dslreports logo
uniqs
9
« The Register?!?Idle Speculation »
This is a sub-selection from .xxx, whatever
compufixaz
join:2005-06-16
Scottsdale, AZ

compufixaz to bmn

Member

to bmn

Re: .xxx, whatever

So this whole debate is pointless. .xxx or .com, the titties and ass will still get to me.
bmn
? ? ?

join:2001-03-15
hiatus

bmn

said by compufixaz:

So this whole debate is pointless. .xxx or .com, the titties and ass will still get to me.
Exactly, there's no reason to oppose it because porn is still going to be on the internet even if .xxx doesn't exist.

.XXX will aid in blocking some porn because one would only need to block all domains in that namespace.

So having .XXX really won't make things any worse...

kamm
join:2001-02-14
Brooklyn, NY

kamm to compufixaz

Member

to compufixaz
This is just getting better:
said by compufixaz:

So this whole debate is pointless. .xxx or .com, the titties and ass will still get to me.
vs
said by compufixaz:

I rarely agree with them. But, this decision was excellent.
:D

danza
Premium Member
join:2002-08-23

danza

Premium Member

So our church and state are not separated anymore? With all the things that our current administration is supporting

RayW
Premium Member
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
·XMission

RayW

Premium Member

said by danza:

So our church and state are not separated anymore? With all the things that our current administration is supporting
You are correct, the church of not-christian is doing a good job of running the government now, despite what GW says.
bmn
? ? ?

join:2001-03-15
hiatus

bmn

said by RayW:

You are correct, the church of not-christian is doing a good job of running the government now, despite what GW says.
You mean those people who call themselves Christian, but don't follow its ideas and teachings ?

RayW
Premium Member
join:2001-09-01
Layton, UT
·XMission

RayW

Premium Member

said by bmn:
said by RayW:

You are correct, the church of not-christian is doing a good job of running the government now, despite what GW says.
You mean those people who call themselves Christian, but don't follow its ideas and teachings ?
Actually the ones who's religion is forcing everyone to not have religious symbols in governmental/public places, despite how old and historical they may be are the ones I am referring to.
bmn
? ? ?

join:2001-03-15
hiatus

bmn

said by RayW:

Actually the ones who's religion is forcing everyone to not have religious symbols in governmental/public places, despite how old and historical they may be are the ones I am referring to.
Ahh... Yeah, that's different from opposing the installation of NEW symbols.

I doubt they have as much clout as people seem to give them.
mglunt
join:2001-09-10
Fredericksburg, VA

mglunt to RayW

Member

to RayW
In recent news, a school district was sued by the ACLU for having a Nativity Scene on display. The ACLU was suing to have the nativity scene removed.

Of course, they didn't mention in the law suit that the school also had a menorah, a Ramadan display, etc. Of course, the ACLU only wanted the Nativity Scene removed.

No to nativity Scenes, Yes to North American Man Boy Love Association (NAMBLA)
« The Register?!?Idle Speculation »
This is a sub-selection from .xxx, whatever