able to see that your using both ports for download and web surfing...does this mean you actually see an increase in speeds?<br><br>I am also looking at a solution like this, but im going more towards the speed end. <br><br>and hows that network diagram coming :)<br><br>Very interested, let us know :)<br><br>John<br><SMALL>--<br>Dream as if you'll live forever, live as if you'll die today.<BR><BR>Disclaimer: These are MY comments, my emplyer cant be held responsible.</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13897502</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:01:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13449242</link>
<description><![CDATA[foneguy9 posted : Here it is...<br>I purchased from Eagle Store the Xincom 502 for 132.00.<br><br>Setup on the Network with WAN port 1 for DSL(PPOE) and WAN Port 2 for Cable Modem. I can see I am using both WAN ports for DL and Web surfing.  I still need to see how I can tweak it any. <br>Connections are working with a Dlink DI614+ for Wireless.  <br><br>YESSS:>>><br><br>I still need to setup the Dlink 804HV for the VPN and setup the passthrough to it.  <br>Also, I need to setup my NEC phone, it is connecting to the Voice server, however, no voice Packets(UDP being held up in this setup).  I could use it as an expensive and fancy clock<br>:)<br><br>I'll put together the network diagram for all...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13449242</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2005 20:34:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13318713</link>
<description><![CDATA[Nightfall posted : Ok, my take.<br><br>My company currently has a Fortinet FGT200 at our main facility and a smaller FGT60 at our remote Atlanta facility.  They both work flawlessly.  We use it for not only firewall, but content filtering, antivirus, and VPN.  It wasn't difficult to set up to be honest.  It did take a little reading though as well as a call to tech support initially.  :)<br><br>I have a Linksys RV082 router with dual WAN capabilities.  I don't have the dual WAN running at my place, but I have set up a dual WAN with this router at a friends.  It works great as well.  Neither myself or my friend who I set this up for has had to reboot the router yet.  Now that is uptime!<br><br>If you are recommending a dual WAN solution for a company, I can recommend Fortinet.  The extra cost of antivirus scanning as well as content filtering are easy to justify, especially for a work environment.  The content filtering is $1000 a year for the FGT200, but it is cheaper for the lower models.  Advantage is that I don't have to babysit the employees anymore.  :)<br><br>However, for home, I can recommend the Linksys RV0 series of routers.  I know there are other dual wan routers out there.  I used to have a Nexland and those were nice until Symantec took them over.  Now the support sucks pretty badly.  :(<br><SMALL>--<br><A HREF="http://www.nightfall.net">My Domain</A><BR><A HREF="http://cbdudek.livejournal.com">Nightfall's Hockey and Life Journal</A></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13318713</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 10:13:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13318388</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : I think your choices are right. The Xincom 502 will provide the dual wan, it should pass through the VPN from your other router.  To be sure contact Xincom tech support directly and state your situation.  The ZyWALL 35 at approx 700$ is certainly a business priced unit (claim as a business expense) and hard for the household to handle. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13318388</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 09:18:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13317424</link>
<description><![CDATA[foneguy9 posted : I believe I will be doing the following:<br>For the Dual Wan connection, fail-over, load balancing, <br>The Xincom XC-DPG502 TWIN WAN ROUTER 4PORT 10/100BTX<br>@ $150.00<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www1.bottomdollar.com/p__Global_Marketing_Partners_XC_DPG502_TWIN_WAN_ROUTER_4PORT_10_100BTX_BY_XINCOM_XC_DPG502,__3094847//" >www1.bottomdollar.com/p_ &middot;&middot;&middot; 094847//</A><br><br>I will make do without the dial up backup and bandwidth aggregation.<br><br>I have an Existing 8 port Switch which I will connect to one of the Xincom ports.  Every other device will be attached to this switch. <br><br>Now, My question now is:<br>For the VPN portion, will an existing Dlink DI-804HV work BEHIND the Xincom?  <br>I have established gateway to gateway and client to gateway VPN connections with this device connected directly to either the DSL or Cable WAN.  <br>I have sent an email to Dlink support and Xincom, but haven't got a response yet.  <br><br>Any thoughts?<br><br>(The DI-804HV is a 4-port Ethernet Broadband Router with VPN (Virtual Private Network) capabilities. The VPN feature allows users to securely connect multiple computers over the Internet. It also features 10/100Mbps Auto MDIX Ethernet ports allowing CAT 5 cable (straight-through or crossover) to work with the DI-804HV.<br><br>The DI-804HV includes a new setup wizard and D-Link&#146;s easy-to-use web-based graphical user interface (GUI) to help users configure network settings with a few simple clicks. With its built-in firewall protection, this router will also help to prevent unwanted Internet intruders from accessing your private network. <br><br>Oh, and by the way, if I didn't have the DI-804HV already, and I needed the VPN connection(s) more often, I would definately go with the ZyWALL 35!!!!!:o <br><br>Also, the price is somewhat still above my budget...<br>Still the possibility of getting this device when I can get additional funds funneled for it!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13317424</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2005 02:55:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13304077</link>
