<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;befsx41   Names vs local IP address?&#x27; in forum &#x27;Linksys&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13522036</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:16:10 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2022 18:16:10 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: befsx41 Names vs local IP address?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13573986</link>
<description><![CDATA[ezdsl posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/901172" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=901172');">will792</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>So many people in this forum recommend setting up static IP addresses but it is real pain of the neck to make changes whenever ISP switches DNS servers. It is so much easier to maintain locked DHCP entries (if this functionality is available of course).<br> </DIV>I use static IP addresses on my internal network and on each workstation, I have assigned the DNS server to be the router (i.e. 192.168.1.1). My BEFSR41 V4 (and previously V2) seems to  forward and return DNS requests/responses to each workstation without a problem. <br><br>I'm not sure if this is a BEFSR41 specific feature or not.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13573986</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 07:59:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: befsx41 Names vs local IP address?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13565585</link>
<description><![CDATA[YeOldeStonecat posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/901172" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=901172');">will792</a>:</SMALL><BR><BR>So many people in this forum recommend setting up static IP addresses but it is real pain of the neck to make changes whenever ISP switches DNS servers. It is so much easier to maintain locked DHCP entries (if this functionality is available of course).<br> </DIV>Hello fellow Connecticut resident!<br>(Stonington myself)<br>I'd take the static IP approach.  Pain in the neck whenever the ISP changes DNS servers...but in reality that's such a rare case!  Once every couple of years (perhaps your on DSL with SNET/SBC, yes they changed around a year ago with juggling stuff around after the Yahoo merger thing...but that's a rare thing). <br><br>Does the new 1.53 or so firmware for the sx41 add "reservations" to the DHCP service?  I know Linksys has been rolling that out in newer firmwares, where you can set a fixed IP address bound to the MAC of your machines.  That would solve your problem, you can leave rigs set to "Obtain Auto" so they pull info from the router (including current DNS)...yet still be static.  I know the RV0 series of routers has that feature, I use it for a lot of clients so they can remote desktop from home.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13565585</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 06:41:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: befsx41 Names vs local IP address?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13545271</link>
<description><![CDATA[Dan Tseng posted : We're suggesting the use of static IP's within the LAN, not on the WAN side of the router itself; and only for situations that require it.  Otherwise, take the easy way out and let the computer & router do everything automatically.<br><br>You can make your LAN IP's static by assigning them on each of your computers: Control Panel, Network Connections, Local Area Connection, Properties, Internet Protocol (TCP/IP): select "use the following ip address" and fill one in (for example: 192.168.1.2).  Each computer must have a different address, of course. The subnet mask is always 255.255.255.0 and the gateway address for this example is 192.168.1.1.<br><SMALL>--<br>Dan Tseng (WallWatcher author)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13545271</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 23:19:00 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: befsx41 Names vs local IP address?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13544807</link>
<description><![CDATA[will792 posted : So many people in this forum recommend setting up static IP addresses but it is real pain of the neck to make changes whenever ISP switches DNS servers. It is so much easier to maintain locked DHCP entries (if this functionality is available of course).]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13544807</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 22:28:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: befsx41 Names vs local IP address?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13542375</link>
<description><![CDATA[Dan Tseng posted : Have you tried ff1324's solution? It worked on my system even without letting WallWatcher use NetBios, and even though the router's DHCP table is still empty.<br><br>The HOSTS file is in C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc<br><br>Make a backup of it before making any changes.  There's also an LMHOSTS file, but changing it didn't solve the problem.<br><br>You can edit the HOSTS file with Notepad. The last line is the only non-comment entry in the original HOSTS file. It says:<br><br>127.0.0.1      localhosts<br><br>You can add your own entries below it, one per line. Leave no spaces before the IP address, and at least one space between the address and the name.  When done, save it back to disk, then see whether the "convert local" option in WallWatcher starts to work.  Please post your results here.<br><SMALL>--<br>Dan Tseng (WallWatcher author)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13542375</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 17:42:18 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: befsx41 Names vs local IP address?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13532111</link>
<description><![CDATA[ttim34 posted : you are correct. I just elaborated for the newer firmware on blocking outgoing netbios traffic]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13532111</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 11:58:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: befsx41 Names vs local IP address?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13531919</link>
<description><![CDATA[Dan Tseng posted : The wording of my explanation above may have been misleading: WallWatcher does not look at the DHCP Client's list (nor at any of the router's pages, for that matter). It just seems to be the case that a Windows rDNS lookup of a LAN address works without the need for NetBios when that list happens to exist.<br><br>I also should have mentioned that WW's "use NetBios 137" option may not work with XP's Service Pack 2.<br><SMALL>--<br>Dan Tseng (WallWatcher author)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13531919</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 11:31:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: befsx41 Names vs local IP address?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13531539</link>
