tenpin784I Went To The Dark Side? join:2001-03-30 Brierfield, AL |
to Johkal
Re: SB5101 Researchis anyone else having speed problems with their 5101s?
At work, we are seeing nothing but speed problems with these, replace with a 5100, and they're off and running.
I wonder if its a firmware we are using, or the modem in general, but so far i do not like it |
· actions · 2005-Jul-15 9:19 am · (locked) |
JohkalCool Cat MVM join:2002-11-13 Pennsyltucky |
Johkal
MVM
2005-Jul-15 9:34 am
Thus far, the 5101s are not very main stream. Only a few ISPs are distributing them. This research thread has not generated enough info. to make an assumption. If you could, can you check your firmware versions and post them. Hopefully when they do become more common place, this thread will provide enough evaluation info. to help. |
· actions · 2005-Jul-15 9:34 am · (locked) |
tenpin784I Went To The Dark Side? join:2001-03-30 Brierfield, AL 2 edits |
heres a few
HW_REV: 1; VENDOR: Motorola Corporation; BOOTR: 2164; SW_REV: SB5101-2.4.1.3-SCM00-NOSH; MODEL: SB5101
That one is having speed problems even though it is on a seperate blade on the CMTS (its set at 8x1.5, and it gets 4x1.4) using an sb5100 on the same line, i get the full 8
Another one:
HW_REV: 1; VENDOR: Motorola Corporation; BOOTR: 2164; SW_REV: SB5101-2.4.1.1-SCM14-NOSH; MODEL: SB5101
Those are the two firmwares we have distributed, since I was looking at a handful of them, and it was either 2.4.1.3 or 2.4.1.1
as far as i know, its either hit or miss with the problems, but there are quite a few hits, and quite a few replacements that have been happening. |
· actions · 2005-Jul-15 10:09 am · (locked) |
JohkalCool Cat MVM join:2002-11-13 Pennsyltucky |
Johkal
MVM
2005-Jul-15 10:15 am
So you have the 2.4.1.3! This is definetely a 5101 & not a 5101e? |
· actions · 2005-Jul-15 10:15 am · (locked) |
tenpin784I Went To The Dark Side? join:2001-03-30 Brierfield, AL |
right on the front it just says SB5101
am i not supposed to have 2.4.1.3?
i was browsing our provisioning server, we have 426 5101s out there right now (just searching by MAC ID 00:12:25:84)
I dont know what the other range (if any) is out there for a 5101, does you MAC start with 00:12:25:84 as well? |
· actions · 2005-Jul-15 10:19 am · (locked) |
JohkalCool Cat MVM join:2002-11-13 Pennsyltucky |
Johkal
MVM
2005-Jul-15 10:24 am
That firmware is new to me. Since I hadn't seen it before, I was assuming it was for the 5101e I encountered. It must be the latest.
I have the 2.4.1.1 and my MAC starts with: 00140....... |
· actions · 2005-Jul-15 10:24 am · (locked) |
tenpin784I Went To The Dark Side? join:2001-03-30 Brierfield, AL 1 edit |
said by Johkal:That firmware is new to me. Since I hadn't seen it before, I was assuming it was for the 5101e I encountered. It must be the latest. I have the 2.4.1.1 and my MAC starts with: 00140....... searching with 00140 pulled up 384 more results horray for having almost 900 of these crappy things out there. thats gonna generate 100+ service calls in the next month at this rate im curious, im gonna go grab a 2.4.1.1 modem and see if i have the same problems on this line (if i can find one thats not sealed) |
· actions · 2005-Jul-15 10:32 am · (locked) |
JohkalCool Cat MVM join:2002-11-13 Pennsyltucky |
Johkal
MVM
2005-Jul-15 10:37 am
Can you find out this info: Hardware Version: MIB Version: GUI Version:
This is mine: Hardware Version: 1 MIB Version: II GUI Version: 1.0
The problem with firmware is that the ISP has the only option to push it. In fact I've repeatedly tried to inquire about the 5101 from Motorola with much resistance and lack of knowledge. |
· actions · 2005-Jul-15 10:37 am · (locked) |
tenpin784I Went To The Dark Side? join:2001-03-30 Brierfield, AL |
The 2.4.1.3 version is the same:
Hardware Version: 1 MIB Version: II GUI Version: 1.0 |
· actions · 2005-Jul-15 10:43 am · (locked) |
JohkalCool Cat MVM join:2002-11-13 Pennsyltucky 1 edit |
Johkal
MVM
2005-Jul-15 10:50 am
Cool! So were strictly looking at firmware here.