<description><![CDATA[Freezone posted : Inbound load balancing started with if and buts. In any case if the claims of fate pipe and xincom are true then we have a way to do the"Impossible"<br><br>Too bad after an extensive google search I could only find reviews on the 602 with smal references to the 603.<br><br>I have to agree with ANAV there is simply not enough data from real users to support their claims.  <br><br>However the good news is that the 603 is $520+ which is much lower than the $799 on the xincom site. If it drops below $400 I will take the plunge on one for the inbound loadbalancing, however I will be up for testing with others.  <br><br>Would be great if xincom sent out 603 to some test sites.  <br>Someone in another forum said that they believe the proc on the 603 would choke under the load that dual wan vpn would cuase.  Perhaps that is true.  I remember when the pro800 turbo did noteven work for lodbalancing and the makers did not seem to have an understanding of their own tech untill one year after release and much user input.  We were rewarded with the symantec purchase :)]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13304077</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 13:23:01 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13303402</link>
<description><![CDATA[Shootist posted : Maybe but that is a lot of IFs ANDs and BUTs. But you would still only have 12Mbs - overhead. God for all equipment needed and the fact that you would need to have a office connection greater than the total of your home connections and then working it all out with whomever runs the office network what do you really gain. Nothing.<br><br>If you own the office and the fast 100Mbs connection at the office you can afford to install a fast line at your home. And then just how fast does your home connection really need to be.<br><SMALL>--<br>Shooter Ready--Stand By      BEEP    <B>********</B></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13303402</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 11:24:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13301947</link>
<description><![CDATA[Freezone posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/977927" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=977927');">michaelr7</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR> <br>No.<br><br>You have an amount of bandwidth at home (1.5mbps, 3.0 mbps, or whatever you are paying your ISP for).  That is all you have.  <B>To get more bandwidth you need to buy it from an ISP.</B>  Once you buy more bandwidth the 603 will allow you to combine the bandwidth if you bought the bandwidth from two different ISPs <B>but only to the 603 you are connecting to (the office in your example)</B>.<br> </DIV>You ar enot understanding my question or I am not understanding your answer.  What I want to know again is the 603 or fatpipe a way to get arround binding connections with out the isp.  <br><br>So lets say you office has a 100mb connection.  Lets say you have 2 6mb connections at home.  You and the office both have fat pipe or the 603.  Would you be able to connect first to the office with vpn aggr4egating through fate pipe or the 603 and then through the office vpn connection be able to get out to the internet at the full 12mb minus the vpn overhead?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13301947</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 01 May 2005 02:07:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13298434</link>
<description><![CDATA[michaelr7 posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>Close I am asking is if the office has a much faster internet connection and I vpn to the office using a 603 would I in fact be using both connections aggregate?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>No.<br><br>You have an amount of bandwidth at home (1.5mbps, 3.0 mbps, or whatever you are paying your ISP for).  That is all you have.  <B>To get more bandwidth you need to buy it from an ISP.</B>  Once you buy more bandwidth the 603 will allow you to combine the bandwidth if you bought the bandwidth from two different ISPs <B>but only to the 603 you are connecting to (the office in your example)</B>.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13298434</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:58:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13297117</link>
<description><![CDATA[Shootist posted : No if you connect to the office that has a 3Mbs connection FROM a connection that is only 1.5 that is all you can get, the 1.5.<br><br>You and ALL, and I do mean ALL, the people that post to threads like this with statements and or questions about this or that hardware making it possible to <B>COMBINE</B> 2 or more connection <B>need to read up of the whole internet/(TCP/IP)/networking/protocol/packet transfer system</B>.<br><br>It CAN NOT BE DONE. Just how many times does it need to be stated.<br><SMALL>--<br>Shooter Ready--Stand By      BEEP    <B>********</B></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13297117</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:32:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13297024</link>
