| |
to bmn
Re: .xxx, whateverSo this whole debate is pointless. .xxx or .com, the titties and ass will still get to me. |
|
bmn? ? ?
join:2001-03-15 hiatus |
said by compufixaz:So this whole debate is pointless. .xxx or .com, the titties and ass will still get to me. Exactly, there's no reason to oppose it because porn is still going to be on the internet even if .xxx doesn't exist. .XXX will aid in blocking some porn because one would only need to block all domains in that namespace. So having .XXX really won't make things any worse... |
|
kamm join:2001-02-14 Brooklyn, NY |
to compufixaz
This is just getting better: said by compufixaz:So this whole debate is pointless. .xxx or .com, the titties and ass will still get to me. vs said by compufixaz:I rarely agree with them. But, this decision was excellent. :D |
|
danza Premium Member join:2002-08-23 |
danza
Premium Member
2005-Dec-1 8:35 pm
So our church and state are not separated anymore? With all the things that our current administration is supporting  |
|
RayW Premium Member join:2001-09-01 Layton, UT ·XMission
|
RayW
Premium Member
2005-Dec-1 8:44 pm
said by danza:So our church and state are not separated anymore? With all the things that our current administration is supporting You are correct, the church of not-christian is doing a good job of running the government now, despite what GW says. |
|
bmn? ? ?
join:2001-03-15 hiatus |
said by RayW:You are correct, the church of not-christian is doing a good job of running the government now, despite what GW says. You mean those people who call themselves Christian, but don't follow its ideas and teachings ? |
|
RayW Premium Member join:2001-09-01 Layton, UT ·XMission
|
RayW
Premium Member
2005-Dec-1 9:16 pm
said by bmn:said by RayW:You are correct, the church of not-christian is doing a good job of running the government now, despite what GW says. You mean those people who call themselves Christian, but don't follow its ideas and teachings ? Actually the ones who's religion is forcing everyone to not have religious symbols in governmental/public places, despite how old and historical they may be are the ones I am referring to. |
|
bmn? ? ?
join:2001-03-15 hiatus |
said by RayW:Actually the ones who's religion is forcing everyone to not have religious symbols in governmental/public places, despite how old and historical they may be are the ones I am referring to. Ahh... Yeah, that's different from opposing the installation of NEW symbols. I doubt they have as much clout as people seem to give them. |
|
mglunt join:2001-09-10 Fredericksburg, VA |
to RayW
In recent news, a school district was sued by the ACLU for having a Nativity Scene on display. The ACLU was suing to have the nativity scene removed.
Of course, they didn't mention in the law suit that the school also had a menorah, a Ramadan display, etc. Of course, the ACLU only wanted the Nativity Scene removed.
No to nativity Scenes, Yes to North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) |
|