Edit: I see you work for Metrocast. So if you start to see issues with the 2.4.1.3, you have the capability to get the 2.4.1.1 from Motorola & test/push it. |
· actions · 2005-Jul-15 10:50 am · (locked) |
| |
to tenpin784
Nope, my 5101 has seen +1MB/s transfer rates...yep, you got that right...or +8Mb/s for those of you in the mine is bigger than yours world (...bestbuy anyone :P ) Oh, and here's my modem stats, along with the ones from Motorola's website, just for those of you who don't have the patience to look it up... Mine:Downstream Value Frequency 399 MHz Signal To Noise Ratio 35.6 dB Power Level 0.6 dBmV The Downstream Power Level reading is a snapshot taken at the time this page was requested. Please Reload/Refresh this Page for a new reading Upstream Value Frequency 36 MHz Power 47.0 dBmV Motorolas:(sorry, couldn't copy and paste this one...it's a .pdf and I didn't want to download a .pdf writer software) Downstream ValueFrequency 88-860 MHz (+/- 30kHz) Signal To Noise Ratio ? dB Power Level -15 to +15 dBmV Upstream ValueFrequency ? Hz Power ? dBmV *Note: "?" above denotes that motorolas .pdf at » distributor.livas.lv/Mot ··· view.pdfdoes not show those values. Just a final note, my average download speed (from a capable file provider) is between 600kB/s to 1.2MB/s (or 4.8Mb/s, and 9.6Mb/s). It seems that this varies with the time of day (not because of my end, but because of the file providers end), and the quality of the file provider (i.e. Microsoft vs. fileplanet). |
· actions · 2005-Dec-11 1:43 am · (locked) |
tenpin784I Went To The Dark Side? join:2001-03-30 Brierfield, AL |
Thats cool
but what version are you running?
We're still having problems with MOST of the 5101's in our network. Recently we have had a change of management, so its not in my area anymore, but I would still like to know.
Seems like most of our customers have
SB5101-2.4.1.1-SCM14-NOSH
Although, a few have
SB5101-2.4.1.6-SCM02-NOSH
I dont care, as long as I have my trusty 5100 |
· actions · 2005-Dec-11 9:37 am · (locked) |
JohkalCool Cat MVM join:2002-11-13 Pennsyltucky |
Johkal
MVM
2005-Dec-11 8:39 pm
Why hasn't Metrocast updated the modems running 2.4.1.1, knowing the lock-up issues? |
· actions · 2005-Dec-11 8:39 pm · (locked) |
N3CAL Premium Member join:2005-04-27 Lexington Park, MD |
to tenpin784
I'm a Metrocast Customer in Lexington Park, Maryland. I've got SB5101-2.4.1.1-SCM14-NOSH and have been having problems for several months. Besides lockups my download speeds vary tremendously! I only get close to the advertised 4000 kbps during the early morning hours. Afternoon and evening hours my download speeds are between 395 to 900 kbps! My log page shows allot of the following entries:
2005-12-13 06:04:00 3-Critical R005.0 Started Unicast Maintenance Ranging - No Response received - T3 time-out
1970-01-01 00:00:14 3-Critical D003.0 DHCP WARNING - Non-critical field invalid in response
2005-12-10 22:07:33 3-Critical D005.0 TFTP failed - request sent - No Response
1970-01-01 00:00:29 3-Critical T001.0 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing
1970-01-01 00:00:29 3-Critical T002.0 SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire FEC framing
Frequency 117000000 Hz
Signal To Noise Ratio 30.6 dB
Power Level 5.6 dBmV The Downstream Power Level reading is a snapshot taken at the time this page was requested. Please Reload/Refresh this Page for a new reading Channel ID 2 Frequency 26992000 Hz Power 37.8 dBmV
I've called and emailed Metrocast Tech Support several times providing this information but they have not responded other than acknowledge there is a problem.
Can anyone provide comment on my power levels and log messages. Is the problem the Modem or something upstream?