<description><![CDATA[Freezone posted : Close I am asking is if the office has a much faster internet connection and I vpn to the office using a 603 would I in fact be using both connections aggregate?  This seems like it would make the impossible possible. Further if that would work then could a service be created that would allow people to use it as a proxy to the internet that all the service did was combine two connections.  <br><br>What would the cost of vpn overhead be on total bandwidth?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13297024</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:15:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13293920</link>
<description><![CDATA[michaelr7 posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>Lets say your office has a 603 and you do also. Then lets say your office has a much faster internet connection then your home. Using vpn aggregation would you not be able to connect through the office and then connect to the internet to infact have both connections act as one since the vpn aggregation would be combining them?<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>I am not sure I understand what you are asking.  If you and the office both have the same device then you can setup a VPN connection to the office.  but it doesn't matter what connect your office has - you are still limited by the speed of your connection.  If you obtain a second connection and setup a tunnel using each ISP and the 603s work properly then you could get the total bandwidth of each of your connections to/from the office.  However any traffic which does not go via the office will only get the bandwidth of one or the other ISP connections.<br><br>Is this what you are asking?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13293920</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 22:07:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13291134</link>
<description><![CDATA[Shootist posted : The only mention of COMBINING from FatPipe is with T3/T1 lines. They do mention a lot about failover/failsafe redundancy connections with multiple ISPs but there is no reference to combining a DSL and cable connection to form one big pipe and then most of there hype is about VPN connection between locations using multiple ISPs not about making one big pipe to the real NET.<br><SMALL>--<br>Shooter Ready--Stand By      BEEP    <B>********</B></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13291134</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:55:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13290814</link>
<description><![CDATA[wifi4milez posted : I would also like to know if anyone has used the FatPipe or Xincom aggregators. I have seen a number of people in this forum state that what these companies are claiming to offer is impossible without ISP support, and I just want to get to the bottom of it! If these vendors are making misleading or downright false statements then it should be dealt with. FatPipe is a certified partner of ours and if their CPE <B>doesnt</B> do what it says then that is a serious issue that must be addressed. If anyone can provide further insight into this matter(specific to the CPE in question) it would really help me, and all the other people who are curious about this topic. <br><SMALL>--<br><B>I like dogs, guns, and cheeseburgers. Whats your malfunction?</B></SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13290814</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:14:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13289463</link>
<description><![CDATA[Freezone posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/977927" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=977927');">michaelr7</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR> <br>What everyone says is impossible it just what I described.  And it is still impossible.<br> </DIV>I believe I understand your point, but what I am sying is this.<br><br>If you can agregate connections via vpn with equipment on both ends bypassing the isp alltogether, then one could have the desired efffect of combining 2 connections into a single one.<br>This would not be a cheap solution to start but over time I could imagine it falling in price.<br><br>Lets say your office has a 603 and you do also.  Then lets say your office has a much faster internet connection then your home.  Using vpn aggregation would you not be able to connect through the office and then connect to the internet to infact have both connections act as one since the vpn aggregation would be combining them?<br><br>Where am I going wrong?  And sure this is not cheap but prices will fall.  I could see where my friend would have a fiber connection and I am stuck with 2 dsl and he would act as a proxy for me and the isp need not be involved. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13289463</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:08:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13287207</link>
<description><![CDATA[michaelr7 posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>And the fact that this exist for me at least is proof of concept of a proxy like service that could do the "impossible"<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>You mis-understand the point.  No message I have seen on this site has ever said or even implied that using multiple VPN point-to-point tunnels was impossible.  It has been possible (and has been done) for a while.  In fact you could do this with just about any encapsulation you can think of as long as both ends agree.<br><br>What everyone says is impossible it just what I described.  And it is still impossible.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13287207</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 01:06:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13285718</link>