<description><![CDATA[ttim34 posted : Clever! but you need to allow for different firmware...<br>"Filters page" is now the "Restrict Access" page, each section in this page is mutually exclusive of the other parts....in some cases.<br>( long drawn out explanation to follow )<br>you can set the "Internet Access Policy:" name to anything you want ( as long as you remember what its for).<br>For the "PCs: [EDIT LIST] you need to include all the LAN subnet.<br>For the  "Deny, Allow &#9;Internet access during selected days and hours" Allow ALL!!!<br>Now for the "Blocked Services"part of the "Restrict Access" page....click on Add/Edit Service button, (POPUP page) under " Service Name" call it "netbios", under "Protocol" select from the dropdown both "TCP/UDP", under "Port Range" enter 137-139 then click "Add" then click "Apply"......<br>now from the main "Restrict Access" page in the "Blocked Services"part use the pop-down to select the new "netbios" service you just created in the popup page..........<br><br>Remember to "Save Settings" at the bottom of the "Restrict Access" page<br><br> WOW I didnt think I'd get that out!!!.........I need a nap now.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13531539</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 10:32:58 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: befsx41 Names vs local IP address?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13530537</link>
<description><![CDATA[Dan Tseng posted : The information below is based on tests within my own LAN, and has not been confirmed on other systems; so please be at least a bit skeptical about some of it...<br><br>WallWatcher converts IP address to URL's (or names) by asking Windows to do it. When you select WW's "Convert local IP Addresses to Names" option, WW handles those conversions exactly the same way it handles remote IP conversions (by asking Windows to do it).<br><br>When using certain Firmware versions for the BEFSX41 (or BEFSR41), the router's DHCP table listed the names of all of my LAN stations.  When using other Firmware versions, it never listed any of them.<br><br>When the router's DHCP table did list the names, WW's "Convert local" option displayed all the LAN names; when the router's DHCP table did NOT list the names, neither did WW, unless another WW option was used: "use NetBios 137" (on the LOGGING menu).<br><br>For security reasons, I normally don't use that option myself, and recommend that other people not use it, either: it can tell a remote hacker he's found a "live" computer.  Of course, doing a DNS lookup of a computer within your own LAN does not expose you to that risk, so if you can restrict the lookup range to the LAN, you can use the feature safely.<br><br>One way to impose that LAN-only restriction is by using the "Filters" page in the Router: define a new service (let's call it "NetBios"), and have it cover the port range 136-139.  Then, select it as a "deny / outbound" filter and give it a name ("NetBios" again).  Once "Apply" has been clicked, and if you've done it properly, the router won't let NetBios requests get out to the 'net.  LAN-LAN requests are not blocked, so it will be safe to let WW do NetBios lookups: the ones for remote addresses will be blocked.<br><br>Implementing the previous paragraph is even trickier than it may seem: you have to do things just right, and in the right sequence.  Otherwise, you could wind up configuring the router to block ALL internet access from ALL your computers; or you could wind up without the NetBios filter you've tried to set, which will let those NetBios requests get out to the 'net.<br><br>Another drawback to using NetBios lookups is that they can take up to 65 seconds to fail (and they will fail, since you've told the router to block them).  That can slow WW down under some circumstances.<br><SMALL>--<br>Dan Tseng (WallWatcher author)</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13530537</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 04:27:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: WTR54G after mkt firware features?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WTR54G-after-mkt-firware-features-13524646</link>
<description><![CDATA[ff1324 posted : <div class="bquote"><SMALL>said by <a href="/profile/1138536" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1138536');">rkruz</a>:</SMALL><br><br>I dont plan on making them static.<br> </DIV>Why not? If its your LAN at home...<br><br>Seems to be the simplest solution, requires no additional software or hardware, uses existing stuff...etc.<br><SMALL>--<br>The funny thing about firemen...night and day they're always firemen</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WTR54G-after-mkt-firware-features-13524646</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 11:09:59 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: WTR54G after mkt firware features?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WTR54G-after-mkt-firware-features-13524212</link>
<description><![CDATA[ttim34 posted : enable netbios over the pipe and give each box its own name in the network props for each box under hostname, or setup a DNS server behind the firewall to keep track.....( a DNS server does not have to be a dedicated box) ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WTR54G-after-mkt-firware-features-13524212</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 09:36:52 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: WTR54G after mkt firware features?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WTR54G-after-mkt-firware-features-13523154</link>
<description><![CDATA[rkruz posted : ok..good point.  these IP are dynamic.  They change alot.  Like when the routher resets.  I assign names by IP in Wallwatcher but they always get wrong after a while when the IP addresses change on each PC.  I dont plan on making them static.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-WTR54G-after-mkt-firware-features-13523154</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 01:57:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Re: befsx41   Names vs local IP address?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13522921</link>
<description><![CDATA[ff1324 posted : If the IPs are static, you can assign them via your hosts file if you're using windows.<br><SMALL>--<br>The funny thing about firemen...night and day they're always firemen</SMALL>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13522921</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2005 01:05:54 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>befsx41   Names vs local IP address?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13522036</link>
<description><![CDATA[rkruz posted : is there a way to set up the router server so that it will pass on the names of the other PCs on my home LAN? <br><br>I am using a realvnc to monitor and control desktops on 3 other PCs and i have to find and enter the IP address each time.  If there was a name, apparently it will display a choice.  the VNC help suggested something about DNC but I didnt see that feature in the router setup.<br><br>I also use Wallwatcher, and its supposed to show names of local machines vs IP but I cant get it to do that either. <br>So im wondering if there is some routher setup thing I can do.<br><br>I have the latest firmware installed that is listed on the Linksys site.<br><br>thanks for any tips!]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/befsx41-Names-vs-local-IP-address-13522036</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2005 22:47:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