Cal |
· actions · 2005-Dec-13 6:12 am · (locked) |
JohkalCool Cat MVM join:2002-11-13 Pennsyltucky 3 edits |
Johkal
MVM
2005-Dec-13 8:18 am
Read this: » Adelphia High Speed Internet » FAQ: Acceptable cable modem signal levels.You do have a firmware/software issue. They need to update your firmware or swap it for a modem that has a newer version. If they won't, consider buying your own. |
· actions · 2005-Dec-13 8:18 am · (locked) |
tenpin784I Went To The Dark Side? join:2001-03-30 Brierfield, AL 1 edit |
to Johkal
said by Johkal:Why hasn't Metrocast updated the modems running 2.4.1.1, knowing the lock-up issues? thats such a good question :shrugs: it was supposed to be done, but like i said, thats in another area, so all i can do is just pass the word along...... and just to confirm, i do see quite a bit of 2.4.1.1 out there, joy. edit: N3CAL's going to be a bit different to handle. We recently acquired properties in the Maryland area, and right now, hes not hooked up to our system up here. N3CAL, I would try going to a local office and swap out that modem for a 5100 if they have one. If they dont, try for at least a 4100, cause those are just as reliable as the 5100. Also, what number have you been calling for support? |
· actions · 2005-Dec-20 12:31 pm · (locked) |
N3CAL Premium Member join:2005-04-27 Lexington Park, MD |
N3CAL
Premium Member
2005-Dec-21 5:41 pm
said by tenpin784:said by Johkal:Also, what number have you been calling for support? I've been calling 877-817-8002. I've also talked to the local office here in St. Mary's County. The trouble ticket remains open. They don't have anything other than 5101's so a replacement currently is not worth the trouble. They indicate it's a county wide problem. They sent a Technician out to check signal levels last week. Of course they are fine. I gave him a copy of this post along with a months worth of speed test results like the one below taken at various times of the day. I can only wait and call weekly to ensure the ticket is still open. I asked for a reduction in my rate since the service is so poor. They offered me a $20.00 credit but it wasn't on my latest bill I received today! I'm stuck! It's 5:30 PM and my Speed Test results are : Download Speed: 369 kbps (46.1 KB/sec transfer rate) Upload Speed: 324 kbps (40.5 KB/sec transfer rate) Cal |
· actions · 2005-Dec-21 5:41 pm · (locked) |
| N3CAL |
to tenpin784
Update,
My speed issues have gotten worse over the last month. Here is an average test result during the day:
Last Result: 14 Jan 2006 @ 1:34 PM Download Speed: 362 kbps (45.3 KB/sec transfer rate) Upload Speed: 358 kbps (44.8 KB/sec transfer rate)
After several phone calls into Metrocast they sent out another Tech to my home today. The signal levels are still all very good. The Tech acknowledged a county wide problem (Head End). He told me they were getting ready to add another "UBR" to the system.
After letting him read this post he brought in another SB5101. The replacement 5101 has the following software version:
Software Version: SB5101-2.4.1.5-SCM01-NOSH Hardware Version: 1 MIB Version: II GUI Version: 1.0
After replacing the modem the speed results are a bit better:
Last Result: Download Speed: 1187 kbps (148.4 KB/sec transfer rate) Upload Speed: 356 kbps (44.5 KB/sec transfer rate)
But I still need to wait for improvements in Metrocast's Head End! Hope it doesn't take too long!
Cal |
· actions · 2006-Jan-17 4:32 pm · (locked) |
JohkalCool Cat MVM join:2002-11-13 Pennsyltucky |
Johkal
MVM
2006-Jan-17 4:50 pm
How are your signal levels? |
· actions · 2006-Jan-17 4:50 pm · (locked) |
N3CAL Premium Member join:2005-04-27 Lexington Park, MD |
N3CAL
Premium Member
2006-Jan-17 7:35 pm
Frequency 117000000 Hz Signal To Noise Ratio 30.2 dB Power Level 5.3 dBmV The Downstream Power Level reading is a snapshot taken at the time this page was requested. Please Reload/Refresh this Page for a new reading Channel ID 2 Frequency 26992000 Hz Power 40.3 dBmV |
· actions · 2006-Jan-17 7:35 pm · (locked) |
JohkalCool Cat MVM join:2002-11-13 Pennsyltucky |
Johkal
MVM
2006-Jan-17 7:57 pm
Your signal levels are within acceptable ranges, but your SNR is on the low side. » Adelphia High Speed Internet » FAQ: Acceptable cable modem signal levels. |
· actions · 2006-Jan-17 7:57 pm · (locked) |