<description><![CDATA[KCB_PDX posted : I'm sure that is a large part of the problem.  My cable and DSL modems, along with the Xincom and Netgear devices are all connected to a good UPS system.  <br><br>Can you give me the name of the website in order to test my 502 on the site?<br><SMALL>--<br>"The City That Works" - slogan for the City of Portland</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13285718</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 21:36:29 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13279667</link>
<description><![CDATA[Freezone posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/838260" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=838260');">KCB_PDX</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>I have had no problems whatsoever with the 502 rebooting.  The only reason it is not showing a longer uptime is because a wireless device was added and I had to flush IP and DNS information.<br><br></DIV>I have found that many routers are very sensitive to "BAD" power.  It may be a good idea to keep them on a ups to clean the power.  Also I have found that certain rare websites can cause some routers to have issues with that site.  My 502 sffuers the same issue that linksys routers seem to have accessing local real-estate multilist website.  The work arround is a temp sight they provide people like myself with router issues with their sight.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13279667</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 07:24:08 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13279649</link>
<description><![CDATA[Freezone posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/977927" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=977927');">michaelr7</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR> But aggregation of VPNs between the same end points is not what most people mean when they ask about getting two broadband connections and doubling their download speed.<br> </DIV>But for many at work at home people this is a way to accomplish just that.  And the fact that this exist for me at least is proof of concept of a proxy like service that could do the "impossible" <br><br>I have seen so much mis information given here over the years.  things like you can not use all the bandwidth on 1 pc where I can do that with out a router at all using rout tables in windows.  That being an example.<br><br>And what is now an enterprise solution could very wel come to the masses in a few years if history is any indication.<br><br>Inbound load balancing is now a viable option for many now and new to soho market.  TZO sold a service at one time for it, but  now their are routers that authorize their own dns which trivilize the problem.  <br><br>The real question I have is who is using fatepipe or dual 603s and how well does it work?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13279649</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 07:17:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13278791</link>
<description><![CDATA[foneguy9 posted : This was from Dunga Bee:<br>Re: Recommendations for VPN Router for Telecommuter?<br><br>You may want to look at something like m0n0wall. »m0n0.ch/wall<br><br>It's a very feature rich and free firewall based on BSD.<br><br>It's designed to be installed on a solid state (no HDD) box like a Wrap. These can be purchased with 2-3 NICs in them for around $150 or less. I believe the m0n0 site has info on where you can purchase them.<br><br>m0n0 can also be installed on a normal low end PC as well, if you or the users have any to spare.<br><br>I've been using m0n0 and a m0n0 derivative pfSense (»www.pfsense.com) for some time now and have been amazed with the amount of power and flexibility they offer for free. IMHO, unless I really needed something that only a high end Cisco unit needed, I would use m0n0 or pfSense anyplace I needed a firewall.<br><br>Check them out and see what you think.<br><br>foneguy9:<br>Also says the m0n0 will have dual WAN capability... Not yet though...<br>I still sifting through the hardware options...]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13278791</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 01:08:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13278716</link>
<description><![CDATA[sweintz posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/746600" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=746600');">foneguy9</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>Check what these guys say!!<br>Ha...<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.networkingsmallbusiness.com/reviews/2004/0913rev.html" >www.networkingsmallbusin &middot;&middot;&middot; rev.html</A><br> </DIV>Interesting what they say about the tz170. I'm a big fan of sonicwalls, but haven't used any of the tz series boxes. I have spoken to a few folks that hated them, though. Not sure if was really the boxes were as bad as they described, but I have heard reports of randomly dropped TCP streams that these folks SWEAR are not problems with their ISP connection, etc. <br><br>They HAVE had a run of bugs that should have never gotten past the beta - right now for instance my box (a pro4060) refuses to advertise the default route to my LAN routers over ospf.(even tho I have it specifically configured to do so)  Sort of a drawback for a device intended to be used as an internet gateway. It advertises it's VPN routes just fine, just not the default route. Not the kind of bug that should slip through testing before the code is released.<br><br>I get the feeling management is pushing their programmers a little to hard to hurry up and get the code out the door.<br><br>Go to www.sonicusers.com, and search the discussion board for posts that contain the phrase "stable firmware" and you'll see what I am refering to.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13278716</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:51:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13278704</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : Reviews can be quickly irrelevant with firmware changes but certainly provide some measure of investigation.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13278704</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:50:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13278548</link>
<description><![CDATA[foneguy9 posted : Check what these guys say!!<br>Ha...<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.networkingsmallbusiness.com/reviews/2004/0913rev.html" >www.networkingsmallbusin &middot;&middot;&middot; rev.html</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13278548</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:23:35 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13278508</link>
<description><![CDATA[sweintz posted : another option (for comparison sake)-<br><br>sonicwall tz170sp - about $600 street. 1 wan port, 5 lan, serial for dial backup, and one "opotional" ethernet port which becomes a second wan port that willl load balance if you buy the enhanced firmware, which will run another $425. So just over a grand street price. <br><br>I give this for comparison to the other recommendations here only, since it meets yoyur spec. I do NOT recommend it. I have never used one, but from what I have heard sonicwall seems to be struggling to resolve the bugs in their lower end boxes such as this.<br><br>That said, it does have some nice options (that cost extra of course) such as content filtering, anti-virus at the firewall (looks into the TCP streams on the fly), anti-spyawre that works the same way, email filtering, dnsrbl list spam filtering, a "snort like" signature based IDS system on the firewall, etc. They tried to make it like a swiss army knife.<br><br>I know on the higher end boxes they make that all works quite well for the most part and makes a nice supplement to server and desktop based anti virus,anti spam, etc. I hear otherwise about the lower end boxes. To many bugs keep popping up in the firmware. In fact the latest rev of the enhanced firmware has been held in beta for almost 5 months now after it was released for the higher end boxes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13278508</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:17:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13277699</link>
<description><![CDATA[KCB_PDX posted : I have had no problems whatsoever with the 502 rebooting.  The only reason it is not showing a longer uptime is because a wireless device was added and I had to flush IP and DNS information.<br><br>Device Statistics<br>System UpTime 	19d 23h 44m 51s since 2005/04/07 19:40:23 <br>CPU Usage 	2 % <br>Memory Usage 	Heap 	1%<br>Queue 	        2%<br><SMALL>--<br>"The City That Works" - slogan for the City of Portland</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13277699</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 22:32:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13276864</link>
<description><![CDATA[michaelr7 posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>Don't know much about Fortinet<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>I tried once to use a Fortinet device to connect to a non-Fortinet device.  Didn't work correctly.  The Fortinet device had a lot of things hard-coded instead of allowing the user to configure them.  And the hard-coded values are sometimes not ones other vendors use or even support.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13276864</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:07:39 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13276837</link>
<description><![CDATA[michaelr7 posted :  <BLOCKQUOTE><SMALL>quote:</SMALL><HR>Anav but for years people have sworn up and down how that was not possible, and yet here we are with xincom and fat pipe offering solutions.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><br>What most people have sworn is not possible is for a user to get the total bandwidth of both ISPs when accessing a single site.  Accessing multiple sites you can get the total bandwidth if each individual site maximizes a single link.<br><br>The functionality mentioned above which maximizes traffic over two or more VPNs is standard on most enterprise class routers when the end points are the same for each VPN (or the end points work together) and the brand of router is the same on both ends.  (I have 4 VPN tunnels - two primary and two backup - for this purpose.)<br><br>But aggregation of VPNs between the same end points is not what most people mean when they ask about getting two broadband connections and doubling their download speed.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13276837</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:04:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13272469</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : Don't know much about Fortinet, They are 1.0d certified like the ZyWALL but not 1.1D certified (digital certificates).  If you can locate a user guide to download and read that would be good for starters....]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13272469</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:29:14 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13272260</link>
<description><![CDATA[Freezone posted : There seems to be a lot of vendors in the space. What I worry about is  firmware and what is the companies support track record.  <br><br>Also look at their manual and read as much as you can stand to get a feel for them.  <br><br>I have learned the hardway that you get what you pay for in this space.  I have 2 hawking paper weights.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13272260</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 12:05:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13271921</link>
<description><![CDATA[foneguy9 posted : I was skimming through another post and found this product.  Anyone familiar with it???<br>Could it be a contender?<br><br>FortiGate-60  	   	<br>The FortiGate-60 system is an ideal solution for small offices. The FortiGate-60 features dual WAN link support for redundant internet connections, and an integrated 4-port switch that eliminates the need for an external hub or switch, giving networked devices a direct connection to the FortiGate-60.<br>	<br><br>    * Dual WAN link support for redundant Internet connections, and an integrated 4-port switch provide flexible deployment<br>    * Delivers superior performance and reliability from hardware accelerated, ASIC-based architecture ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13271921</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:22:06 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13271845</link>
<description><![CDATA[Freezone posted : Anav but for years people have sworn up and down how that was not possible, and yet here we are with xincom and fat pipe offering solutions.  <br><br>The short answer may have been no, but I see it becoming yes.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13271845</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 11:11:44 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13270587</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : Not rocket science in that anybody can set up some proprietary schemes if you only use their routers.  Haven't seen any feedback on that particular application. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13270587</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 06:23:07 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13270433</link>
<description><![CDATA[Freezone posted : What about the 603?  You said aggregate.  Do you control both ends of the vpn?  If so then a 603 at both ends is a no brainer. <br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://xincom.com/twr603.html" >xincom.com/twr603.html</A><br><br>"VPN Gateway-to-Gateway Aggregation & Redundancy<br>The XC-DPG603's primary features are full VPN Aggregation with Automatic Failover and the Authoritative DNS function with Inbound Load Balancing. The VPN capability will allow for two aggregated VPN tunnles to effectively work as single tunnel combining VPN traffic over two broadband connections. Full redundancy is assured when establishing a VPN tunnel on each WAN port. The authoritative DNS feature load balances inbound traffic requests to the respective IP address on a network infrastructure that hosts content on multiple servers. High throughput of inbound and outbound requests are managed by dual WAN ports that utilize the combined bandwidth of two separate concurrent broadband connections including DSL, Cable, and/or T1."<br><br>I just can not help but be impressed with this router.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13270433</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2005 04:33:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13269186</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : Its really no contest, the ZyWALL 35 has a larger engine, the 400MHZ Intel IXP 425 with 64/128 flash & Ram (compared to 1/16 for the Xincom. Throughput numbers 45/20 firewall/vpn. 10,000 concurrent sessions. 35 VPN tunnels.  <br><br>I suspect the throughput <U>one way</U> on the xincom is for the firewall only and is 27Mbps.<br><SMALL>--<br>Ain't nuthin but the blues! "Albert Collins". <br>Leave your troubles at the door! "Pepe Peregil" De Sevilla.  Just Don't Wifi without WPA, "Yul Brenner" - <br>(<B><A HREF="http://www.llamaworks.ca">Llama Works Equipment <A></B>) -</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13269186</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:26:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13268738</link>
<description><![CDATA[foneguy9 posted : Anav,<br>Your recommendation is looking good as well, thanks!  Though you recommend the Xincom 502 w/o the VPN gateway, but Dual WAN capable, what about the Xincom 503 below?  <br>Also, I have seached others who use the Xincom 502, and are having problems with reboot.<br>(&raquo;<A HREF="/forum/remark,12577059">Xincom 502 Reboot Problem</A>)<br><br>And you're very right, @$700 for the Zywall 35 is looking better!!!<br>Still, I'd like some comments for the Zywall or the Xincom 503.  Either looks good, however, since dial up backup is on my wish list only and not required, I could get used to the PRICE of the Xincom 503 :)<br><br>I'm still open to any other suggestions and recommendations you all might have!<br><br>Xincom 503 Twin WAN VPN Gateway<br>$356.99 on PCMall.com<br>Model Number XC-DPG503<br>Product Specifications<br>Physical Interface Features -<br><br>    WAN:<br>    &#149; 2-port 10/100 Mbps RJ45<br>    &#149; Auto-MDI/MDIX; 802.3/802.3u<br><br>    LAN:<br>    &#149; 4-port 10/100 Mbps RJ45<br>    &#149; Auto-MDI/MDIX; 802.3/802.3u<br><br>Hardware Features -<br><br>    &#149; RISC 166 Mhz Processor<br>    &#149; 1 Mb Flash Memory<br>    &#149; 16 Mb RAM<br><br>Performance Features -<br><br>    Throughput: Over 54 Mbps<br><br>    Load Balace & Backup:<br>    &#149; Outbound load balancing by bytes, packets, or sessions<br>    &#149; Auto backup connection<br><br>    Supported Protocols:<br>    &#149; Security: NAT, UPAP, CHAP<br>    &#149; Network: TCP/IP, DHCP, PPP, UPAP, PPPoE, Multi-session PPPoE<br>    &#149; Routing: static route (WAN & LAN), ICMP, ARP Proxy, HTTP, RIP I/II<br>    &#149; Connection: static IP, dynamic IP, PPPoE, PPTP<br><br>    User Support: LAN: Up to 253 users<br><br>Security Features -<br><br>    VPN:<br>    &#149; Gateway-to-Gateway Endpoint<br>    &#149; IPSecTunnels: 30<br>    &#149; Encryption: DES(56-bit), 3DES(168-bit), & AES(128-bit)<br>    &#149; Authentication: MD5, SHA1, SHA2, Manual key & IKE<br>    &#149; VPN throughput: 10 Mbps<br><br>    Firewall:<br>    &#149; Stateful Packet Inspection<br>    &#149; NAT (Network Address Translation)<br>    &#149; NAPT (Network Address Port Translation)<br>    &#149; DoS (Denial of Service)<br>    &#149; Access control by group<br>    &#149; Ping to Death<br>    &#149; ICMP filter for WAN<br>    &#149; Packet filter<br>    &#149; URL block<br><br>Management -<br><br>    Security:<br>    &#149; Admin passwords<br>    &#149; Authentication with UPAP and CHAP for PPPoE<br><br>    Firewall:<br>    &#149; Management through WAN & LAN port<br>    &#149; HTTP web based management<br>    &#149; Email alert of disconnection<br><br>Applications -<br><br>    &#149; Support MSN & Net meeting<br>    &#149; Support with H.323 VoIP products<br>    &#149; Multi-session PPPoE<br>    &#149; SMTP binding<br>    &#149; SNMP<br>    &#149; NAT status & connection list<br>    &#149; Virtual server<br><br>	<br>&#149; Multi-DMZ<br>&#149; MTU changeable for WAN<br>&#149; Dial-on-demand & Auto-disconnect<br>&#149; Dynamic DNS<br>&#149; MAC address clone<br>&#149; Transparent Bridge Mode]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13268738</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 22:35:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13268089</link>
<description><![CDATA[Anav posted : None of the routers you came up with would I recommend.<br><br>If you were looking for a straightforward Dual Wan Router, I would only consider the Xincom 502. <br>Since you add in VPN endpoint capability, that adds a much more complex solution and an appropriate processor.  Add in dial backup and other features and concur with shootists suggestion.<br><br>The street price is more like 700$<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://froogle.google.com/froogle?as_q=zywall+35&num=10&scoring=p&btnG=Search+Froogle&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&price=between&price1=650&price2=750&as_occt=any&cat=0&filter=1&tiled=0&safe=active" >froogle.google.com/froog &middot;&middot;&middot; e=active</A><br><SMALL>--<br>Ain't nuthin but the blues! "Albert Collins". Leave your troubles at the door! "Pepe Peregil" De Sevilla.  Just Don't Wifi without WPA, "Yul Brenner" - (<B><A HREF="http://www.llamaworks.ca">Llama Works Equipment <A></B>) -</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13268089</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 21:25:46 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13267346</link>
<description><![CDATA[foneguy9 posted : Thanks Shootist!<br>Looks awesome!:D:D  Everything I need and wish for!  :o<br>A bit pricy for what I was looking for however, If I'm going to dish out this kind of money, have you, Shootist, or anyone else have experience using this product?<br><br>I was looking in the price range @ $500.    <br><br>The following is straight from their web site(online shop):<br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://store.zyxel.com/usshopcat/product_info.php?cPath=24&products_id=167" >store.zyxel.com/usshopca &middot;&middot;&middot; s_id=167</A><br><br>ZyWALL 35 $995.00USD <br> <br><br>Features<br><br>Virtual Private Network <br>- 35 simultaneous IPSec VPN Connections <br>- Max. 40Mbps 3DES/AES VPN performance <br>- Manual Key, IKE and PKI(X.509) <br>- IPSec NAT Traversal <br>- Xauth User Authentication <br><br>Firewall Security <br>- Transparent Firewall (bridge mode)* <br>- Stateful Packet Inspection <br>- DoS and DDoS Protection <br>- Real-time Attack Alert and Logs <br><br>Content Filtering <br>- Java/Active X/Cookie/Proxy Blocking <br>- URL and Keyword Blocking <br>- Web Content Filtering (Cerberian) <br><br>Traffic Management <br>- Policy-based Traffic Shaping <br>- Priority-bandwidth Utilization <br>- Guaranteed and Maximum Bandwidth Allocation <br><br>High Availability <br>- Dual WAN ports Auto fail-over and fail-back <br>- Dual WAN ports for Load Balancing * <br>- Dial Backup <br><br>Network <br>- DHCP client/relay/server <br>- PPPoE <br>- PPTP <br><br>System Management <br>- WebGUI (HTTP and HTTPS) <br>- Command Line Interface (Console, Telnet, SSH) <br>- Firmware Upgradeable (WebGUI, TFTP/FTP/SFTP) <br>- Vantage Centralized Network Management* <br><br>Wireless <br>- IEEE 802.11b/11g compliant <br>- 128-bits WEP Encryption <br>- IEEE 802.1x Port-Based Authentication with RADIUS Client <br>- WPA* <br>- IPSec VPN over WLAN ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13267346</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 20:05:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: [XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13266222</link>
<description><![CDATA[Shootist posted : Zyxel Zywall35.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13266222</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 17:53:27 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>[XP] Dual WAN Hardware Help and Advise!!!</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13265046</link>
<description><![CDATA[foneguy9 posted : Hi all,<br>I've been reading the responses to post and they are in MHO very straightforward and wise. I need your advice on a router that supports dual WAN.   <br><br>I have a DSL(2.0/384)and a Cable(3.0/256) connection at home.  I would like to primarily do a load balance and backup between these 2 connections and possibly, a dial up modem for a tertiary backup.  If I can aggregate the bandwidth, that would be excellent, however, its not necessary(budget concerns :D )<br><br>Here is what I want to have setup:<br>Dual WAN Router with VPN (Not passthrough, but actual VPN tunnels @ 2 at a time) If VPN isn't available, then I can use a DLINK VPN Router I have lying around.<br>Minimum of (4) 10/100 LAN ports (I will be using @ 7 ports, not all the time but I can use an 8 port switch that I am now using)<br>QOS for IP phone(s) from work.(The NEC IP phone I'm using uses IPSec)<br>Wish list:<br>Tertiary Analog Modem backup<br>Aggregated Bandwidth (salivating!!!)<br><br>Currently, I have both connections separated between the devices(PCs, IP phone(s), and wireless Access points).  They have a static bridge between the routers.  I want to consolidate my setup.<br><br>Hope you can help me make up my mind on the hardware!!! :) <br>It doesn't have to be any particular brand, I was comparing features with the ones below.<br>The following is what I have been looking at:<br><br>[SIZE=6][U]Linksys RV0 series RV082[/U][/SIZE]<br><br>A high-reliability Internet connection-sharing router and 8-port switch for small business <br>Features dual Internet ports for load balancing and connection redundancy <br>Securely connects up to 50 remote office or traveling users to your office network via VPN <br>Advanced SPI firewall protects your PCs from most known Internet attacks <br><br>[SIZE=6][U]Hawking Technology H2BR4 Dual WAN 4-Port Firewall Router[/U][/SIZE]<br>The H2BR4 features high-level security and is equipped with true, hardware-based firewall protection. The firewall utilizes Stateful Packet Inspection (SPI) technology, Network Address Translation, and prevents against Denial of Service (DoS) attacks from outside intruders. In addition, the VPN (Virtual Private Network) pass-through feature allows for fast, reliable, and secure access to your corporate network via a public Internet network.<br><br>The H2BR4 includes a full set of powerful features. It utilizes Network Address Translation (NAT) to expand your existing network without affecting existing IP based account schemes. The router supports DSL, Cable, and other broadband modem connections that connect to an RJ-45 Ethernet port. The H2BR4 also features Virtual Server and DMZ functions, which allow the user to protect clients on the network behind the router while permitting specified traffic to be opened up outside the network. The router has a built-in DHCP server, which eliminates the need to configure each IP address manually. The user-friendly web management interface provides the user with an easy way to configure the router from anywhere in the world using a web browser. The H2BR4 can easily be firmware upgraded and is compatible with all standard Internet applications. <br><br>Product Description<br>Hawking Technologies HBR49, Cable/DSL Broadband Router Dual WAN Ports and 4-Port 10/100Mbps Switch. <br><br>[SIZE=6][U]NETGEAR FVX538 - PROSAFE 8PORT VPN FIREWALL RTR DUAL WAN 10/100 [/U] W/ 1PORT GBIT - FVX538NA[/SIZE]<br>Features Product Description - NETGEAR ProSafe FVX538 - firewall <br> Device Type - Firewall <br> Connection / User Qty - 200 <br> Enclosure Type - External - 1 U <br> Dimensions (WxDxH) - 13 in x 8 in x 0.7 in <br> Weight - 4.4 lbs <br> Localization - North America <br> Processor - 1 x Intel 533 MHz <br> RAM Installed ( Max ) - 32 MB <br> Flash Memory Installed (Max) - 16 MB flash <br> Ports Qty - 8 <br> Data Link Protocol - Ethernet, Fast Ethernet <br> Network / Transport Protocol - TCP/IP, UDP/IP, ICMP/IP, IPSec, PPPoE <br> Remote Management Protocol - SNMP, Telnet, SNMP 2c, HTTP <br> Features - DMZ port, DHCP support, NAT support, VPN, Stateful Packet Inspection (SPI), DoS attack prevention, Intrusion Detection System (IDS), VPN passthrough, URL filtering <br> Power - AC 110/230 V ( 50/60 Hz ) <br> Manufacturer Warranty - 3 years warranty <br> <br>Technical Specs Device Type - Firewall <br> Connection / User Qty - 200 <br> Height (Rack Units) - 1 U <br> Width - 13 in <br> Depth - 8 in <br> Height - 0.7 in <br> Weight - 4.4 lbs <br> Localization - North America <br> Processors Installed - 1 x Intel 533 MHz <br> RAM Installed ( Max ) - 32 MB <br> Flash Memory Installed (Max) - 16 MB flash <br> Form Factor - External <br> Ports Qty - 8 <br> Connectivity Technology - Wired <br> Data Link Protocol - Ethernet, Fast Ethernet <br> Switching Protocol - Ethernet <br> Network / Transport Protocol - TCP/IP, UDP/IP, ICMP/IP, IPSec, PPPoE <br> Routing Protocol - RIP-1, RIP-2, static IP routing <br> Remote Management Protocol - SNMP, Telnet, SNMP 2c, HTTP <br> Features - DMZ port, DHCP support, NAT support, VPN, Stateful Packet Inspection (SPI), DoS attack prevention, Intrusion Detection System (IDS), VPN passthrough, URL filtering <br> Encryption Algorithm - DES, Triple DES, MD5, AES, SSL, SHA-1 <br> Interfaces - 1 x network - Ethernet 10Base-T/100Base-TX/1000Base-TX - RJ-45 ¦ 8 x network - Ethernet 10Base-T/100Base-TX - RJ-45 ¦ 1 x management ¦ 2 x network - Ethernet 10Base-T/100Base-TX - RJ-45 ( WAN ) <br> Cables Included - 1 x network cable <br> Rack Mounting Kit - Included <br> Power Device - Power adapter <br> Voltage Required - AC 110/230 V ( 50/60 Hz ) <br> Software Included - Drivers & Utilities <br> Service & Support - 3 years warranty <br> Service & Support Details - Limited warranty - parts and labor - 3 years ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/XP-Dual-WAN-Hardware-Help-and-Advise-13265046</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 15:03:45 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
